Prognostic Factors for Contralateral Recurrence of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Nephroureterectomy: A Large Multiregional Study

Simple Summary

Recurrence of cancer on the opposite side after the removal of primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon, but the risk of subsequent deterioration of kidney function may be severe and result in the need for permanent dialysis. There is a clear correlation between inflammation and tumor development in patients with cancer. As the presence of white blood cells (WBC) in urine is an indicator of local inflammation and a biomarker for bladder recurrence of UTUC, we hypothesized that systemic inflammation is involved in the occurrence of contralateral lesions. We proved that elevated serum WBC, late chronic kidney disease, and multiple tumors are independent prognostic factors for contralateral recurrence. Moreover, in a subgroup analysis, the importance of chronic kidney disease in contralateral recurrence was demonstrated for the first time in a non-Asian population. It is recommended that high-risk patients be closely followed up to monitor the opposite upper urinary tract.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the prognostic significance of preoperative inflammation-associated blood cell markers in the metachronous contralateral recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in Taiwan and the U.S. between 1990 and 2017 were included. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the contralateral recurrence rate, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to study the association of blood cell markers and clinicopathological characteristics with contralateral recurrence. Overall, a total of 1039 patients were included in this study, 52 of whom (5.0%) developed metachronous recurrence of the contralateral side. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that a history of bladder cancer (p = 0.006), multiple tumors (p = 0.016), advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD; p < 0.001), elevated serum white blood cell (WBC) count (p < 0.001), and decreased hemoglobin levels (p = 0.001) significantly reduced the contralateral recurrence-free survival. Multivariate analysis showed that multiple tumors (hazard ratio (HR), 1.87; p = 0.030), advanced CKD (HR, 2.63; p = 0.002) and increased WBC count (HR, 2.60; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for higher contralateral recurrence rate. Notably, advanced CKD was a significant factor regardless of the patient’s region. In summary, multiple tumors, advanced CKD and elevated serum WBC count are independent predictors of contralateral recurrence in patients with UTUC. It is recommended that patients with these adverse characteristics be closely followed up to monitor the opposite upper urinary tract.

Formalin disinfection of prostate biopsy needles may reduce post-biopsy infectious complications

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether formalin disinfection of prostate biopsy needles between cores reduces post-biopsy urinary tract infections (UTIs).

METHODS

We reviewed a single-surgeon experience of transrectal prostate biopsies from 2010 to 2014. Biopsies were performed in either an operative suite, where 10% formalin was used to disinfect the needle tip between each biopsy core, or an outpatient clinic, where formalin was not used. Our primary outcome was post-biopsy UTI rates, defined as a positive urine culture within 30 days of biopsy. Infection severity was characterized by the need for admission. Patient demographics, prostate size, prior biopsies, prior UTIs, pre-biopsy antibiotics and cultures and post-biopsy cultures were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of post-biopsy UTIs. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 756 patients were included for analysis, including 253 who received formalin disinfection and 503 who did not. Of these, 32 patients (4.2%) experienced post-biopsy UTIs, with 8 requiring admission (all without formalin use). Infection rates were more than double in the group that did not receive formalin (5.2% vs 2.3%, P=0.085). More patients in the formalin group had undergone prior biopsies (73.9% vs 31.8%, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, prior UTI (odds ratio (OR) 3.77, P=0.006) was a significant predictor for post-biopsy infection, whereas formalin disinfection trended towards a protective effect (OR 0.41, P=0.055).

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications following prostate biopsy may be mitigated by the use of formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle between cores.