1
|
Pantano I, Mauro D, Simone D, Costa L, Capocotta D, Raimondo M, Birra D, Cuomo G, D'Errico T, Ferrucci M, Comentale F, Italiano G, Moscato P, Pappone N, Russo R, Scarpato S, Tirri R, Buono P, Postiglione A, Guida R, Scarpa R, Trama U, Tirri E, Ciccia F. The data project: a shared approach between stakeholders of the healthcare system in definition of a therapeutic algorithm for inflammatory arthritis. Reumatismo 2023; 74. [PMID: 36942981 DOI: 10.4081/reumatismo.2022.1528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases or RMD [rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA)] are systemic inflammatory diseases for which there are no biomarkers capable of predicting treatments with a higher likelihood of response in naive patients. In addition, the expiration of the anti-TNF blocking drugs' patents has resulted in the availability of anti-TNF biosimilar drugs with the same efficacy and safety than originators but at significantly reduced prices. To guarantee a personalized therapeutic approach to RMD treatment, a board of rheumatologists and stakeholders from the Campania region, Italy, developed a clinically applicable arthritis therapeutic algorithm to guide rheumatologists (DATA project). The general methodology relied on a Delphi technique forecast to produce a set of statements that summarized the experts' consensus. Selected clinical scenarios were discussed in light of the available evidence, and there were two rounds of voting on the therapeutic approaches. Separate discussions were held regarding rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The decision-making factors for each disease were clinical presentation, demographics, and comorbidities. In this paper, we describe a virtuous process between rheumatologists and healthcare system stakeholders that resulted in the development of a shared therapeutic algorithm for RMD patients naive to bDMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Pantano
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples.
| | - D Mauro
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples.
| | - D Simone
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples.
| | - L Costa
- Rheumatology Unit, University Federico II of Naples, Naples.
| | - D Capocotta
- Rheumatology Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Local Health Company, ASL NA1, Naples.
| | - M Raimondo
- Internal Medicine, S. Giuseppe Moscato Hospital, Avellino.
| | - D Birra
- Rheumatology Service, San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi Hospital, Salerno.
| | - G Cuomo
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples.
| | - T D'Errico
- Rheumatologist, Local Health Company, ASL NA1, Naples.
| | - M Ferrucci
- Rheumatology Unit, Rummo Hospital, Benevento.
| | - F Comentale
- Rheumatologist, Local Health Company, ASL NA3 Sud, Naples.
| | - G Italiano
- Internal Medicine, Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta.
| | - P Moscato
- Rheumatology Service, San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi Hospital, Salerno.
| | - N Pappone
- Rheumatological Rehabilitation Unit, Maugeri Foundation, Telese.
| | - R Russo
- Rheumatology Unit, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital of Naples, Naples.
| | - S Scarpato
- Rheumatology Unit, Scarlato Hospital, Scafati (SA).
| | - R Tirri
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples.
| | - P Buono
- STAFF 91 Unit, Regione Campania, Naples.
| | - A Postiglione
- General Direction for Health Protection and Coordination of the Regional Health System, Regione Campania, Naples.
| | - R Guida
- Drug Policy and Devices Unit, Regione Campania Health Department, Naples.
| | - R Scarpa
- Rheumatology Unit, University Federico II of Naples, Naples.
| | - U Trama
- Drug Policy and Devices Unit, Regione Campania Health Department, Naples.
| | - E Tirri
- Rheumatology Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Local Health Company, ASL NA1, Naples.
| | - F Ciccia
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D’angelo S, Tirri E, Giardino AM, Matucci-Cerinic M, Dagna L, Santo L, Ciccia F, Frediani B, Govoni M, Bobbio Pallavicini F, Grembiale RD, Delle Sedie A, Cercone S, Mule’ R, Cantatore FP, Foti R, Gremese E, Perricone R, Salaffi F, Viapiana O, Cauli A, Giacomelli R, Arcarese L, Guggino G, Russo R, Capocotta D, Nacci F, Anelli MG, Picerno V, Iannone F. AB0467 EFFECTIVENESS OF GOLIMUMAB AFTER TNF-INHIBITOR FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS, OR AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: RESULTS AT 3 MONTHS FROM THE GO-BEYOND ITALY STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Golimumab showed trial efficacy in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) previously treated with TNF-inhibitors (TNFi); no trial data are available for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).Objectives:To assess the effectiveness of golimumab after TNFi failure in patients with RA, PsA, or axSpA in a real-world setting.Methods:GO-BEYOND-Italy is an ongoing, multicenter, prospective, observational study of RA, PsA, or axSpA patients starting golimumab after TNFi failure. Patients were enrolled between July 2017 and December 2019, and followed for 1 year, with evaluations at 3, 6, and 12 months. This interim analysis estimates the effectiveness after 3 months of golimumab therapy. Differences from baseline were tested by paired t-tests.Results:193 patients were enrolled: 38 (19.7%) with RA (median age 54 years; median disease duration 9.5 years), 91 (47.2%) with PsA (median age 53 years; median disease duration 9.0 years) and 64 (33.2%) with axSpA (median age 54 years; median disease duration 7.2 years). Majority of the RA (73.7%), PsA (51.6%) and axSpA (53.1%) were females. Previous TNFi treatment included etanercept (44.6% of patients), adalimumab (42.0%), infliximab (8.8%) and certolizumab (4.7%). The main reason for switching to golimumab was loss of efficacy of TNFi (78.9% in RA, 83.5% in PsA, 75% in axSpA). Comorbidities were highly prevalent (RA 65.8%, PsA 65.9%, axSpA 75%); hypertension (31.1%), dyslipidaemia (13.5%), fibromyalgia (10.4%) were the most common ones. DAS28-CRP significantly reduced in RA and PsA (p<0.01) after 3 months of treatment. In RA, rates of DAS28-CRP remission and low disease activity (LDA) were 29.6% and 22.2%, respectively, and 65.2% of patients achieved good/moderate EULAR response. As for PsA, good/moderate EULAR response was observed in 78.8% of patients and 28% of patients achieved minimal disease activity. In axSpA, ASDAS-CRP (p<0.01), BASDAI (p<0.01) and ASAS-HI (p=0.032) significantly reduced; rates of ASDAS-CRP inactive disease and LDA were 15.2% and 26.1%, respectively; 14% of patients had a ≥50% improvement in baseline BASDAI. After 3 months of golimumab treatment, there was a decrease in the prevalence of enthesitis (32.9% to 16.5%), nail (17.6% to 12.9%) and skin psoriasis (42.4% to 34.1%) in PsA patients; the frequency of extra articular manifestations tended to decrease also in axSpA patients.Conclusion:Preliminary results of the GO-BEYOND-Italy study showed a good short-term effectiveness of golimumab in RA, PsA and axSpA after TNFi failure.Table 1.Effectiveness of golimumab at 3 months in the GO-BEYOND-Italy studyRheumatoid arthritis (n=38)Psoriatic arthritis (n=91)Axial spondyloarthritis (n=64)DAS28-CRP, mean (SD)n=27DAS28-CRP, mean (SD)n=47ASDAS-CRP, mean (SD)n=44V0 / V14.05 (0.8) / 3.10* (1.0)V0 / V13.66 (1.0) / 2.79* (1.2)V0 / V12.86 (1.0) / 2.33* (1.0)V1: DAS28-CRP disease activity, n (%)n=27V1: EULAR response, n (%)n=33V1: ASDAS-CRP disease activity, n (%)n=46Remission8 (29.6)Good16 (48.5)Inactive disease7 (15.2)Low disease activity6 (22.2)Moderate10 (30.3)Low disease activity12 (26.1)Moderate disease activity13 (48.1)No response7 (21.2)High disease activity22 (47.8)Very high disease activity5 (10.9)V1: EULAR response, n (%)n=23V1: MDA, n (%)n=75Good7 (30.4)Yes21 (28.0)BASDAI, mean (SD)n=50Moderate8 (34.8)V0 / V15.99 (2.1) / 4.92 (2.3)*No response8 (34.8)V1: BASDAI50, n (%)7 (14.0)ASAS-HI, mean (SD)n=48V0 / V110.67 (3.8) / 9.68 (4.6)^*p value for the difference from V0 <0.01. ^ p for the difference from V0=0.032Abbreviations: ASDAS: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; ASAS-HI: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international society Health Index; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; CRP: C-reactive protein; DAS: disease activity score; EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism; MDA: Minimal Disease Activity; SD: standard deviation; V0: baseline; V1: 3 months evaluation.Disclosure of Interests:Salvatore D’Angelo Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Enrico Tirri Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Angela Maria Giardino Employee of: MSD Italia, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: BMS, Pfizer, Actelion, Consultant of: Eli-Lilly, Celgene, Chemomab, CSL Behring, Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, CSL Behring, Lorenzo Dagna Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and SOBI, Leonardo Santo: None declared., francesco ciccia: None declared., Bruno Frediani: None declared., Marcello Govoni: None declared., Francesca Bobbio Pallavicini: None declared., Rosa Daniela Grembiale: None declared., Andrea Delle Sedie: None declared., Stefania Cercone Employee of: MSD Italia, RITA MULE’: None declared., Francesco Paolo Cantatore Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme and Roche, Consultant of: Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme and Roche outside this work., Rosario Foti: None declared., Elisa Gremese: None declared., Roberto Perricone: None declared., Fausto Salaffi: None declared., Ombretta Viapiana Speakers bureau: Novartis, UCB, Abbvie, MSD, Fresenius kabi, Gilead, Biogen, Consultant of: Novartis, Abbvie, Fresenius kabi, Gilead, Biogen, Alberto Cauli Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Alfa-Sigma, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Glaxo, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Alfa-Sigma, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Glaxo, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Rorberto Giacomelli: None declared., Luisa Arcarese: None declared., Giuliana Guggino Speakers bureau: Novartis, Celgene, Abbvie, Sandoz, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Jansen, ROMUALDO RUSSO: None declared., Domenico Capocotta: None declared., Francesca Nacci: None declared., Maria Grazia Anelli: None declared., valentina picerno: None declared., Florenzo Iannone Speakers bureau: Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche outside this work.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fasano S, Pantano I, Mauro D, Capocotta D, Iacono D, Gaggiano E, Pasquale MD, Rozza G, DI Vico C, Ruggiero A, Tirri E, Ciccia F. POS1210 PREVALENCE OF COVID-19 AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES: AN OBSERVATIONAL SURVEY DURING THE TWO WAVES IN ITALY. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.2297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:The new coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a source of concern for the management of patients suffering from rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) treated with immunomodulatory therapies (1).Objectives:We aimed to analyze the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with RMDs living in Italy.Methods:During the first wave (March-May 2020) and during the second wave (October-December 2020) of COVID-19, we conducted a survey to investigate the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with RMDs followed at the Rheumatology Unit of the University of Campania, Italy. The demographic data, medication use, the frequency of respiratory symptoms and the incidence of COVID-19 confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab were collected with questionnaires administered by phone. The prevalence of COVID-19 of our cohort was compared to that of the general population (2).Results:During the first wave, we collected data from 900 patients with RMDs (Table 1): 320 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 295 patients with spondyloarthropathies (SpA), 283 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 2 patients with vasculitis. 546 (60%) were treated with bDMARD/tsDMARDs. Overall, a total of 11/900 (1%) cases were tested for COVID-19 due to compatible symptoms. 2 (0.2%) adult patients treated with bDMARDs were registered as swab test positive by PCR for COVID-19. 2 patients without confirmed COVID-19 developed pneumonia that required admission to hospital. No deaths occurred among the patients with confirmed COVID-19.During the second wave, data were collected from 470 patients who accepted to take part of the study (Table 1). 49 presented with symptoms that were compatible with COVID-19. 139 patients were tested whereas 30 patients (6%) had a swab confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among them, 16 (53%) were treated with bDMARDs and a patient was treated with tofacitinib. we found no increase in COVID-19 prevalence in patients treated with bDMARD/tsDMARDs (p>0.05). A patient with SLE developed pneumonia that required admission to hospital and died.Lacking distinct prevalence data between first and second waves, we found no differences in total COVID-19 prevalence between general population living in Campania (215.752/5.802.000; 3.7%) and patients with RMDs (32/900; 3.5%). However, we had a significant increase in COVID-19 prevalence in our cohort during the second wave compared to the first. Nevertheless, no increase in mortality or hospitalization was recorded, confirming the safety of immunomodulatory therapies in patients with RMDs.Conclusion:In this cohort of patients with RMDs in a geographical region with a high prevalence of COVID-19, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection does not appear different from that observed in the general population.References:[1]Wang L., Wang Y., Ye D. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020:105948.[2]http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/ (accessed 28.01.21)Table 1.Demographics and clinical characteristics of 900 patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic.First waveSecond waveWomen, n 660 (73 %) 366(77%)Age, years, median (range)56 (54-57)53 (51-55)Rheumatoid Arthritis320 (35.5%)143 (30%)Spondyloarthritis295 (32%)110 (23%)Systemic Lupus Erythematosus283 (31%)217 (46 %)Vasculitis2 (0.2%)1 (0.2%)Prior ILD56 (6%)22 (4.6%)Smokers220 (24%)118 (25%)Hydroxychloroquine215 (23%)155 (32%)Steroids337 (37%)194 (41%)Prednisone equivalent dose, median (range)5 (0-75)5 (0-50)bDMARD/tsDMARDs546 (60%)247 (52%)csDMARDS387 (43%)185 (39%)Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors178 (19.8%)101 (21%)Angiotensin II receptor blockers(ARBs)153 (17%)61 (13%)Fever64 (7%)30 (6.3%)Cough83 (9%)36 (7%)Shortness of breath34 (3%)15 (3%)Sore throat32 (3%)11 (2.3%)Rhinorrhoea36 (3%)11 (2.3%)Headache5 (0.5%)2 (0.4%)Anosmia10 (1%)24 (5%)Myalgia2 (0.2%)1 (0.2%)Gastrointestinal symptoms24 (2.6%)3 (0.6%)Pneumonia2 (0.2%)2 (0.4%)Admission to hospital2 (0.2%)9 (1.9%)Swab confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection230Disclosure of Interests:None declared.
Collapse
|
6
|
Della Rossa A, Valentini G, Bombardieri S, Bencivelli W, Silman AJ, D'Angelo S, Cerinic MM, Belch JF, Black CM, Becvar R, Bruhlman P, Cozzi F, Czirják L, Drosos AA, Dziankowska B, Ferri C, Gabrielli A, Giacomelli R, Hayem G, Inanc M, McHugh NJ, Nielsen H, Scorza R, Tirri E, van den Hoogen FH, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG. European multicentre study to define disease activity criteria for systemic sclerosis. I. Clinical and epidemiological features of 290 patients from 19 centres. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60:585-91. [PMID: 11350847 PMCID: PMC1753678 DOI: 10.1136/ard.60.6.585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the existence of differences among European referral centres for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the pattern of attendance and referral and in the clinical and therapeutical approaches. METHODS In 1995 the European Scleroderma Study Group initiated a multicentre prospective one year study whose aim was to define the disease activity criteria in SSc. During the study period each participating European centre was asked to enroll consecutive patients satisfying American College of Rheumatology criteria for SSc and to fill out for each of them a standardised clinical chart. Patients from various centres were compared and differences in epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutical aspects were analysed. RESULTS Nineteen different medical research centres consecutively recruited 290 patients. The patients could be divided into two subgroups: 173 with the limited (lSSc) and 117 with the diffuse (dSSc) form of the disease. The clinical and serological findings for the series of 290 patients seemed to be similar to data previously reported. However, when the data were analysed to elicit any differences between the participating centres, a high degree of variability emerged, in both epidemiological and clinical features and in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to the disease. CONCLUSIONS The clinical approach to SSc, not only in different countries but also in different centres within the same country, is not yet standardised. To overcome this problem, it will be necessary for the scientific community to draw up a standardised procedure for the management of patients with SSc. This would provide a common research tool for different centres engaged in research on this complex disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Della Rossa
- Department of Internal Medicinw, University of Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|