Kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy based on multiple small VOIs

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the use of multiple small VOIs for kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy.

METHOD

The study was based on patient and simulated SPECT images in anthropomorphic geometries. Images were reconstructed using two reconstruction programs (local LundaDose and commercial Hermia) using OS-EM with and without resolution recovery (RR). Five small VOIs were placed to determine the average activity concentration (AC) in each kidney. The study consisted of three steps: (i) determination of the number of iterations for AC convergence based on simulated images; (ii) determination of recovery-coefficients (RCs) for 2 mL VOIs using a separate set of simulated images; (iii) assessment of operator variability in AC estimates for simulated and patient images. Five operators placed the VOIs, using for guidance: a) SPECT/CT with RR, b) SPECT/CT without RR, and c) CT only. For simulated images, time-integrated ACs (TIACs) were evaluated. For patient images, estimated ACs were compared with results of a previous method based on whole-kidney VOIs.

RESULTS

Eight iterations and ten subsets were sufficient for both programs and reconstruction settings. Mean RCs (mean ± SD) with RR were 1.03 ± 0.02 (LundaDose) and 1.10 ± 0.03 (Hermia), and without RR 0.91 ± 0.03 (LundaDose) and 0.94 ± 0.03 (Hermia). Most stable and accurate estimates of the AC were obtained using five 2-mL VOIs guided by SPECT/CT with RR, applying them to images without RR, and including an explicit RC for recovery correction.

CONCLUSION

The small VOI method based on five 2-mL VOIs was found efficient and sufficiently accurate for kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy.

Traceable calibration with 177Lu and comparison of activity meters at hospitals in Norway and Sweden

INTRODUCTION

The activity meter is used to determine the activity of delivered radiopharmaceuticals, administered activity to patients and reference activity when gamma-cameras are calibrated prior to imaged-based dosimetry. The aim is to describe a procedure for cross-calibration of activity meters at different clinical sites, and report on 177Lu activity results when using factory-set calibration factors compared to when calibration is performed with traceability to a primary standard.

METHODS

Thirty activity meters placed at seven hospitals in Norway and Sweden from four manufacturers: Capintec, Commecer, NuviaTech and Veenstra were included. A stock solution with 177Lu was prepared at the local sites and measured in each activity meter with factory settings. The solution was shipped to the reference site at Lund University for measurements in a secondary standard activity meter. Deviations between local and reference activity measurements were determined for three geometries: 25-mL vial, 10-mL syringe and 1-mL syringe.

RESULTS

The median of the deviations was 6.4 % for the 25 mL vial, 5.9 % for the 10 mL syringe and 6.8 % for the 1 mL syringe. The median of the deviations for the 25 mL vial, was 1.5 % for activity meters from Capintec, 7.0 % for Comecer, 11.0 % for NuviaTech and 2.4 % for Veenstra. The majority of the deviations were positive and the maximum deviation was 14.5 %.

CONCLUSION

The activity of 177Lu measured in an activity meter with factory-set dial settings may yield deviations up to 14.5%, compared to activities measured with traceability to a primary standard. This would imply an undertreatment of patients.