Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Bone Marrow-Sparing Radiation Therapy for Locoregionally Advanced Cervix Cancer: Final Results From the INTERTECC Phase II/III Trial

PURPOSE

To test effects of positron emission tomography (PET)-based bone marrow-sparing (BMS) image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) on efficacy and toxicity for patients with locoregionally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In an international phase II/III trial, patients with stage IB-IVA cervical carcinoma were treated with either PET-based BMS-IG-IMRT (PET-BMS-IMRT group) or standard image-guided IMRT (IMRT group), with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m² weekly), followed by brachytherapy. The phase II component nonrandomly assigned patients to PET-BMS-IMRT or standard IMRT. The phase III trial randomized patients to PET-BMS-IMRT versus IMRT, with a primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) but was closed early for futility. Phase III patients were analyzed separately and in combination with phase II patients, comparing acute hematologic toxicity, cisplatin delivery, PFS, overall survival (OS), and patterns of failure. In a post-hoc exploratory analysis, we investigated the association between pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and OS.

RESULTS

In total, 101 patients were enrolled on the phase II/III trial, including 29 enrolled in phase III (PET-BMS-IMRT group: 16; IMRT group: 13) before early closure. Median follow-up was 33 months for phase III patients and 39 months for all patients. PFS and OS at 5 years for all patients were 73.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.9%-84.3%) and 84% (95% CI, 76%-92.9%]), respectively. There were no differences in number of cisplatin cycles, OS, PFS, or patterns of failure between groups for the combined cohort. The incidence of acute grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly lower in the PET-BMS-IMRT group compared with IMRT for randomized patients (19% vs 54%, χ²P = .048) and in the combined cohort (13% vs 35%, χ²P = .01). Patients with pretreatment ALC ≤ 1.5 k/µL had nonsignificantly worse OS on multivariable analysis (HR 2.85; 95% CI, 0.94-8.62; adjusted P = .216), compared with patients with ALC > 1.5 k/µL. There was no difference in posttreatment ALC by treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

PET-BMS-IMRT significantly reduced acute grade ≥3 neutropenia, but not treatment-related lymphopenia, compared with standard IMRT. We found no evidence that PET-BMS-IMRT affected chemotherapy delivery or long-term outcomes, and weak evidence of an association between pretreatment ALC and OS.

Trends and geographic variation in women's representation as principal investigators (PI) in phase 3 gynecologic oncology clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the representation of women as principal investigators (PI) in phase 3, gynecologic oncology clinical trials.

METHODS

ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for all phase 3 clinical trials with start dates between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 using the search terms: "ovarian cancer", "endometrial cancer", and "cervical cancer". Trial characteristics were abstracted from the website. Gender of the PI was assessed by name, image on institutional website or by querying the trial coordinator. Trials were considered to have women's representation if women were the sole PI or among multiple co-PIs. Chi-square tests and relative risks were used to compare proportions across groups. Linear regression was used to assess trends over time.

RESULTS

200 unique clinical trials were included in this analysis, of which women were represented as PI in 76 (38%). Women were more likely to be a PI of trials funded by multiple sites than a single entity (RR = 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 2.61, p = 0.01), registered outside of Asia than those in Asia (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.11, 2.88, p = 0.02), and trials with multiple co-PIs than with one PI (RR = 1.78 (95% CI 1.18, 2.67), p = 0.01). Overall, women's representation as a PI increased by 3% annually (by year of registration, R² = 0.61, p = 0.01). This increase was most evident in trials registered in multiple continents and Europe (both 4% annually).

CONCLUSIONS

Women's representation as PIs in clinical trials has increased in the last decade. Trials funded by multiple sources outside of Asia have the highest proportion of PIs who are women. These trends may represent ongoing leadership and mentorship opportunities for women gynecologic oncologists.

Phase I/II study of sagopilone (ZK-EPO) plus carboplatin in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Sagopilone is the first fully synthetic epothilone in clinical development and has demonstrated promising preclinical activity. This phase I/II, prospective, open-label trial investigated the efficacy and safety of sagopilone plus carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

In phase I (dose-escalation stage), patients with OC recurring at least 6 months after platinum-containing chemotherapy received 3-h infusions of sagopilone (initial dose of 12 mg m(-2)) followed by carboplatin every 3 weeks, for 2-6 treatment courses. Patients enrolled in phase II received 3-h infusions of 16 mg m(-2) sagopilone. Efficacy was assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modRECIST) and Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup CA125 criteria. The safety and tolerability of sagopilone were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In all, 45 patients received sagopilone at 12 mg m(-2) or 16 mg m(-2). There were 29 confirmed tumour responses (21 modRECIST and 8 CA125) across both treatment groups, indicating that the primary objective of the study was reached. The main adverse events (AEs) reported were peripheral neuropathy (75.6%), fatigue (71.1%) and nausea (64.4%). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 35 patients (77.8%). No deaths related to the study drug were reported.

CONCLUSION

Sagopilone in combination with carboplatin was effective and toxicities were manageable in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive OC.

Field cancerization: why late "recurrent" ovarian cancer is not recurrent

OBJECTIVE

Late "recurrence" of ovarian cancer may result from either regrowth of dormant tumor cells or from development of a new cancer caused by the phenomenon of field cancerization. Clinically, some recurrent ovarian cancers show the same therapeutic sensitivities to chemotherapy and surgery as did the primary disease, whereas others are refractory to all therapy. We hypothesize that recurrent ovarian cancers are distinguishable on the basis of a molecular genetic fingerprint and that some are actually new primary cancers of the peritoneum rather than recurrent ovarian cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed molecular genetic fingerprints of 13 paired primary and late recurrent ovarian cancers to study their clonal relationships. The tumor pairs were analyzed for p53 mutations and allelotypes, patterns of X-chromosome inactivation, loss of heterozygosity, and microsatellite instability at 12 different loci on 6 different chromosomes. Techniques used included single-strand conformational polymorphism mutation screening and polymerase chain reaction-based sequence analysis of the p53 locus, restriction digestion of the androgen receptor locus to determine X-chromosome inactivation, and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of highly polymorphic dinucleotide, trinucleotide, and tetranucleotide repeats.

RESULTS

The average age at initial diagnosis for this cohort was 54.7 years (range 45.3 to 65.5). Mean interval to recurrence was 42.7 months (range 28 to 62). Molecular fingerprints were characterized for 4 to 8 informative loci per tumor pair. The fingerprints of 10 (77%) differed significantly, strongly suggesting that a second primary cancer had developed. The remaining 3 tumor pairs demonstrated identical allelotypes consistent with regrowth of dormant tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

Our results are consistent with the "field cancerization" hypothesis of ovarian carcinogenesis but could also be explained by a polyclonal tumor origin, which contrasts with the currently accepted monoclonal theory of ovarian carcinogenesis. Late development of a new primary cancer may herald the proband as a member of a familial cancer phenotype. These studies provide a molecular genetic rationale that both explains and prognosticates the clinical course of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Phase I trial of cisplatin in combination with glutathione

We treated 16 patients in a phase I trial of escalating doses of intravenous cisplatin in combination with the chemoprotectant glutathione given every 21 days. Forty-three of 44 cycles (98%) were evaluable, 85% of cycles were given on time, and the median number of cycles per patient was 2. Dose-limiting nephrotoxicity was reached at a dose of 175 mg/M2 of cisplatin. Other toxicities included ototoxicity in 7 patients (44%) and grade 3 to 4 nausea and vomiting in 15 evaluable cycles (34.9%). Myelosuppression was infrequent. An increase to 175% of standard cisplatin dose intensity is attainable with the administration of glutathione; however, toxicity is substantial and the number of tolerated cycles is limited. Alternatives to the single bolus dose schedule studied in the present trial should be explored in order to better define the clinical utility of glutathione in combination with high-dose cisplatin.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal carboplatin and etoposide

BACKGROUND

We attempted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of etoposide (VP-16) when administered in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) (300 mg m-2) and administered via the intraperitoneal (IP) route.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 26 patients were treated on this trial. CBDCA was administered at a fixed dose of 300 mg m-2) while VP-16 was started at a dose of 200 mg m-2 and escalated at 50 mg m-2 increments. Both agents were mixed together in 2 litres of 5% Dextrose and administered as quickly as possible into the peritoneal cavity. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

RESULTS

The MTD for this regimen was CBDCA 300 mg m-2 and VP-16 350 mg m-2. Patients > or = 70 years of age or who had received more than six cycles of previous chemotherapy, tolerated this regimen poorly. The MTD for this group of patients was CBDCA 200 mg m-2 and VP-16 50 mg m-2. Neutropenia was the dose limiting toxicity for both groups. The mean peritoneal/plasma peak ratio was 18.3 for CBDCA and 12.7 for VP-16. The pharmacologic advantage (peritoneal/plasma AUC ratio) was 14.9 for CBDCA and 8.8 for VP-16. Although measurable disease was not a requirement for entrance into this study a response rate of 27% was noted in 15 patients with evaluable disease who had ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacologic advantage exists for both CBDCA and VP-16 when administered together via the IP route.

High-dose biweekly intraperitoneal cisplatin: an effective way to increase cisplatin dose intensity

The amount of cisplatin (DDP) delivered per unit time (dose intensity, expressed in mg/m2/week) may be an important factor in determining the clinical outcome in tumors such as ovarian carcinoma. In this neoplasm, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective form of treatment. In this trial we have explored the tactic of shortening the cycle interval as a way to increase the dose intensity of ip DDP. Sixteen patients with a variety of solid tumors received a total of 77 cycles of DDP 180 mg/m2 instilled ip concurrent with i.v. sodium thiosulfate at the dose of 4 g/m2 as loading dose, followed by 12 g/m2 over 6 hr. Each cycle was repeated every 2 weeks. The number of cycles delayed for 3 or more days was 28 (36%). The mean DDP dose intensity received by these patients was 77% of the planned dose or 69 mg/m2/week (confidence interval 95%, 60.5-77.5). The treatment was generally well tolerated: myelotoxicity was mild, only 1 patient had an increase in serum creatinine to > 2 mg/dl. Five patients (31%) developed symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. All patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate (complete plus partial) in these heavily pretreated patients was 19%. When DDP is given in high doses by the ip route concurrently with systemic sodium thiosulfate, the dosing interval can be reduced to every 2 weeks permitting a marked increase in DDP dose intensity.

Dose intensification of cisplatin chemotherapy through biweekly administration

PURPOSE

Dose intensity (DI, expressed in mg/m2/wk) may be an important factor in the clinical use of cisplatin (DDP). We have explored the shortening of the cycle interval as a way to increase the DI of DDP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DDP 180 mg/m2 was given intravenously (i.v.) over 4 hours; sodium thiosulfate (STS) was given i.v. in the opposite arm at a loading dose of 4 g/m2, followed by 12 g/m2 over 6 hours. Each cycle was repeated every two weeks. Seventy-five cycles were administered to 28 patients in this clinical trial.

RESULTS

In 19 patients who received 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy, a delay of three or more days was required on 17/66 courses (26%); the mean DDP DI actually received by these patients was 83 mg/m2/wk (88% of the planned DI). The major side effect was ototoxicity; this occurred in 9 patients (33%), but none required a hearing aid. Myelosuppression was moderate with thrombocytopenia greater than neutropenia. Nephrotoxicity (creatinine > 2 mg/dl) occurred on only 2 cycles (3%). Three patients (11%) developed symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. In 23 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 39%.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to give 180 mg/m2 of DDP and STS every two weeks with tolerable nephrotoxicity but without blocking other types of toxicity, such as myelosuppression and ototoxicity. The shortening of cycle intervals resulted in a markedly increased DI.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin-based chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma

Ovarian carcinoma demonstrates a steep dose-response curve for cisplatin, but even very small levels of acquired resistance at the cellular level are sufficient to block the efficacy of intravenous (IV) cisplatin. The intraperitoneal (IP) route of administration produces a 12-fold to 15-fold greater exposure for the peritoneal cavity, and concurrent use of IV thiosulfate permits the safe IP injection of 200 mg/m2 cisplatin. In this study, two phase II trials of an IP regimen containing cisplatin 200 mg/m2 and etoposide 350 mg/m2 with IV thiosulfate were conducted; the first trial enrolled patients with residual disease less than 2 cm who had failed primary cisplatin-based IV chemotherapy and the second trial newly diagnosed ovarian carcinoma patients irrespective of the size of residual disease after primary surgery. As salvage therapy, the IP cisplatin/etoposide regimen produced a median survival of 26 months from the start of IP therapy and 51 months from diagnosis. As first-line therapy, the median survival has not yet been reached; projected survival is 68% at 27 months. In both studies the major toxicity was myelosuppression; the use of concurrent thiosulfate almost completely eliminated serious nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. The size of the largest tumor mass was an important determinant of efficacy in both settings. The results of these trials are consistent with the hypothesis that increased drug delivery will result in higher response rates and improved survival. Data are sufficiently encouraging to mandate phase III randomized trials of this program.

A comparative study of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical staging for the detection of early cervix cancer

Sixteen patients with cervical cancer underwent radical surgery following standard clinical staging, MRI, and CT. The sensitivity of the CT scan was 14%, the specificity 100%. MRI had a sensitivity of 28% and a specificity of 64%. The clinical stage was correct in 10 of 16 patients (62%). CT and MRI are not individually or collectively better than clinical staging in predicting extent of disease, and currently should not be included in the FIGO staging for cervix cancer.

Extrauterine pelvic malignant mixed mesodermal tumors. A study of 10 cases with immunohistochemistry

Ten cases of extrauterine malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (MMMTs), nine ovarian, and one pelvic, are presented. One patient had a purely epithelial primary ovarian tumor and MMMT in her recurrent tumors. All the other patients had MMMT in their primary and recurrent tumors. Eight patients had heterologous MMMT including cartilage, striated muscle, and adipose tissue in one case. Two patients had homologous MMMT. All cases presented with metastases involving abdominal organs that were either MMMT or epithelial neoplasms and MMMT. Five patients had recurrent tumors, one extensively involving the spleen. In all recurrent tumors, the mesenchymal components were considerably more abundant than in the primary tumors. Immunohistologic studies of intermediate filaments were performed in seven cases, revealing cytokeratin-positive epithelial structures, vimentin-positive mesenchymal (including cartilaginous) structures, as well as coexpression of cytokeratin and vimentin in anaplastic and giant tumor cells in some cases. Some anaplastic spindle cells, which on routine stains were suggestive of stromal cells, stained positive for cytokeratin, thus identifying their epithelial nature. Desmin staining performed in five cases showed positive staining of rhabdomyoblasts in only one case. Myoglobin staining performed in seven cases was positive in four. The histogenesis from primitive müllerian structures and the natural history of these uncommon neoplasms are discussed in light of the pathological and immunohistochemical data presented.

Routine clinical chemistries as improved determinates of prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer of the stomach

Pretreatment total serum protein of less than 6 g%, serum glumatic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) greater than 40 mU/ml or a total serum bilirubin greater than 0.6 mg% predicted a bad prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. If two of these objective laboratory tests predicted a good prognosis, partially nonambulatory patients lived an additional 20 weeks (median survival 27.9 vs 8.7, p less than 0.001) and patients with no clinically recognized liver metastases lived an additional 22 weeks (median survival 34.2 vs. 12.4, p less than 0.001). Patients with liver metastases lived an additional 11 weeks (median survival 20.9 vs. 9.6, p less than 0.001). These objective laboratory tests improve the assessment of patients in clinical trials. The model corrected a false assessment of a poor prognosis for 38% of all patients and 64% of patients with liver metastases.