Lung Transplantation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Related to COVID-19: The Lesson Learned from the First Two Cases

Purpose

The respiratory system, and namely the lung, is undoubtedly the preferential target of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The clinical pictures are extremely various, up to the intensive care unit (ICU) admission for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung transplantation (LT) is a consolidate therapeutic option for end-stage chronic respiratory diseases. Its role in an acute setting is questionable, particularly due to lack of experiences, donor shortage, and the difficulty to fully evaluate the potential recipient. We report our preliminary experience with the first two cases of LT for SARS-CoV-2 related ARDS, trying to provide some food for thought.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed our first two cases of bilateral LT for ARDS after COVID-19. We recorded data on pre-transplantation clinical course, transplantation management and outcomes.

Results

The two patients had a similar clinical evolution of COVID-19. Transplantations were successful in both cases; the first patient is alive and in good condition 5 months after transplantation, while the second died 62 days after surgery. Table 1 shows clinical details and relevant time-points.

Conclusion

Our experience showed that LT for COVID-19 is feasible. Importantly, observing a dedicated protocol made the procedure safe for the healthcare staff involved. On the other hand, our second unsuccessful case poses relevant questions: first of all, lung transplantation should be reserved to highly selected patient, after careful clinical, infective as well as psychiatric evaluation. The ethical aspects should also be considered in this situation, with regard to the centre rate mortality on waiting list. Anyway, the potential role of LT in the acute and sub-acute/chronic settings suggests the need for maintaining LT centre active during pandemic. Finally, COVID-19, once more, imposes to share clinical experiences.

The Long-Term Benefit of Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors

Selection criteria and benefit of liver transplantation for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remain uncertain. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with metastatic NETs eligible for liver transplantation according to Milan-NET criteria were offered transplant (n = 42) versus nontransplant options (n = 46) depending on list dynamics, patient disposition, and age. Tumor burden between groups did not differ. Transplant patients were younger (40.5 vs. 55.5 years; p < 0.001). Long-term outcomes were compared after matching between groups made on multiple Cox models adjusted for propensity score built on logistic models. Survival benefit was the difference in mean survival between transplant versus nontransplant options. No patients were lost or died without recurrence. Median follow-up was 122 months. The transplant group showed a significant advantage over nontransplant strategies at 5 and 10 years in survival (97.2% and 88.8% vs. 50.9% and 22.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) and time-to-progression (13.1% and 13.1% vs. 83.5% and 89%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for propensity score, survival advantage of the transplant group was significant (hazard ratio = 7.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-23.0; p = 0.001). Adjusted transplant-related survival benefit was 6.82 months (95% CI: 1.10-12.54; p = 0.019) and 38.43 months (95% CI: 21.41-55.45; p < 0.001) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Liver transplantation for metastatic NETs under restrictive criteria provides excellent long-term outcome. Transplant-related survival benefit increases over time and maximizes after 10 years.

Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation: the retrospective analysis of an early multicenter experience including graft sharing

Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation divides a donor liver into two grafts to be transplanted in adult-size patients. Major technical and organizational difficulties have limited its application to few single center series. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term results of the first multicenter series of this procedure with graft sharing. Between November 1998 and January 2005, 43 transplants were performed by five centers from 23 full-right-full-left in situ split liver procedures; 65% of the grafts were shared. A total of 31 (72%) patients had complications above grade II; 3 (6.9%) were retransplanted. Hospital mortality was 23% with sepsis as the main cause. Six patients died in the long term, two of them for a road accident. A total of 27 patients are alive after a median follow-up of 3200 days (2035-4256). Actuarial survival at 1 and 10 years were 72.1%, 62.6% and 65.1%, 57.9%, respectively for patients and grafts. These figures are similar to those reported for adult living donor liver transplantation by the European Registry over a similar period. Multicenter collaboration in sharing of these grafts is feasible and can help facing the organizational limits, thus increasing diffusion of full-right-full-left split liver transplantation.

Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation: the retrospective analysis of an early multicenter experience including graft sharing

Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation divides a donor liver into two grafts to be transplanted in adult-size patients. Major technical and organizational difficulties have limited its application to few single center series. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term results of the first multicenter series of this procedure with graft sharing. Between November 1998 and January 2005, 43 transplants were performed by five centers from 23 full-right-full-left in situ split liver procedures; 65% of the grafts were shared. A total of 31 (72%) patients had complications above grade II; 3 (6.9%) were retransplanted. Hospital mortality was 23% with sepsis as the main cause. Six patients died in the long term, two of them for a road accident. A total of 27 patients are alive after a median follow-up of 3200 days (2035-4256). Actuarial survival at 1 and 10 years were 72.1%, 62.6% and 65.1%, 57.9%, respectively for patients and grafts. These figures are similar to those reported for adult living donor liver transplantation by the European Registry over a similar period. Multicenter collaboration in sharing of these grafts is feasible and can help facing the organizational limits, thus increasing diffusion of full-right-full-left split liver transplantation.

Circulating burst-forming-unit erythroid and the responsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin in patients on regular hemodialytic treatment

The dose of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEpo) required to correct anemia of end-stage renal disease varies among patients. The possible factors that interfere with the responsiveness to r-HuEpo were not completely known. In 32 patients on regular hemodialytic treatment with marked anemia (Hb 5.6 +/- 0.7 g/dl), we evaluated circulating erythroid progenitor cells [burst-forming-unit erythroid (BFU-E)], erythropoietin, ferritin, folate and 1-84-parathormone levels before r-HuEpo therapy. In 12 patients, the aluminum levels after deferoxamine were also evaluated. The possible correlation between these factors and the response to r-HuEpo therapy was then evaluated. The number of circulating (c) BFU-E was highly variable (521 +/- 447 colonies/ml of blood; normal level 742 +/- 192) and does not correlate with erythropoietin, ferritin, folate, 1-84-parathormone or aluminum levels. A direct correlation between basal cBFU-E and the responsiveness to r-HuEpo therapy was recorded while no correlation was found with the other analyzed parameters. We hypothesized that low basal cBFU-E (interleukin-3 deficiency?) could reduce the response to r-HUEpo because of failure of this hematopoietic stem cell compartment to replenish the pool of more mature erythropoietic progenitor cells during the phase of accelerated maturation induced by r-HuEpo.

Uremic inhibitors of erythropoiesis: a study during treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin

The effects of increasing amounts of uremic sera (US) on the growth of erythroid progenitor cells [burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-E)] collected from peripheral blood of normal subjects were evaluated to assess the potential role of uremic inhibitors of erythropoiesis during a treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEpo). US were collected from 8 patients on regular dialysis with marked anemia (Hb 6 +/- 0.5 g%) before and after a treatment with high doses of r-HuEpo (from 300 to 525 U/kg/week). Standard cultures for BFU-E were performed in alpha-metylcellulose with fetal calf serum (FCS) and 4 U/ml of r-HuEpo (Cilag, Ortho). In successive cultures, US were added at increasing amounts to the standard culture in order to assess a possible inhibitory effect on BFU-E growth. Finally, in order to assess a possible lack of stimulatory factors, we partially substituted FCS with US. The addition of US collected either before or after therapy with r-HuEpo to the standard culture had no effect on the growth of BFU-E. Vice versa, the number of cultured BFU-E decreased when FCS was partially substituted with US collected before r-HuEpo. This effect was not evident when FCS was partially substituted with US collected after r-HuEpo. No significant differences were recorded in the tested sera collected before and after therapy considering erythropoietin levels and amino acid levels. We hypothesized that some other factors with erythropoietic stimulatory activity (burst-promoting activity?) may be deficient in uremic patients with marked anemia and can be induced during therapy with r-HuEpo.