1
|
Islam F, Lewis MR, Craig JD, Leyendecker PM, Deans TL. Advancing in vivo reprogramming with synthetic biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2024; 87:103109. [PMID: 38520824 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
Reprogramming cells will play a fundamental role in shaping the future of cell therapies by developing new strategies to engineer cells for improved performance and higher-order physiological functions. Approaches in synthetic biology harness cells' natural ability to sense diverse signals, integrate environmental inputs to make decisions, and execute complex behaviors based on the health of the organism or tissue. In this review, we highlight strategies in synthetic biology to reprogram cells, and discuss how recent approaches in the delivery of modified mRNA have created new opportunities to alter cell function in vivo. Finally, we discuss how combining concepts from synthetic biology and the delivery of mRNA in vivo could provide a platform for innovation to advance in vivo cellular reprogramming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhana Islam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mitchell R Lewis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - James D Craig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Peyton M Leyendecker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lewis MR, Deans TL. In Vitro Generation of Megakaryocytes from Engineered Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2774:279-301. [PMID: 38441772 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3718-0_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The in vitro differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into desired lineages enables mechanistic studies of cell transitions into more mature states that can provide insights into the design principles governing cell fate control. We are interested in reprogramming pluripotent stem cells with synthetic gene circuits to drive mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) down the hematopoietic lineage for the production of megakaryocytes, the progenitor cells for platelets. Here, we describe the methodology for growing and differentiating mESCs, in addition to inserting a transgene to observe its expression throughout differentiation. This entails four key methods: (1) growing and preparing mouse embryonic fibroblasts for supporting mESC growth and expansion, (2) growing and preparing OP9 feeder cells to support the differentiation of mESCs, (3) the differentiation of mESCs into megakaryocytes, and (4) utilizing an integrase-mediated docking site to insert transgenes for their stable integration and expression throughout differentiation. Altogether, this approach demonstrates a streamline differentiation protocol that emphasizes the reprogramming potential of mESCs that can be used for future mechanistic and therapeutic studies of controlling cell fate outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell R Lewis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Javdan SB, Islam F, Deans TL. Reprogramming megakaryocytes to engineer platelets as delivery vehicles. bioRxiv 2023:2023.10.13.562311. [PMID: 37873465 PMCID: PMC10592833 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
We developed a method for the efficient generation of engineered platelets that can be filled with any recombinant therapeutic protein during the differentiation process by reprogramming megakaryocytes, the progenitor cells of platelets. To demonstrate the versatility of this approach, we loaded cytoplasmic and secreted proteins that can be delivered as active enzymes to recipient cells, be released upon platelet activation, or be continuously secreted by platelets over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shwan B. Javdan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Farhana Islam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Tara L. Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lewis MR, Deans TL. In vitro generation of megakaryocytes from engineered mouse embryonic stem cells. bioRxiv 2023:2023.03.01.530476. [PMID: 36909620 PMCID: PMC10002726 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.01.530476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
The in vitro differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into desired lineages enables mechanistic studies of cell transitions into more mature states that can provide insights into the design principles governing cell fate control. We are interested in reprogramming pluripotent stem cells with synthetic gene circuits to drive mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) down the hematopoietic lineage for the production of megakaryocytes, the progenitor cells for platelets. Here, we describe the methodology for growing and differentiating mESCs, in addition to inserting a transgene to observe its expression throughout differentiation. This entails four key methods: (1) growing and preparing mouse embryonic fibroblasts for supporting mESC growth and expansion, (2) growing and preparing OP9 feeder cells to support the differentiation of mESCs, (3) the differentiation of mESCs into megakaryocytes, and (4) utilizing an integrase mediated docking site to insert transgenes for their stable integration and expression throughout differentiation. Altogether, this approach demonstrates a streamline differentiation protocol that emphasizes the reprogramming potential of mESCs that can be used for future mechanistic and therapeutic studies of controlling cell fate outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell R. Lewis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Tara L. Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cabrera A, Edelstein HI, Glykofrydis F, Love KS, Palacios S, Tycko J, Zhang M, Lensch S, Shields CE, Livingston M, Weiss R, Zhao H, Haynes KA, Morsut L, Chen YY, Khalil AS, Wong WW, Collins JJ, Rosser SJ, Polizzi K, Elowitz MB, Fussenegger M, Hilton IB, Leonard JN, Bintu L, Galloway KE, Deans TL. The sound of silence: Transgene silencing in mammalian cell engineering. Cell Syst 2022; 13:950-973. [PMID: 36549273 PMCID: PMC9880859 DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
To elucidate principles operating in native biological systems and to develop novel biotechnologies, synthetic biology aims to build and integrate synthetic gene circuits within native transcriptional networks. The utility of synthetic gene circuits for cell engineering relies on the ability to control the expression of all constituent transgene components. Transgene silencing, defined as the loss of expression over time, persists as an obstacle for engineering primary cells and stem cells with transgenic cargos. In this review, we highlight the challenge that transgene silencing poses to the robust engineering of mammalian cells, outline potential molecular mechanisms of silencing, and present approaches for preventing transgene silencing. We conclude with a perspective identifying future research directions for improving the performance of synthetic gene circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Cabrera
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Hailey I Edelstein
- Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; The Eli and Edythe Broad CIRM Center, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Fokion Glykofrydis
- Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033-9080, USA
| | - Kasey S Love
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Sebastian Palacios
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Josh Tycko
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Sarah Lensch
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Cara E Shields
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Mark Livingston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Ron Weiss
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Synthetic Biology Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Huimin Zhao
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Karmella A Haynes
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Leonardo Morsut
- Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033-9080, USA
| | - Yvonne Y Chen
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Ahmad S Khalil
- Biological Design Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wilson W Wong
- Biological Design Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - James J Collins
- Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033-9080, USA; Synthetic Biology Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Susan J Rosser
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Karen Polizzi
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK; Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, South Kensington Campus, London, UK
| | - Michael B Elowitz
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Martin Fussenegger
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, Basel 4058, Switzerland; Faculty of Science, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 26, Basel 4058, Switzerland
| | - Isaac B Hilton
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Joshua N Leonard
- Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; The Eli and Edythe Broad CIRM Center, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Lacramioara Bintu
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kate E Galloway
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Advances in synthetic biology have provided genetic tools to reprogram cells to obtain desired cellular functions that include tools to enable the customization of cells to sense an extracellular signal and respond with a desired output. These include a variety of engineered receptors capable of transmembrane signaling that transmit information from outside of the cell to inside when specific ligands bind to them. Recent advances in synthetic receptor engineering have enabled the reprogramming of cell and tissue behavior, controlling cell fate decisions, and providing new vehicles for therapeutic delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shwan B. Javdan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Tara L. Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
MacDonald IC, Seamons TR, Emmons JC, Javdan SB, Deans TL. Enhanced regulation of prokaryotic gene expression by a eukaryotic transcriptional activator. Nat Commun 2021; 12:4109. [PMID: 34226549 PMCID: PMC8257575 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24434-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Expanding the genetic toolbox for prokaryotic synthetic biology is a promising strategy for enhancing the dynamic range of gene expression and enabling new engineered applications for research and biomedicine. Here, we reverse the current trend of moving genetic parts from prokaryotes to eukaryotes and demonstrate that the activating eukaryotic transcription factor QF and its corresponding DNA-binding sequence can be moved to E. coli to introduce transcriptional activation, in addition to tight off states. We further demonstrate that the QF transcription factor can be used in genetic devices that respond to low input levels with robust and sustained output signals. Collectively, we show that eukaryotic gene regulator elements are functional in prokaryotes and establish a versatile and broadly applicable approach for constructing genetic circuits with complex functions. These genetic tools hold the potential to improve biotechnology applications for medical science and research. Expanded toolkits for prokaryotic synthetic biology can enhance the dynamic range of gene expression. Here the authors move the eukaryotic transcription factor QF into E. coli and integrate it into genetic devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Cody MacDonald
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Travis R Seamons
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jonathan C Emmons
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shwan B Javdan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bush LM, Healy CP, Marvin JE, Deans TL. High-throughput enrichment and isolation of megakaryocyte progenitor cells from the mouse bone marrow. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8268. [PMID: 33859294 PMCID: PMC8050096 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87681-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Megakaryocytes are a rare population of cells that develop in the bone marrow and function to produce platelets that circulate throughout the body and form clots to stop or prevent bleeding. A major challenge in studying megakaryocyte development, and the diseases that arise from their dysfunction, is the identification, classification, and enrichment of megakaryocyte progenitor cells that are produced during hematopoiesis. Here, we present a high throughput strategy for identifying and isolating megakaryocytes and their progenitor cells from a heterogeneous population of bone marrow samples. Specifically, we couple thrombopoietin (TPO) induction, image flow cytometry, and principal component analysis (PCA) to identify and enrich for megakaryocyte progenitor cells that are capable of self-renewal and directly differentiating into mature megakaryocytes. This enrichment strategy distinguishes megakaryocyte progenitors from other lineage-committed cells in a high throughput manner. Furthermore, by using image flow cytometry with PCA, we have identified a combination of markers and characteristics that can be used to isolate megakaryocyte progenitor cells using standard flow cytometry methods. Altogether, these techniques enable the high throughput enrichment and isolation of cells in the megakaryocyte lineage and have the potential to enable rapid disease identification and diagnoses ahead of severe disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas M Bush
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Connor P Healy
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - James E Marvin
- Flow Cytometry Core Facility, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The in vitro production of platelets could provide a life-saving intervention for patients that would otherwise require donor-derived platelets. Producing large numbers of platelets in vitro from their progenitor cells, megakaryocytes, remains remarkably difficult and inefficient. Here, a human megakaryoblast leukemia cell line (MEG-01) was used to assess the maturation of megakaryocytes and to develop a new methodology for producing high numbers of platelet-like particles from mature MEG-01 cells in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie M Persson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Pauline V Kneller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mark W Livingston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lucas M Bush
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bush LM, Healy CP, Javdan SB, Emmons JC, Deans TL. Biological Cells as Therapeutic Delivery Vehicles. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2020; 42:106-118. [PMID: 33342562 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
One of the significant challenges remaining in the field of drug delivery is insufficient targeting of diseased tissues or cells. While efforts to perform targeted drug delivery by engineered nanoparticles have shown some success, there are underlying targeting, toxicity, and immunogenicity challenges. By contrast, live cells usually have innate targeting mechanisms, and can be used as drug-delivery vehicles to increase the efficiency with which a drug accumulates to act on the intended tissue. In some cases, when no native cell types exhibit the desired therapeutic phenotype, preferred outcomes can be achieved by genetically modifying and reprogramming cells with gene circuits. This review highlights recent advances in the use of cells to deliver therapeutics. Specifically, we discuss how red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, neutrophils, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and bacteria have been utilized to advance drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas M Bush
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Connor P Healy
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Shwan B Javdan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Jonathan C Emmons
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fitzgerald M, Livingston M, Gibbs C, Deans TL. Rosa26 docking sites for investigating genetic circuit silencing in stem cells. Synth Biol (Oxf) 2020; 5:ysaa014. [PMID: 33195816 PMCID: PMC7644442 DOI: 10.1093/synbio/ysaa014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Approaches in mammalian synthetic biology have transformed how cells can be programmed to have reliable and predictable behavior, however, the majority of mammalian synthetic biology has been accomplished using immortalized cell lines that are easy to grow and easy to transfect. Genetic circuits that integrate into the genome of these immortalized cell lines remain functional for many generations, often for the lifetime of the cells, yet when genetic circuits are integrated into the genome of stem cells gene silencing is observed within a few generations. To investigate the reactivation of silenced genetic circuits in stem cells, the Rosa26 locus of mouse pluripotent stem cells was modified to contain docking sites for site-specific integration of genetic circuits. We show that the silencing of genetic circuits can be reversed with the addition of sodium butyrate, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. These findings demonstrate an approach to reactivate the function of genetic circuits in pluripotent stem cells to ensure robust function over many generations. Altogether, this work introduces an approach to overcome the silencing of genetic circuits in pluripotent stem cells that may enable the use of genetic circuits in pluripotent stem cells for long-term function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fitzgerald
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Mark Livingston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Chelsea Gibbs
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Persistent and complex problems arising with respect to human physiology and pathology have led to intense investigation into therapies and tools that permit more targeted outcomes and biomimetic responses to pathological conditions. A primary goal in mammalian synthetic biology is to build genetic circuits that exert fine control over cell behavior for next-generation biomedical applications. In pursuit of this, synthetic biologists have engineered cells endowed with genetic circuits with sensor that are capable of reacting to a variety of stimuli and responding with targeted behavior. Here, we highlight how synthetic biology approaches are being used to program cells with novel functions for therapeutic applications, and how they can be used in stem cells to improve differentiation outcomes. These approaches open the possibilities for engineering synthetic tissues for employing personalized medicine and to develop next-generation biomedical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Healy
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | - T L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weisenberger MS, Deans TL. Bottom-up approaches in synthetic biology and biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2018; 45:599-614. [PMID: 29552703 PMCID: PMC6041164 DOI: 10.1007/s10295-018-2027-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Synthetic biologists use engineering principles to design and construct genetic circuits for programming cells with novel functions. A bottom-up approach is commonly used to design and construct genetic circuits by piecing together functional modules that are capable of reprogramming cells with novel behavior. While genetic circuits control cell operations through the tight regulation of gene expression, a diverse array of environmental factors within the extracellular space also has a significant impact on cell behavior. This extracellular space offers an addition route for synthetic biologists to apply their engineering principles to program cell-responsive modules within the extracellular space using biomaterials. In this review, we discuss how taking a bottom-up approach to build genetic circuits using DNA modules can be applied to biomaterials for controlling cell behavior from the extracellular milieu. We suggest that, by collectively controlling intrinsic and extrinsic signals in synthetic biology and biomaterials, tissue engineering outcomes can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The field of mammalian synthetic biology seeks to engineer enabling technologies to create novel approaches for programming cells to probe, perturb, and regulate gene expression with unprecedented precision. To accomplish this, new genetic parts continue to be identified that can be used to build novel genetic circuits to re-engineer cells to perform specific functions. Here, we establish a new transcription-based genetic circuit that combines genes from the quinic acid sensing metabolism of Neorospora crassa and the bacterial Lac repressor system to create a new orthogonal genetic tool to be used in mammalian cells. This work establishes a novel genetic tool, called LacQ, that functions to regulate gene expression in Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells, human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, and in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fitzgerald
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Chelsea Gibbs
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Adrian A Shimpi
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Advances in synthetic biology have enabled the engineering of cells with genetic circuits in order to program cells with new biological behavior, dynamic gene expression, and logic control. This cellular engineering progression offers an array of living sensors that can discriminate between cell states, produce a regulated dose of therapeutic biomolecules, and function in various delivery platforms. In this review, we highlight and summarize the tools and applications in bacterial and mammalian synthetic biology. The examples detailed in this review provide insight to further understand genetic circuits, how they are used to program cells with novel functions, and current methods to reliably interface this technology in vivo; thus paving the way for the design of promising novel therapeutic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Cody MacDonald
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Abstract
Genetically identical cells in culture often exhibit significant variations, or noise, in gene expression, largely due to transcriptional bursting. Halpern et al. (2015) have developed methods to study gene bursting in tissues to find that this transcriptional bursting also occurs in the mammalian liver and may contribute to functional plasticity in hepatocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Lam
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah Biopolymers Research Building, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Tara L Deans
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah Biopolymers Research Building, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Biomaterials are designed to mimic aspects of various extracellular matrix environments, through chemical modifications to input biological or chemical signals. However, the dynamic nature and timing of gene expression during cellular events is much more difficult to mimic and control in these synthetic environments. Here, we utilized concepts of photochemistry combined with click chemistry for synthetic biology applications to modulate cellular gene expression in poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels. Specifically, a genetic inducer, isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), is covalently linked to PEG via a biocompatible and easy to synthesize 2-(2-azido-6-nitrophenyl)ethoxycarbonyl (ANPEOC) photocleavable moiety that, on a short exposure to UV light, effectively releases IPTG and activates gene expression of enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP). We anticipate that combining concepts of material chemistry with synthetic biology will further enable the construction of highly defined engineered niches that are capable of controlling both intrinsic and extrinsic cellular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirudha Singh
- Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 400 North Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland
21231, United States
| | - Tara L. Deans
- Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 400 North Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland
21231, United States
| | - Jennifer H. Elisseeff
- Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 400 North Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland
21231, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Tara L Deans
- Johns Hopkins University, Whitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Deans TL, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. A tunable genetic switch based on RNAi and repressor proteins for regulating gene expression in mammalian cells. Cell 2007; 130:363-72. [PMID: 17662949 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2006] [Revised: 04/11/2007] [Accepted: 05/15/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Here, we introduce an engineered, tunable genetic switch that couples repressor proteins and an RNAi target design to effectively turn any gene off. We used the switch to regulate the expression of EGFP in mouse and human cells and found that it offers >99% repression as well as the ability to tune gene expression. To demonstrate the system's modularity and level of gene silencing, we used the switch to tightly regulate the expression of diphtheria toxin and Cre recombinase, respectively. We also used the switch to tune the expression of a proapoptotic gene and show that a threshold expression level is required to induce apoptosis. This work establishes a system for tight, tunable control of mammalian gene expression that can be used to explore the functional role of various genes as well as to determine whether a phenotype is the result of a threshold response to changes in gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara L Deans
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for BioDynamics and Center for Advanced Biotechnology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|