1
|
Enervald E, Powell LM, Boteva L, Foti R, Blanes Ruiz N, Kibar G, Piszczek A, Cavaleri F, Vingron M, Cerase A, Buonomo SBC. RIF1 and KAP1 differentially regulate the choice of inactive versus active X chromosomes. EMBO J 2021; 40:e105862. [PMID: 34786738 DOI: 10.15252/embj.2020105862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The onset of random X chromosome inactivation in mouse requires the switch from a symmetric to an asymmetric state, where the identities of the future inactive and active X chromosomes are assigned. This process is known as X chromosome choice. Here, we show that RIF1 and KAP1 are two fundamental factors for the definition of this transcriptional asymmetry. We found that at the onset of differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), biallelic up-regulation of the long non-coding RNA Tsix weakens the symmetric association of RIF1 with the Xist promoter. The Xist allele maintaining the association with RIF1 goes on to up-regulate Xist RNA expression in a RIF1-dependent manner. Conversely, the promoter that loses RIF1 gains binding of KAP1, and KAP1 is required for the increase in Tsix levels preceding the choice. We propose that the mutual exclusion of Tsix and RIF1, and of RIF1 and KAP1, at the Xist promoters establish a self-sustaining loop that transforms an initially stochastic event into a stably inherited asymmetric X-chromosome state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Enervald
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy
| | - Lynn Marie Powell
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lora Boteva
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rossana Foti
- Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy
| | - Nerea Blanes Ruiz
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gözde Kibar
- Max-Planck-Institut fuer molekulare Genetik, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnieszka Piszczek
- Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy
| | - Fatima Cavaleri
- Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy
| | - Martin Vingron
- Max-Planck-Institut fuer molekulare Genetik, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Cerase
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sara B C Buonomo
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Constitutive heterochromatin is essential for chromosome maintenance in all eukaryotes. However, the repetitive nature of the underlying DNA, the presence of very stable protein-DNA complexes and the highly compacted nature of this type of chromatin represent a challenge for the DNA replication machinery. Data collected from different model organisms suggest that at least some of the components of the DNA replication checkpoint could be essential for ensuring the completion of DNA replication in the context of heterochromatin. I review and discuss the literature that directly or indirectly contributes to the formulation of this hypothesis. In particular, I focus my attention on Rif1, a newly discovered member of the DNA replication checkpoint. Recent data generated in mammalian cells highlight the spatial and temporal relation between Rif1, pericentromeric heterochromatin and S-phase. I review these recent and the previous data coming from studies performed in yeast in order to highlight the possible evolutionary conserved links and propose a molecular model for Rif1 role in heterochromatin replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S B C Buonomo
- EMBL Mouse Biology Unit, Via Ramarini 32, Monteorotondo, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Rif1, originally recognized for its role at telomeres in budding yeast, has been implicated in a wide variety of cellular processes in mammals, including pluripotency of stem cells, response to double-strand breaks, and breast cancer development. As the molecular function of Rif1 is not known, we examined the consequences of Rif1 deficiency in mouse cells. Rif1 deficiency leads to failure in embryonic development, and conditional deletion of Rif1 from mouse embryo fibroblasts affects S-phase progression, rendering cells hypersensitive to replication poisons. Rif1 deficiency does not alter the activation of the DNA replication checkpoint but rather affects the execution of repair. RNA interference to human Rif1 decreases the efficiency of homology-directed repair (HDR), and Rif1 deficiency results in aberrant aggregates of the HDR factor Rad51. Consistent with a role in S-phase progression, Rif1 accumulates at stalled replication forks, preferentially around pericentromeric heterochromatin. Collectively, these findings reveal a function for Rif1 in the repair of stalled forks by facilitating HDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B C Buonomo
- Laboratory of Cell Biology and Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silverman J, Takai H, Buonomo SBC, Eisenhaber F, de Lange T. Human Rif1, ortholog of a yeast telomeric protein, is regulated by ATM and 53BP1 and functions in the S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2108-19. [PMID: 15342490 PMCID: PMC515289 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1216004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2004] [Accepted: 06/21/2004] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
We report on the function of the human ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rif1 (Rap1-interacting factor 1). Yeast Rif1 associates with telomeres and regulates their length. In contrast, human Rif1 did not accumulate at functional telomeres, but localized to dysfunctional telomeres and to telomeric DNA clusters in ALT cells, a pattern of telomere association typical of DNA-damage-response factors. After induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs), Rif1 formed foci that colocalized with other DNA-damage-response factors. This response was strictly dependent on ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and 53BP1, but not affected by diminished function of ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related kinase), BRCA1, Chk2, Nbs1, and Mre11. Rif1 inhibition resulted in radiosensitivity and a defect in the intra-S-phase checkpoint. The S-phase checkpoint phenotype was independent of Nbs1 status, arguing that Rif1 and Nbs1 act in different pathways to inhibit DNA replication after DNA damage. These data reveal that human Rif1 contributes to the ATM-mediated protection against DNA damage and point to a remarkable difference in the primary function of this protein in yeast and mammals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Silverman
- Laboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Buonomo SBC, Rabitsch KP, Fuchs J, Gruber S, Sullivan M, Uhlmann F, Petronczki M, Tóth A, Nasmyth K. Division of the nucleolus and its release of CDC14 during anaphase of meiosis I depends on separase, SPO12, and SLK19. Dev Cell 2003; 4:727-39. [PMID: 12737807 DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00129-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Disjunction of maternal and paternal centromeres during meiosis I requires crossing over between homologous chromatids, which creates chiasmata that hold homologs together. It also depends on a mechanism ensuring that maternal and paternal sister kinetochore pairs attach to oppositely oriented microtubules. Proteolytic cleavage of cohesin's Rec8 subunit by separase destroys cohesion between sister chromatid arms at anaphase I and thereby resolves chiasmata. The Spo12 and Slk19 proteins have been implicated in regulating meiosis I kinetochore orientation and/or in preventing cleavage of Rec8 at centromeres. We show here that the role of these proteins is instead to promote nucleolar segregation, including release of the Cdc14 phosphatase required for Cdk1 inactivation and disassembly of the anaphase I spindle. Separase is also required but surprisingly not its protease activity. It has two mechanistically different roles during meiosis I. Loss of the protease-independent function alone results in a second meiotic division occurring on anaphase I spindles in spo12delta and slk19delta mutants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B C Buonomo
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|