A community-engaged approach to understanding environmental health concerns and solutions in urban and rural communities

Background

Focus groups and workshops can be used to gain insights into the persistence of and potential solutions for environmental health priorities in underserved areas. The objective of this study was to characterize focus group and workshop outcomes of a community-academic partnership focused on addressing environmental health priorities in an urban and a rural location in Alabama between 2012 and 2019.

Methods

Six focus groups were conducted in 2016 with 60 participants from the City of Birmingham (urban) and 51 participants from Wilcox County (rural), Alabama to discuss solutions for identified environmental health priorities based on previous focus group results in 2012. Recorded focus groups were transcribed and analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Four follow-up workshops that included written survey instruments were conducted to further explore identified priorities and determine whether the priorities change over time in the same urban (68 participants) and rural (72 participants) locations in 2018 and 2019.

Results

Consistent with focus groups in 2012, all six focus groups in 2016 in Birmingham identified abandoned houses as the primary environmental priority. Four groups listed attending city council meetings, contacting government agencies and reporting issues as individual-level solutions. Identified city-level solutions included city-led confiscation, tearing down and transferring of abandoned property ownership. In Wilcox County, all six groups agreed the top priority was drinking water quality, consistent with results in 2012. While the priority was different in Birmingham versus Wilcox County, the top identified reason for problem persistence was similar, namely unresponsive authorities. Additionally, individual-level solutions identified by Wilcox County focus groups were similar to Birmingham, including contacting and pressuring agencies and developing petitions and protesting to raise awareness, while local policy-level solutions identified in Wilcox County included government-led provision of grants to improve septic systems, and transparency in allocation of funds. Workshops in 2018 and 2019 further emphasized water quality as the top priority in Wilcox County, while participants in Birmingham transitioned from abandoned houses as a top priority in 2018 to drinking water quality as a new priority in 2019.

Conclusions

Applying a community-engaged approach in both urban and rural locations provided better understanding of the unique opportunities and challenges for identifying potential interventions for environmental health priorities in both locations. Results can help inform future efforts to address locally defined environmental health issues and solutions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11799-1.

Heat-Health Behavior Change During Summer 2020 in African American Alabama Residents

To investigate how heat-health behaviors changed in summer 2020 compared with previous summers, our community-academic partnership conducted telephone surveys to collect data on cooling behaviors, safety concerns, and preferences for cooling alternatives for 101 participants living in Alabama. Participants indicating they would visit cooling centers declined from 23% in previous summers to 10% in summer 2020. The use of cooling centers and other public spaces may be less effective in reducing heat-related illness because of safety concerns amid the COVID-19 pandemic and police brutality.

The Valued Life Activities Scale (VLAs): linguistic validation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the UK

Background

The Valued Life Activities Scale (VLAs) measures difficulty in daily activities and social participation. With various versions involving a different number of items, we have linguistically and culturally adopted the full VLAs (33-items) and psychometrically tested it in adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the United Kingdom.

Methods

Participants with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Chronic Pain/ Fibromyalgia, Chronic Hand/ Upper Limb Conditions, Osteoarthritis, Systemic Lupus, Systemic Sclerosis and Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome were recruited from out-patient clinics in National Health Service Hospitals, General Practice and patient organisations in the UK. Phase1 involved linguistic and cultural adaptation: forward translation to British English; synthesis; expert panel review and cognitive debriefing interviews. In Phase2 participants completed postal questionnaires to assess internal construct validity using (i) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (ii) Mokken scaling and (iii) Rasch model.

Results

Responders (n = 1544) had mean age of 59 years (SD13.3) and 77.2% women. A CFA failed to support a total score from the 33-items (Chi Square 3552:df 464: p < 0.0001). Mokken scaling indicated a strong non-parametric association between items. Fit to the Rasch model indicated that the VLAs was characterised by multidimensionality and item misfit, which may have been influenced by clusters of residual item correlations. An item banking approach resolved a 25-item calibrated set whose application could accommodate the ‘does not apply to me’ response option.

Conclusions

The UK version of the VLAs failed to satisfy classical and modern psychometric standards for complete item sets. However, as the scale is not usually applied in complete format, an item bank approach calibrated 25 items with fit to the Rasch model. Suitable Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) software could implement the item set, giving patients the choice of whether an item applies to them, or not.

Revisiting the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and QuickDASH in rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Limitations in upper limb functioning are common in Musculoskeletal disorders and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale (DASH) has gained widespread use in this context. However, various concerns have been raised about its construct validity and so this study seeks to examine this and other psychometric aspects of both the DASH and QuickDASH from a modern test theory perspective.

Methods

Participants in the study were eligible if they had a confirmed diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). They were mailed a questionnaire booklet which included the DASH. Construct validity was examined by fit to the Rasch measurement model. The degree of precision of both the DASH and QuickDASH were considered through their Standard Error of Measurement (SEM).

Results

Three hundred and thirty-seven subjects with confirmed RA took part, with a mean age of 62.0 years (SD12.1); 73.6% (n = 252) were female. The median standardized score on the DASH was 33 (IQR 17.5–55.0). Significant misfit of the DASH and QuickDASH was observed but, after accommodating local dependency among items in a two-testlet solution, satisfactory fit was obtained, supporting the unidimensionality of the total sets and the sufficiency of the raw (ordinal or standardized) scores.

Conclusion

Having accommodated local response dependency in the DASH and QuickDASH item sets, their total scores are shown to be valid, given they satisfy the Rasch model assumptions. The Rasch transformation should be used whenever all items are used to calculate a change score, or to apply parametric statistics within an RA population.

Significance and innovations

Most previous modern psychometric analyses of both the DASH and QuickDASH have failed to fully address the effect of a breach of the local independence assumption upon construct validity.

Accommodating this problem by creating ‘super items’ or testlets, removes this effect and shows that both versions of the scale are valid and unidimensional, as applied with a bi-factor equivalent solution to an RA population.

The Standard Error of Measurement of a scale can be biased by failing to take into account the local dependency in the data which inflates reliability and thus making the SEM appear better (i.e. smaller) than the true value without bias.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2414-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Screening for mood disorders after stroke: a systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility

BACKGROUND

Routine mood screening is recommended after stroke. However, clinicians report difficulty selecting appropriate tools from the wide range available. We aimed to systematically review the psychometric properties and clinical utility of mood screening tools for stroke survivors.

METHOD

Electronic databases (AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO) were searched to identify studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of mood screening tools. Tools that demonstrated at least 80% sensitivity and 60% specificity with stroke survivors with identifiable cut-off scores indicating major and/or any mood disorder in at least one study were selected and clinical utility was assessed. Those with high clinical utility (against predefined criteria) were selected for recommendation.

RESULTS

Thirty papers examining 27 screening tools were identified and 16 tools met the psychometric and clinical utility criteria: 10 were verbal self-report tools, four were observational and two incorporated visual prompts for those with communication problems. Only the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire -Hospital version (SADQ-H) met all the psychometric and utility criteria. The nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) can detect major depression and the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) can identify milder symptoms; both are feasible to use in clinical practice. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was the only tool able to identify anxiety accurately, but clinical utility was mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

Valid and clinically feasible mood screening tools for stroke have been identified but methodological inconsistency prevented recommendations about the optimal cut-off scores.

Identifying environmental health priorities in underserved populations: a study of rural versus urban communities

OBJECTIVES

Understanding and effectively addressing persistent health disparities in minority communities requires a clear picture of members' concerns and priorities. This study was intended to engage residents in urban and rural communities in order to identify environmental health priorities. Specific emphasis was placed on how the communities: defined the term environment; their perceptions of environmental exposures as affecting their health; specific priorities in their communities; and differences in urban versus rural populations.

STUDY DESIGN

A community-engaged approach was used to develop and implement focus groups and compare environmental health priorities in urban versus rural communities.

METHODS

A total of eight focus groups were conducted: four in rural and four in urban communities. Topics included: defining the term environment; how the environment may affect health; and environmental priorities within their communities, using both open discussion and a predefined list. Data were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to identify patterns and trends.

RESULTS

There were important areas of overlap in priorities between urban and rural communities; both emphasized the importance of the social environment and shared a concern over air pollution from industrial sources. In contrast, for urban focus groups, abandoned houses and their social and physical sequelae were a high priority while concerns about adequate sewer and water services and road maintenance were high priorities in rural communities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was able to identify environmental health priorities in urban versus rural minority communities. In contrast to some previous risk perception research, the results of this study suggest prioritization of tangible, known risks in everyday life instead of rare, disaster-related events, even in communities that have recently experienced devastating damage from tornadoes. The findings can help inform future efforts to study, understand and effectively address environmental issues, and are particularly relevant to developing effective community-based strategies in vulnerable populations.

"It's hard to tell": the challenges of scoring patients on standardised outcome measures by multidisciplinary teams: a case study of neurorehabilitation

Background

Interest is increasing in the application of standardised outcome measures in clinical practice. Measures designed for use in research may not be sufficiently precise to be used in monitoring individual patients. However, little is known about how clinicians and in particular, multidisciplinary teams, score patients using these measures. This paper explores the challenges faced by multidisciplinary teams in allocating scores on standardised outcome measures in clinical practice.

Methods

Qualitative case study of an inpatient neurorehabilitation team who routinely collected standardised outcome measures on their patients. Data were collected using non participant observation, fieldnotes and tape recordings of 16 multidisciplinary team meetings during which the measures were recited and scored. Eleven clinicians from a range of different professions were also interviewed. Data were analysed used grounded theory techniques.

Results

We identified a number of instances where scoring the patient was 'problematic'. In 'problematic' scoring, the scores were uncertain and subject to revision and adjustment. They sometimes required negotiation to agree on a shared understanding of concepts to be measured and the guidelines for scoring. Several factors gave rise to this problematic scoring. Team members' knowledge about patients' problems changed over time so that initial scores had to be revised or dismissed, creating an impression of deterioration when none had occurred. Patients had complex problems which could not easily be distinguished from each other and patients themselves varied in their ability to perform tasks over time and across different settings. Team members from different professions worked with patients in different ways and had different perspectives on patients' problems. This was particularly an issue in the scoring of concepts such as anxiety, depression, orientation, social integration and cognitive problems.

Conclusion

From a psychometric perspective these problems would raise questions about the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the scores. However, from a clinical perspective, such characteristics are an inherent part of clinical judgement and reasoning. It is important to highlight the challenges faced by multidisciplinary teams in scoring patients on standardised outcome measures but it would be unwarranted to conclude that such challenges imply that these measures should not be used in clinical practice for decision making about individual patients. However, our findings do raise some concerns about the use of such measures for performance management.

Results of phase I clinical trials of Coramsine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2070

Background: Coramsine (C) is a 1:1 mixture of solasonine and solamargine, plant glycoalkaloids found in the species Solanum Linneanum, with single agent and synergistic combination in vitro and in vivo preclinical efficacy in various tumor models through interaction with rhamnose-containing cell membrane glycoproteins and subsequent internalization. Methods: C initially as a 2-hr IV infusion daily × 5 every 2 weeks to define the MTD, recommended Phase II dose, toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Based on preclinical toxicology the infusion duration was increased to 4 hours and 24 hours (120 hr continuous infusion). Doses studied range from 0.75 mg/kg/day to 3.0 mg/kg/day. Results: 27 pts were treated. DLT occurred in 2/2 pts at 1.5 mg/kg/day (2 hr) and 2/2 pts each at 3.0 mg/kg/day (4 hr and 24 hr). Preceding dose levels 1.0 mg/kg (2 hr) and 1.5 mg/kg (4 hr) produced DLT in 2/6 pts each with no grade IV. Over 24 hr, 2.25 mg/kg/day produced DLT in 4/6 patients. Limiting toxicity at all schedules was grade III/IV transaminitis with grade I-III increases of bilirubin and grade I-II creatinine. Hepatotoxicity was maximal at days 3–5, resolved over 10–21 days, was clinically asymptomatic apart from grade I-II fatigue, and was not cumulative. No myelosuppression or other serious drug-related toxicity was recorded. Partial responses were documented in 2 pts (renal, NSCLC) and minor response in 1 pt with unknown primary. Responses were seen using both 2 hr and 4 hr infusions. Pharmacokinetic parameters for solasonine and solamargine are linear across the narrow range of doses studied with elimination T1/2 of 5.57 ± 1.27 hr (solasonine), 8.40 ± 2.00 hr (solamargine) and Cl of 5.6 ± 1.6 L/hr (solasonine), 3.0 ± 0.7 L/hr (solamargine). Peak levels of both exceed active in vitro levels (>2,000 ng/ml). Conclusions: Coramsine produces dose-limiting hepatotoxicity at doses above 1.0 mg/kg/day over 2 hours or 1.5 mg/kg/day over 4 hours. 2.25 mg/kg/day over 24 hours exceeds the MTD. Activity has been seen against resistant solid tumors. Phase II studies in renal cancer and melanoma will be performed using 1.5 mg/kg/day over 4 hours.

[Table: see text]

National breast surgery audit

BACKGROUND

Surgical audit is routinely conducted throughout the surgical community in order to examine practice in a peer-review environment. A national audit for breast cancer surgery has been implemented in Australia and New Zealand. It aims to standardize the way in which surgical activities are recorded. The present paper describes the development and implementation of the audit project.

METHODS

An audit kit including instruction manual, data dictionary and choice of two data collection instruments (paper or database) were distributed among participants. Surgeons record their patients prospectively, submit data to central office and provide feedback.

RESULTS

Information on 3000 breast cancer patients has been collected within the first 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The project has been successfully implemented and is continuing to develop. Many surgeons have incorporated the patient record forms in their routine case management activities. Comments and other submissions have been reviewed and changes incorporated into the second and subsequent releases of the kit.

Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: what happens and why

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of the process of discharge from hospital and follow-up services for people with stroke.

DESIGN

A criterion-based process audit and basic outcome measures, combined with surveys of patients' satisfaction and staff opinion of the service.

SETTING

All units treating stroke patients in a health care district including an acute and a community NHS trust, and 23 participating GP practices.

SUBJECTS

Process audit: documented notes of 98 stroke patients admitted and discharged over a four-month period. Patient satisfaction survey: 93 surviving stroke patients. Staff opinion survey: general practitioners, hospital doctors, therapists and nurses treating stroke patients throughout the district.

RESULTS

A poor level of service was found. The main shortcomings were poor communication and liaison and a narrow focus of rehabilitation which concentrated on the assessment and provision of basic home care and activities of daily living (ADL) required to obtain discharge. There was a paucity of provision beyond this most basic level and little follow-up after discharge. Pass rates against agreed criteria were: communication between staff and patients/carers 47%, liaison between staff 44%, assessment of home-based needs 48%, assessment of domestic skills 15.5%. Fifty-one per cent of patients were referred for follow-up therapy and of these 72% started follow-up therapy within six weeks of discharge, only 27% had any follow-up assessment of activity levels and well-being. Patients were dissatisfied with the information, support services and therapy they received. The main reasons for the shortcomings were lack of awareness of the services provided, professionals' low expectations of patients' abilities, and limitations of community-based therapy services.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from other publications suggests that these results do not indicate a service that is any worse than other districts, rather it represents the poor deal offered to stroke patients. By comprehensively assessing several aspects of the service together this methodology has been able to reveal these inadequacies and the reasons for them.

Conceptualizing battered women as a vulnerable population: a case study report

Battered women are a vulnerable population in the United States. Using a case study report, resource availability and relative risk are identified and examined as critical components that influence morbidity and mortality in battered women. The case study supports the conceptualization that battered women have few societal and environmental resources, which results in a high number of risk factors. Decreased health status, especially morbidity and premature mortality, are associated with gender, sociocultural, and economic factors which define battered women as a vulnerable population group.

Bridging the gap between inpatient and outpatient providers using organizational elements of assertive community treatment

Even among comprehensive local public mental health systems, there remain large gaps in continuity of care following discharge from inpatient settings. The authors describe a modification of the assertive community treatment (ACT) program model that links inpatients to ongoing community-based care, and provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness as a component in a rationally organized comprehensive system of care. Given the recent trend toward managed Medicaid arrangements, there will be increased pressure to reduce clients' length of stay in ACT programs. State mental health authorities are cautioned to resist allowing managed care contractors to radically change the conditions under which ACT programs operate until there is greater evidence of the effectiveness of alternative approaches.

Inpatient treatment of children with multiple personality/dissociative disorders and their families

A number of children who are admitted for inpatient psychiatric treatment have experienced significant trauma and abuse. It is important to evaluate them for the presence of a DD. The variety, complexity, and subtlety of the symptomatic presentation of childhood MPD makes differential diagnosis difficult, and it is probable that many cases have been missed in the past. Detailed historical information and extensive behavioral observations in a variety of settings can assist in establishing the diagnosis and in delineating areas for therapeutic intervention. Hospitalization may be necessary to conduct an adequate evaluation, develop a therapeutic alliance, safely manage behaviors that are injurious to the child or others, and/or to diffuse potentially volatile family situations. All members of a multidisciplinary inpatient team play important roles in the achievement of successful therapeutic intervention with dissociating children and their families. Skilled family therapy is often an important adjunct to therapeutic interventions focused on the child, particularly when the parent also has MPD. Knowledge of the psychodynamic issues involved in dissociation can be used to develop behavioral interventions that are successful in decreasing the child's need to dissociate, improving his or her overall functioning, and help him or her gain mastery over problematic behaviors.

Association between weight for age and mid-upper arm circumference measurement: findings from Malawi

Anthropometric methods involving measurement of weight-for-height, height-for-age, weight-for-age, and mid-upper arm circumference have been extensively researched to identify an appropriate method of monitoring infant and child growth. Many countries have adopted weight for age as the main practical method. The Malawi Ministry of Health introduced weight for age based upon WHO recommended standards as a growth indicator in 1973. There are, however, difficulties in making the practice widely used at community level. In the present study, confined to the four urban areas of Malawi, a comparison was made between the weight-for-age (W/A) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurements. A very good correlation was observed between the two methods of screening for identification of undernourished children from 4 months of age onwards. Correct use of MUAC was found to be as effective as W/A in detecting undernutrition.