1
|
von Siebenthal HK, Gessler S, Vallelian F, Steinwendner J, Kuenzi UM, Moretti D, Zimmermann MB, Stoffel NU. Alternate day versus consecutive day oral iron supplementation in iron-depleted women: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102286. [PMID: 38021373 PMCID: PMC10659995 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines to treat iron deficiency recommend daily provision of oral iron, but this may decrease fractional iron absorption and increase side effects. Our objective was to compare consecutive-day versus alternate-day iron supplementation. Methods In a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, young Swiss women (n = 150; serum ferritin ≤30 μg/L) were assigned to: daily 100 mg iron for 90 d, followed by daily placebo for another 90 d (consecutive-day group) or the same daily dose of iron and placebo on alternate days for 180 d (alternate-day group). The study period was 24/11/2021-10/8/2022. Co-primary outcomes, at equal total iron doses, were serum ferritin and gastrointestinal side effects; secondary outcomes were iron deficiency and serum hepcidin. Compliance and side effects were recorded daily using a mobile application. Data were analysed using mixed models and longitudinal prevalence ratios (LPR). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05105438). Findings 75 women were assigned to each group and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Capsule adherence and side effect reporting was >97% in both groups. At equal total iron doses, comparing consecutive-day and alternate-day groups, median serum ferritin was 43.8 μg/L (31.7-58.2) versus 44.8 μg/L (33.8-53.6) (P = 0.98), the LPR for gastrointestinal side effects on days of iron intake was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.38, 1.77; P < 0.0001), and median serum hepcidin was 3.0 nM (IQR 2.0-5.0) versus 1.9 nM (1.4-2.9) (P < 0.0001). Iron deficiency prevalence after 3 months was 5.5% versus 4.3% (P = 0.74) and after 6 months was 11.4% and 3.0% (P = 0.049). Interpretation At equal total iron doses, compared to consecutive day dosing of iron, alternate day dosing did not result in higher serum ferritin but reduced iron deficiency at 6 months and triggered fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Funding Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, Switzerland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna K. von Siebenthal
- Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sara Gessler
- Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florence Vallelian
- Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joachim Steinwendner
- Laboratory of Web Science, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Urs-Martin Kuenzi
- Laboratory of Web Science, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Diego Moretti
- Nutrition Research, Department of Health, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael B. Zimmermann
- Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicole U. Stoffel
- Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arns-Glaser L, Zihlmann R, Gessler S, Verkaik-Kloosterman J, Zandberg L, Assey VD, Rigutto-Farebrother J, Braegger CP, Zimmermann MB, Andersson M. Estimating habitual iodine intake and prevalence of inadequacy from spot urine in cross-sectional studies: a modeling analysis to determine the required sample size. Am J Clin Nutr 2023; 117:1270-1277. [PMID: 37270291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The habitual/usual iodine intake and the prevalence of iodine inadequacy may be estimated from spot urinary iodine concentrations in cross-sectional studies by collecting a repeat spot urine in a subgroup of the study population and accounting for within-person variability in iodine intake. However, guidance on the required overall sample size (N) and the replicate rate (n) is lacking. OBJECTIVES To determine the sample size (N) and replicate rate (n) needed to estimate the prevalence of iodine inadequacy in cross-sectional studies. METHODS We used data from local observational studies conducted in women 17-49 y old in Switzerland (N = 308), South Africa (N = 154), and Tanzania (N = 190). All participants collected 2 spot urine samples. We calculated the iodine intake using urinary iodine concentrations and accounted for urine volume using urinary creatinine concentration. For each study population, we estimated the habitual iodine intake distribution and determined the prevalence of iodine intake below the average requirement using the Statistical Program to Assess habitual Dietary Exposure (SPADE). We used the obtained model parameters in power analyzes and estimated the prevalence of iodine inadequacy for different sample sizes (N = 400, 600, and 900) and replicate rates (n = 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, and 900). RESULTS The estimated prevalence (95% CI) of inadequate iodine intake was 21% (15, 28%), 5.1% (1.3, 8.7%), and 8.2% (3.4, 13%) for Swiss, South African, and Tanzanian women, respectively. An N of 400 women, with a repeated measure (n) in 100 women, achieved a satisfactory precision of the prevalence estimate in all study populations. Increasing the replicate rate (n) improved the precision more effectively than increasing the N of the study. CONCLUSIONS The sample size for cross-sectional studies aiming to assess the prevalence of inadequate iodine intake depend on the expected prevalence, the overall variance in intake, and the study design. However, an N of 400 participants with a repeated measure of 25% may be used as guidance when planning observational studies applying simple random sampling. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03731312.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Arns-Glaser
- Human Nutrition Laboratory, Institute of Food Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Reto Zihlmann
- Seminar for Statistics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sara Gessler
- Human Nutrition Laboratory, Institute of Food Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Lizelle Zandberg
- Centre of Excellence for Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - Vincent D Assey
- Nutrition Services Section Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | - Christian P Braegger
- Nutrition Research Unit, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael B Zimmermann
- Human Nutrition Laboratory, Institute of Food Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Iodine Global Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Andersson
- Nutrition Research Unit, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; Iodine Global Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manchanda R, Gaba F, Talaulikar V, Pundir J, Gessler S, Davies M, Menon U. Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy Below the Age of Natural Menopause: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66 October 2021: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66. BJOG 2022; 129:e16-e34. [PMID: 34672090 PMCID: PMC7614764 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
This paper deals with the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after the removal of fallopian tubes and ovaries to prevent ovarian cancer in premenopausal high risk women. Some women have an alteration in their genetic code, which makes them more likely to develop ovarian cancer. Two well-known genes which can carry an alteration are the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Examples of other genes associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer include RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 and Lynch syndrome genes. Women with a strong family history of ovarian cancer and/or breast cancer, may also be at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Women at increased risk can choose to have an operation to remove the fallopian tubes and ovaries, which is the most effective way to prevent ovarian cancer. This is done after a woman has completed her family. However, removal of ovaries causes early menopause and leads to hot flushes, sweats, mood changes and bone thinning. It can also cause memory problems and increases the risk of heart disease. It may reduce libido or impair sexual function. Guidance on how to care for women following preventative surgery who are experiencing early menopause is needed. HRT is usually advisable for women up to 51 years of age (average age of menopause for women in the UK) who are undergoing early menopause and have not had breast cancer, to minimise the health risks linked to early menopause. For women with a womb, HRT should include estrogen coupled with progestogen to protect against thickening of the lining of the womb (called endometrial hyperplasia). For women without a womb, only estrogen is given. Research suggests that, unlike in older women, HRT for women in early menopause does not increase breast cancer risk, including in those who are BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and have preventative surgery. For women with a history of receptor-negative breast cancer, the gynaecologist will liaise with an oncology doctor on a case-by-case basis to help to decide if HRT is safe to use. Women with a history of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are not normally offered HRT. A range of other therapies can be used if a woman is unable to take HRT. These include behavioural therapy and non-hormonal medicines. However, these are less effective than HRT. Regular exercise, healthy lifestyle and avoiding symptom triggers are also advised. Whether to undergo surgery to reduce risk or not and its timing can be a complex decision-making process. Women need to be carefully counselled on the pros and cons of both preventative surgery and HRT use so they can make informed decisions and choices.
Collapse
|
4
|
Reisel D, Burnell M, Side L, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, Desai R, Sanderson S, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Jacobs C, Legood R, Beller U, Tomlinson I, Wardle J, Menon U, Jacobs I, Manchanda R. Jewish cultural and religious factors and uptake of population-based BRCA testing across denominations: a cohort study. BJOG 2021; 129:959-968. [PMID: 34758513 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of Jewish cultural and religious identity and denominational affiliation with interest in, intention to undertake and uptake of population-based BRCA (Breast Cancer Gene)-testing. DESIGN Cohort-study set within recruitment to GCaPPS-trial (ISRCTN73338115). SETTING London Ashkenazi-Jewish (AJ) population. POPULATION OR SAMPLE AJ men and women, >18 years. METHODS Participants were self-referred, and attended recruitment clinics (clusters) for pre-test counselling. Subsequently consenting individuals underwent BRCA testing. Participants self-identified to one Jewish denomination: Conservative/Liberal/Reform/Traditional/Orthodox/Unaffiliated. Validated scales measured Jewish Cultural-Identity (JI) and Jewish Religious-identity (JR). Four-item Likert-scales analysed initial 'interest' and 'intention to test' pre-counselling. Item-Response-Theory and graded-response models, modelled responses to JI and JR scales. Ordered/multinomial logistic regression modelling evaluated association of JI-scale, JR-scale and Jewish Denominational affiliation on interest, intention and uptake of BRCA testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Interest, intention, uptake of BRCA testing. RESULTS In all, 935 AJ women/men of mean age = 53.8 (S.D = 15.02) years, received pre-test education and counselling through 256 recruitment clinic clusters (median cluster size = 3). Denominational affiliations included Conservative/Masorti = 91 (10.2%); Liberal = 82 (9.2%), Reform = 135 (15.1%), Traditional = 212 (23.7%), Orthodox = 239 (26.7%); and Unaffiliated/Non-practising = 135 (15.1%). Overall BRCA testing uptake was 88%. Pre-counselling, 96% expressed interest and 60% intention to test. JI and JR scores were highest for Orthodox, followed by Conservative/Masorti, Traditional, Reform, Liberal and Unaffiliated Jewish denominations. Regression modelling showed no significant association between overall Jewish Cultural or Religious Identity with either interest, intention or uptake of BRCA testing. Interest, intention and uptake of BRCA testing was not significantly associated with denominational affiliation. CONCLUSIONS Jewish religious/cultural identity and denominational affiliation do not appear to influence interest, intention or uptake of population-based BRCA testing. BRCA testing was robust across all Jewish denominations. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Jewish cultural/religious factors do not affect BRCA testing, with robust uptake seen across all denominational affiliations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Reisel
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - M Burnell
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - L Side
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - K Loggenberg
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - S Gessler
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - R Desai
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - S Sanderson
- Behavioral Sciences Unit, Dept Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - H Dorkins
- St Peter's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Y Wallis
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Dept Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - R Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - U Beller
- Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - I Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Wardle
- Behavioral Sciences Unit, Dept Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - I Jacobs
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R Manchanda
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Wolfson Institute of Population Health, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Manchanda R, Burnell M, Gaba F, Desai R, Wardle J, Gessler S, Side L, Sanderson S, Loggenberg K, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Jacobs C, Legood R, Beller U, Tomlinson I, Menon U, Jacobs I. Randomised trial of population‐based
BRCA
testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long‐term outcomes. BJOG 2019; 127:364-375. [PMID: 31507061 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit University College London London UK
| | - M Burnell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit University College London London UK
| | - F Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK
| | - R Desai
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit University College London London UK
| | - J Wardle
- Behavioural Sciences Unit Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London London UK
| | - S Gessler
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit University College London London UK
| | - L Side
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - S Sanderson
- Behavioural Sciences Unit Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London London UK
| | - K Loggenberg
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit Department of Clinical Genetics Great Ormond Street Hospital London UK
| | - AF Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service Northwick Park Hospital Harrow UK
| | - H Dorkins
- St Peter's College University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Y Wallis
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - C Chapman
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service Department of Clinical Genetics Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Department of Clinical Genetics Guy's Hospital London UK
- University of Technology Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
| | - R Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
| | - U Beller
- Department of Gynaecology Shaare Zedek Medical Centre Jerusalem Israel
| | - I Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit University College London London UK
| | - I Jacobs
- University of New South Wales UNSW Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manchanda R, Burnell M, Gaba F, Sanderson S, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, Wardle J, Side L, Desai R, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I. Attitude towards and factors affecting uptake of population-based BRCA testing in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: a cohort study. BJOG 2019; 126:784-794. [PMID: 30767407 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors affecting unselected population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ). DESIGN Cohort-study set within recruitment to the GCaPPS trial (ISRCTN73338115). SETTING North London AJ population. POPULATION OR SAMPLE Ashkenazi Jews women/men >18 years, recruited through self-referral. METHODS Ashkenazi Jews women/men underwent pre-test counselling for BRCA testing through recruitment clinics (clusters). Consenting individuals provided blood samples for BRCA testing. Data were collected on socio-demographic/family history/knowledge/psychological well-being along with benefits/risks/cultural influences (18-item questionnaire measuring 'attitude'). Four-item Likert-scales analysed initial 'interest' and 'intention-to-test' pre-counselling. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors affecting uptake/interest/intention to undergo BRCA testing. Statistical inference was based on cluster robust standard errors and joint Wald tests for significance. Item-Response Theory and graded-response models modelled responses to 18-item questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Interest, intention, uptake, attitude towards BRCA testing. RESULTS A total of 935 individuals (women = 67%/men = 33%; mean age = 53.8 (SD = 15.02) years) underwent pre-test genetic-counselling. During the pre-counselling, 96% expressed interest in and 60% indicated a clear intention to undergo BRCA testing. Subsequently, 88% opted for BRCA testing. BRCA-related knowledge (P = 0.013) and degree-level education (P = 0.01) were positively and negatively (respectively) associated with intention-to-test. Being married/cohabiting had four-fold higher odds for BRCA testing uptake (P = 0.009). Perceived benefits were associated with higher pre-counselling odds for interest in and intention to undergo BRCA testing. Reduced uncertainty/reassurance were the most important factors contributing to decision-making. Increased importance/concern towards risks/limitations (confidentiality/insurance/emotional impact/inability to prevent cancer/marriage ability/ethnic focus/stigmatisation) were significantly associated with lower odds of uptake of BRCA testing, and discriminated between acceptors and decliners. Male gender/degree-level education (P = 0.001) had weaker correlations, whereas having children showed stronger (P = 0.005) associations with attitudes towards BRCA testing. CONCLUSIONS BRCA testing in the AJ population has high acceptability. Pre-test counselling increases awareness of disadvantages/limitations of BRCA testing, influencing final cost-benefit perception and decision-making on undergoing testing. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews has high acceptability and uptake. Pre-test counselling facilitates informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Manchanda
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Burnell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - F Gaba
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Sanderson
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - K Loggenberg
- Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Gessler
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Wardle
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - L Side
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - R Desai
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - A F Brady
- Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK
| | - H Dorkins
- St Peter's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Y Wallis
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Chapman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - I Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - U Beller
- Department of Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - I Jacobs
- University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rahman B, Side L, Gibbon S, Meisel SF, Fraser L, Gessler S, Wardle J, Lanceley A. Moving towards population-based genetic risk prediction for ovarian cancer. BJOG 2018; 124:855-858. [PMID: 28217902 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Rahman
- Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - L Side
- Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, London, UK
| | - S Gibbon
- UCL Anthropology, University College London, London, UK
| | - S F Meisel
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - L Fraser
- Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Gessler
- Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - A Lanceley
- Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Datta S, Tripathi L, Varghese R, Logan J, Gessler S, Chatterjee S, Bhaumik J, Menon U. Pivotal role of families in doctor-patient communication in oncology: a qualitative study of patients, their relatives and cancer clinicians. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 26. [PMID: 27430633 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S.S. Datta
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology; Tata Medical Center; Kolkata West Bengal India
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - L. Tripathi
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology; Tata Medical Center; Kolkata West Bengal India
| | - R. Varghese
- School of Public Health; University of California; Berkeley CA USA
| | - J. Logan
- Clare College; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - S. Gessler
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - S. Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tata Medical Center; Kolkata West Bengal India
| | - J. Bhaumik
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Tata Medical Center; Kolkata West Bengal India
| | - U. Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Tata Medical Center; Kolkata West Bengal India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meisel SF, Side L, Fraser L, Gessler S, Wardle J, Lanceley A. Population-based, risk-stratified genetic testing for ovarian cancer risk: a focus group study. Public Health Genomics 2013; 16:184-91. [PMID: 23838408 DOI: 10.1159/000352028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2013] [Accepted: 05/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE A population-based risk stratification programme for ovarian cancer (OC) may improve OC survival by identifying women at increased risk and implementing an appropriate risk management strategy. The present study explored attitudes towards an OC risk stratification programme incorporating predictive genetic testing and risk-stratified screening as part of a larger study investigating OC screening. METHODS Focus groups consisting of 56 members of the general public (mean age 45 years; 34% non-white) were conducted using a hypothetical scenario. The group sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS There was strong support for the proposed programme. Genetic testing and risk-stratified screening was thought to raise awareness, offer reassurance and offer opportunities for early intervention. Anxiety was only mentioned in relation to receiving a diagnosis of OC and not with screening per se. Perhaps because lay models of cancer already embrace both environmental and genetic factors, a low-risk result was not anticipated to result in a false sense of immunity. Unexpectedly, participants also wanted to receive cancer prevention advice in conjunction with genetic testing; screening alone was not regarded as sufficient. CONCLUSION The encouraging results from this small study warrant further large-scale research into risk-stratified OC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Meisel
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL Institute for Women's Health and NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- A.C. de C. Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology; University College London; UK
| | - J. Morris
- Research Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology; University College London; UK
| | | | - S. Gessler
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health; University College London Hospitals NHS Trust; UK
| | - M. Cella
- Research Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology; University College London; UK
| | - J. Baxter
- Women and Children's Division; Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust; Stoke Mandeville Hospital; Aylesbury; UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Manchanda R, Burnell M, Abdelraheim A, Johnson M, Sharma A, Benjamin E, Brunell C, Saridogan E, Gessler S, Oram D, Side L, Rosenthal AN, Jacobs I, Menon U. Factors influencing uptake and timing of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at risk of familial ovarian cancer: a competing risk time to event analysis. BJOG 2012; 119:527-36. [PMID: 22260402 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03257.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors affecting uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) over time in women at high-risk of familial ovarian cancer. DESIGN Prospective observational cohort. SETTING Tertiary high-risk familial gynaecological cancer clinic. POPULATION/SAMPLE New clinic attendees between March 2004 and November 2009, fulfilling the high-risk criteria for the UK Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. METHODS Risk management options discussed included RRSO and ovarian surveillance. Outcome data were analysed from a bespoke database. The competing risk method was used to model the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of RRSO over time, and the sub-hazard ratio (SHR) was used to assess the strength of the association of variables of interest with RRSO. Gray's test was used to evaluate the difference in CIF between two groups and multivariable competing risk regression analysis was used to model the cumulative probabilities of covariates on the CIF. RESULTS Of 1133 eligible women, 265 (21.4%) opted for RRSO and 868 (69.9%) chose screening. Women undergoing RRSO were older (49 years, interquartile range 12.2 years) than those preferring screening (43.4 years, interquartile range 11.9 years) (P < 0.0005). The CIF for RRSO at 5 years was 0.55 (95% CI 0.45-0.64) for BRCA1/2 carriers and 0.22 (95% CI 0.19-0.26) for women of unknown mutation status (P < 0.0001); 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.47) for postmenopausal women (P < 0.0001); 0.29 (95% CI 0.25-0.33) for parity ≥1 (P = 0.009) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.39-0.55) for a personal history of breast cancer (P < 0.0001). Variables of significance from the regression analysis were: a BRCA1/2 mutation (SHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.7-3.14), postmenopausal status (SHR 2.16, 95% CI 1.62-2.87)) and a personal history of breast cancer (SHR 1.5, 95% CI 1.09-2.06). CONCLUSIONS Decision-making is a complex process and women opt for surgery many years after initial risk assessment. BRCA carriers, postmenopausal women and women who had breast cancer are significantly more likely to opt for preventative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, EGA Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Manchanda R, Abdelraheim A, Johnson M, Rosenthal AN, Benjamin E, Brunell C, Burnell M, Side L, Gessler S, Saridogan E, Oram D, Jacobs I, Menon U. Outcome of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA carriers and women of unknown mutation status. BJOG 2011; 118:814-24. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02920.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
13
|
Gessler S, Low J, Daniells E, Williams R, Brough V, Tookman A, Jones L. Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psychooncology 2008; 17:538-47. [PMID: 17973237 DOI: 10.1002/pon.1273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
A prospective validation study was conducted in 171 consenting patients from oncology and palliative care outpatient clinics to validate the Distress Thermometer (DT) against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) at baseline, four weeks and eight weeks. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was used to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the DT scores against the clinically significant cut-off scores of the criterion measures reporting 95% confidence intervals. Standardised response means were used to compare DT scores with criterion measures over time. For a cut-off of 4 vs 5, sensitivity against HADS was 79%, specificity 81%; against GHQ-12, sensitivity was 63%, specificity 83%; and against BSI-18, sensitivity was 88%, specificity 74%. At both four and eight weeks, DT scores tended to change significantly in the same direction as the criterion measures. Ninety-five percent of patients found completing the DT acceptable. The DT is valid and acceptable for use as a rapid screening instrument for patients in the UK with cancer. Our results indicate that it can be used to monitor change in psychological distress over time, but further work is needed to confirm this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gessler
- UCL Hospitals Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
How do social justice issues affect the clinical evaluation of students? An emotionally charged issue, clinical evaluation can become a mine field when it becomes entangled with issues of social justice. The authors discuss the issues of justice and fairness in relation to situations that arise when a student repeatedly fails to meet minimum expectations for clinical performance. They discuss policies developed to deal with such situations and describe the application of these policies in a case study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Scanlan
- Faculty of Nursing, Helen Glass Center for Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Abstract
The ability of schizophrenics to judge facial emotion was examined using a new test derived to remedy methodological inadequacies in previous studies. The derivation procedure of the test is described. Five groups of 20 subjects each took part: acute schizophrenics, chronic schizophrenics, schizophrenics in remission, in-patients with depressive illness and normal subjects. They were asked to make a dichotomous emotion judgement ('happy' or 'sad') about a set of photographed faces: and then to make a dichotomous non-emotion judgement ('old' or 'young') on a set of photographs chosen from the same original pool to form a task of equal difficulty and discriminating ability. It was predicted, from previous studies, that acute schizophrenics would be specifically impaired on judging emotional expression in faces. Instead, they were found to be impaired on both an emotion and a non-emotion task on photographs of faces when these tasks were matched for difficulty and discriminating ability. They were significantly worse than remitted schizophrenics and normal subjects for both tasks, and for emotion, significantly worse then depressed subjects as well. The findings are considered in the light of current theories of visual processing in schizophrenia and of the neuropsychology of face processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gessler
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College Hospital, London
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|