Computerized adaptive technology for the assessment of HRQOL of PD and CKD patients

This study was designed as a pilot study to see whether electronic patient-reported outcome measures using computer adaptive technology (CAT) could be successfully implemented in clinics caring for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using CAT on an iPad to assess the symptom burden and health-related quality of life of both PD and CKD patients.

Patients’ Descriptions of Specific Factors Leading to Modality Selection of Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis Or Hemodialysis

♦ Objectives

There has been increasing interest in understanding how patients with chronic renal failure choose between chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) and hemodialysis (HD) for renal replacement therapy. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influences and specific factors that patients identify as significant in choosing a specific dialysis modality for treatment of their end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

♦ Patients and Design

40 patients (20 CPD, 20 HD) who had started dialysis within the preceding 6 months were randomly selected to participate in the study. A structured interview was conducted with the patients, discussing and exploring what factors patients thought were important in helping them decide their treatment modality. The format of the interview was open-ended. Based on patients’ comments, a taxonomy of the specific factors that influenced the patients’ decisions was developed.

♦ Setting

The study was conducted in a freestanding CPD unit and two freestanding HD units.

♦ Results

All 20 CPD patients reported choosing their treatment modality; only 8 of the 20 HD patients reported having a choice of treatment modality. 18 of the 22 patients who participated in predialysis educational programs opted for CPD. 83% of the patients reported that their physician was important in influencing their treatment choice; however, the CPD patients relied more on written material and the opinions of their spouse/significant other or other family members in making their decisions. Issues of autonomy and control were important for 95% of patients choosing CPD. Both CPD and HD patients cited a variety of treatment-specific factors. The three most frequently cited reasons for choosing CPD were ( 1 ) flexibility of schedule (19 patients), ( 2 ) convenience of performing CPD in their own home (19 patients), and ( 3 ) the option of doing dialysis at night while sleeping (8 patients). The 8 HD patients who selected their treatment modality cited the desirability of having a planned schedule (7 patients) and letting nurses or other take care of them (5 patients).

♦ Conclusions

The present study explored factors perceived by patients as being important in determining their choice of renal replacement therapy. A taxonomy of patient influences and concerns has been developed to provide caregivers with a framework to structure their educational strategies and assist patients with progressive renal failure in making an informed choice of therapeutic modality for their ESRD treatment.

Erectile Dysfunction in Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Incidence and Treatment with Sildenafil

Objectives

Sexual and erectile dysfunction (ED) have been reported to occur frequently in male patients with end-stage renal disease maintained on dialysis. Numerous etiologies for this ED have been suggested. Although a variety of therapies for the ED of the dialysis patient have been suggested, most clinicians indicate that patients report a poor response to therapy. Recently, sildenafil has been reported to be beneficial in treating patients with ED of both organic and psychogenic causes. The present study was designed to document the incidence of ED in male patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) and to determine the efficacy of prescribing sildenafil therapy to treat their ED.

Methods

All male patients in our CPD unit were notified by letter of the availability of sildenafil as a treatment modality for ED. A sexuality/erectile dysfunction assessment was conducted in all male patients by their primary nephrologist. Patients who reported ED and who had no medical contraindication to sildenafil were offered this therapy. Those patients who were interested in this treatment were interviewed by a social worker, and patients were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire. Sildenafil was prescribed at a starting dose of 25 mg and increased to a maximum of 100 mg during a 12-week study trial. Patients were re-evaluated 6 and 12 weeks after the start of therapy.

Results

There were 68 male patients maintained on CPD at the time of the study. Mean age of all patients was 60.8 ± 15.3 years and mean duration on PD was 32.6 ± 25.6 months. Thirty-three patients had diabetes, 66 hypertension, 35 peripheral vascular disease, and 32 coronary artery disease. Thirty-two of 68 male patients in the CPD unit were assessed to have ED. Only 17 of the 32 patients expressed interest in pursuing sildenafil therapy. Two of these patients were excluded because they were receiving nitrate therapy. Of the 15 patients who agreed to take sildenafil, only 6 completed the 12-week study. Two of these patients responded to sildenafil.

Conclusion

Erectile dysfunction is common in male patients maintained on CPD. Only about half of patients with ED in the present study were willing to consider sildenafil therapy to treat the ED and, of those who agreed to treatment, only a minority completed the 12-week trial; 2 of these 6 patients reported a satisfactory response.

The Impact of Anemia Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in the Contemporary Era

The treatment of anemia with erythropoietic-stimulating agents is now part of the routine care of patients with CKD with guidelines for anemia management carefully outlined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. The treatment of anemia impacts the health-related quality of life of CKD patients, primarily affecting the domains of energy/vitality and physical functioning. Improvements in these domains occur, in general, most noticeably when hemoglobin levels are raised from below 9 g/dL to the 10-12 range, with limited improvements occurring when hemoglobin levels are increased above 12 g/dL. Importantly, individual patient responses to anemia treatment vary depending on a variety of factors and it is important to assess the impact of treatment on each patient, particularly as nephrology care moves to a patient-centered care model.

The experience of dialysis therapy among younger adults

The present study was undertaken to examine the experience of younger dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) care. Structured tape-recorded interviews focusing on perceptions of ESRD care and how that care could be improved were initially conducted with 25 dialysis patients [16 on conventional hemodialysis (HD), 6 on nocturnal in-center HD, 2 on home peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 1 on home HD]. The mean age of the patients was 43.8 +/- 12.2 years, and their mean dialysis duration was 4.6 +/- 3. Oyears. Five important domains were identified from the interviews. Based on those findings, a questionnaire was developed and distributed to 62 ESRD patients (49 on HD, 13 on PD). Several domains were identified that provide insight into how the patients thought their care could be improved. Our results suggest that certain changes in ESRD care might improve the experience of younger dialysis patients.

Depression and end-stage renal disease: a therapeutic challenge

Hedayati et al. document a 26.5% incidence of clinical depression and a strong association between depression and hospitalizations and mortality in hemodialysis patients. We can no longer ignore the impact of depression on end-stage renal disease patients. Appropriate therapeutic regimens and trials need to be explored.

PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: The Identification and Treatment of Depression in Patients Maintained on Dialysis

The high incidence of depression in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is well documented. Our group and others have estimated that 20-30% of ESRD patients experience major depression. Several recent studies have emphasized the relationship between depressive symptoms and mortality and morbidity in both hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. We screened 380 PD patients for depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The mean patient age was 59.9 +/- 14.1 (SD) years, 55% were Caucasian, 51% were male, and 39% had diabetes. The mean BDI score was 12.1 +/- 7.7; 49% had a score of 11 or greater. Fifty-five percent refused further assessment to confirm the diagnosis of major depression, while 45% of patients eligible for treatment agreed to further assessment. Their mean BDI was 18.8 +/- 6.2. Eighty-four percent were diagnosed with major depression on direct interviews and offered pharmacologic treatment, 16% did not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of depression, and 50% successfully completed 12 weeks of pharmacologic treatment. The BDI score of these patients at the start of treatment was 17.4 +/- 6.6, and at completion of treatment it was 8.4 +/- 3.0. Thirty-eight percent of treatment failures were in those who were also diagnosed with a DSM-IV personality disorder. Major depression is common in PD patients, and is potentially treatable with pharmacologic therapy. However, there are major problems providing a depression assessment and treatment program to such patients. Problems include refusal to complete depression assessment and patients with axis 2 personality disorders who have difficulty complying with treatment. Although depression treatment can improve depressive symptoms, it is unclear whether such therapy will improve medical outcomes.

Psychosocial assessment of the patient on chronic peritoneal dialysis: an overview

The psychosocial assessment of the patient with end-stage renal disease is critically important because (1) there is growing evidence that the psychosocial status of the patient impacts medical outcomes and (2) the objective of therapy is to maximize a patient's sense of well-being and quality of life. This is particularly true for patients receiving a home-based therapy such as chronic peritoneal dialysis. The present review outlines a possible structure and format for performing psychosocial evaluations for patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis. But, each facility must design its own format, making sure that the critical domains discussed in this review are addressed.

Effects of home hemodialysis on health-related quality of life measures

In recent years, there has been an increased interest in performing hemodialysis (HD) more frequently than thrice weekly, particularly in the home setting. This interest has been stimulated by some studies that have indicated significant benefits to performing more frequent HD on various medical and quality of life outcome measures. However, only a few studies using varying quality of life instruments have critically examined the impact of frequent HD on the quality of life of patients. Although not consistent across studies, results suggest a positive impact of more frequent HD on patients' quality of life. It is hoped that the results of two landmark studies, now in progress (the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trial and the FREEDOM study), will provide more insight into the impact of more frequent HD on quality of life.

Therapy Insight: sexual dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease

Sexual dysfunction is common in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Sexual dysfunction in these patients should be thought of as a multifactorial problem that is affected by a variety of physiological and psychological factors, as well as by comorbid conditions. Assessment of sexual difficulties in patients with CKD, therefore, involves a careful investigation of a variety of domains. The development of treatment strategies presents challenges as it is often difficult to determine the primary factor(s) responsible for the sexual dysfunction. It is important to think of the treatment in the overall context of the management of various medical problems presented by patients with CKD. It must be remembered that the design of therapeutic approaches for each patient is dependent on the systematic evaluation of the functional and psychosocial problems presented, and assessment of the cause(s) of sexual dysfunction.

Integration of cognitive behavioral therapy into psychiatric rehabilitation day programming

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy has substantial empirical support for the treatment of people with severe and persistent mental illnesses. Efforts to integrate this type of therapy into psychiatric rehabilitation practices are growing. This paper describes an innovative integration of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy into a psychiatric rehabilitation day program attended by people with severe and persistent mental illnesses and frequently co-occurring substance use disorders. The challenges of maintaining the cognitive model and other core features of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in a heterogeneous, large, group-based program are discussed.

Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: patients' assessment of their satisfaction with therapy and the impact of the therapy on their lives

This study was undertaken to examine patient satisfaction with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) therapies, focusing attention on the positive and negative impact of the therapies on patients' lives. Patients were recruited from a free-standing PD unit and two free-standing HD units. A total of 94% (n = 62) of eligible PD and 84% (n = 84) of eligible HD patients participated. HD patients were significantly older and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than the PD patients, but there were no differences in duration of dialysis treatment, prevalence of diabetes, educational backgrounds, or home situations. Patients were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with and the overall impact of their dialysis therapy on their lives, using a 1 to 10 Likert scale. In addition, patients were asked to rate the impact of their therapy on 15 domains that had been cited previously as being important for patients' quality of life. The mean satisfaction score for PD patients (8.02 +/- 1.41) was higher than for HD patients (7.4 +/- 1.4; P = 0.15). PD patients indicated that there was less impact of the dialysis treatment on their lives globally (7.25 +/- 2.12 versus 6.19 +/- 2.83; P = 0.019). In addition, PD patients noted less impact of the therapy in 14 of the 15 domains examined. With the use of a proportional odds model analysis, the only significant predictor of overall satisfaction and impact of therapy was dialysis modality (P = 0.037 and P = 0.021, respectively). Patients also were asked to comment freely on the positive and negative effects of the dialysis treatments on their lives, and a taxonomy of patient perceptions and concerns was developed. This study suggests that PD patients in general are more satisfied with their overall care and believe that their treatment has less impact on their lives than HD patients.

The Role of Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis in the Management of the Patient with Chronic Kidney Disease

The role of chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) in the management of patient with chronic kidney disease is being reexamined. There has been a decline in CPD utilization in the United States, which has been attributed to a variety of factors. It is important that these factors be understood and addressed, since nephrologists feel that about 30% of end-stage renal disease patients should be maintained on CPD and patients are more satisfied with CPD and feel that CPD has a less negative impact on their lives than hemodialysis. The present chapter discusses some of the reasons for decline in CPD utilization in the United States.

Chronic peritoneal dialysis patients diagnosed with clinical depression: results of pharmacologic therapy

Depression has been documented as the most frequently encountered psychological problem in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and has been correlated with both mortality and morbidity in these patients. Previous work by our group has shown that clinical depression is treatable with psychotropic medications in these patients, but that only a limited number of ESRD patients with depression will successfully complete a course of pharmacologic therapy. From July 1997 to October 2002, all chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in our facility were encouraged to be screened for depression utilizing the self-administered Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire. Based on previous work, a score > or =11 on this questionnaire was used to indicate a possible diagnosis of clinical depression; patients with BDI scores > or =11 were encouraged to complete a more formal evaluation for the presence of clinical depression. A total of 320 BDI questionnaires were completed during the study period: 134 patients. (42%) scored > or =11 on the BDI, 69 of the 134 patients (51%) with BDI scores > or =11 agreed to further evaluation. Sixty of these 69 patients (87%) were diagnosed with clinical depression based on scores > or =18 on the Hamilton Depression Scale and standard Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria. Forty-four patients with clinical depression agreed to pharmacologic treatment. However, only 23 of the 44 patients (52%) successfully completed a 12-week course of drug therapy. Two unit social work reviewers systematically reviewed the records of these 21 patients who did not complete therapy and assessed the reasons for their inability to complete treatment. Reasons identified included eight patients who experienced acute medical problems, three who were active substance abusers, and two who reported medication side effects. The remaining eight patients who did not complete the 12 weeks of therapy were examined by applying the axis 1 and axis 2 DSM-IV criteria. Axis 1 is used to diagnose clinical disorders and axis 2 is used to diagnose personality disorders. While all these patients met the DSM-IV axis 1 criteria for clinical depression, eight of these patients met axis 2 criteria for personality disorders; five patients had borderline personality disorders, one had a narcissistic personality disorder, one had a factitious disorder, and one had features of avoidant personality disorder. While some chronic PD patients can be successfully treated for clinical depression with psychotropic medication prescribed by the dialysis medical team, not all patients will agree to be evaluated for clinical depression and accept pharmacologic treatment. Others cannot or will not complete treatment when additional psychiatric disorders exist. These patients may require additional intervention when diagnosed with clinical depression and a personality disorder. Further trials are warranted.

Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis

OBJECTIVES

There has been increasing interest in understanding how patients with chronic renal failure choose between chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) and hemodialysis (HD) for renal replacement therapy. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influences and specific factors that patients identify as significant in choosing a specific dialysis modality for treatment of their end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

40 patients (20 CPD, 20 HD) who had started dialysis within the preceding 6 months were randomly selected to participate in the study. A structured interview was conducted with the patients, discussing and exploring what factors patients thought were important in helping them decide their treatment modality. The format of the interview was open-ended. Based on patients' comments, a taxonomy of the specific factors that influenced the patients' decisions was developed.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a freestanding CPD unit and two freestanding HD units.

RESULTS

All 20 CPD patients reported choosing their treatment modality; only 8 of the 20 HD patients reported having a choice of treatment modality. 18 of the 22 patients who participated in predialysis educational programs opted for CPD. 83% of the patients reported that their physician was important in influencing their treatment choice; however, the CPD patients relied more on written material and the opinions of their spouse/significant other or other family members in making their decisions. Issues of autonomy and control were important for 95% of patients choosing CPD. Both CPD and HD patients cited a variety of treatment-specific factors. The three most frequently cited reasons for choosing CPD were (1) flexibility of schedule (19 patients), (2) convenience of performing CPD in their own home (19 patients), and (3) the option of doing dialysis at night while sleeping (8 patients). The 8 HD patients who selected their treatment modality cited the desirability of having a planned schedule (7 patients) and letting nurses or other take care of them (5 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study explored factors perceived by patients as being important in determining their choice of renal replacement therapy. A taxonomy of patient influences and concerns has been developed to provide caregivers with a framework to structure their educational strategies and assist patients with progressive renal failure in making an informed choice of therapeutic modality for their ESRD treatment.

Erectile dysfunction in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients: incidence and treatment with sildenafil

OBJECTIVES

Sexual and erectile dysfunction (ED) have been reported to occur frequently in male patients with end-stage renal disease maintained on dialysis. Numerous etiologies for this ED have been suggested. Although a variety of therapies for the ED of the dialysis patient have been suggested, most clinicians indicate that patients report a poor response to therapy. Recently, sildenafil has been reported to be beneficial in treating patients with ED of both organic and psychogenic causes. The present study was designed to document the incidence of ED in male patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) and to determine the efficacy of prescribing sildenafil therapy to treat their ED.

METHODS

All male patients in our CPD unit were notified by letter of the availability of sildenafil as a treatment modality for ED. A sexuality/erectile dysfunction assessment was conducted in all male patients by their primary nephrologist. Patients who reported ED and who had no medical contraindication to sildenafil were offered this therapy. Those patients who were interested in this treatment were interviewed by a social worker, and patients were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire. Sildenafil was prescribed at a starting dose of 25 mg and increased to a maximum of 100 mg during a 12-week study trial. Patients were re-evaluated 6 and 12 weeks after the start of therapy.

RESULTS

There were 68 male patients maintained on CPD at the time of the study. Mean age of all patients was 60.8 +/- 15.3 years and mean duration on PD was 32.6 +/- 25.6 months. Thirty-three patients had diabetes, 66 hypertension, 35 peripheral vascular disease, and 32 coronary artery disease. Thirty-two of 68 male patients in the CPD unit were assessed to have ED. Only 17 of the 32 patients expressed interest in pursuing sildenafil therapy. Two of these patients were excluded because they were receiving nitrate therapy. Of the 15 patients who agreed to take sildenafil, only 6 completed the 12-week study. Two of these patients responded to sildenafil.

CONCLUSION

Erectile dysfunction is common in male patients maintained on CPD. Only about half of patients with ED in the present study were willing to consider sildenafil therapy to treat the ED and, of those who agreed to treatment, only a minority completed the 12-week trial; 2 of these 6 patients reported a satisfactory response.

Identification and treatment of depression in a cohort of patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis

Depression is the most commonly encountered psychological problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Depression has recently been shown to significantly impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing therapy for ESRD. The present study was designed as a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of screening a large cohort of patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) for depression and then pharmacologically treating those patients assessed to have clinical depression. One hundred thirty-six patients maintained on CPD in our CPD unit were screened for depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), a self-administered questionnaire. Patients with scores of 11 or greater were referred to a trained psychiatric interviewer for further evaluation to confirm the diagnosis of clinical depression and determine whether the patient was a candidate for antidepressant medication. Sixty-seven patients had BDI scores of 11 or greater, and 60 of these patients were asked to participate in further evaluation and possible therapy. Only 27 patients agreed to further study and were evaluated by a trained psychiatric interviewer for clinical depression. Twenty-three of these patients were assessed to have clinical depression, and 22 patients were eligible for antidepressant medication based on their scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale and psychiatric interview. Eleven patients completed a 12-week course of therapy with antidepressant medication, and their BDI scores decreased from a mean of 17.1 +/- 6.9 (SD) to a mean of 8.6 +/- 3.2. Seven patients were treated with sertraline, 2 patients with bupropion, and 2 patients with nefazodone. It is concluded that (1) depression is commonly present in patients maintained on CPD, (2) the BDI is a useful tool to use to screen for clinical depression, and (3) clinical depression is treatable with medication in this patient population.

Patient assessment of quality of care in a chronic peritoneal dialysis facility

The percentage of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) in the United States remains well less than the percentage in several other countries. Furthermore, there has recently been a decline in the percentage of patients with ESRD in the United States undergoing CPD. The reasons for this decline are uncertain, and investigators have implicated problems with the kinetics of peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis and exit-site infections, and psychosocial stresses imposed by the therapy. Few studies, however, have considered the role of the dialysis facility itself and patient perceptions of the facility as contributing to problems with the long-term acceptance of CPD. This study is designed to examine patients' perceptions of the organization and structure of the peritoneal dialysis facility and their interactions with the facility, focusing attention on areas of patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the facility. The study was conducted in a large, freestanding peritoneal dialysis program in an urban area that currently treats 140 patients undergoing CPD. Thirty patients were randomly selected to participate in the present study. A structured interview that included open-ended questions was administered and tape-recorded by a trained interviewer not affiliated with the dialysis unit. Patient responses were then reviewed by two investigators, and a taxonomy of patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction was developed, using a modification of the classification proposed by Concato and Feinstein. Patient responses were then categorized according to the taxonomy. The most frequently cited areas of patient satisfaction included the amount of information and instruction provided by the staff (n = 30), personal atmosphere of the facility (n = 30), efficiency of delivery of the dialysis supplies (n = 23), and availability of the primary nurse (n = 18). The importance of the nurse-patient interaction was emphasized by all 30 patients, whereas the physician-patient interaction was cited by only 14 patients. The most frequently cited area of dissatisfaction noted by all 30 patients concerned the dialysis regimen itself. The present study focuses attention on patient perceptions of their CPD facility, identifying areas of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The analysis is important not only in providing a framework for CPD facilities with which to review their own interactions with CPD patients, but also for identifying those areas that require attention to maintain the long-term viability of CPD therapy.

Psychosocial factors and clinical outcome on CAPD

Patient dropout from chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) and transfer to hemodialysis remains a major problem with patients on CPD. Peritonitis, exit-site infections, and medical complications requiring hospitalization often adversely affect the outcome of CPD. The role of psychosocial factors in determining patient outcome and influencing the rates of these complications is not clear. Our group has employed a variety of instruments, including the Patient Related Anxiety Scale (PRAS), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), Kupfer-Detre System II somatic symptom scale (KDS-II), and a patient self-assessed quality of life (PAQOL) questionnaire to assess quality of life and to objectively evaluate the psychosocial status of the patient treated with CPD. The present study extends previous observations by relating the results of these psychosocial instruments to the incidence of various complications in 103 patients maintained on CPD. Patients were divided into low-scoring (lowest symptoms of depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, and best quality of life evaluation), intermediate, and high-scoring (highest symptoms of depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, and worst quality of life) categories. The peritonitis rates, exit-site infection rates, and days of hospitalization of the three categories were then compared. The results demonstrate significantly higher complication rates in the high-scoring when compared to the low-scoring patients. Thus screening patients maintained on CPD with objective measures of psychosocial functioning may enable caregivers to more accurately predict which patients are at greater risk for developing medical complications.

Quality of life assessment in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients

Previous studies by our group have attempted to examine quality of life (QoL) issues in a cohort of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients maintained on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) by assessing a variety of psychological tests and by asking patients to rate their own QoL. The present study was undertaken to extend previous observations by asking patients to spontaneously select those domains of life experience that they think are most important in determining their quality of life. Sixty-eight medically stable CPD patients were asked to spontaneously select those three to five domains felt to be most important to them in defining their QoL. The 307 responses were then grouped into 22 broad categories by three investigators. The most frequently selected domains focused on interpersonal relationships. Domains that enhance the quality of one's day and add meaning to one's life were selected with a midrange frequency. Some domains that might intuitively seem to be important for a patient's QoL were selected with a surprisingly low frequency. These findings suggest that to understand what CPD patients value in assessing their QoL can best be determined by asking them directly and not by using predetermined variables.

Quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients

In 49 patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, we assessed the relative influences of adequacy of dialysis (assessed by kinetic transfer/volume urea) and psychological symptoms (depression and anxiety) upon the patients' evaluation of their overall quality of life (QoL). Subjects completed self-rating forms for anxiety, depressive, and somatic symptoms, for discrete areas relevant to QoL, and for overall QoL; clinicians also rated QoL. Depressive symptoms proved a much stronger correlate of overall QoL than did the biochemical measure of dialysis adequacy, and they remained influential even after adjustment for anxiety, kinetic transfer/volume, and somatic symptoms. In contrast, the effects of kinetic transfer/volume, anxiety symptoms, and somatic symptoms dropped sharply when adjusted for the other variables. Because psychological (especially depressive) symptoms may be stronger determinants of patients' overall QoL than is adequacy of dialysis, assessing QoL and psychological status should be part of the care of end-stage renal disease patients.

Marital discord, sexual problems, and depression

Systematic studies of relationships among depression, sexual function, and martial discord in hemodialysis patients and their spouses arelacking; existing studies focus upon only one of these three topics, or deal with patient or spouse as individuals rather than as a couple. We studied 17 chronic, medically stable hemodialysis patients and their husbands or wives. Although couples rated their degree of marital discord as low, the investigators rated it as high, based on the number and type of specific problems reported by the couple. The couples' evaluation may not represent denial, as has been commonly assumed. Instead their evaluation may imply that the disease and its treatment overshadow marital problems, even though couples recognize and react to these problems. Couples showed a high prevalence of sexual problems--in terms of overall satisfaction, frequency of intercourse, and specific dysfunctional symptoms (difficulty becoming excited, maintaining excitement, or having orgasm). We found a strong relationship between severity of depression and severity of sexual dysfunction in patients, but not in their mates. No strong relationship existed between a patient's depression score and marital discord, although spouses showed a trend toward correlation between severity of depression and martial discord. Younger couples, especially, seem not to want intercourse when severe martial discord exists. Patients' depression scores were comparable to thoseof psychiatric patients, while spouses' depression scores resembled those of normals. While psychosocial phenomena such as marital discord, sexual dysfunction, and depression are clear, causal chains are not. Despite disadvantages inherent in using questionnaires, short, self-administered, easily scored instruments may elicit problems with sex, marriage, and mood which might otherwise be overlooked by caretaking personnel.

Assessment of marital relationships of hemodialysis patients

In addition to the somatic problems associated with uremia and dialysis it is apparent that successful hemodialysis is dependent upon psychological adjustment to this type of therapy. While previous studies have focused on the patient or spouse as individuals, patterns of marital interactions and conflicts have not been systematically evaluated. These factors ere examined in 17 medically stable patients maintained on hemodialysis for a mean duration of 22 +/- 4 SE months. Standardized pssychiatric evaluation forms ere used to examine mood and cognition disturbances in all patients and spouses, and a deailed marital questionnaire, which each patient and spouse filled out independently, was used to evaluate fundamental aspects of the marital relationship...