The impact of hidradenitis suppurativa on professional life

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects intertriginous skin.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent of work ability and productivity impairment as a result of HS in Germany.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, epidemiological, noninterventional study of patients with HS was conducted. Medical history, medical examination performed by dermatologists and patient-reported outcomes [Work Ability Index (WAI) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)] were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 481 patients with HS included in the study, 99% were below the current statutory retirement age. In total, 53·3% of patients were working full time, 16·8% part time and 7·3% had retired. The unemployment rate was 12·6%, two times higher than in the general German population. Medical leave because of HS, within the last 6 months, was reported in 41·4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 36·9-46·0], with a duration of 39·3 days on average (95% CI 32·4-46·1). The mean HS-related WPAI absenteeism was 13.3% (95% CI 9·7-16·8), and the loss in productivity because of HS during working hours (WPAI presenteeism) was 25.2% (95% CI 21·8-28·6). Presenteeism was associated with HS disease severity. Overall work impairment because of HS was 33·4% (95% CI 29·3-37·6). The WAI score for patients was 32·2, ∼20% lower than for the average German employee. Only 62·8% of patients were relatively certain that they would be able to perform their work in the coming 2 years. Being more depressed and having more severe pain were associated with lower work ability and overall work impairment. The estimated annual loss of gross value added because of HS for Germany was ∼€12.6 billion (€3.3 billion related to a lower employment rate, €3.5 billion related to absenteeism and €5.8 billion related to presenteeism).

CONCLUSIONS

HS leads to a substantial decrease in work ability and productivity and considerable loss of gross value added. Impairment during working hours correlates with disease severity, underlining the socioeconomic importance of early and adequate treatment. Furthermore, decreased work ability and productivity is linked to depressed mood and severe pain, aspects that need more attention in patient care.

Association between sacubitril/valsartan initiation and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction: Insights from ARIADNE registry

AIMS

We tested the hypothesis that initiation versus non-initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a more favorable subsequent change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, double-arm, open-label, cohort study had been conducted across 687 centers in 17 European countries enrolling HFrEF patients aged ≥18 years with symptoms of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II-IV) and "reduced LVEF". For the current analysis, 2602 patients with LVEF measured at baseline and follow-up were chosen, of which 860 (33%, mean age 67 years, 26% women) were started on sacubitril/valsartan at baseline and 1742 (67%, 68 years, 23% women) were not. Patients started on sacubitril/valsartan had higher NYHA class and lower LVEF.

RESULTS

LVEF increased from mean 32.7% to 38.1% in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus from 35.9% to 38.7% in the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (mean difference in increase 2.6%, p < 0.001). LVEF increased from baseline in 64% versus 53% of patients and increased by ≥5% (absolute %) in 50% versus 35% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan versus non-sacubitril/valsartan groups, respectively. In the overall cohort, initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with any increase in LVEF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.49 [1.26-1.75]) and with increase by ≥5% (OR 1.65 [1.39-1.95]).

CONCLUSION

Initiating versus not initiating sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with a greater subsequent increase in LVEF in this real-world setting. Reverse cardiac remodeling may be one mechanism of benefit of sacubitril/valsartan.

Outcomes with sacubitril/valsartan in outpatients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: The ARIADNE registry

AIMS

ARIADNE aimed to assess the association between effects of sacubitril/valsartan and no sacubitril/valsartan treatment and clinical characteristics, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes (cause-specific mortality and hospitalizations) in outpatients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

ARIADNE was a prospective European registry of 9069 patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians. Of the 8787 eligible for analysis, 4173 patients were on conventional HF treatment (non-S/V group), whereas 4614 patients were either on sacubitril/valsartan treatment at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). We also generated a restricted analysis set (rS/V) including only those 2108 patients who started sacubitril/valsartan treatment within the month prior to or after enrolment.

RESULTS

At the baseline, average age of patients enrolled in the study was 68 years, and 23.9% (2099/8787) were female. At the baseline, the proportions of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III symptoms were 30.9 (1288/4173), 42.8 (1974/4614), and 48.2% (1015/2108), in non-S/V, S/V, and rS/V groups, respectively. After 12 months of treatment, the proportion of patients with NYHA Class III at baseline who improved to Class II was 32.0% (290/907) in the non-S/V group vs. 46.3% (648/1399) in S/V group and 48.7% (349/717) in rS/V group. The overall mortality rate was 5.0 per 100 patient-years. Rates of HF hospitalizations were high (20.9, 20.3, and 21.2 per 100 patient-years in the non-S/V, S/V, and rS/V groups, respectively). Emergency room visits without hospitalization occurred in 3.9, 3.2, and 3.9% of patients in the non-S/V, S/V, and rS/V groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This large HFrEF European registry provides a contemporary outcome profile of outpatients with HFrEF treated with or without sacubitril/valsartan. In a real-world setting, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with an improvement of symptoms in patients with HFrEF compared with the conventional HFrEF treatment.

Sarilumab reduces disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to JAK-inhibitors or tocilizumab in regular care in Germany

Objectives

To evaluate safety and effectiveness of sarilumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after inadequate response (IR) to janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and tocilizumab.

Methods

The prospective, observational, 24-months single-arm PROSARA study (SARILL08661) is currently running in Germany at 96 sites. RA patients were prospectively selected at physician’s discretion according to label. This interim analysis (IA) included 536 patients over a treatment course of up to 6 months. Patients were stratified in 4 groups according to pretreatment before start of sarilumab therapy: 1. last prior treatment JAKi (JAKi-IR), 2. last prior treatment tocilizumab (tocilizumab-IR), 3. any other biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) in treatment history (bDMARD TH) and 4. patients who haven’t received any bDMARDs or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (b/tsDMARD naïve) before.

Results

For this pre-planned IA, 536 patients were included in the baseline population, of which 502 patients had at least one corresponding post-baseline effectiveness assessment documented (main analysis population). In all analysed cohorts, safety was consistent with the anticipated profile of sarilumab, without new safety signals. Six months of sarilumab treatment attenuated disease activity in JAKi-IR, tocilizumab-IR, bDMARD TH and b/tsDMARD naïve patients to a very similar extent. Physical function did not substantially change over the course of treatment. Premature study discontinuation rates were comparable between cohorts.

Conclusion

Sarilumab treatment was effective in patients with IR to JAKi and tocilizumab with an expectable safety profile and drug retention over 6 months. Confirmation of this promising results should encourage further studies on this treatment sequence which is highly practically relevant.

Study registration

Paul-Ehrlich-Institut—Federal Institute for Vaccine and Biomedics, SARILL08661

POS0591 SARILUMAB ATTENUATES DISEASE ACTIVITY IN SERONEGATIVE RA PATIENTS – PRELIMINARY DATA FROM A NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY IN REGULAR CARE IN GERMANY

Background:

Although seronegative RA patients often present with substantial disease burden [1], patients are underrepresented in research cohorts or clinical trials. Consequently, less knowledge about this subgroup has been accumulated.

Objectives:

To describe outcome of seronegative vs. seropositive RA patients treated with sarilumab in regular care in Germany.

Methods:

The prospective, observational, 24-month single-arm PROSARA study (SARILL08661) is currently running in Germany at 96 sites, aiming to enroll up to 750 RA patients treated with sarilumab. RA patients are prospectively selected at physician’s discretion according to label, and medical history is documented before treatment. This interim analysis included patients with data available up to 24 months. Here we focus on sustained treatment response after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Patients were stratified according to serostatus (RF- AND ACPA- as seronegative or RF+ AND/OR ACPA+ as seropositive). All analyses are descriptive only.

Results:

To date 473 patients were included in the study, of which 22.2% (n=105) were seronegative and 59.0% (n=279) were seropositive (Table 1). For 89 patients (18.8%) serostatus was not specified.

Table 1.

Baseline data regarding patient characteristics, prior treatment and disease activity

seronegativeseropositivepatients [n] (%)105(22.2)279(59.0)patient characteristicsSex female [n] (%)81(77.1)207(74.2)Age mean [years] (SD)56.6(12.5)59.6(10.9)BMI mean (SD) [kg/m2]29.2(6.7)28(6.0)Smoking history current/former [%]22.1/11.525.5/20.4Time since diagnosis of RA mean [years] (SD)7.9(7.6)11.5(9.9)prior RA treatmentcsDMARD [n] (%)102(97.1)273(97.8)bDMARD (TNFi) [n] (%)54(51.4)167(59.9)bDMARD (non-TNFi) [n] (%)32(30.5)83(29.7)tsDMARD (JAKi) [n] (%)25(23.8)57(20.4)disease activityCRP [mg/l] (SD)12.9(30.9)14.2(31.0)ESR [mm/h] (SD)23.7(20.5)25.3(22.4)SJC mean (SD)5.3(5.5)4.6(4.8)TJC mean (SD)10.2(8.2)7.2(6.6)HAQ-DI mean (SD)1.4(0.7)1.2(0.7)DAS28-ESR mean (SD)5.0(1.5)4.6(1.5)CDAI mean (SD)27.7(14.7)23.0(12.9)Fatigue [VAS] (SD)64.0(25.5)51.1(28.1)

The mean time since diagnosis of RA was shorter in seronegative than in seropositive patients (7.9±7.6 years vs. 11.5±9.9 years) (Table 1).

At baseline, CDAI score was 27.7±14.7 (n=104) and 23.0±12.9 (n=272) in seronegative and seropositive patients, respectively. After 12 months of sarilumab treatment, CDAI improved to 15.6±12.3 (n=38) and 9.1±8.7 (n=101) in seronegative and seropositive, respectively, for patients with post-baseline data available. At that time, remission/low disease activity according to CDAI was reached by 5.3% (n=2/38) / 39.5% (n=15/38) of seronegative patients, respectively and by 26.7% (n=27/101) / 68.3% (n=69/101) of seropositive patients, respectively (Fig. 1A, B).

Figure 1.

CDAI (A, B) and HAQ-DI (C) outcomes in seronegative and seropositive patients

Physical function, assessed by HAQ-DI, was slightly more impaired in seronegative patients (1.4±0.7) than in seropositive patients (1.2±0.7) at baseline. HAQ-DI improved over 12 months to 0.9±0.7 in seropositive patients (n=90) but showed no change in seronegative patients (1.4±0.7; n=37) (Fig. 1C).

Safety was consistent with the anticipated profile of IL-6-R-inhibition and no new safety signals occurred. Adverse events and serious adverse events were described in 61.7% and 12.8% of seronegative patients, respectively and in 55.2% and 13.7% of seropositive patients, respectively.

Conclusion:

Sarilumab treatment ameliorated CDAI in both seronegative (ΔCDAI -17.0±16.5) and seropositive (ΔCDAI -15.4±14.3) patients to the same extent over the course of 12 months, with a higher remission rate in seropositive patients. Functional capacity improved meaningfully in the seropositive cohort but had no significant impact in seronegative patients. The safety profile was consistent with data reported from controlled clinical trials.

References:

[1]Choi S-T et al. (2018) PLoS ONE 13(4): e0195550.

Acknowledgements:

We thank Cornelia Kühne (Haldensleben) for substantial contribution to patient recruitment in PROSARA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Harald Burkhardt Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, Abb- vie, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Bristol Myer Scribb, Janssen, and Novartis, Consultant of: Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Bristol Myer Scripps, Janssen, and Novartis, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Hans-Peter Tony Consultant of: AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Peer-Malte Aries Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biogen, Berlin Chemie, Celgene, GSK, Hexal, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Hexal, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Silke Zinke: None declared, Klaus Krueger Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Jonas Ahlers Employee of: Sanofi, Rolf Hecker Employee of: Sanofi, Inka Albrecht Employee of: Sanofi, Stefanie Kalus Consultant of: Sanofi, Oliver Bley Employee of: Sanofi, Patrizia Sternad: None declared, Ann-Dörthe Holst: None declared, Niklas Thomas Baerlecken: None declared, Thilo Klopsch: None declared, Martin Welcker Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Aescu, Amgen, Biogen, Berlin Chemie, Celgene, GSK, Hexal, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Actelion, Aescu, Amgen, Cel- gene, Hexal, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Novartis, UCB, Hexal, BMS, Lilly, Roche, Celgene, Sanofi, Eugen Feist Speakers bureau: Novartis, Roche, Sobi, Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Sanofi, Consultant of: Novartis, Roche, Sobi, Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Sanofi

Utilization of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: real-world data from the ARIADNE registry

Aims

To compare baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) initiated on sacubitril/valsartan compared with patients continued on conventional heart failure (HF)-treatment in a European out-patient setting.

Methods and results

Between July 2016 and July 2019, ARIADNE enrolled 8787 outpatients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF from 17 European countries. Choice of therapy was solely at the investigators’ discretion. In total, 4173 patients were on conventional HF-treatment (non-S/V group), while 4614 patients were on sacubitril/valsartan either at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). Of these, 2108 patients started sacubitril/valsartan treatment ±1 month around enrolment [restricted S/V (rS/V) group]. The average age of the patients was 68 years. Patients on S/V were more likely to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms (50.3%, 44.6%, 32.1% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively) and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 32.3%, 32.7%, and 35.4% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively; P &lt; 0.0001). The most frequently received HF treatments were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; ∼84% in non-S/V), followed by β-blockers (∼80%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs; 53%). The use of triple HF therapy (ACEI/ARB/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor with β-blockers and MRA) was higher in the S/V groups than non-S/V group (48.2%, 48.2%, and 40.2% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively).

Conclusion

In this large multinational HFrEF registry, patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan tended to be younger with lower LVEF and higher NYHA class. Fewer than half of the patients received triple HF therapy.

Death, hospitalization, emergency department visits and out-patient visits in patients with heart failure in contemporary practice: results from the prospective Europeam 9069-patient ARIADNE registry

Background

In Europe, heart failure (HF) is managed in variable settings and frequently in office-based practice. In HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) there is now extensive evidence based therapy, but implementation is inconsistent, variable and overall inadequate. The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry aimed to assess in detail how outpatients with HFrEF are managed in Europe in contemporary practice.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective non-interventional registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA class II-IV) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. Patients were enrolled in 687 centres in 17 European countries, and studied at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Key pre-specified outcomes were deaths, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and office visits, and their primary reasons.

Results

Over 20 months, we enrolled 9069 patients; median age 69 (19–96) years, 24% women, with 30% older than 75 years, 61% NYHA class II, with a median EF 35% (30–40%).

Over a median follow-up of 353 (1–631) days, 382 patients (4.3%) died, with 171 cardiovascular deaths (1.9%). The rates of total hospitalizations overall, for HF, and for non-HF cardiovascular reasons were 19.3, 8.1, and 4.8 per 100 patient years, respectively; and rates of emergency department visits overall, for HF reasons, and for non-HF CV reason were 7.7, 1.6, and 1.8, respectively. The number of HF office visits were on average 1.0 per patient.

Conclusions

In this large multinational HFrEF registry with detailed data on cause-specific outcomes and health care utilization, incidence of death was low and outpatient HF visits were few, but incidence of HF and CV hospitalization and emergency department visits was high.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in European outpatients with chronic heart failure in Europe: results from ARIADNE registry

Background

Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as a novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of heart failure (HF). The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry provides real world information about its use and efficacy in real life in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Europe.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA II-IV, reduced EF) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. 9069 HFrEF patients were enrolled from 674 investigators in 17 European countries, and followed over 12 months. Out of 8787 patients fulfilling criteria for analysis, 52.5% of the patients received S/V treatment at baseline, whereas 47.5% continued on their previous individualized heart failure medication. Results of S/V patients are reported here.

Results

The mean age of patients prescribed S/V was 67.3 years, mainly NYHA class II or III (49.7% and 48.2%, respectively), and mean LVEF of 32.7%. Common documented comorbidities were arterial hypertension (63.7%), coronary heart disease (62.4%), dyslipidemia (50.3%), diabetes (32.5%), and chronic kidney disease (24.1%).

Of the 4143 patients in the S/V group, 89.9% received S/V at baseline, 74.8% received S/V in combination with a β-blocker; 47.8% with a β-blocker and MRA.

Within 6 months of the observational period, 693 (17.4%) of the S/V patients were hospitalized, of which 46.8% and 28.7%, had HF related and non-HF cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations. Emergency room visits without hospitalization were documented for 3.4% of S/V patients in the same time period; stroke and myocardial infarction occurred in 22 (0.5%) and 24 (0.6%) of the S/V patients, respectively. Cardiac catheterization or coronary angiography procedures were applied to 1.7% and 2.8% of the S/V patients. Total mortality was 4.3% (S/V 3.8%; non-S/V 5.0%), cardiovascular mortality 1.9% (S/V 1.8%; non-S/V 2.2%), during the 12 month observational period.

The proportion of S/V patients in NYHA class III or IV decreased in the course of the study from 44.6% to 24.0%. After 12 months of follow up, 46.3% of patients with NYHA class III had a reported improvement to NYHA class II. Consistently, mean LVEF increased to 37.9%. The percentage of S/V patients with LVEF &lt;22.5% decreased from 11.5% to 5.8%. KCCQ overall summary score increased by 1.9 points. An improvement of ≥5 points, denoting a clinically meaningful increase, was reported for 36.2% of S/V patients.

Conclusions

Data from the ARIADNE prospective registry portray a diverse, multinational study cohort receiving sacubitril/valsartan under real-world conditions. Throughout the study, symptoms and quality of life improved with the use of S/V.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

Baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a European real-world, non-interventional registry study

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a major medical and economic burden that is often managed in office based practices. Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of HF. The ARIADNE registry aims to provide information on how outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are managed in Europe, in light of this novel treatment option.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists (OBC) or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists; PCP) in a real world setting. HFrEF patients were included prospectively, independently of whether treatment had been changed recently or not. 9069 patients were recruited from 687 centres in 17 European countries.

Results

The mean age of all patients was 68.1 years (S/V: 67.3 years, Non-S/V: 68.9 years). The majority of patients were in NYHA class II (61.3%), or NYHA class III (37.1%) overall, while more patients in the S/V group showed NYHA class III (S/V: 42.8%, Non-S/V: 30.9%). Mean LVEF was slightly lower in the S/V group than in the Non-S/V group (S/V: 32.7%, Non-S/V: 35.4%, overall 34.0%). The most frequently observed signs of HF were dyspnoea upon effort, followed by fatigue, palpitations on exertion at baseline. More patients tend to have more severe symptoms in the S/V groups (e.g. for dyspnoea on effort, Non-S/V: moderate 40.8%, severe 8.6%; S/V: moderate 46.4%, severe 14.1%). 44.0% of patients from the S/V group and 39.3% of non-S/V patients reported at least one hospitalization within 12 months prior to baseline, of which 73.3% in S/V and 69.9% in non-S/V patients were due to HF., At baseline, 44.7% of the patients used a CV device, of which most were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: Non-S/V 54.2%, S/V: 52.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-ICD:Non-S/V 21.9%, S/V: 27.0%), and pacemaker (Non-S/V: 13.4%, S/V: 10.5%). The mean KCCQ overall summary score was 62.6 in the S/V group and 69.5 in the Non-S/V group at baseline.

83.9% of patients were treated with ARB or ACEi in Non-S/V group, (ACEi 57.3%, ARB 26.9%). The most frequently taken drug combinations in either group were ACEi/ ARB or S/V with β -blockers (Non-S/V 69.3%, S/V 67.3%). 40.2% in the Non-S/V group and 42.9% in S/V groups used a combination of ACEi/ARB or S/V, β-blocker and MRA.

Conclusions

The ARIADNE prospective registry provides insights and reflects variations in HF treatment practices in outpatients in Europe and the way S/V was introduced by OBCs and specialized PCPs in a real-world setting. In the observed population, S/V is more often prescribed to slightly younger patients with slightly lower LVEF, there was a greater observed percentage of S/V patients NYHA class III, with lower quality of life measurements and with more severe symptoms and recent hospitalizations for heart failure.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

Delayed Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Its Effect on Patients and Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a neglected chronic inflammatory disease with long delay in diagnosis. Besides pain, purulent discharge, and destruction of skin architecture, HS patients experience metabolic, musculoskeletal, and psychological disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the delay in HS diagnosis and its consequences for patients and the healthcare system.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, epidemiologic, non-interventional cross-sectional trial carried out in Germany and based on self-reported questionnaires and medical examinations performed by dermatologists. In total, data of 394 adult HS patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

The average duration from manifestation of first symptoms until HS diagnosis was 10.0 ± 9.6 (mean ± SD) years. During this time, HS patients consulted on average more than 3 different physicians - most frequently general practitioners, dermatologists, surgeons, gynecologists - and faced more than 3 misdiagnoses. Diagnosis delay was longer in younger and non-smoking patients. In most cases, HS was correctly diagnosed by dermatologists. The longer the delay of diagnosis, the greater the disease severity at diagnosis. Delayed HS diagnosis was also associated with an increased number of surgically treated sites, concomitant diseases, and days of work missed.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates an enormous delay in the diagnosis of HS, which results in more severe disease. It also shows for the first time that a delay in diagnosis of a chronic inflammatory disease leads to a higher number of concomitant systemic disorders. In addition to the impaired health status, delayed diagnosis of HS was associated with impairment of the professional life of affected people.

Predictors of RSV LRTI Hospitalization in Infants Born at 33 to 35 Weeks Gestational Age: A Large Multinational Study (PONI)

BACKGROUND

Preterm infants are at high risk of developing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). This observational epidemiologic study evaluated RSV disease burden and risk factors for RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization in preterm infants 33 weeks+0 days to 35 weeks+6 days gestational age not receiving RSV prophylaxis.

METHODS

Preterm infants ≤6 months of age during RSV season (1 October 2013-30 April 2014) were followed at 72 sites across 23 countries from September 2013-July 2014 (study period). RSV testing was performed according to local clinical practice. Factors related to RSV-associated hospitalization for LRTI were identified using multivariable logistic regression with backward selection.

RESULTS

Of the 2390 evaluable infants, 204 and 127 were hospitalized for LRTI during the study period and RSV season, respectively. Among these subjects, 64/204 and 46/127, respectively, were hospitalized for confirmed RSV LRTI. Study period and RSV season normalized RSV hospitalization rates (per 100 infant years) were 4.1 and 6.1, respectively. Factors associated with an increased risk of RSV-related LRTI hospitalization in multivariable analyses were smoking of family members (P<0.0001), non-hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease diagnosis (P = 0.0077), maternal age of ≤25 years at delivery (P = 0.0009), low maternal educational level (P = 0.0426), household presence of children aged 4 to 5 years (P = 0.0038), age on 1 October ≤3 months (P = 0.0422), and presence of paternal atopy (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

During the 2013-2014 RSV season across 23 countries, for preterm infants 33-35 weeks gestation ≤6 months old on 1 October not receiving RSV prophylaxis, confirmed RSV LRTI hospitalization incidence was 4.1 per 100 infant years during the study period and 6.1 per 100 infant years during the RSV season. This study enhances the findings of single-country studies of common risk factors for severe RSV infection in preterm infants and suggests that combinations of 4-6 risk factors may be used to accurately predict risk of RSV hospitalization. These findings may be useful in the identification of infants most at risk of severe RSV infection.

[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during standard interventions in ear, nose and throat medicine]

BACKGROUND

The majority of standard interventions in otorhinolaryngology are classified as "clean contaminated" according to international classifications; correspondingly, no generally accepted recommendations regarding perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (pAP) exist. The value of such pAP for these interventions remains unclear. Aim of the study was to assess the effects of pAP in selected standard otorhinolaryngologic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In August 2012 a standard operating procedure (SOP) was implemented, which lead to termination of routine pAP for the majority of standard operations. All patients included in this retrospective study had undergone a standard procedure (tonsil, septum or paranasal sinus surgery) during a period either 6 months before or 6 months after the inauguration of the SOP. The charts were reviewed for demographic factors, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The group before the inauguration of the SOP consisted of 316 patients (132 female, 184 male), aged 30±20 years. The group after the inauguration comprised 308 patients (128 female, 180 male), aged 31±19 years. For the entire patient collective, the termination of pAP led to a statistically significant increase in postoperative antibiotic treatment for all types of interventions tested. A statistically significant change in noninflammatory complications or the length of hospital stay was not detected.

DISCUSSION

The termination of pAP during standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology is associated with an increase in postoperative antibiotic treatment but has no effect on other postoperative complications tested or the length of hospital stay.

Statistical modeling of time-dependent fMRI activation effects

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation detection within stimulus-based experimental paradigms is conventionally based on the assumption that activation effects remain constant over time. This assumption neglects the fact that the strength of activation may vary, for example, due to habituation processes or changing attention. Neither the functional form of time variation can be retrieved nor short-lasting effects can be detected by conventional methods. In this work, a new dynamic approach is proposed that allows to estimate time-varying effect profiles and hemodynamic response functions in event-related fMRI paradigms. To this end, we incorporate the time-varying coefficient methodology into the fMRI general regression framework. Inference is based on a voxelwise penalized least squares procedure. We assess the strength of activation and corresponding time variation on the basis of pointwise confidence intervals on a voxel level. Additionally, spatial clusters of effect curves are presented. Results of the analysis of an active oddball experiment show that activation effects deviating from a constant trend coexist with time-varying effects that exhibit different types of shapes, such as linear, (inversely) U-shaped or fluctuating forms. In a comparison to conventional approaches, like classical SPM, we observe that time-constant methods are rather insensitive to detect temporary effects, because these do not emerge when aggregated across the entire experiment. Hence, it is recommended to base activation detection analyses not merely on time-constant procedures but to include flexible time-varying effects that harbour valuable information on individual response patterns.

A new strategy to analyze possible association structures between dynamic nocturnal hormone activities and sleep alterations in humans

The human sleep process shows dynamic alterations during the night. Methods are needed to examine whether and to what extent such alterations are affected by internal, possibly time-dependent, factors, such as endocrine activity. In an observational study, we examined simultaneously sleep EEG and nocturnal levels of renin, growth hormone (GH), and cortisol (between 2300 and 0700) in 47 healthy volunteers comprising 24 women (41.67 ± 2.93 yr of age) and 23 men (37.26 ± 2.85 yr of age). Hormone concentrations were measured every 20 min. Conventional sleep stage scoring at 30-s intervals was applied. Semiparametric multinomial logit models are used to study and quantify possible time-dependent hormone effects on sleep stage transition courses. Results show that increased cortisol levels decrease the probability of transition from rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep to wakefulness (WAKE) and increase the probability of transition from REM to non-REM (NREM) sleep, irrespective of the time in the night. Via the model selection criterion Akaike's information criterion, it was found that all considered hormone effects on transition probabilities with the initial state WAKE change with time. Similarly, transition from slow-wave sleep (SWS) to light sleep (LS) is affected by a “hormone-time” interaction for cortisol and renin, but not GH. For example, there is a considerable increase in the probability of SWS-LS transition toward the end of the night, when cortisol concentrations are very high. In summary, alterations in human sleep possess dynamic forms and are partially influenced by the endocrine activity of certain hormones. Statistical methods, such as semiparametric multinomial and time-dependent logit regression, can offer ambitious ways to investigate and estimate the association intensities between the nonstationary sleep changes and the time-dependent endocrine activities.

Heritability of sleep electroencephalogram

BACKGROUND

Understanding the basis of sleep-related endophenotypes might help to pinpoint factors modulating susceptibility to psychiatric disorders. However, the genetic underpinnings of sleep microarchitecture in humans remain largely unknown. Here we report on the results of a classical twin study in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs examining the genetic effect on sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) composition.

METHODS

Polysomnographic recordings were obtained in 35 pairs of MZ (26.4 +/- 5.4 years, 17-43 years, 17 male pairs, 18 female pairs) and 14 same-gender pairs of DZ twins (22.1 +/- 2.7 years, 18-26 years, 7 male pairs, 7 female pairs). The EEG power spectra were generated on the basis of Fast Fourier transformations combined with conventional sleep parameters, according to standardized criteria.

RESULTS

We tested the genetic variance contributing to the observed overall variance of the sleep measures and found that the relative contributions of the delta, theta, alpha, and sigma frequency bands at central derivations were significantly correlated to the genetic background. In these frequency bands, MZ twins also showed within-pair concordance in spectral power that was significantly higher than that of DZ twins.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad overlap of EEG frequencies during non-REM sleep and wakefulness, which shows a significant genetic variance, supports the hypothesis of common neuronal mechanisms generating EEG oscillations in humans. Our findings strongly support the suitability of the spectral composition of non-REM sleep for defining endophenotypes.

Side-chain effects on phenothiazine cation radical reactions

The cation radical of each of the phenothiazine tranquilizers is a likely intermediate in the metabolism of the drugs to at least two of the three major metabolic classes, the sulfoxides and the hydroxylated derivatives. Previous work has shown that the reactions of the radical are highly dependent on the environment, particularly the presence of nucleophiles. The present report discusses the effect of cation radical structure on the formation of sulfoxide and hydroxylated metabolites in vitro. Cyclic voltammetry, spectrophotometry, and liquid chromatography were used to examine reactions of various phenothiazine radicals in aqueous buffers. A radical with a three-carbon aliphatic side chain (e.g., chlorpromazine) forms solely sulfoxide and parent unless amine nucleophiles are present, in which case hydroxylation occurs. A shorter side chain (e.g., promethazine) causes radical dimerization and pronounced hydroxylation, regardless of external nucleophiles. A piperazine side chain (e.g., fluphenazine) promotes hydroxylation, with some sulfoxide observed. The results indicate that a deprotonated amine is necessary for hydroxylation and that the amine may be present in the original drug rather than an external nucleophile. In addition to information about cation radical reactions, the redox properties of several different phenothiazines are presented.