p16, cyclin D1 and Rb expression in colorectal carcinomas: Correlations with clinico-pathological parameters and prognosis

In an immunohistochemical study, 200 colorectal carcinomas were stained with monoclonal antibodies recognizing the cell cycle regulators p16, cyclin D1 and Rb, in order to study their expression and prognostic impact. Cyclin D1 and Rb were generally expressed in a nuclear pattern, whereas p16 also exhibited cytoplasmic reactivity. Immunoreactivity was observed in 94% (p16), 75% (cyclin D1) or 91% (Rb) of the carcinomas. Cytoplasmic p16 and cyclin D1 correlated with the extent of the mucinous tumor component. The cytoplasmic expression of p16 was reduced in advanced pN stages. At a cut-off point of 20%, cyclin D1 was significantly upregulated in tumors of the right colon. Further correlations with gender, growth pattern, staging, grading or prognosis were not revealed. The three cell cycle regulators do not represent useful markers of prognosis or predictors of colorectal carcinoma.

Rapid immunohistochemical detection of tumor cells in gastric carcinoma

The detection of single tumor cells or tumor cell clusters represents an important issue in intraoperative frozen section analysis. For example, surgical margins may be evaluated in order to minimize the number of additional operations. Furthermore, intraoperative diagnosis of lymph node micrometastasis (LNM) may help to define the area of appropriate lymph node dissection. In addition to haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, immunohistochemical detection of single tumor cells or cell clusters may be helpful in this context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance, reliability and sensitivity of intraoperative rapid immunostaining of frozen sections. Therefore, we compared the results of rapid immunohistochemical staining of frozen sections and paraffin sections applying the EnVision and Histofine(R) detection systems. In a prospective immunohistochemical study, paraffin and frozen sections of 20 gastric cancer specimens were analyzed. Paraffin as well as frozen sections were stained immunohistochemically applying the EnVision and Histofine detection systems. As primary antibodies, AE1/AE3 (anti-cytokeratin), EMA (anti-MUC1) and B lymphocyte marker anti-CD20 were applied. The rapid immunostaining procedure was able to be completed within 10-13 min. Rapid immunohistochemical staining of frozen and paraffin sections of the same tumors resulted in comparable immunoreactivity. The rapid EnVision and Histofine procedures allowed immunostaining of frozen sections in less than 13 min. These methods can represent useful additional tools in routine surgical pathology and research, enabling a more accurate frozen section diagnosis compared to staining with H&E alone. Intraoperative rapid immunostaining can be a simple and useful technique to detect LNM.

Expression of MUC1, MUC2 and oligosaccharide epitopes in breast cancer: prognostic significance of a sialylated MUC1 epitope

MUC1 represents a promising marker in breast cancer. However, due to the structural complexity of the MUC1 glycoprotein, multiple epitopes can be detected by monoclonal antibodies. This fact may be responsible for the contradictory results of previous investigations regarding the clinical and prognostic relevance of MUC1 expression in breast cancer. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the role of different glycosylated and non-glycoslyated MUC1 epitopes as well as other mucin-associated peptides (MUC2) and carbohydrates (Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen, sialyl-Lewisa, sialyl-Lewisx) as predictors of the clinical course and prognosis in mammary carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study applying numerous monoclonal antibodies (mabs) was performed to characterize the expression of a selected panel of MUC1 epitopes, and of MUC2, Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen, sialyl-Lewisa, and sialyl-Lewisx in a series of 140 patients with breast cancer. The results were correlated with clinicopathological variables as well as overall survival. Generally, more than 90% of the mammary cancers, were strongly stained with the MUC1-specific mabs. Especially ductal and lobular carcinomas were strongly MUC1- and sialyl Lewisa-positive, whereas MUC2 binding was significantly elevated in mucinous neoplasms. Associations between the immunoreactivity of any mab under study and tumor progression as reflected by pTNM staging could not be observed. However, expression of the sialylated MUC1 epitope detected by mab MY1.E12 was revealed as a favourable independent prognostic factor. These results confirm that MUC1 is generally strongly expressed in mammary carcinomas. As an exception, mucinous carcinomas are significantly less MUC1 reactive, but strongly express MUC2. Our data suggest that only the presence of a sialylated short-chain MUC1 glycoform is associated with a better prognosis, whereas the other molecules under study are not correlated with the course of disease and survival probability.

Expression of MUC1, MUC2 and oligosaccharide epitopes in breast cancer: prognostic significance of a sialylated MUC1 epitope

MUC1 represents a promising marker in breast cancer. However, due to the structural complexity of the MUC1 glycoprotein, multiple epitopes can be detected by monoclonal antibodies. This fact may be responsible for the contradictory results of previous investigations regarding the clinical and prognostic relevance of MUC1 expression in breast cancer. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the role of different glycosylated and non-glycoslyated MUC1 epitopes as well as other mucin-associated peptides (MUC2) and carbohydrates (Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen, sialyl-Lewisa, sialyl-Lewisx) as predictors of the clinical course and prognosis in mammary carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study applying numerous monoclonal antibodies (mabs) was performed to characterize the expression of a selected panel of MUC1 epitopes, and of MUC2, Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen, sialyl-Lewisa, and sialyl-Lewisx in a series of 140 patients with breast cancer. The results were correlated with clinicopathological variables as well as overall survival. Generally, more than 90% of the mammary cancers, were strongly stained with the MUC1-specific mabs. Especially ductal and lobular carcinomas were strongly MUC1- and sialyl Lewisa-positive, whereas MUC2 binding was significantly elevated in mucinous neoplasms. Associations between the immunoreactivity of any mab under study and tumor progression as reflected by pTNM staging could not be observed. However, expression of the sialylated MUC1 epitope detected by mab MY1.E12 was revealed as a favourable independent prognostic factor. These results confirm that MUC1 is generally strongly expressed in mammary carcinomas. As an exception, mucinous carcinomas are significantly less MUC1 reactive, but strongly express MUC2. Our data suggest that only the presence of a sialylated short-chain MUC1 glycoform is associated with a better prognosis, whereas the other molecules under study are not correlated with the course of disease and survival probability.

Co-expression of CDX2 and MUC2 in gastric carcinomas: Correlations with clinico-pathological parameters and prognosis

AIM: To evaluate the role of CDX2 homeobox protein as a predictor for cancer progression and prognosis as well as its correlation with MUC2 expression. CDX2 represents a transcription factor for various intestinal genes (including MUC2) and thus an important regulator of intestinal differentiation, which could previously be identified in gastric carcinomas and intestinal metaplasia.

METHODS: Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues from 190 gastric carcinoma patients were stained with monoclonal antibodies recognizing CDX2 and MUC2, respectively. Immunoreactivity was evaluated semiquantitatively and statistical analyses including χ² tests, uni- and multi-variate survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS: CDX2 was mostly expressed in a nuclear or supranuclear pattern, whereas MUC2 showed an almost exclusive supranuclear reactivity. Both antigens were present in >80% of areas exhibiting intestinal metaplasia. An immunoreactivity in >5% of the tumor area was observed in 57% (CDX2) or in 21% (MUC2) of the carcinomas. The presence of both molecules did not correlate with WHO, Laurén and Goseki classification (with the exception of a significantly stronger MUC2 expression in mucinous tumors). CDX2 correlated with a lower pT and pN stage in the subgroups of intestinal and stage I cancers and was associated with MUC2 positivity. A prognostic impact of CDX2 or MUC2 was not observed.

CONCLUSION: CDX2 and MUC2 play an important role in the differentiation of normal, inflamed, and neoplastic gastric tissues. According to our results, loss of CDX2 may represent a marker of tumor progression in early gastric cancer and carcinomas with an intestinal phenotype.

Smad4 deficiency in cervical carcinoma cells

Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix is one of the most frequent cancers affecting women worldwide. Carcinomas arise from cervical intraepithelial lesions, in which infection with high-risk human papillomavirus types has led to deregulated growth control through the actions of the viral E6 and E7 oncoproteins. The molecular mechanisms underlying progression to invasive tumor growth are poorly understood. One important feature, however, is the escape from growth inhibition by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta). Loss of chromosomal arm 18q is among the most frequent cytogenetic alterations in cervical cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis. Since the TGF-beta response is mediated by Smad proteins and the tumor suppressor gene Smad4 resides at 18q21, we have analysed the Smad4 gene for cervical cancer-associated alterations in cell lines and primary carcinomas. Here, we report Smad4 deficiency in four out of 13 cervical cancer cell lines which is due to an intronic rearrangement or deletions of 3' exons. All cell lines, however, showed either absent or moderate responsiveness to TGF-beta irrespective of their Smad4 status. In 41 primary squamous cervical carcinomas analysed, 10 samples showed loss of Smad4 protein expression and 26 samples a reduced expression. Altogether, our results strongly suggest that Smad4 gene alterations are involved in cervical carcinogenesis.

MUC1 and nuclear beta-catenin are coexpressed at the invasion front of colorectal carcinomas and are both correlated with tumor prognosis

PURPOSE

Overexpression of MUC1 and cytosolic interaction of the mucin with beta-catenin are claimed to be involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. In vitro data published recently suggest that MUC1 overexpression results in an increase of steady state levels of nuclear beta-catenin. We tried to elucidate the coexpression of both molecules in colorectal cancer to demonstrate possible correlations with clinical, pathological, and prognostic data.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

An immunohistochemical double staining study was performed to characterize the expression and subcellular distribution of MUC1 and beta-catenin in a series of 205 patients with colorectal carcinoma. The results were correlated with clinicopathological variables as well as overall survival.

RESULTS

MUC1 was strongly expressed in the tumor center and at the invasion front in approximately 50% of the cases. Similar results were obtained with regard to nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin at the invasive tumor parts. MUC1 protein expression in the tumor center correlated significantly with a low grade of differentiation, and nuclear beta-catenin in the tumor periphery was more frequent in carcinomas of the left colon and rectum. Overexpression of MUC1 and beta-catenin, as well as their nuclear coexpression at the invasion front correlated with a worse overall survival in an univariate analysis. However, only pathological tumor-node-metastasis staging and MUC1 at the invasion front revealed as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that MUC1 and beta-catenin are coexpressed at the invasion front of colorectal carcinomas and that this feature is associated with an accelerated course of disease and worse prognosis.

Loss of Smad4 correlates with loss of the invasion suppressor E-cadherin in advanced colorectal carcinomas

Smad4 is a tumour suppressor gene predominantly involved in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. Loss of Smad4 is considered to be a genetically late step and occurs in up to 30% of metastatic colorectal carcinomas. Smad4, originally characterized as an intracellular transmitter of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signals, is a transcriptional co-modulator capable of integrating cellular responses to multiple signalling cascades. Thus, there are many Smad4 target genes and they are presumably strongly context-dependent. It was recently shown that re-expression of Smad4 in Smad4-deficient SW480 human colon carcinoma cells restored epithelioid morphology and induced P-cadherin and E-cadherin transcription. The cadherins are key players in cell-cell adhesion connecting adjacent cells via the cadherin-catenin adhesion complex. Frequent loss of E-cadherin expression in human cancers has been a long-standing observation, but the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. To assess the role of Smad4 in E-cadherin regulation in colorectal carcinogenesis further, the present study has analysed Smad4 and E-cadherin RNA and protein expression in colorectal carcinoma cell lines and in 51 late-stage colorectal carcinomas. In primary tumours, loss of Smad4 expression correlated highly significantly with loss of E-cadherin expression, thus providing further evidence for involvement of the tumour suppressor Smad4 in the control of expression of the tumour and invasion suppressor E-cadherin.