Immunonutrition vs standard nutrition for patients with cancer

The prevailing belief in the value of immunonnutrition has been questioned as different patient populations show variable responses ranging from no benefit or even harm to significant improvements in clinical outcomes. The subject of this invited review is a previously published meta-analysis that showed important benefits from the perioperative use of an immunonutrition formula (defined as nutrition therapy that contains specific immune-modulating agents) in a distinct population: adult patients with cancer undergoing an elective major surgical operation. Findings showed that use of an immunonutrition formula was associated with reduced infectious morbidity, anastomotic leakage, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications compared with standard formulations. These benefits were seen after adjusting for bias and removal of older publications. Issues, such as dosing, duration of therapy, baseline nutrition status, content of specific immunomodulatory agents, and route of delivery that contributed to the beneficial response, were discussed. Little difference in response was seen between well-nourished and malnourished patients, but geographic differences were seen, with greater outcome benefits seen in studies originating from Europe than from Asia or the United States. The best results were seen when at least three agents (arginine, fish oil, and RNA nucleotides) were given, with the timing of the delivery occurring throughout the perioperative period. A review of this meta-analysis is warranted because it shows a consistent benefit from such therapy over 30 years of clinical research, provides a detailed subset analysis of related issues, and highlights its value in improving outcome in this patient population.

Clinical role of fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery - an updated review

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal surgery has markedly advanced due to the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic surgery. During the past 20 years, these two modalities have been further enhanced by fluorescence imaging.

AREAS COVERED

This article will review the common and novel uses for fluorophores in colorectal surgery, including tissue perfusion for anastomotic creation, ureter identification, lymphatic mapping, and tumor localization.

EXPERT OPINION

The versatility of this technology permeates through many aspects of colorectal procedures. The white light spectrum has historically been the only available modality to visualize tissue perfusion, tumor implants, and structures including the ureters and lymph nodes. The ability of the near-infrared spectrum to penetrate biologic tissues allows the identification of these structures with injection of fluorophores. The two most common intravenously utilized fluorophores are methylene blue and indocyanine green. Additionally, novel tumor marker-specific fluorophores are being investigated for purposes of cancer detection.

Peptide inhibitors of MK2 show promise for inhibition of abdominal adhesions

BACKGROUND

Abdominal adhesions are a common side effect of surgical procedures with complications including infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction, which may lead to the need for surgical lyses of the adhesions. Mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) has been implicated in several diseases, involving inflammation and fibrosis. Thus, the development of a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) that modulates MK2 activity may confer therapeutic benefit after abdominal surgery in general and more specifically after bowel anastomosis.

METHODS

This study evaluated the function of a CPP inhibitor of MK2 in human mesothelial cells and in a rat bowel anastomosis model. To determine IC50 and basic specificity, kinase inhibition was performed using a radiometric assay. Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) was used to evaluate interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression in response to IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) stimulation in vitro to validate MK2 kinase inhibition. Following bowel anastomosis (10 rats for each control and treatment at 4 and 10 d), the rats were evaluated for weight loss, normal healing (colonic burst strength and hydroxyproline content at the anastomosis), and number and density of adhesions.

RESULTS

The IC50 of the MK2 inhibitor peptide (22 μM) was similar to that of the nonspecific small molecule rottlerin (IC50 = 5 μM). The MK2 inhibitor peptide was effective at suppressing IL-1β and TNF-α stimulated IL-6 expression in mesothelial cells. In vivo, the MK2 inhibitor peptide was effective at suppressing both the density and number of adhesions formed as a result of bowel an anastamosis. Importantly, the peptide had no negative effect on normal healing.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the peptide inhibitor of MK2, MMI-0100, has the potential to significantly reduce inflammation through suppression of inflammatory cytokine expression and showed promise as a therapeutic for abdominal adhesions.