Pelvic pain and venous congestion revisited: examining relationship between chronic pelvic pain and uterine venous size and blood flow

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between increased uterine venous plexus diameter and chronic pelvic pain in women attending a gynecology clinic.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients attending a tertiary university hospital in London, UK. Women presenting to the gynecology clinic undergoing transvaginal ultrasound examination were recruited into the study. The largest trunk of the uterine venous plexus was measured on each side. Blood flow within the uterine veins was categorized into continuous or interrupted flow and evaluated using color and spectral Doppler ultrasound during normal respiration and on Valsalva maneuver to demonstrate the presence of venous reflux. The largest uterine vein diameter and its blood flow were used for the analysis. The main variables of interest were chronic pelvic pain, uterine vein diameter and type of blood flow.

RESULTS

We included 1500 women in the study, of whom 584 (38.9% (95% CI, 36.5-41.5%)) reported chronic pelvic pain. Dysmenorrhea was the most common type of pelvic pain. Age (P < 0.001), menopausal status (P = 0.02), varicose veins (P = 0.01), adenomyosis (P < 0.001) and endometriosis (P < 0.001) were found to be independently associated with the occurrence of pain on multiple logistic regression analysis. There was no difference in uterine vein diameter between women with and those without pain (P = 0.10). Neither uterine vein diameter (P = 0.47) nor type of blood flow (P = 0.07) was significantly associated with the occurrence of pelvic pain on multiple logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that uterine vein diameter is not associated with pelvic pain. However, we found other important clinical and demographic factors that are associated with chronic pelvic pain. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The Natural History of Uterine Venous Plexus Thrombosis

The management of incidental or unusual site venous thrombosis (VT) is challenging and is often extrapolated from studies on symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT). There is a tendency to treat with anticoagulation, due to the theoretical risk of propagation and embolism; however, this is not without risk. Furthermore, there is little guidance on how to monitor incidental VT. The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of incidental uterine venous plexus thrombosis (UVPT) and provide a structured approach to its overall management. A prospective study was conducted in a university teaching hospital over a 16-month period. Women diagnosed with UVPT on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) were followed up over a six-month period and managed based on an individualised risk assessments, in conjunction with haematologists. Fifty women were diagnosed with UVPT during the study period, of which 38 were managed expectantly. The resolution was documented in 70% of women. There were no cases of symptomatic DVT or pulmonary embolisms in either the expectant or treatment groups. Our study has shown that in a high proportion of women, incidental UVPT could be managed successfully without the need for anticoagulation. The overall management of UVPT should be based on individualised clinical risk assessments.

The prevalence of incidental uterine venous plexus thrombosis in women attending a gynecology clinic

BACKGROUND

The uterine venous plexus (UVP) is an unusual site for venous thrombosis (VT). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of UVP thrombosis (UVPT) and identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study on consecutive nonpregnant women attending our general gynecology clinic with a wide variety of presenting symptoms over a 16-month period. All women underwent a transvaginal ultrasound scan which involved detailed examination of the uterine venous plexus. Women diagnosed with incidental UVPT had thrombophilia screening, lower limb venous duplex imaging, and specialist hematological review. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between various risk factors and UVPT.

RESULTS

We screened 1383 women, 39 of whom had an incidental UVPT, giving a prevalence of 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1%-4.1%). Multivariate analysis showed positive associations between multiparity (odds ratio [OR] 5.75 [95% CI 2.10, 15.7]), recent surgery (OR 3.10 [95% CI 1.19, 8.07]), presence of leg varicose veins (OR 3.15 [95% CI 1.32, 7.49]), and a family history of venous thromboembolism (OR 8.74 [1.65, 46.4]) and negative associations between postmenopausal status (OR 0.36 [95% CI 0.13, 0.95]) and the development of UVPT. Thrombophilia was detected in 12.8% women diagnosed with UVPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of incidental UVPT in a general gynecology population was 3.0%. Several demographic and clinical factors were found to be associated with UVPT. This could help to identify women at risk of this condition, and facilitate its early detection and development of evidence-based management strategies.