The data project: a shared approach between stakeholders of the healthcare system in definition of a therapeutic algorithm for inflammatory arthritis

Rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases or RMD [rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA)] are systemic inflammatory diseases for which there are no biomarkers capable of predicting treatments with a higher likelihood of response in naive patients. In addition, the expiration of the anti-TNF blocking drugs' patents has resulted in the availability of anti-TNF biosimilar drugs with the same efficacy and safety than originators but at significantly reduced prices. To guarantee a personalized therapeutic approach to RMD treatment, a board of rheumatologists and stakeholders from the Campania region, Italy, developed a clinically applicable arthritis therapeutic algorithm to guide rheumatologists (DATA project). The general methodology relied on a Delphi technique forecast to produce a set of statements that summarized the experts' consensus. Selected clinical scenarios were discussed in light of the available evidence, and there were two rounds of voting on the therapeutic approaches. Separate discussions were held regarding rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The decision-making factors for each disease were clinical presentation, demographics, and comorbidities. In this paper, we describe a virtuous process between rheumatologists and healthcare system stakeholders that resulted in the development of a shared therapeutic algorithm for RMD patients naive to bDMARDs.

AB0441 PREDICTORS OF CLASI RESPONSE OVER TIME IN A MULTICENTRIC REAL LIFE COHORT OF SLE PATIENTS TREATED WITH BELIMUMAB

Background

Over 80% of patients affected with SLE experience skin involvement. The anti-BLyS drug belimumab was shown effective in ameliorating mucocutaneous SLE manifestations in clinical trials and real-life studies. Cutaneous response is quantified through the CLASI (cutaneous lupus erythematosus area and severity index). Clinically relevant improvements are defined as decreases of ≥50% (CLASI50) or 70% (CLASI70) from baseline values.

Objectives

To assess rates and predictors of CLASI50 and CLASI70 in the Berliss multicentric SLE cohort1 of patients treated with belimumab.

Methods

Baseline and ongoing features of patients with baseline active skin involvement (CLASI>0) were assessed in relationship to the chosen outcomes CLASI50 and CLASI70 at 24 and 52 weeks. A subanalysis on patients with CLASI≥5 was as well conducted. Logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of response.

Results

172 patients displayed skin involvement at baseline (CLASI>0). Of those, 124 displayed at least a 12-month-follow-up and were included in the analysis. Seventy-seven (62.1%) patients reached CLASI50 at 24 weeks and 91 (77.8%) at 52 weeks; 87 (70.2%) reached CLASI70 at 24 and 99 (79.8%) at 52 weeks. Baseline predictors of CLASI50 at 24 weeks were CLASI-damage (CLASI-d) (OR [95%CI], p; 0.79 [0.65-0.98] 0.03) and disease duration (0.93[0.86-0.99], 0.011). No baseline predictors of CLASI70 at 24 weeks emerged, however having achieved a CLASI50 response at 24 weeks portended CLASI50 and 70 response through week 52 (p<0.01, Table 1). In the subgroup of patients with CLASI≥5, longer disease and increased CLASI-d at baseline confirmed as negative predictors of CLASI50 at 24 weeks. In this subset, use of antimalarials and active smoking at baseline predicted CLASI70 at 24 weeks (Table 1).

Table 1.

Predictors of CLASI-A Response at Week 24 and 52 by Baseline CLASI-A at 50% and 70% Response Thresholds

TimepointOutcomeVariableOR[95%CI] pCLASI>024 weeksCLASI50CLASI-d0.79 [0.65-0.98] 0.030Disease duration0.93[0.86-0.99], 0.011CLASI70CLASI-d0.93 [0.74-1.16], 0.51Disease duration0.97 [0.97-1.02], 0.1852 weeksCLASI50CLASI50 at 24 weeks14.3[4.88-44.42], <0.001CLASI70CLASI50 at 24 weeks6.22 [2.00-19.34], 0.002CLASI≥524 weeksCLASI50CLASI-d0.72 [0.53-0.98], 0.037Disease duration0.93 [0.66-1.00], 0.071CLASI70Antimalarials6.61 [1.20-36.29] 0.032Smoking0.15 [0.03-0.83], 0.03452 weeksCLASI50CLASI50 at 24 weeks22.0 [2.47-196.05], 0.006CLASI70CLASI50 at 24 weeks1.24 [0.06-25.08], 0.88

CLASI, cutaneous lupus erythematosus area and severity index; CLASI-d, CLASI damage; CLASI50 and CLASI70: decrease ≥50% or ≥70% in CLASI from baseline. OR and 95%CIs are estimated using a logistic regression model with stratification factors as covariates (SLEDAI-2K at baseline, baseline prednisone dosage).

Conclusion

Earlier use of belimumab favors achievement of skin response among SLE patients and attainment of a prompt response predicts further response. Use of antimalarials reinforces while smoking hampers a more profound CLASI improvement over time.

References:

[1]Gatto M, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Aug;72(8):1314-1324

Disclosure of Interests

Mariele Gatto Speakers bureau: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK, Roberto Depascale: None declared, Angela Tincani: None declared, Giacomo Emmi: None declared, Salvatore Scarpato: None declared, Fabrizio Conti: None declared, Marcello Govoni: None declared, Marta Mosca: None declared, Maria Gerosa: None declared, Enrica Bozzolo: None declared, Valentina Canti: None declared, Armando Gabrielli: None declared, Elisa Gremese: None declared, Salvatore De Vita: None declared, francesco ciccia: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Maurizio Rossini: None declared, Paola Faggioli: None declared, Antonella Laria: None declared, Amato De Paulis: None declared, Roberto Gerli: None declared, Enrico Brunetta: None declared, Alessandro Mathieu: None declared, Carlo Selmi: None declared, Rossella De Angelis: None declared, Simone Negrini: None declared, Margherita Zen: None declared, Andrea Doria Speakers bureau: GSK, Eli Lilly, Roche, Grant/research support from: GSK, Luca Iaccarino Speakers bureau: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK

POS0693 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS IN REAL-LIFE SETTING: RESULTS FROM A LARGE, NATIONWIDE, MULTICENTRIC, PROSPECTIVE COHORT

Background:

LN is still a severe manifestation of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multitarget therapy is needed to control the disease especially in refractory cases.

Objectives:

To evaluate renal response in SLE patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) treated with Belimumab in real-life setting.

Methods:

Patients with proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h and/or active sediment at baseline enrolled in a multicentre Italian cohort of SLE patients (BeRLiSS study), treated with monthly iv Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard of care were considered in this study. Complete renal response (CRR) was defined as proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥90ml/min/1.73m2 and no rescue therapy. Primary efficacy renal response (PERR) was defined as proteinuria ≤0.7 g/24 h, eGFR ≥60ml/min/1.73m2 and no rescue therapy. Prevalence and predictive factors of CRR and PERR at 12 and 24 months after Belimumab initiation were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results:

A total of 91 patients were considered in this study, 79 female, mean age 40.51±9.03 years, mean disease duration 12.18±8.15 years, median follow-up time after Belimumab initiation 22 months. Twenty patients had baseline proteinuria ≥0.5 <1 g/day, 17 ≥1 <2 g/day, 13 ≥2 g/day. Belimumab was started at GN onset in 20 (22%) patients and at the time of a renal flare in all other cases. Seventy-five patients underwent a renal biopsy: 1 class I, 4 class II, 14 class III, 47 class IV and 9 class V. Baseline serum creatinine was 82.44±29.26 umol/L; 15 patients showed eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 at baseline. Immunosuppresants were taken by 70 (76.9%) patients: 47 micofenolate, 15 azathioprine and 5 ciclosporine. Sixty patients (65.9%) were on antimalarials. During follow-up 34 (37.4%) patients achieved CRR. Among them 5 (14.7%) patients relapsed and 29 (85.3%) patients maintained remission. Mean time to achieved CRR was 9.71±5.91 months.

High levels of baseline proteinuria were a negative independent predictor of CRR and PERR at 6 months (OR 0.044 CI95% 0.006-0.320 p=0.002 and OR 0.232 CI95% 0.091-0.596 p=0.002) and 12 months (OR 0.029 CI95% 0.002-0.556 p=0.019 and OR 0.056 CI95% 0.009-0.327 p=0.001). High levels of baseline creatinine were a negative independent predictor of renal response. Renal response at 6 months was a strong predictive factor of renal response at 12 and 24 months.

Conclusion:

Belimumab is an effective add-on therapy in the treatment of GN in real-life practice setting.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0348 CLINICAL SPECTRUM TIME COURSE OF ANTISYNTHETASE SYNDROME PATIENTS POSITIVE FOR ANTICENTROMERE ANTIBODIES

Background:

ASSD is characterized by antisynthetase antibodies (ARS) and the triad arthritis/myositis/Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). ASSD and systemic sclerosis (SSc) may share features, like Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP), capillaroscopic alterations, and also some SSc specific autoantibodies.

Objectives:

To evaluate the characteristics of ASSD + for anticentromere antibodies (ACA).

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory characteristics of ACA + ASSD. Patients were identified in an established international cohort, randomly matched 1:1 for sex, age, disease duration and ARS positivity with a group of ACA - ASSD.

Results:

18 ACA + ASSD (15 females, 83%, 15 anti-Jo1, 2 anti-PL7, 1 anti-PL12 ARS) patients were identified. In comparison to ACA - group, no differences were observed in disease clinical presentation and evolution. Though, 9 ACA + patients (50%) satisfied the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc and only 1 in ACA - group (p=0.007) (Table 1).

An incomplete ASSD (lack of at least one triad finding) was observed in 15 patients in both ACA + and – group (p=1). Among these patients, 13 ACA + and 11 ACA – developed de-novo triad finding during disease course (p=0.651). In ACA + group, a de-novo arthritis was observed in 4 patients (vs 1, p=0.565), a de-novo myositis in 8 (vs 5, p=1), and a de-novo ILD in 7 (vs 10, p=1). The prevalence of complete forms was similar between ACA + and – group at both disease onset (3 vs 3, 17%, p=1) and last follow-up, (10 vs 11, 56% vs 61%, p=1). Of note, only 1 patient (6%) for each group died (p=1).

Conclusion:

The clinical spectrum time course of ACA+ and - ASSD is similar, even when ACA + patients could be classified as SSc. By considering the high prevalence of arthritis and myositis we observed, we suggest that ACA+ patients with arthritis and myositis, should be tested for ARS antibodies even when an ASSD is not clearly suspected.

References:

[1]Mirrakhimov AE. Curr Med Chem 2015;22:1963–75

[2]Cavagna L. J Clin Med 2019;8:E2013

[3]Sebastiani M. J Rheum 2019:46:279-84

[4]van den Hoogen F. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1747-55

Table 1.

Patients characteristics. IQR, interquartile range; ILD, interstitial Lung Disease; SSc, systemic sclerosis

ACA+ (18)ACA - (18)pAge (years) at disease onset (median, IQR)47 (37-63)47 (39-63)0.834Disease duration (months) (median, IQR)81 (62-169)77 (58-165)0.486anti Ro52antibody (%)12(67)11 (61)1Arthritis onset10 (56)13 (72)0.489Arthritis last follow-up (%)14 (78)14 (78%)1Myositis onset (%)7 (39)11 (61)0.318Myositis last follow-up (%)15 (83)16 (89)1ILD onset (%)9 (50)6 (33)0.5ILD last follow-up (%)16 (89)16 (89)1Complete form onset (%)3 (17)3 (17)1Complete form last follow-up (%)10 (56)11 (61)1Raynaud phenomenon (%)13 (72)9 (50)0.305Mechanic’s hands (%)6 (33)7 (38)1Teleangectasias (%)2 (11)0 (0)0.486Cutaneous sclerosis (%)510.177Acral ulcers (%)1 (6)0 (0)1Scleroderma pattern at NVC8 (44)7 (39)1Pulmonary arterial hypertension (%)3 (17)2 (11)12013 ACR/EULAR SSc classification criteria9 (50)1 (6)0.007

Disclosure of Interests:

Giovanni Zanframundo: None declared, Gianluca Sambataro: None declared, Veronica Codullo: None declared, Alessandro Biglia: None declared, Emanuele Bozzalla Cassione: None declared, Elena Bravi: None declared, Florenzo Iannone Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Marco Fornaro: None declared, Konstantinos Triantafyllias: None declared, Alberto Pesci: None declared, Paola Tomietto: None declared, Øyvind Molberg: None declared, Salvatore Scarpato: None declared, Reinhard Voll: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Carlomaurizio Montecucco: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared

Preliminary classification criteria for the cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis

Background

To develop preliminary classification criteria for the cryoglobulinaemic syndrome or cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis (CV).

Methods

Study part I developed a questionnaire for CV to be included in the formal, second part (study part II). Positivity of serum cryoglobulins was defined by experts as an essential condition for CV classification. In study part II, a core set of classification items (questionnaire, clinical and laboratory items, as agreed) was tested in three groups of patients and controls—that is, group A (new patients with the CV), group B (controls with serum cryoglobulins but lacking CV) and group C (controls without serum cryoglobulins but with features which can be observed in CV).

Results

In study part I (188 cases, 284 controls), a positive response to at least two of three selected questions showed a sensitivity of 81.9% and a specificity of 83.5% for CV. This questionnaire was employed and validated in study part II, which included 272 patients in group A and 228 controls in group B. The final classification criteria for CV, by pooling data from group A and group B, required the positivity of questionnaire plus clinical, questionnaire plus laboratory, or clinical plus laboratory items, or all the three, providing a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 93.6% for CV. By comparing data in group A versus group C (425 controls), the same classification criteria showed a sensitivity 88.5% and a specificity 97.0% for CV.

Conclusion

Classification criteria for CV were developed, and now need validation.

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate new classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with SpA with peripheral manifestations only.

METHODS

In this Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) study, two prespecified sets of criteria were compared against the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) and Amor criteria in newly referred consecutive patients with undiagnosed peripheral arthritis, and/or enthesitis, and/or dactylitis that usually began before 45 years of age. The clinical diagnosis (SpA vs no SpA) made by the ASAS rheumatologist served as reference standard.

RESULTS

In all, 24 ASAS centres included 266 patients, with a final diagnosis of SpA being made in 66.2%. After adjustments a final set of criteria showed the best balance between sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (82.9%): arthritis and/or enthesitis and/or dactylitis plus (A) one or more of the following parameters: psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, preceding infection, human leucocyte antigen B27, uveitis, sacroiliitis on imaging, or (B) two or more other parameters: arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, inflammatory back pain in the past, family history of SpA. The new criteria performed better than modified versions of the ESSG (sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 81.1%) and the Amor criteria (sensitivity 39.8%, specificity 97.8%), particularly regarding sensitivity. In the entire ASAS population of 975 patients the combined use of ASAS criteria for axial SpA and ASAS criteria for peripheral SpA also had a better balance (sensitivity 79.5%, specificity 83.3%) than the modified ESSG (sensitivity 79.1%, specificity 68.8%) and Amor criteria (sensitivity 67.5%, specificity 86.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The new ASAS classification criteria for peripheral SpA performed well in patients presenting with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis.

Plasmapheresis in cryoglobulinemic neuropathy: a clinical study

Mixed cryoglobulinemia (MC) and glomerulonephritis are the most important extrahepatic manifestations of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The clinical expression of cryoglobulinemia varies from an indolent course to the development of systemic vasculitis. The renal manifestations may range from isolated proteinuria to overt nephritic or nephrotic syndrome with variable progression towards chronic renal insufficiency. Plasmapheresis appears to be a useful adjunct to conventional therapy in the treatment of anti-GBM nephritis, severe dialysis-dependent forms of pauciimmune RPGN, cryoglobulinemia, and HUS-TTR Therapy with plasmapheresis produced a marked decrease in cryoglobulin levels and a subsequent relevant clinical improvement of cutaneous lesions and renal function. In cryoglobulinemia, plasmapheresis can be used as effective further therapy to minimize cutaneous, renal and/or neurologic involvement.