Domain-specific relationships of subjective and objective cognition in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Many people with epilepsy report subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), i.e., problems with memory, attention or executive functions, reducing quality of life. Nevertheless, overlap with objective cognitive impairment (OCI) is often weak. One reason may be a domain-specific mismatch between subjective reports and objective tests. We aimed to evaluate relations between SCI and OCI of corresponding domains and to assess whether these differ between persons that over- or underestimate their performance.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional sample of 104 adult in-patients with epilepsy, we performed multiple regression analyses predicting SCI in the domains attention, memory and executive functions. We tested relationships with measures of psychomotor speed, short-term memory, verbal learning, verbal delayed recall, and word fluency while controlling for age, sex, seizure frequency, structural lesions, mono- vs. polytherapy and adverse events of antiseizure medication (ASM), depressive and anxiety symptoms, level of education, and employment status. Furthermore, we tested whether these relationships differed between realistic raters and over- and underestimators.

RESULTS

We found domain-specific relations for attention and executive functions for the full sample, explaining a small proportion of variance of SCI (General dominance index [GDI] 0.03 and 0.004), whereas ASM adverse events and psychological variables were more important predictors. When dividing the sample according to the concordance of SCI and OCI, we found high frequencies of both over- (23-46%) and underestimation (31-35%) depending on the domain. The explanatory power of OCI for SCI was stronger within the subgroups compared to the full sample, suggesting non-linear relationships and different underlying mechanisms for realistic raters, underestimators and overestimators.

SIGNIFICANCE

Domain-specific SCI and OCI are related, and both should be assessed with standardized instruments. These relationships differ between over- and underestimators as well as realistic raters. Based on the concordance of self-ratings and objective measures, tailored counseling and treatment should be offered.

Subjective cognition is linked to everyday functioning in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Many people with epilepsy (PWE) suffer from reduced everyday functioning such as unemployment, relationship difficulties, or lifestyle limitations. To identify whether subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) is a potential source of these impairments, associations with restrictions of daily life (RDL) and reduced daily activities (DA) were examined.

METHODS

In a prospective cross-sectional sample of 316 adult in-patients with epilepsy, multiple regression analyses were calculated predicting RDL and DA. The relationships between these two measures and SCI were controlled for age, sex, seizure frequency, presence of structural lesions, epilepsy duration, mono- vs polytherapy and adverse events of antiseizure medication (ASM), level of depressive and anxiety symptoms, education, and employment. We also checked for an interaction between depressive symptoms and SCI, to evaluate whether patients with more depressive symptoms are more vulnerable for unfavorable associations between SCI and RDL or DA, respectively. General dominance indices (GDIs) were calculated to compare predictors.

RESULTS

Substantial SCI was present in 46% of our sample. SCI was independently associated with RDL and DA. Comparison of relative predictor importance revealed that SCI accounted for 23% of the total variance of RDL (GDI_SCI  = 0.12, R RDL 2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{RDL}}^2 $$  = 50%) and 24% of the total variance of DA (GDI_SCI  = 0.08, R DA 2 $$ {R}_{\mathrm{DA}}^2 $$  = 32%). SCI was among the two most important predictors in both models. PWE with more depressive symptoms had stronger associations between SCI and RDL or DA, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

Subjective cognitive impairment represents a frequent concern in PWE and may have detrimental consequences for their everyday life. PWE with depressive symptoms may be at greater risk of unfavorable relationships between SCI and everyday functioning. Exchange and collaboration between professionals offering psychotherapeutic, neuropsychological, and psychosocial interventions are crucial to address the patients' individual needs.

Psycho-socio-clinical profiles and quality of life in seizure disorders: A cross-sectional registry study

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study aimed at comparing quality of life (QoL) and psycho-socio-clinical profiles between patients with epilepsy, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), and syncope. We also intended to identify predictors of QoL in these three seizure disorders.

METHODS

A total of 245 inpatients (epilepsy n = 182, PNES n = 50, syncope n = 13) from a tertiary epilepsy clinic were included. Information on QoL as well as on psychological, sociodemographic, and clinical profiles was retrieved using questionnaires and medical records. Group comparisons on QoL and psycho-socio-clinical profiles were performed via analyses of variance, chi-square tests, and related post hoc tests. Predictors of QoL in epilepsy and PNES were determined using general linear modeling, which was not possible for syncope due to a small sample size.

RESULTS

Patients with epilepsy, PNES, and syncope reported levels of QoL impairment that did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.266). However, there were significant group differences regarding sex distribution (p < 0.001), seizure disorder duration (p = 0.004), seizure frequency (p = 0.019), current treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) (p < 0.001), number of current ASM (p < 0.001), and adverse ASM events (p = 0.019). More depressive symptoms (p = 0.001), more adverse ASM events (p = 0.036), and unemployment (p = 0.046) (in this order) independently predicted a diminished QoL in epilepsy. For PNES, more depressive symptoms were the only independent predictor of lower QoL (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with epilepsy, PNES, and syncope experience similarly diminished QoL and show a general psycho-socio-clinical burden with a specific pattern for each seizure disorder diagnosis. Although clinical aspects play an undisputed role for QoL in epilepsy, the psychosocial aspects and consequences are equally, or for PNES probably even more, meaningful. A comprehensive approach to research and treatment of seizure disorders seems mandatory to increase QoL for these patients. More research on QoL in syncope is needed.

Perceived epilepsy-related stigma is linked to the socioeconomic status of the residence

Purpose

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders with high costs for the healthcare systems and great suffering for patients. Beyond seizures, psychosocial comorbidities can have detrimental effects on the well-being of people with epilepsy. One source of social stress and reduced quality of life is epilepsy-related stigma that often occurs, e.g., due to public misconceptions or myths. Stigma has individual biological, psychological and social correlates. Moreover, environmental factors like living in remote areas are associated with stigma. However, little is known about the link between the social structure of the residence and stigma in epilepsy. Thus, we investigated the association between the structural socioeconomic status (SES) and perceived stigma in an urban epilepsy population.

Methods

This prospective, cross-sectional study examined 226 adult in-patients with epilepsy from Berlin. Multiple regression analyses were performed to check the relationship between structural SES and stigma controlling for individual-level demographic, clinical, psychological and social factors. Continuous social indices (SI) of the districts and neighborhoods ("SI district" and "SI neighborhood") of Berlin were used to measure different levels of structural SES. Non-linear relationships are tested by grouping the SI in quartiles.

Results

Both indicators of structural SES were independently linked to stigma (p = 0.002). For "SI district", we identified a non-linear relationship with patients from the most deprived quartile feeling less stigmatized compared to those in the second (p < 0.001) or least deprived quartile (p = 0.009). Furthermore, more restrictions of daily life (p < 0.001), unfavorable income (p = 0.009) and seizure freedom in the past 6 months (p = 0.05) were related to increased stigma. A lower "SI neighborhood" was associated with higher stigma (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Strategies to reduce epilepsy-related stigma need to consider the sociostructural living environment on different regional levels. Unfavorable relations with the immediate living environment may be directly targeted in patient-centered interventions. Non-linear associations with the structural SES of broader regional levels should be considered in public education programs. Further research is needed to examine possible underlying mechanisms and gain insight into the generalizability of our findings to other populations.