1
|
Cummins DD, Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Cernera S, Fernandez-Gajardo R, Hammer LH, Starr PA. Physiological effects of dual target DBS in an individual with Parkinson's disease and a sensing-enabled pulse generator. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2024; 122:106089. [PMID: 38460490 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.106089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus (GP) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Novel DBS devices can record local field potential (LFP) physiomarkers from the STN or GP. While beta (13-30 Hz) and gamma (40-90 Hz) STN and GP LFP oscillations correlate with PD motor severity and with therapeutic effects of treatments, STN-GP interactions in electrophysiology in patients with PD are not well characterized. METHODS Simultaneous bilateral STN and GP LFPs were recorded in a patient with PD who received bilateral STN-DBS and GP-DBS. Power spectra in each target and STN-GP coherence were assessed in various ON- and OFF-levodopa and DBS states, both at rest and with voluntary movement. RESULTS OFF-levodopa and OFF-DBS, beta peaks were present at bilateral STN and GP, coincident with prominent STN-GP beta coherence. Levodopa and dual-target-DBS (simultaneous STN-DBS and GP-DBS) completely suppressed STN-GP coherence. Finely-tuned gamma (FTG) activity at half the stimulation frequency (62.5 Hz) was seen in the STN during GP-DBS at rest. To assess the effects of movement on FTG activity, we recorded LFPs during instructed movement. We observed FTG activity in bilateral GP and bilateral STN during contralateral body movements while on GP-DBS and ON-levodopa. No FTG was seen with STN-DBS or dual-target-DBS. CONCLUSION Dual-target-DBS and levodopa suppressed STN-GP coherence. FTG throughout the basal ganglia was induced by GP-DBS in the presence of levodopa and movement. This bilateral STN-FTG and GP-FTG corresponded with the least severe bradykinesia state, suggesting a pro-kinetic role for FTG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Cummins
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States.
| | - Stephanie S Sandoval-Pistorius
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Rm M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Rm M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Rodrigo Fernandez-Gajardo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Rm M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 1651 4th Street, East Care Center, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Philip A Starr
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Rm M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olaru M, Cernera S, Hahn A, Wozny TA, Anso J, de Hemptinne C, Little S, Neumann WJ, Abbasi-Asl R, Starr PA. Motor network gamma oscillations in chronic home recordings predict dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2024:awae004. [PMID: 38195196 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
In Parkinson's disease, imbalances between "antikinetic" and "prokinetic" patterns of neuronal oscillatory activity are related to motor dysfunction. Invasive brain recordings from the motor network have suggested that medical or surgical therapy can promote a prokinetic state by inducing narrowband gamma rhythms (65-90 Hz). Excessive narrowband gamma in the motor cortex promotes dyskinesia in rodent models, but the relationship between narrowband gamma and dyskinesia in humans has not been well established. To assess this relationship, we used a sensing-enabled deep brain stimulator system, attached to both motor cortex and basal ganglia (subthalamic or pallidal) leads, paired with wearable devices that continuously tracked motor signs in the contralateral upper limbs. We recorded 984 hours of multisite field potentials in 30 hemispheres of 16 subjects with Parkinson's disease (2/16 female, mean age 57 ± 12 years) while at home on usual antiparkinsonian medications. Recordings were done two to four weeks after implantation, prior to starting therapeutic stimulation. Narrowband gamma was detected in the precentral gyrus, subthalamic nucleus, or both structures on at least one side of 92% of subjects with a clinical history of dyskinesia. Narrowband gamma was not detected in the globus pallidus. Narrowband gamma spectral power in both structures co-fluctuated similarly with contralateral wearable dyskinesia scores (mean correlation coefficient of ρ=0.48 with a range of 0.12-0.82 for cortex, ρ=0.53 with a range of 0.5-0.77 for subthalamic nucleus). Stratification analysis showed the correlations were not driven by outlier values, and narrowband gamma could distinguish "on" periods with dyskinesia from "on" periods without dyskinesia. Time lag comparisons confirmed that gamma oscillations herald dyskinesia onset without a time lag in either structure when using 2-minute epochs. A linear model incorporating the three oscillatory bands (beta, theta/alpha, and narrowband gamma) increased the predictive power of dyskinesia for several subject hemispheres. We further identified spectrally distinct oscillations in the low gamma range (40-60 Hz) in three subjects, but the relationship of low gamma oscillations to dyskinesia was variable. Our findings support the hypothesis that excessive oscillatory activity at 65-90 Hz in the motor network tracks with dyskinesia similarly across both structures, without a detectable time lag. This rhythm may serve as a promising control signal for closed-loop deep brain stimulation using either cortical or subthalamic detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Olaru
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Thomas A Wozny
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida Gainesville, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Reza Abbasi-Asl
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Hacker ML, Waters AC, Wang J, Provenza NR, de Hemptinne C, Johnson KA, Morrison MA, Cernera S. Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications. J Neurosci 2023; 43:7575-7586. [PMID: 37940596 PMCID: PMC10634582 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1427-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, involving chronic implantation of electrodes into target brain regions for electrical stimulation delivery. Despite its safety and efficacy, DBS remains an underutilized therapy. Advances in the field of DBS, including in technology, mechanistic understanding, and applications have the potential to expand access and use of DBS, while also improving clinical outcomes. Developments in DBS technology, such as MRI compatibility and bidirectional DBS systems capable of sensing neural activity while providing therapeutic stimulation, have enabled advances in our understanding of DBS mechanisms and its application. In this review, we summarize recent work exploring DBS modulation of target networks. We also cover current work focusing on improved programming and the development of novel stimulation paradigms that go beyond current standards of DBS, many of which are enabled by sensing-enabled DBS systems and have the potential to expand access to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
| | - Allison C Waters
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
- Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Melanie A Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eisinger RS, Okun MS, Cernera S, Cagle J, Beke M, Ramirez-Zamora A, Kim BH, Barbosa DAN, Qiu L, Vaswani P, Aamodt WW, Halpern CH, Foote KD, Gunduz A, Almeida L. Weight and survival after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2023; 115:105810. [PMID: 37660542 PMCID: PMC10664863 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight loss in Parkinson's disease (PD) is common and associated with increased mortality. The clinical significance of weight changes following deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is unclear. OBJECTIVES To address (1) whether PD patients exhibit progressive weight loss, (2) whether staged DBS surgery is associated with weight changes, and (3) whether survival after DBS correlates with post-DBS weight. METHODS This is a single-center, longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of 1625 PD patients. We examined trends in weight over time and the relationship between weight and years survival after DBS using regression and mixed model analyses. RESULTS There was a decline in body weight predating motor symptom onset (n = 756, 0.70 ± 0.03% decrease per year, p < 0.001). Weight decline accelerated in the decade preceding death (n = 456, 2.18 ± 0.31% decrease per year, p < 0.001). DBS patients showed a weight increase of 2.0 ± 0.33% at 1 year following the first DBS lead implant (n = 455) and 2.68 ± 1.1% at 3 years if a contralateral DBS lead was placed (n = 249). The bilateral STN DBS group gained the most weight after surgery during 6 years of follow up (vs bilateral GPi, 3.03 ± 0.45% vs 1.89 ± 0.31%, p < 0.01). An analysis of the DBS cohort with date of death available (n = 72) revealed that post-DBS weight (0-12 months after the first or 0-36 months after the second surgery) was positively associated with survival (R2 = 0.14, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION Though PD is associated with significant weight loss, DBS patients gained weight following surgery. Higher post-operative weight was associated with increased survival. These results should be replicated in other cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Eisinger
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA; Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Jackson Cagle
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA
| | - Matthew Beke
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA; Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, USA
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA
| | - B Hope Kim
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel A N Barbosa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Liming Qiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pavan Vaswani
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Whitley W Aamodt
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Casey H Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Surgery, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, PA, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sermon JJ, Olaru M, Ansó J, Cernera S, Little S, Shcherbakova M, Bogacz R, Starr PA, Denison T, Duchet B. Sub-harmonic entrainment of cortical gamma oscillations to deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: Model based predictions and validation in three human subjects. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1412-1424. [PMID: 37683763 PMCID: PMC10635843 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The exact mechanisms of deep brain stimulation (DBS) are still an active area of investigation, in spite of its clinical successes. This is due in part to the lack of understanding of the effects of stimulation on neuronal rhythms. Entrainment of brain oscillations has been hypothesised as a potential mechanism of neuromodulation. A better understanding of entrainment might further inform existing methods of continuous DBS, and help refine algorithms for adaptive methods. The purpose of this study is to develop and test a theoretical framework to predict entrainment of cortical rhythms to DBS across a wide range of stimulation parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS We fit a model of interacting neural populations to selected features characterising PD patients' off-stimulation finely-tuned gamma rhythm recorded through electrocorticography. Using the fitted models, we predict basal ganglia DBS parameters that would result in 1:2 entrainment, a special case of sub-harmonic entrainment observed in patients and predicted by theory. RESULTS We show that the neural circuit models fitted to patient data exhibit 1:2 entrainment when stimulation is provided across a range of stimulation parameters. Furthermore, we verify key features of the region of 1:2 entrainment in the stimulation frequency/amplitude space with follow-up recordings from the same patients, such as the loss of 1:2 entrainment above certain stimulation amplitudes. CONCLUSION Our results reveal that continuous, constant frequency DBS in patients may lead to nonlinear patterns of neuronal entrainment across stimulation parameters, and that these responses can be predicted by modelling. Should entrainment prove to be an important mechanism of therapeutic stimulation, our modelling framework may reduce the parameter space that clinicians must consider when programming devices for optimal benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Sermon
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Brain Networks Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Olaru
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Juan Ansó
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rafal Bogacz
- MRC Brain Networks Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Denison
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Brain Networks Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benoit Duchet
- MRC Brain Networks Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Personalized chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation outperforms conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease. medRxiv 2023:2023.08.03.23293450. [PMID: 37649907 PMCID: PMC10463549 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.23293450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but currently lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control has the potential to improve therapeutic effectiveness, but optimal control strategy and additional benefits of "adaptive" neurostimulation are unclear. We implemented adaptive subthalamic nucleus stimulation, controlled by subthalamic or cortical signals, in three PD patients (five hemispheres) during normal daily life. We identified neurophysiological biomarkers of residual motor fluctuations using data-driven analyses of field potentials over a wide frequency range and varying stimulation amplitudes. Narrowband gamma oscillations (65-70 Hz) at either site emerged as the best control signal for sensing during stimulation. A blinded, randomized trial demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. Our approach highlights the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation based on data-driven selection of control signals and may be applied to other neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wong JK, Mayberg HS, Wang DD, Richardson RM, Halpern CH, Krinke L, Arlotti M, Rossi L, Priori A, Marceglia S, Gilron R, Cavanagh JF, Judy JW, Miocinovic S, Devergnas AD, Sillitoe RV, Cernera S, Oehrn CR, Gunduz A, Goodman WK, Petersen EA, Bronte-Stewart H, Raike RS, Malekmohammadi M, Greene D, Heiden P, Tan H, Volkmann J, Voon V, Li L, Sah P, Coyne T, Silburn PA, Kubu CS, Wexler A, Chandler J, Provenza NR, Heilbronner SR, Luciano MS, Rozell CJ, Fox MD, de Hemptinne C, Henderson JM, Sheth SA, Okun MS. Proceedings of the 10th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: Advances in cutting edge technologies, artificial intelligence, neuromodulation, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, and women in neuromodulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 16:1084782. [PMID: 36819295 PMCID: PMC9933515 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1084782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The deep brain stimulation (DBS) Think Tank X was held on August 17-19, 2022 in Orlando FL. The session organizers and moderators were all women with the theme women in neuromodulation. Dr. Helen Mayberg from Mt. Sinai, NY was the keynote speaker. She discussed milestones and her experiences in developing depression DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank X speakers was that DBS has continued to expand in scope however several indications have reached the "trough of disillusionment." DBS for depression was considered as "re-emerging" and approaching a slope of enlightenment. DBS for depression will soon re-enter clinical trials. The group estimated that globally more than 244,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia, and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, closed loop DBS, DBS tele-health, neuroethics, lesion therapy, interventional psychiatry, and adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Doris D. Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - R. Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Casey H. Halpern
- Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika, Goose Creek, SC, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James F. Cavanagh
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Jack W. Judy
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Svjetlana Miocinovic
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Annaelle D. Devergnas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Roy V. Sillitoe
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Carina R. Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wayne K. Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Erika A. Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Helen Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Petra Heiden
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Pankaj Sah
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Terry Coyne
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter A. Silburn
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Cynthia S. Kubu
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Anna Wexler
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jennifer Chandler
- Centre for Health Law, Policy, and Ethics, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sarah R. Heilbronner
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Marta San Luciano
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michael D. Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie M. Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cagle JN, Okun MS, Cernera S, Eisinger RS, Opri E, Bowers D, Ward H, Foote KD, Gunduz A. Embedded Human Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79:1064-1068. [PMID: 36094652 PMCID: PMC9468946 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Because Tourette syndrome (TS) is a paroxysmal disorder, symptomatic relief in individuals with TS may be possible through the application of stimulation only during the manifestation of human tic neural signatures. This technique could be capable of suppressing both motor and vocal tics and would have similar effectiveness to conventional continuous deep brain stimulation (DBS). Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical effectiveness of bilateral centromedian-parafascicular complex thalamic closed-loop DBS as a treatment for medication-refractory TS. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-center double-blinded safety and feasibility trial was conducted between February 2014 and June 2020. Six individuals with TS were screened and recruited from the Norman Fixel Institute at the University of Florida. The primary outcome was measured at 6 months, and participants were followed up for the duration of the neurostimulator battery life. Independent ratings that compared closed-loop and conventional DBS were videotaped. The first 2 of 6 individuals with TS were excluded from the study because the technology for embedded closed-loop capability was not yet available. The date of analysis was August 2020. Interventions DBS therapy controlled by an embedded closed-loop stimulation system. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary clinical outcome measure was a minimum of a 40% reduction in the YGTSS score at 6 months following DBS. There was also a comparison of conventional DBS with closed-loop DBS using the Modified Rush Videotape Rating Scale for Tic. Results The mean (SD) age at TS diagnosis for the cohort was 8.5 (2.9), and the mean (SD) disease duration was 23.7 (5.8) years. Four individuals with TS were analyzed (2 male, 2 female; mean [SD] age, 23.7 [5.8] years). The study showed the closed-loop approach was both feasible and safe. One of the novelties of this study was that a patient-specific closed-loop paradigm was created for each participant. The features and stimulation transition speed were customized based on the signal quality and the tolerance to adverse reactions. The mean (SD) therapeutic outcome with conventional DBS was 33.3% (35.7%) improvement on the YGTSS and 52.8% (21.9%) improvement on the Modified Rush Videotape Rating Scale. Two of 4 participants had a primary outcome variable improvement of 40% meeting the primary efficacy target. When comparing closed-loop DBS with conventional DBS using a Wilcoxon sign-rank test, there was no statistical difference between tic severity score and both approaches revealed a lower tic severity score compared with baseline. The study was feasible in all 4 participants, and there were 25 total reported adverse events with 3 study-related events (12%). The most common adverse events were headache and anxiety. Conclusions and Relevance Embedded closed-loop deep DBS was feasible, safe, and had a comparable outcome to conventional TS DBS for the treatment of tics. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02056873.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson N. Cagle
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
- Associate Editor, JAMA Neurology
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Robert S. Eisinger
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Dawn Bowers
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville
| | - Herbert Ward
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eisinger RS, Cagle JN, Alcantara JD, Opri E, Cernera S, Le A, Torres Ponce EM, Lanese J, Nelson B, Lopes J, Hundley C, Ravy T, Wu SS, Foote KD, Okun MS, Gunduz A. Distinct Roles of the Human Subthalamic Nucleus and Dorsal Pallidum in Parkinson's Disease Impulsivity. Biol Psychiatry 2022; 91:370-379. [PMID: 33993998 PMCID: PMC8419208 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impulsivity and impulse control disorders are common in Parkinson's disease and lead to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life. Impulsivity is thought to arise from aberrant reward processing and inhibitory control, but it is unclear why deep brain stimulation of either the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) affects levels of impulsivity. Our aim was to assess the role of the STN and GPi in impulsivity using invasive local field potential (LFP) recordings from deep brain stimulation electrodes. METHODS We measured LFPs during a simple rewarding Go/NoGo paradigm in 39 female and male human patients with Parkinson's disease manifesting variable amounts of impulsivity who were undergoing unilateral deep brain stimulation of either the STN (18 nuclei) or GPi (28 nuclei). We identified reward-specific LFP event-related potentials and correlated them to impulsivity severity. RESULTS LFPs in both structures modulated during reward-specific Go and NoGo stimulus evaluation, reward feedback, and loss feedback. Motor and limbic functions were anatomically separable in the GPi but not in the STN. Across participants, LFP reward processing responses in the STN and GPi uniquely depended on the severity of impulsivity. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes LFP correlates of impulsivity within the STN and GPi regions. We propose a model for basal ganglia reward processing that includes the bottom-up role of the GPi in reward salience and the top-down role of the STN in cognitive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Eisinger
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| | - Jackson N Cagle
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jose D Alcantara
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Enrico Opri
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Anh Le
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - Joseph Lanese
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brawn Nelson
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Janine Lopes
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - Tasmeah Ravy
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Samuel S Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cernera S, Pramanik L, Boogaart Z, Cagle JN, Gomez J, Moore K, Au KLK, Okun MS, Gunduz A, Deeb W. The Human Tic Detector: An automatic approach to tic characterization using wearable sensors. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 134:102-110. [PMID: 34952803 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current rating scales for Tourette syndrome (TS) are limited by recollection bias or brief assessment periods. This proof-of-concept study aimed to develop a sensor-based paradigm to detect and classify tics. METHODS We recorded both electromyogram and acceleration data from seventeen TS patients, either when voluntarily moving or experiencing tics and during the modified Rush Video Tic Rating Scale (mRVTRS). Spectral properties of voluntary and tic movements from the sensor that captured the dominant tic were calculated and used as features in a support vector machine (SVM) to detect and classify movements retrospectively. RESULTS Across patients, the SVM had an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 96.69 ± 4.84%, 98.24 ± 4.79%, and 96.03 ± 6.04%, respectively, when classifying movements in the test dataset. Furthermore, each patient's SVM was validated using data collected during the mRVTRS. Compared to the expert consensus, the tic detection accuracy was 85.63 ± 15.28% during the mRVTRS, while overall movement classification accuracy was 94.23 ± 5.97%. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that wearable sensors can capture physiological differences between tic and voluntary movements and are comparable to expert consensus. SIGNIFICANCE Ultimately, wearables could individualize and improve care for people with TS, provide a robust and objective measure of tics, and allow data collection in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Cernera
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Leena Pramanik
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Zachary Boogaart
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jackson N Cagle
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Julieth Gomez
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Katie Moore
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Ka Loong Kelvin Au
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester, MA, United States; University of Massachusetts Memorial Health Care, Worchester, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vedam-Mai V, Deisseroth K, Giordano J, Lazaro-Munoz G, Chiong W, Suthana N, Langevin JP, Gill J, Goodman W, Provenza NR, Halpern CH, Shivacharan RS, Cunningham TN, Sheth SA, Pouratian N, Scangos KW, Mayberg HS, Horn A, Johnson KA, Butson CR, Gilron R, de Hemptinne C, Wilt R, Yaroshinsky M, Little S, Starr P, Worrell G, Shirvalkar P, Chang E, Volkmann J, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Kühn AA, Li L, Johnson M, Otto KJ, Raike R, Goetz S, Wu C, Silburn P, Cheeran B, Pathak YJ, Malekmohammadi M, Gunduz A, Wong JK, Cernera S, Hu W, Wagle Shukla A, Ramirez-Zamora A, Deeb W, Patterson A, Foote KD, Okun MS. Corrigendum: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Optogenetics, Ethical Issues Affecting DBS Research, Neuromodulatory Approaches for Depression, Adaptive Neurostimulation, and Emerging DBS Technologies. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:765150. [PMID: 34658825 PMCID: PMC8517517 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.765150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vinata Vedam-Mai
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Karl Deisseroth
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - James Giordano
- Department of Neurology and Neuroethics Studies Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Winston Chiong
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nanthia Suthana
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jean-Philippe Langevin
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Neurosurgery Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jay Gill
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wayne Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Casey H Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Rajat S Shivacharan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Tricia N Cunningham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Christopher R Butson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ro'ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Robert Wilt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Maria Yaroshinsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Philip Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Greg Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Prasad Shirvalkar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Department of Anesthesiology (Pain Management) and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Edward Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Neurologischen Klinik Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kevin J Otto
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Robert Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Steve Goetz
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Chengyuan Wu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Peter Silburn
- Asia Pacific Centre for Neuromodulation, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Binith Cheeran
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | - Yagna J Pathak
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | | | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wei Hu
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aparna Wagle Shukla
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, MA, United States
| | - Addie Patterson
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Opri E, Cernera S, Molina R, Eisinger RS, Cagle JN, Almeida L, Denison T, Okun MS, Foote KD, Gunduz A. Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor. Sci Transl Med 2021; 12:12/572/eaay7680. [PMID: 33268512 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved therapy for the treatment of medically refractory and severe movement disorders. However, most existing neurostimulators can only apply continuous stimulation [open-loop DBS (OL-DBS)], ignoring patient behavior and environmental factors, which consequently leads to an inefficient therapy, thus limiting the therapeutic window. Here, we established the feasibility of a self-adjusting therapeutic DBS [closed-loop DBS (CL-DBS)], fully embedded in a chronic investigational neurostimulator (Activa PC + S), for three patients affected by essential tremor (ET) enrolled in a longitudinal (6 months) within-subject crossover protocol (DBS OFF, OL-DBS, and CL-DBS). Most patients with ET experience involuntary limb tremor during goal-directed movements, but not during rest. Hence, the proposed CL-DBS paradigm explored the efficacy of modulating the stimulation amplitude based on patient-specific motor behavior, suppressing the pathological tremor on-demand based on a cortical electrode detecting upper limb motor activity. Here, we demonstrated how the proposed stimulation paradigm was able to achieve clinical efficacy and tremor suppression comparable with OL-DBS in a range of movements (cup reaching, proximal and distal posture, water pouring, and writing) while having a consistent reduction in energy delivery. The proposed paradigm is an important step toward a behaviorally modulated fully embedded DBS system, capable of delivering stimulation only when needed, and potentially mitigating pitfalls of OL-DBS, such as DBS-induced side effects and premature device replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Opri
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Rene Molina
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA
| | - Robert S Eisinger
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases at UF Health, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Jackson N Cagle
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases at UF Health, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Timothy Denison
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases at UF Health, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases at UF Health, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.,Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases at UF Health, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vedam-Mai V, Deisseroth K, Giordano J, Lazaro-Munoz G, Chiong W, Suthana N, Langevin JP, Gill J, Goodman W, Provenza NR, Halpern CH, Shivacharan RS, Cunningham TN, Sheth SA, Pouratian N, Scangos KW, Mayberg HS, Horn A, Johnson KA, Butson CR, Gilron R, de Hemptinne C, Wilt R, Yaroshinsky M, Little S, Starr P, Worrell G, Shirvalkar P, Chang E, Volkmann J, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Kühn AA, Li L, Johnson M, Otto KJ, Raike R, Goetz S, Wu C, Silburn P, Cheeran B, Pathak YJ, Malekmohammadi M, Gunduz A, Wong JK, Cernera S, Wagle Shukla A, Ramirez-Zamora A, Deeb W, Patterson A, Foote KD, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Optogenetics, Ethical Issues Affecting DBS Research, Neuromodulatory Approaches for Depression, Adaptive Neurostimulation, and Emerging DBS Technologies. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:644593. [PMID: 33953663 PMCID: PMC8092047 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.644593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We estimate that 208,000 deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices have been implanted to address neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders worldwide. DBS Think Tank presenters pooled data and determined that DBS expanded in its scope and has been applied to multiple brain disorders in an effort to modulate neural circuitry. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 providing a space where clinicians, engineers, researchers from industry and academia discuss current and emerging DBS technologies and logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The emphasis is on cutting edge research and collaboration aimed to advance the DBS field. The Eighth Annual DBS Think Tank was held virtually on September 1 and 2, 2020 (Zoom Video Communications) due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The meeting focused on advances in: (1) optogenetics as a tool for comprehending neurobiology of diseases and on optogenetically-inspired DBS, (2) cutting edge of emerging DBS technologies, (3) ethical issues affecting DBS research and access to care, (4) neuromodulatory approaches for depression, (5) advancing novel hardware, software and imaging methodologies, (6) use of neurophysiological signals in adaptive neurostimulation, and (7) use of more advanced technologies to improve DBS clinical outcomes. There were 178 attendees who participated in a DBS Think Tank survey, which revealed the expansion of DBS into several indications such as obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction and Alzheimer’s disease. This proceedings summarizes the advances discussed at the Eighth Annual DBS Think Tank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinata Vedam-Mai
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Karl Deisseroth
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - James Giordano
- Department of Neurology and Neuroethics Studies Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Winston Chiong
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nanthia Suthana
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jean-Philippe Langevin
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Neurosurgery Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jay Gill
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wayne Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Casey H Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Rajat S Shivacharan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Tricia N Cunningham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Christopher R Butson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ro'ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Robert Wilt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Maria Yaroshinsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Philip Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Greg Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Prasad Shirvalkar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Department of Anesthesiology (Pain Management) and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Edward Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Neurologischen Klinik Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kevin J Otto
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Robert Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Steve Goetz
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Chengyuan Wu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Peter Silburn
- Asia Pacific Centre for Neuromodulation, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Binith Cheeran
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | - Yagna J Pathak
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | | | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aparna Wagle Shukla
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, MA, United States
| | - Addie Patterson
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and the Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Molina R, Hass CJ, Cernera S, Sowalsky K, Schmitt AC, Roper JA, Martinez-Ramirez D, Opri E, Hess CW, Eisinger RS, Foote KD, Gunduz A, Okun MS. Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Medication-Refractory Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:633655. [PMID: 33732122 PMCID: PMC7959768 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.633655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Treating medication-refractory freezing of gait (FoG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains challenging despite several trials reporting improvements in motor symptoms using subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS). Pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) region DBS has been used for medication-refractory FoG, with mixed findings. FoG, as a paroxysmal phenomenon, provides an ideal framework for the possibility of closed-loop DBS (CL-DBS). Methods: In this clinical trial (NCT02318927), five subjects with medication-refractory FoG underwent bilateral GPi DBS implantation to address levodopa-responsive PD symptoms with open-loop stimulation. Additionally, PPN DBS leads were implanted for CL-DBS to treat FoG. The primary outcome of the study was a 40% improvement in medication-refractory FoG in 60% of subjects at 6 months when “on” PPN CL-DBS. Secondary outcomes included device feasibility to gauge the recruitment potential of this four-lead DBS approach for a potentially larger clinical trial. Safety was judged based on adverse events and explantation rate. Findings: The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated as we recruited five subjects with both “on” and “off” medication freezing. The safety for this population of patients receiving four DBS leads was suboptimal and associated with a high explantation rate of 40%. The primary clinical outcome in three of the five subjects was achieved at 6 months. However, the group analysis of the primary clinical outcome did not reveal any benefit. Interpretation: This study of a human PPN CL-DBS trial in medication-refractory FoG showed feasibility in recruitment, suboptimal safety, and a heterogeneous clinical effect in FoG outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rene Molina
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Chris J Hass
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kristen Sowalsky
- Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Abigail C Schmitt
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie A Roper
- Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | | | - Enrico Opri
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Christopher W Hess
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Robert S Eisinger
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and The Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cernera S, Eisinger RS, Wong JK, Ho KWD, Lopes JL, To K, Carbunaru S, Ramirez-Zamora A, Almeida L, Foote KD, Okun MS, Gunduz A. Long-term Parkinson's disease quality of life after staged DBS: STN vs GPi and first vs second lead. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2020; 6:13. [PMID: 32656315 PMCID: PMC7338364 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-020-0115-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) improves quality of life (QoL), but longitudinal follow-up data are scarce. We sought to quantify long-term benefits of subthalamic nucleus (STN) vs globus pallidus internus (GPi), and unilateral vs staged bilateral PD-DBS on postoperative QoL. This is a retrospective, longitudinal, non-randomized study using the PD QoL questionnaire (PDQ)-39 in patients with STN- or GPi-DBS, and with unilateral (N = 191) or staged bilateral (an additional contralateral lead implant) surgery (N = 127 and 156 for the first and second lead, respectively). Changes in PDQ-39 summary index (PDQ-39SI) and subscores throughout 60 months of follow-up were used as the primary analysis. We applied mixed models that included levodopa and covariates that differed at baseline across groups. For unilateral implantation, we observed an initial improvement in PDQ-39SI of 15.55 ± 3.29% (µ ± SE) across both brain targets at 4 months postoperatively. Unilateral STN patients demonstrated greater improvement in PDQ-39SI than GPi patients at 4 and 18 months postoperatively. Analysis of patients with staged bilateral leads revealed an initial 25.34 ± 2.74% (µ ± SE) improvement in PDQ-39SI at 4 months after the first lead with further improvement until 18 months, with no difference across targets. Scores did not improve after the second lead with gradual worsening starting at 18 months postoperatively. STN-DBS provided greater short-term QoL improvement than GPi-DBS for unilateral surgery. For staged bilateral DBS, overall QoL improvement was explained primarily by the first lead. Decision-making for patients considering DBS should include a discussion surrounding the potential risks and benefits from a second DBS lead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Cernera
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Robert S Eisinger
- Department of Neuroscience, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Kwo Wei David Ho
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Janine Lobo Lopes
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Kevin To
- Department of Neuroscience, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Samuel Carbunaru
- Department of Neuroscience, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neuroscience, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA.,Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, FL USA.,Department of Neuroscience, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA.,Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cagle JN, Okun MS, Opri E, Cernera S, Molina R, Foote KD, Gunduz A. Differentiating tic electrophysiology from voluntary movement in the human thalamocortical circuit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91:533-539. [PMID: 32139653 PMCID: PMC7296862 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder commonly associated with involuntary movements, or tics. We currently lack an ideal animal model for Tourette syndrome. In humans, clinical manifestation of tics cannot be captured via functional imaging due to motion artefacts and limited temporal resolution, and electrophysiological studies have been limited to the intraoperative environment. The goal of this study was to identify electrophysiological signals in the centromedian (CM) thalamic nucleus and primary motor (M1) cortex that differentiate tics from voluntary movements. METHODS The data were collected as part of a larger National Institutes of Health-sponsored clinical trial. Four participants (two males, two females) underwent monthly clinical visits for collection of physiology for a total of 6 months. Participants were implanted with bilateral CM thalamic macroelectrodes and M1 subdural electrodes that were connected to two neurostimulators, both with sensing capabilities. MRI scans were performed preoperatively and CT scans postoperatively for localisation of electrodes. Electrophysiological recordings were collected at each visit from both the cortical and subcortical implants. RESULTS Recordings collected from the CM thalamic nucleus revealed a low-frequency power (3-10 Hz) increase that was time-locked to the onset of involuntary tics but was not present during voluntary movements. Cortical recordings revealed beta power decrease in M1 that was present during tics and voluntary movements. CONCLUSION We conclude that a human physiological signal was detected from the CM thalamus that differentiated tic from voluntary movement, and this physiological feature could potentially guide the development of neuromodulation therapies for Tourette syndrome that could use a closed-loop-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson N Cagle
- J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Enrico Opri
- J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rene Molina
- Deparment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ramirez-Zamora A, Giordano J, Gunduz A, Alcantara J, Cagle JN, Cernera S, Difuntorum P, Eisinger RS, Gomez J, Long S, Parks B, Wong JK, Chiu S, Patel B, Grill WM, Walker HC, Little SJ, Gilron R, Tinkhauser G, Thevathasan W, Sinclair NC, Lozano AM, Foltynie T, Fasano A, Sheth SA, Scangos K, Sanger TD, Miller J, Brumback AC, Rajasethupathy P, McIntyre C, Schlachter L, Suthana N, Kubu C, Sankary LR, Herrera-Ferrá K, Goetz S, Cheeran B, Steinke GK, Hess C, Almeida L, Deeb W, Foote KD, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:54. [PMID: 32292333 PMCID: PMC7134196 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank held on September 8th of 2019 addressed the most current: (1) use and utility of complex neurophysiological signals for development of adaptive neurostimulation to improve clinical outcomes; (2) Advancements in recent neuromodulation techniques to treat neuropsychiatric disorders; (3) New developments in optogenetics and DBS; (4) The use of augmented Virtual reality (VR) and neuromodulation; (5) commercially available technologies; and (6) ethical issues arising in and from research and use of DBS. These advances serve as both "markers of progress" and challenges and opportunities for ongoing address, engagement, and deliberation as we move to improve the functional capabilities and translational value of DBS. It is in this light that these proceedings are presented to inform the field and initiate ongoing discourse. As consistent with the intent, and spirit of this, and prior DBS Think Tanks, the overarching goal is to continue to develop multidisciplinary collaborations to rapidly advance the field and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - James Giordano
- Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry, and Neuroethics Studies Program—Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jose Alcantara
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jackson N. Cagle
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Parker Difuntorum
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Robert S. Eisinger
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Julieth Gomez
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Sarah Long
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Brandon Parks
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Shannon Chiu
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Bhavana Patel
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Harrison C. Walker
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Simon J. Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ro’ee Gilron
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and the University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Wesley Thevathasan
- Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne and Austin Hospitals, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas C. Sinclair
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andres M. Lozano
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Foltynie
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson’s Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Krembil Brain Institute, Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Katherine Scangos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Terence D. Sanger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Biokinesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jonathan Miller
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Audrey C. Brumback
- Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics at Dell Medical School and the Center for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Priya Rajasethupathy
- Laboratory for Neural Dynamics and Cognition, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Cameron McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Leslie Schlachter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nanthia Suthana
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Cynthia Kubu
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Lauren R. Sankary
- Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Steven Goetz
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Binith Cheeran
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | - G. Karl Steinke
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | - Christopher Hess
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wissam Deeb
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cernera S, Okun MS, Gunduz A. A Review of Cognitive Outcomes Across Movement Disorder Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation. Front Neurol 2019; 10:419. [PMID: 31133956 PMCID: PMC6514131 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Although the benefit in motor symptoms for well-selected patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been established, cognitive declines associated with DBS can produce suboptimal clinical responses. Small decrements in cognition can lead to profound effects on quality of life. The growth of indications, the expansion of surgical targets, the increasing complexity of devices, and recent changes in stimulation paradigms have all collectively drawn attention to the need for re-evaluation of DBS related cognitive outcomes. Methods: To address the impact of cognitive changes following DBS, we performed a literature review using PubMed. We searched for articles focused on DBS and cognition. We extracted information about the disease, target, number of patients, assessment of time points, cognitive battery, and clinical outcomes. Diseases included were dystonia, Tourette syndrome (TS), essential tremor (ET), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Results: DBS was associated with mild cognitive issues even when rigorous patient selection was employed. Dystonia studies reported stable or improved cognitive scores, however one study using reliable change indices indicated decrements in sustained attention. Additionally, DBS outcomes were convoluted with changes in medication dose, alleviation of motor symptoms, and learning effects. In the largest, prospective TS study, an improvement in attentional skills was noted, whereas smaller studies reported variable declines across several cognitive domains. Although, most studies reported stable cognitive outcomes. ET studies largely demonstrated deficits in verbal fluency, which had variable responses depending on stimulation setting. Recently, studies have focused beyond the ventral intermediate nucleus, including the post-subthalamic area and zona incerta. For PD, the cognitive results were heterogeneous, although deficits in verbal fluency were consistent and related to the micro-lesion effect. Conclusion: Post-DBS cognitive issues can impact both motor and quality of life outcomes. The underlying pathophysiology of cognitive changes post-DBS and the identification of pathways underpinning declines will require further investigation. Future studies should employ careful methodological designs. Patient specific analyses will be helpful to differentiate the effects of medications, DBS and the underlying disease state, including disease progression. Disease progression is often an underappreciated factor that is important to post-DBS cognitive issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Cernera
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eisinger RS, Cernera S, Gittis A, Gunduz A, Okun MS. A review of basal ganglia circuits and physiology: Application to deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019; 59:9-20. [PMID: 30658883 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drawing on the seminal work of DeLong, Albin, and Young, we have now entered an era of basal ganglia neuromodulation. Understanding, re-evaluating, and leveraging the lessons learned from neuromodulation will be crucial to facilitate an increased and improved application of neuromodulation in human disease. METHODS We will focus on deep brain stimulation (DBS) - the most common form of basal ganglia neuromodulation - however, similar principles can apply to other neuromodulation modalities. We start with a brief review of DBS for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia, and Tourette syndrome. We then review hallmark studies on basal ganglia circuits and electrophysiology resulting from decades of experience in neuromodulation. The organization and content of this paper follow Dr. Okun's Lecture from the 2018 Parkinsonism and Related Disorders World Congress. RESULTS Information gained from neuromodulation has led to an expansion of the basal ganglia rate model, an enhanced understanding of nuclei dynamics, an emerging focus on pathological oscillations, a revision of the tripartite division of the basal ganglia, and a redirected focus toward individualized symptom-specific stimulation. Though there have been many limitations of the basal ganglia "box model," the construct provided the necessary foundation to advance the field. We now understand that information in the basal ganglia is encoded through complex neural responses that can be reliably measured and used to infer disease states for clinical translation. CONCLUSIONS Our deepened understanding of basal ganglia physiology will drive new neuromodulation strategies such as adaptive DBS or cell-specific neuromodulation through the use of optogenetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Eisinger
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Aryn Gittis
- Biological Sciences and Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neurology, Fixel Center for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neurology, Fixel Center for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wong J, Gunduz A, Shute J, Eisinger R, Cernera S, Ho KWD, Martinez-Ramirez D, Almeida L, Wilson CA, Okun MS, Hess CW. Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2018; 8:542. [PMID: 29607241 PMCID: PMC5876470 DOI: 10.7916/d8m62xtc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to evaluate DBS impedance drift and variability over an extended postoperative period across common DBS targets. Methods Retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads were included and drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann–Kendall test of trend. Results There were 866 patients and 1,764 leads available for analysis. The majority of subjects had Parkinson’s disease (60.7%). The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months. There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend (p < 0.001). Discussion The drift in impedance observed primarily within the first 6 months is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode–tissue interface, typically at values approximating 1,000 Ω. The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Wong
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan Shute
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert Eisinger
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kwo Wei David Ho
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel Martinez-Ramirez
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christina A Wilson
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher W Hess
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|