The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce: pregnancy and perinatal guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than non-pregnant women of a similar age. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it was clear that evidenced-based guidance was needed, and that it would need to be updated rapidly. The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce provided a resource to guide care for people with COVID-19, including during pregnancy. Care for pregnant and breastfeeding women and their babies was included as a priority when the Taskforce was set up, with a Pregnancy and Perinatal Care Panel convened to guide clinical practice.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS

As of May 2022, the Taskforce has made seven specific recommendations on care for pregnant women and those who have recently given birth. This includes supporting usual practices for the mode of birth, umbilical cord clamping, skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, rooming-in, and using antenatal corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate as clinically indicated. There are 11 recommendations for COVID-19-specific treatments, including conditional recommendations for using remdesivir, tocilizumab and sotrovimab. Finally, there are recommendations not to use several disease-modifying treatments for the treatment of COVID-19, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. The recommendations are continually updated to reflect new evidence, and the most up-to-date guidance is available online (https://covid19evidence.net.au).

CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT RESULTING FROM THE GUIDELINES

The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce has been a critical component of the infrastructure to support Australian maternity care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Taskforce has shown that a rapid living guidelines approach is feasible and acceptable.

Clinical care of pregnant and postpartum women with COVID-19: Living recommendations from the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce

To date, 18 living recommendations for the clinical care of pregnant and postpartum women with COVID-19 have been issued by the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce. This includes recommendations on mode of birth, delayed umbilical cord clamping, skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, rooming-in, antenatal corticosteroids, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, disease-modifying treatments (including dexamethasone, remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and advanced respiratory support interventions (prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Through continuous evidence surveillance, these living recommendations are updated in near real-time to ensure clinicians in Australia have reliable, evidence-based guidelines for clinical decision-making. Please visit https://covid19evidence.net.au/ for the latest recommendation updates.

Heterosubtypic anti-avian H5N1 influenza antibodies in intravenous immunoglobulins from globally separate populations protect against H5N1 infection in cell culture

With antigenically novel epidemic and pandemic influenza strains persistently on the horizon it is of fundamental importance that we understand whether heterosubtypic antibodies gained from exposures to circulating human influenzas exist and can protect against emerging novel strains. Our studies of IVIG obtained from an infection-naive population (Australian) enabled us to reveal heterosubtypic influenza antibodies that cross react with H5N1. We now expand those findings for an Australian donor population to include IVIG formulations from a variety of northern hemisphere populations. Examination of IVIGs from European and South East-Asian (Malaysian) blood donor populations further reveal heterosubtypic antibodies to H5N1 in humans from different global regions. Importantly these protect against highly pathogenic avian H5N1 infection in vitro, albeit at low titres of inhibition. Although there were qualitative and quantitative differences in binding and protection between globally different formulations, the heterosubtypic antibody activities for the respective IVIGs were in general quite similar. Of particular note because of the relative geographic proximity to the epicentre of H5N1 and the majority of human infections, was the similarity in the antibody binding responses between IVIGs from the Malayan peninsula, Europe and Australia. These findings highlight the value of employing IVIGs for the study of herd immunity, and particularly heterosubtypic antibody responses to viral antigens such as those conserved between circulating human influenzas and emerging influenza strains such as H5N1. They also open a window into a somewhat ill defined arena of antibody immunity, namely heterosubtypic immunity.

Time to treat: A system redesign focusing on decreasing the time from suspicion of lung cancer to diagnosis in a community hospital

17005

Background: Multiple physician visits, numerous investigations, and serial wait times often result in a lengthy process from the onset of lung cancer-related symptoms until diagnosis. An unpublished retrospective chart review from a Toronto community hospital indicated suboptimal delays for patients from onset of symptoms until the diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods: The Time to Treat Program (TTT), consisting of a streamlined referral system and a clerical facilitator to fast-track patients through a diagnostic pathway algorithm, was designed for patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of lung cancer. Data on patient visits and investigations were collected. Pre- and post-implementation data on median wait times were compared. Results: From April 2005 to December 2006 over 120 physicians referred 188 females and 226 males. For the majority of patients (95.2%), the reason for referral was chest x-ray findings suspicious for lung cancer. After TTT implementation, the median time from suspicion of lung cancer to referral for specialist consultation decreased from 19.9 days to 10 days, and the median time from such referral to the actual consultation date decreased from 16.8 days to 5.3 days. The median time from specialist consultation to CT scan decreased from 52.1 days to 4 days and the median time from CT to diagnosis decreased from 39 days to 12.4 days. Overall, the median time from suspicion of lung cancer to diagnosis decreased from 127.8 days to 30 days. For 25% of the patients in the TTT it took 13 or fewer days from suspicion of lung cancer to diagnosis, while for 5% of the patients it took 90 days or more. Half of the patients in the TTT had a diagnosis by 24 days from the time of suspicion. Of all patients in the TTT, 33% were eventually diagnosed with lung cancer. The time from suspicion to diagnosis took longer for patients who eventually had confirmed lung cancer than those who did not: 36.5 days vs. 28.7 days. Conclusions: By addressing process issues in the work-up of lung cancer, the TTT was effective in shortening the time from suspicion of lung cancer to diagnosis and reduced time intervals at each step in the process. Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer may allow increased treatment options for patients.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.