Examining engagement in a self-in-relationship observation exercise by couples coping with breast cancer: A qualitative analysis of text-based feedback

Young women with breast cancer (BC) and their partners generally face greater psychosocial difficulties relative to older couples, justifying the need for targeted support for this group. Toward this end, we examined how couples facing BC responded to participating in a self-in-relationship observation exercise intended to improve the relationship. Participants (N = 60) were 30 women and 30 male partners who, over the course of a week, observed and textually described/reported their "turning-towards-and-away-behaviors" deemed to contribute to relationship closeness/distance. Text-based feedback on the exercise was thematically analyzed. Findings suggest an online exercise promoting in vivo awareness of relationship interactions was feasible and acceptable to the majority of couples. Language accounts reflected acting with and through the shared "turning-towards-and-away-framework" with the intention of increasing closeness with one's partner. We discuss differences in exercise engagement and how participants reported changes in their attending, understanding, and acting in relationship, primarily for the better.

Methodological options of the nominal group technique for survey item elicitation in health research: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a scoping review that identifies different nominal group technique (NGT) methods used to elicit items for health surveys, and their advantages and disadvantages.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a comprehensive search process from database inception to July 22, 2019 in Medline, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Scopus without language restriction. We screened titles and abstracts. Data from potentially relevant articles were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer, with disagreements resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.

RESULTS

We included 57 studies, which used between 1 and 41 nominal groups that included between 2 and 30 participants per group. We grouped the 30 identified decision points for the NGT process into two stages common to most qualitative group methods [Research objectives; Group characteristics] and three stages related to the nominal groups themselves [Eliciting survey items; Refining survey elicited items from stage 3; Evaluating and selecting final survey items]. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each option in relation to specific study contexts.

CONCLUSION

Investigators should carefully consider their options for each of the identified decision points and document the reasons for their choices in their protocol to maximize validity and transparency.