Patients with advanced cancer and their spouses parenting minor children: The role of the relationship context in parenting concerns

OBJECTIVE

Patients with advanced cancer who parent minor children report parenting concerns and increased psychological distress. This cross-sectional study seeks to understand parenting-related issues in patients and spousal caregivers from a relationship perspective.

METHODS

Patients with a metastatic solid malignancy and their spouses independently completed cross-sectional assessments of psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), parenting concerns (Parenting Concern Questionnaire) and efficacy (Cancer-Related Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale), and relationship measures (DAS-7, Couples' Illness Communication Scale, and Family Relationship Index).

RESULTS

Of the 51 patients (57% female, 49% NHW, mean age 42 years) and spouses (43% female, 43% NHW, mean age of 42 years), approximately 50% couples endorsed psychological distress and were at risk for family dysfunction. Spouses reported significantly higher levels of parenting-related concerns (t = -2.0, p < 0.05) and anxiety (t = -2.8, p < 0.001) than patients. Parenting concerns were significantly associated with illness communication (r = -0.56, p < 0.001) and family function (r = -0.38, p < 0.001). Although the expected interactions between parenting concerns and relationship variables (i.e., illness communication, dyadic adjustment, and family function) were significant for depressive symptoms at p < 0.05, the associations were not in the expected direction. Relationship function buffered against depressive symptoms for those with low rather than high parenting concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only patients but also spouses report cancer-related parenting concerns. The associations between parenting concerns and distress were stronger for spouses than patients. Dual caregiving appears to be a particularly stressful role. Because relationship function was associated with parenting concerns, we suggest that parent support programs that are couple-based and include both parenting-specific and relationship-specific content may be most effective in reducing distress for this vulnerable population.

Distress, demoralization, and fulfillment among palliative care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

Prolonged distress is a risk factor for burnout among health-care providers (HCP) and may contribute to demoralization. We examined sources of distress during the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with demoralization.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional survey of HCP was conducted among palliative care providers of an academic medical center. Participants completed a survey evaluating sources of distress and the Demoralization Scale-II (DS-II) to measure the intensity of demoralization.

RESULTS

Of 106 eligible participants, 74 (70%) completed the survey. DS-II median (range) score was 2 (0-19). There were no statistically significant associations with demographic characteristics. Participants reported high rates of distress for multiple reasons and high rates of sense of fulfillment (90%) and satisfaction (89%) with their profession.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Our study identified high levels of distress but low demoralization rates. Further study to evaluate fulfillment and satisfaction as protective factors against demoralization and burnout is indicated.

Supportive Care for Dual Caregivers who Care for Their Partner With Cancer and Their Young Children

PURPOSE

Advanced cancer patients and their spouses who parent minor children report parenting concerns and increased psychological distress. This single-arm trial examined the feasibility and initial evidence for efficacy of a novel parent support program.

METHODS

Patients with a metastatic solid malignancy and their spouses completed self-reported assessments of psychological distress (HADS), parenting concerns (PCQ) and efficacy (CaPSE) at baseline. Both patients and spouses jointly attended the first two sessions addressing illness communication and family routines. Spouses individually attended two additional sessions focusing on caregiver support and death preparedness. All four sessions were delivered via videoconference by a licensed psychological counselor. Dyads completed program evaluations and were reassessed six and 12 weeks postintervention.

RESULTS

With a consent rate of 61%, 10 patients (50% female; 90% non-Hispanic White; mean age = 42 years) and their spouses (50% female; 70% non-Hispanic White; mean age = 42 years) completed the assessments. All patients and 90% of spouses attended all intervention sessions and evaluated the program favorably. Paired t-tests revealed significant improvements in patients' parenting concerns at the six weeks (P = 0.003) and parenting efficacy at the six weeks (P = 0.03) and 12 weeks (P = 0.03) follow-ups. For spouses, we found significant improvements in parenting efficacy (P < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (P = 0.04) at six weeks and parenting concerns at both six weeks (P = 0.006) and 12 weeks (P = 0.001) follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial testing of our parenting intervention yielded promising results regarding feasibility and an initial signal of intervention efficacy. Thus, a randomized controlled trial for further testing is warranted.

Living With an Advanced Cancer While Parenting Minor Children: A Needs Assessment Study

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based interventions addressing the needs of couples co-parenting young children while facing an advanced cancer diagnosis are lacking. Thus, this study seeks to identify parenting-related intervention needs and delivery preferences of advanced cancer patients and their spouses/co-parents.

METHODS

Twenty-one couples completed quantitative measures of cancer-related parenting concerns, relationship and family functioning, and service needs along with individual semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Patients (mean age=44 years, 48% female, 91% White) and spouses (mean age=45 years, 52% female, 91% White) reported family distress (62% of couples) and marital distress (29% of couples). Parenting concerns were generally high with patients revealing concerns particularly regarding the practical impact of the cancer on the child(ren). Spouses rated concerns about the co-parent significantly higher (P<.001) than patients. Parenting concerns were inversely associated with relationship (P<.001 for patients; P=.03 for spouses) and family functioning (P<.001 for patients). Themes identified through qualitative interviews include needs related to maintenance of family routines and traditions, childcare, transportation, meals, home maintenance, and finances. Couples who endorsed marital distress also indicated a need for conflict resolution skills. All patients and 89% of spouses would like to receive parenting-related education/services; up to 50% of couples preferred targeted, self-led readings without therapist support; and up to 50% desired counseling sessions indicating a preference towards dyadic and video conferenced intervention delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The delivery of optimal supportive care involves a family-focused perspective such as screening for parenting status and referrals to social work services to address the need of tangible resources and manage parenting-related distress.

Treating Radiation Anxiety with Systematic Desensitization: Head and Neck Cancer Case Reports

Introduction: Head and neck cancer patients have high rates of psychological distress, which may be exacerbated by the treatments they receive. Many patients who undergo radiation therapy report significant anxiety associated with the thermoplastic mask required for immobilization during treatment. Case Description: This report presents two examples of head and neck cancer patients reporting high mask anxiety, along with a history of claustrophobia, who expressed concern about their abilities to initiate and adhere to treatment. Both were referred to supportive care psychology before radiation treatment initiation. With counseling and the use of systematic desensitization, they were successfully able to complete their treatments. Discussion: Results of these case reports highlight the value of integrating early supportive care in the treatment of head and neck cancer and support the need for further study in future randomized controlled trials.

Physical and Psychosocial Symptoms of Young Adult Patients Referred to the Supportive Care Mobile Team

Young adult (YA) aged cancer patients have unique psychosocial needs with studies indicating more symptoms and emotional distress compared to older patients. Our study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and symptom distress between YAs and older adults. We retrospectively studied 896 randomly selected patients across 3 age groups: 18-39 YAs (n = 297), 40-64 (n = 300), and 65 and older (n = 299). We compared medical, psychosocial history, Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) scores, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores at the time of initial inpatient consultation with supportive care. YAs were more frequently female and white, with higher ECOG scores, had more self-reported psychiatric history and worse ESAS sleep scores compared to the other age cohort groups. YAs had higher pain expression than those of 65 years and older. YAs were more likely to have children younger than 18 years old, which was associated with worse pain, sleep, and financial distress. In general, YAs did not report higher symptoms distress, with the exception of insomnia and self-reported psychiatric history. Importantly, YAs with children was associated with higher ratings of pain, sleep difficulties, and financial distress. Overall, results suggest YAs may benefit from specialized services to address their unique psychosocial needs.

Psychological Aspects of Care in Cancer Patients in the Last Weeks/Days of Life

Palliative care is comprised of an interdisciplinary team (IDT) approach with members from different disciplines who collaboratively work together to reduce multidimensional components of pain and suffering and improve quality of life for patients coping with a terminal illness. Psychosocial team members are integral to the palliative care IDT and provide expertise in assessment and empirically validated interventions to address psychological distress. The following paper will provide a review of different facets of psychological distress experienced by advanced cancer patients such as psychological disorders, existential distress, spiritual distress, caregiver distress, parental distress, and grief. Finally, an overview of commonly used screening and assessment tools as well as psychological interventions relevant for the palliative care population is presented.

Dying Alone during a Pandemic

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented experience that has had profound impact and consequences for health care providers, visitation policies, and procedures. Hospitals and health care facilities were forced to implement changes to visitation policies, in an effort, to minimize transmission of the virus, which unfortunately had negative impact on patients' and family members' well-being as well as moral distress for the staff. Objectives: We present here a case illustration of the impacts of such a response to the pandemic situation at our institution, including challenges for uniformly implementing such a change along with suggestions to support patients during these difficult times. Conclusion: Health care facilities should make efforts to maintain balance between safety precautions and minimizing potential negative impacts on patients, families, and staff by implementing innovative measures to support ongoing communication and access to family support.

Enhancing palliative care patient access to psychological counseling through outreach telehealth services

CONTEXT

Palliative care encompasses an interdisciplinary team, including mental health care professionals, to address psychological distress of cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES

To present the implementation of an outreach counseling program via videoconferencing or telephone to patients receiving care in an outpatient palliative care clinic and to compare patients using this service to those who only received psychological counseling in our outpatient clinic.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of cancer patients seen for psychology counseling services in an outpatient supportive care center between June 2015 and March 2017.

RESULTS

We reviewed 2072 unique patients (52% of the total patients seen at the outpatient Supportive Care Center), who had 4567 total counseling encounters across outreach and outpatient settings. A total of 452 (22%) patients participated in a combination of outpatient and outreach counseling services. Patients who participated in outreach services had significantly more encounters (311 [69%] had two to five sessions) compared with those who had outpatient services only (1137 [70%] had one session only) (P < .001). Outreach patients also had shorter times between the initial and follow-up encounters (median 14 days) compared with those who had outpatient services only (median 30 days) (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Outreach telehealth counseling services was found to enhance palliative care patient access to psychological counseling. These services represent an additional modality for providing continuous psychological care.

Introducing psychology services to advanced cancer patients: A randomized double-blind trial

CONTEXT

Psychology services utilization in cancer patients remains low due to barriers such as patient/caregiver acceptance of counseling.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine if the manner of introducing psychology services impacted patients' acceptance of services and to identify factors associated with acceptance and barriers to psychology utilization.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized cross-over trial, cancer patients with no prior psychology services observed two video vignettes: (a) physician introducing counselor and psychology services to the patient (PI) and (b) counselor introducing psychology services alone (CI). A counterbalanced design was used to control for order effects. After viewing both videos, patients completed a survey regarding preference, attitudes, and barriers for psychology services. Patients and investigators were blinded to the purpose of the study and content and order of videos, respectively. We hypothesized that patients would prefer physician introduction of counselor.

RESULTS

One hundred patients participated: 40 (40%) expressed no difference, 34 (34%) preferred PI, and 26 (26%) preferred CI (P > .2). Younger patients (less than 40 years) either preferred PI (86%) or had no preference (14%, P = .01). Most reported awareness of available psychology services (N = 63), and half (N = 50) were offered psychology services by their physician. Only 40 (40%) and 43 (43%) patients felt psychology services would be helpful for them and their family/caregivers, respectively. Patients who perceived psychology as helpful for self or family had higher anxiety (P = .01 and P = .006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in patient preference of introducing psychology services except in patients less than 40 years old who preferred PI.

Clinical and demographic variables of young adult (YA) patients referred to inpatient supportive care

168

Background: Literature suggests that YA cancer patients have unique psychosocial issues and more emotional distress compared to older aged patients. Our study aimed to evaluate clinical and demographic factors of YA cancer patients that may impact physical and psychosocial symptom expression. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on randomly selected patients seen during 2013-2015 of 3 age groups: 18-39 (YA), 40-64, and 65 and older on demographic, medical, psychosocial history, Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scare (ESAS) scores, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores which are completed at time of initial consultation with the supportive care inpatient mobile team. Results: 896 (YA = 297, 40-64 cohort = 300, 65 and older = 299) patients were reviewed. YA cohort was associated with being female (n = 179 (60%), p = 0.03), more frequently non-white (Black and Hispanic = 124 (42%), p < 0.00), higher ECOG scores (ECOG 0-2 = 83(39%), p < 0.00) more psychiatric history (n = 95(32%), p = 0.00) and worse ESAS sleep scores (median = 6, p = 0.02). The YA cohort also had higher pain expression than the 65 and older cohort (p = .02). The YA group was more likely to have children younger than 18 years old (n = 171(58%), p < 0.00). Patients with children less than 18 years of age reported higher pain expression (median = 6, p = .05), sleep (median = 6, p = 0.01), and financial distress (median = 2, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Contrary to other findings, YA cancer patients did not report higher symptoms or distress when compared to older age cohorts, with the exception of higher insomnia compared to other age cohorts and higher pain expression than the oldest age cohort. YA with young children reported higher level of pain, sleep and financial distress. Our findings suggest that the YA population may benefit from specialized psychosocial services to address their unique social needs, particularly to address concerns related to being parents of young children.

Communicating the introduction of psychology services in the palliative care (PC) cancer setting: A randomized double blind trial

129

Background: Despite high distress and empirical support for psychosocial services for cancer patients, the utilization of these services continue to be low. Our aims are to ascertain if the manner of introducing psychology services impact patients’ acceptance of services and identify factors associated with acceptance and barriers of psychology utilization. Methods: 100 PC cancer patients who have not received prior psychology services were randomized to observe two video vignettes: one showed a physician introducing a counselor and psychology services to the patient (PI); another showed a counselor entering and introducing psychology services alone (CI). Randomization was stratified using baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores. After viewing both videos, patients completed a survey regarding preference, attitudes, and barriers for psychology services. Patients were blinded regarding the purpose of the study and investigators were blinded to content and order of videos presented. Results: 64 patients reported a preference with 34 preferring PI (p=0.37) and 36 reporting no difference. Younger patients preferred PI (85.7%) versus CI (14.3%, p=0.03). Most reported being aware of available psychology services (N=63), and half (N=50) had been offered psychology services by their physician. Only 40 (40%) patients felt psychology services would be helpful for them, and 43 (43%) reported it would be beneficial for their family/caregivers. Those who found it helpful for themselves or family had higher anxiety than those who did not find it helpful (p=0.03 and p=.02 respectively). The most commonly endorsed barriers for psychology services were travel (N=25) and finances (N=21). Conclusions: We found no significant difference in preference of introduction of psychology services except in patients less than 40 years old who preferred PI. Patients with higher anxiety felt psychology services were helpful for self and family. Only 40% perceived psychology services as useful for self and family. More research is needed to investigate the most effective approach for introducing psychology services to increase perception of usefulness and utilization in cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03035448.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Psychology Referrals in a Palliative Care Department

CONTEXT

Psychologists can provide unique contributions to interdisciplinary palliative care. Despite research indicating high distress in palliative care cancer patients, little has been reported regarding the feasibility and practice of psychology in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

To review the integration of clinical psychology practice in a palliative care department at a major comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 1940 unique cancer patients (6451 total patient contacts) referred for psychology services provided by clinical psychologists in palliative care from September 1, 2013 to February 29, 2016.

RESULTS

Psychologists provided services to 1644 inpatients (24% of palliative care inpatients) and 296 outpatients (19% of palliative care outpatients). Most of them (85%) received services in the inpatient setting. Most patients were females (57%) and white (68%) with a variety of cancer diagnoses. Adjustment disorders were the most prevalent in both settings with significant differences in other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Edition) diagnoses by service location (P < 0.0001). Psychological assessment (86%) and supportive expressive counseling (79%) were the most frequent services provided in the initial consult. Duration of initial visit was significantly longer in outpatient (median 60 minutes) compared with inpatient setting (median 40 minutes) (P < 0.0001). No significant differences were noted between settings regarding the median number of counseling sessions per patient; however, most (70%) only received one or two sessions. Over time, total patient encounters increased in the inpatient setting (P < 0.0001), whereas session lengths in both settings significantly decreased (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Palliative care psychology services successfully integrated into an interdisciplinary palliative care department and rapidly grew in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Characteristics of patients referred for psychology services by a palliative care inpatient consult team

183

Background: From Jan 2013 to Dec 2015, only 23% of inpatient palliative care consults were referred for psychology (PSY) services. In an effort to better understand referral practices, we compared those who were referred for PSY services to those who were not. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 930 consecutive patients from Jan 2013 to Dec 2015 was conducted to collect demographic and clinical variables. 455 patients who had at least one PSY contact and 475 patients who had no PSY contact were randomly selected. In an effort to control for age, we selected 330 patients 18-39 years, 300 patients 40-64 years, and 300 patients 65 and older. Descriptive, univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Patients referred to PSY services (N = 455) included 267(59%) females. Majority were White(60%) and English speaking(93%). Majority were married(62%) and parents(79%). The largest cancer type was GI(20%) followed by hematological(15%). Majority had ECOG status of 3(39%) and CAGE-AID negative (82%). Patients with no psychology consult(N = 475) included 50% females. Majority were White(60%) and English speaking(79%). Majority were married(56%) and parents(70%). This sample also had majority GI cancers(18%) followed by hematological(15%). Majority had ECOG status of 3(34%) and was CAGE-AID negative(75%). Univariate variables significant for those referred for PSY services included: Female(p = .01), English language(p = .018), ECOG score of 3(p = .006), psychiatric history(p = .008), higher MEDD(p = .001) and several ESAS subscales including depression(p = .000), anxiety(p = .000), shortness of breath(p = .017), sleep (p. = .029) and spiritual pain(p = .001). Logistic regression identified psychiatric history and ESAS depression scores as significant predictors of PSY referral. Conclusions: Several univariate factors were significantly associated with referral to PSY services. Psychiatric history and ESAS depression score showed to be strong independent predictors. These results help us to understand how palliative care providers determine those they consult for PSY services. More research is needed to investigate who may benefit most from PSY referrals.

Enhancing palliative care patient access to outpatient and outreach counseling services

184

Background: MD Anderson’s interdisciplinary out-patient clinic, palliative care team includes mental health professionals who provide psychological care, including 3 full time Master’s level counselors. Counseling sessions are offered during the patient’s clinic appointments. To increase opportunity and access for additional counseling, patients are offered follow-up counseling through an outreach program which includes videoconferencing or telephone sessions. The data presented represents almost 2 years of our Master’s level clinicians’ practices. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 2041 consecutive patients (3606 total contacts) seen for psychology counseling services in the Supportive Care Center between 6/2015 and 3/2017. Results: Counselors saw 2041 consecutive patients (52% of the patients seen at the out-patient Supportive Care Center). Most patients only had 1 session in clinic (63%); almost 1/3 received 2-5 sessions (33.9%). Median time for the follow-up visit was 30.5 days. Approximately 25% (N = 511) were offered outreach services; 79% (N = 405) of those offered received these services. Median number of outreach sessions received was 1 (57%); 2-5 (38%); 6-9 (4%) and 10+ (1%). Sessions lasted 10-15 minutes (58%); 20-35 minutes (31%); and 40+ minutes (11%). Patient preferred mode of outreach included telephone (93%), Facetime (5.0%), and videoconferencing (2%). In total, 798 outreach sessions were provided representing 18% of total counseling sessions offered. Conclusions: The out-patient palliative care service is able to offer psychological assessment and counseling to more than half of the patients they serviced due to the addition of 3 Master’s level counselors embedded in the clinic. Follow-up counseling for these patients can be challenged for those residing in rural areas, with limited resources and/or transportation problems, and with physical limitations that make travel difficult. Our outreach program has successfully enhanced access to services to patients who otherwise may have had limited to no follow-up psychosocial care.

Characteristics and outcomes of psychology referrals in palliative care

230

Background: Despite high distress, a small percentage of cancer patients are referred for psychological care. MD Anderson’s interdisciplinary Palliative Care team recruited 2 clinical psychologists in 9/2013. The demand for services exceeded capacity; thus a 3rd psychologist and 3 counselors were added in 6/2015. Methods: Retrospective review of 2827 unique patients (6451 total contacts) from 9/1/2013 to 2/29/2016, including billable (psychologists) and non-billable (counselors) services. Results: Psychologists saw 1958 unique patients (4987 contacts): 1662 (85%) inpatients and 296 (15%) outpatients. Mean inpatient and outpatient session length was 37 (SD = 15) and 51 (SD = 19) minutes, respectively. 865 (44%) patients had 1 session, 507 (26%) had 2, and 585 (30%) had 3 or more. At first visit, DSM-5 diagnoses were: 1681 (86%) adjustment disorders and 226 (12%) major mood or anxiety disorders. Most first visits included assessment (N = 1666; 85%); other services were also provided: 1545 (79%) supportive expressive counseling; 300 (15%) family counseling; 114 (6%) cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT); and 40 (2%) relaxation skills. From 6/2015-2/2016, counselors saw 869 unique patients (1464 contacts): 759 (87%) outpatients, 99 (11%) inpatients, and 11 (1%) outreach through web-based video or phone. Mean session length for outpatient, inpatient, and outreach was respectively, 37 (SD = 17), 34 (SD = 18), and 17 (SD = 8) minutes. 560 (64%) patients had 1 session, 166 (19%) had 2, and 143 (17%) had 3 or more. Services at first visit included: 994 (93%) supportive expressive counseling; 654 (61%) assessment; 139 (13%) relaxation skills; 99 (9%) CBT; and 73 (7%) acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Conclusions: The 128% increase in psychology services after expanding providers underscores the value placed by the Palliative Care team. With the majority receiving only 1 session, results indicate the need to improve screening for earlier referral, allowing for more sophisticated services such as CBT and ACT, which are most effective for major mood or anxiety disorders and may prevent adjustment disorders from progressing to greater clinical distress. Our new efforts at outreach could also enhance access and types of services provided.

Changing the culture for psychosocial care: Does it need changing?

70

Background: National organizations recommend routine screening for psychosocial distress in cancer patients. American College of Surgeons (ACoS) Commission on Cancer mandates screening for accreditation with requirements for timing/method/tool for screening; assessment/referral; and documentation. Methods: MD Anderson routinely screens patients for distress with policies and algorithms for the process. We sought to enhance this standard process by incorporating a dedicated psychosocial liaison in the clinic to ensure screening based on NCCN guidelines, follow-up with patients at the medical visit, and clear documentation and referral per ACoS standards. This study compared the standard process to the enhanced process (which occurred in parallel) through a 6-month retrospective chart review of Thoracic Center patients identified as distressed by either process. Results: The enhanced process utilized the Distress Thermometer (DT) cut-off > 4 resulting in optimal specificity (.77) and sensitivity (.64) compared to the standard process using > 6 (specificity = .87; sensitivity = .34). In the enhanced process (N = 71), 99% were seen during the clinic visit, compared to 13% in the standard process (N = 92) (Fishers Exact; P < .0001). In the standard process, 18% were contacted by phone, 10% were seen later while in-patient, and 33% received a phone message; for 26%, no note was dictated. In the enhanced process, there were high rates of documentation of assessments of suicide (100%), depressive symptoms (100%) and anxiety symptoms (96%) compared to the standard process where documentation occurred less often (suicide 5%; depressive symptoms 11%; anxiety symptoms 11%) (Fishers Exact; all P’s < .0001). Conclusions: Results support the institution’s recent practice change to > 4 on the DT. The enhanced process utilizing a psychosocial liaison facilitates screening at the clinic visit and can support existing mental health providers who may have competing responsibilities. Findings also suggest having standards for distress documentation. Overall, the enhanced process fully meets ACoS standards in all required areas.

Predictors of Career Indecision in Three Racial/Ethnic Groups of College Women

This study examines the contributions of career-related barrier and social support perceptions, barrier-related coping beliefs, and career decision-making self-efficacy beliefs to the prediction of career indecision in three racial/ethnic groups of college women. Results indicate that although there are no racial/ethnic differences across scores on most of the key measures, African American women perceive significantly greater career barriers than do either White or Hispanic women. Separate within-racial/ethnic group regressions of career indecision scores indicate that the full model collectively accounted for substantial amounts of criterion variance (range of R2 = .31 to .47), although the pattern of predictor contributions varies somewhat across the three groups.