Systemic inflammatory cytokine profiles in patients with gout during flare, intercritical and treat-to-target phases: TNFSF14 as new biomarker

INTRODUCTION

Untreated gout is characterised by monosodium urate (MSU) crystal accumulation responsible for recurrent flares that are commonly separated by asymptomatic phases. Both phases are inflammatory conditions of variable intensity. Gout flares are self-limited inflammatory reactions involving multiple mediators. This study aimed to characterise the inflammatory profiles of gout at different phases.

METHODS

Using the Olink targeted proteomics, levels of 92 inflammation-related proteins were measured in plasma samples of a prospective gout population (GOUTROS), collected at gout flare (T1), the intercritical phase (T2) and after reaching the target serum urate level under urate-lowering therapy (T3). Results were validated in an independent cohort (OLT1177-05) with plasmas collected at T1 and T2. Ex vivo and in vitro experiments were performed to assess the inflammatory properties of new biomarkers.

RESULTS

In total, 21 inflammatory new biomarkers were differentially expressed during the three time-points of gout disease. The levels of four of these proteins (interleukin 6 (IL-6), colony-stimulating factor 1, vascular endothelial growth factor A and tumour necrosis factor superfamily 14 (TNFSF14)) were increased during gout flare in an independent cohort. IL-6 and TNFSF14 had the highest fold change in expression during T1 versus T2 or T3. TNFSF14 was produced at the inflamed joint and enhanced the inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide and MSU crystal stimulation. Conversely, TNFSF14 blockade reduced the inflammatory response. Additionally, single nucleotide polymorphisms of TNFSF14 affected the ability of myeloid cells to produce inflammatory cytokines.

CONCLUSION

Gout flare involves multiple inflammatory mediators that may be used as potential therapeutic targets.

Constructing Mixed Density Functionals for Describing Dissociative Chemisorption on Metal Surfaces: Basic Principles

The production of a majority of chemicals involves heterogeneous catalysis at some stage, and the rates of many heterogeneously catalyzed processes are governed by transition states for dissociative chemisorption on metals. Accurate values of barrier heights for dissociative chemisorption on metals are therefore important to benchmarking electronic structure theory in general and density functionals in particular. Such accurate barriers can be obtained using the semiempirical specific reaction parameter (SRP) approach to density functional theory. However, this approach has thus far been rather ad hoc in its choice of the generic expression of the SRP functional to be used, and there is a need for better heuristic approaches to determining the mixing parameters contained in such expressions. Here we address these two issues. We investigate the ability of several mixed, parametrized density functional expressions combining exchange at the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) level with either GGA or nonlocal correlation to reproduce barrier heights for dissociative chemisorption on metal surfaces. For this, seven expressions of such mixed density functionals are tested on a database consisting of results for 16 systems taken from a recently published slightly larger database called SBH17. Three expressions are derived that exhibit high tunability and use correlation functionals that are either of the PBE GGA form or of one of two limiting nonlocal forms also describing the attractive van der Waals interaction in an approximate way. We also find that, for mixed density functionals incorporating GGA correlation, the optimum fraction of repulsive RPBE GGA exchange obtained with a specific GGA density functional is correlated with the charge-transfer parameter, which is equal to the difference in the work function of the metal surface and the electron affinity of the molecule. However, the correlation is generally not large and not large enough to obtain accurate guesses of the mixing parameter for the systems considered, suggesting that it does not give rise to a very effective search strategy.

Early Extracorporeal CPR for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) restores perfusion and oxygenation in a patient who does not have spontaneous circulation. The evidence with regard to the effect of extracorporeal CPR on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is inconclusive.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, we assigned patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive extracorporeal CPR or conventional CPR (standard advanced cardiac life support). Eligible patients were between 18 and 70 years of age, had received bystander CPR, had an initial ventricular arrhythmia, and did not have a return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes after CPR had been initiated. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) at 30 days. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Of the 160 patients who underwent randomization, 70 were assigned to receive extracorporeal CPR and 64 to receive conventional CPR; 26 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria at hospital admission were excluded. At 30 days, 14 patients (20%) in the extracorporeal-CPR group were alive with a favorable neurologic outcome, as compared with 10 patients (16%) in the conventional-CPR group (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.5; P = 0.52). The number of serious adverse events per patient was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal CPR and conventional CPR had similar effects on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and Maquet Cardiopulmonary [Getinge]; INCEPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03101787.).

Sulfonimidamides by Sequential Mechanochemical Chlorinations and Aminations of Sulfinamides

Here, we report the first mechanochemical synthesis of sulfonimidamides. The one-pot, two-step method requires neither a solvent nor inert conditions. In a mixer mill, sulfinamides are rapidly converted to sulfonimidoyl chlorides by oxidative chlorination with N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS). Subsequent substitutions with amines provides a wide range of diversely substituted sulfonimidamides.

AB0884 Disease outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis completing 12 months of apremilast treatment - Real-world data from the REWARD study

Background

Patients with moderately active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and limited joint involvement have considerable disease burden1,2. Recent data shows these patients have a high likelihood of achieving treatment goals if treated with apremilast3. This is the first report of outcomes in patients with PsA who received apremilast for 12 months in Dutch clinical practice.

Objectives

We report disease outcomes, including the PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID) 12-item questionnaire, swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), dactylitis and enthesitis, among patients in the prospective, multicenter, observational REWARD study who completed 12 months of apremilast treatment.

Methods

The ongoing REWARD study enrolled patients who had initiated apremilast for the treatment of PsA in the Netherlands between 13 April 2017 and 24 March 2021, and includes up to 12 months follow-up1,4. We report interim data from patients with data available as of 16 September 2021. Baseline data are summarized separately for patients who discontinued apremilast before their month 12 study visit (stoppers) and patients still receiving apremilast at their month 12 visit (completers). Post baseline data are summarized for completers. Continuous data are summarized using mean and SD, categorical data are summarized using n and percent.

Results

98 patients were included in this interim analysis; 32 had completed 12 months of apremilast treatment (completers), 54 had discontinued apremilast before month 12 (stoppers), 12 were ongoing in the study. Compared with stoppers, completers were more likely to be biologic naïve and have dactylitis, and had lower BSA. All other baseline characteristics were similar (Table 1). Among completers, all PsAID domains improved after 3 months of apremilast treatment and these improvements were maintained through month 12 (Figure 1). Mean SJC and TJC decreased between baseline and month 12 (SJC, 4.2 and 1.0 at baseline and month 12, respectively; TJC, 7.1 and 3.3, respectively). The proportion of completers with SJC, TJC, enthesitis and dactylitis scores of 0 increased from baseline to month 12 (Figure 1B). The proportion of completers reporting at least one adverse event (AE) was comparable to the overall study population (14/32 [44%] and 48/98 [49%], respectively); the reported adverse events were similar to the known safety profile of apremilast.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

All=all patients included in this interim analysis; Completers= patients that received apremilast for 12 months; Stoppers= patients that stopped apremilast treatment prior to 12 months.

BMI=Body Mass Index, PsO=Psoriasis, BSA PsO= Body Surface Area Psoriasis, SJC=Swollen Joint Count, TJC=Tender Joint Count, PsAID=Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease, VAS=Visual Analog Scale, CRP= C-reactive protein, cDAPSA=Clinical Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis, Rem=Remission, Mod=Moderate, PsA= Psoriatic Arthritis

Figure 1.

(A) PSAID scores in completers and (B) percentage of completers with no swollen joints, no tender joints, no dactylitis and no enthesitis at baseline (BSL), month 3, 6 and 12 (M3, M6, M12).

Conclusion

In this interim analysis of the REWARD study, patients completing 12 months of apremilast treatment were more likely to be biologic naïve than patients who discontinued apremilast within 12 months of initiation, and had significant decreases in TJC, SJC, dactylitis and enthesis during apremilast treatment. Completed patients also reported decreased PsAID scores during apremilast treatment, indicating improvements in their quality of life.

References

[1]Jansen TL, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78:913 [abstract FRI0442]

[2]Wervers et al. J Rheumatol. 2018;45:1526.

[3]Mease PJ, et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2020; 72, 6, 814–821

[4]Bos R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021; 80:805 [POS1053]

Acknowledgements

Sylvia de Jong and Claire Desborough, Amgen employees, provided medical writing and editorial assistance.

Disclosure of Interests

Reinhard Bos Consultant of: AbbVie BV, Genzyme Europe, Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Tim Jansen Speakers bureau: Grunenthal, Sobi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Grant/research support from: ReumaNederland, Olatec, Grunenthal, Ian Bridges Shareholder of: Amgen, Employee of: Amgen, Sylvia de Jong Shareholder of: Amgen, Employee of: Amgen, Novartis, Marijn Vis Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer

A low aldosterone/renin ratio and high soluble ACE2 associate with COVID-19 severity

BACKGROUND

The severity of COVID-19 after SARS-CoV-2 infection is unpredictable. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) is the receptor responsible for coronavirus binding, while subsequent cell entry relies on priming by the serine protease TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2). Although renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) blockers have been suggested to upregulate ACE2, their use in COVID-19 patients is now considered well tolerated. The aim of our study was to investigate parameters that determine COVID-19 severity, focusing on RAAS-components and variation in the genes encoding for ACE2 and TMPRSS2.

METHODS

Adult patients hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection between May 2020 and October 2020 in the Haga Teaching Hospital were included, and soluble ACE2 (sACE2), renin, aldosterone (in heparin plasma) and polymorphisms in the ACE2 and TMPRSS2 genes (in DNA obtained from EDTA blood) were determined.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Out of the 188 patients who were included, 60 were defined as severe COVID-19 (ICU and/or death). These patients more often used antidiabetic drugs, were older, had higher renin and sACE2 levels, lower aldosterone levels and a lower aldosterone/renin ratio. In addition, they displayed the TMPRSS2-rs2070788 AA genotype less frequently. No ACE2 polymorphism-related differences were observed. Multivariate regression analysis revealed independent significance for age, sACE2, the aldosterone/renin ratio, and the TMPRSS2 rs2070788 non-AA genotype as predictors of COVID-19 severity, together yielding a C-index of 0.79. Findings were independent of the use of RAAS blockers.

CONCLUSION

High sACE2, a low aldosterone/renin ratio and having the TMPRSS2 rs2070788 non-AA genotype are novel independent determinants that may help to predict COVID-19 disease severity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered.

Development of a patient decision aid for the initiation of urate-lowering therapy in gout patients

Aim

Shared decision-making improves patients’ experiences with care, satisfaction with management decisions and possibly health outcomes. This study describes the development of a decision aid (DA) that supports patients with gout and their physicians in a face-to-face clinical setting to (a) decide whether or not to (re)start urate-lowering therapy (ULT) and (b) agree on the preferred ULT.

Methods

Recommendations of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards group guided the development. A steering group of experts in gout and health services research specified the scope. Nominal group technique meetings were organised in which patients ranked the importance of preidentified potential characteristics/attributes of ULT and discussed further needs regarding the DA. A literature search was conducted to collect evidence on gout outcomes with and without ULT. Subsequently, the DA prototype was designed and adjusted using feedback from the steering group and results of cognitive debriefing interviews among five gout patients.

Results

The final DA consists of six pages. First, the DA clarifies the decision at stake and describes gout including its risk factors, the role of lifestyle and treatment of flares. Next, risk of future flares with and without ULT in relation to serum uric acid levels is described and visualised. Relevant attributes of ULT are presented in an option grid distinguishing first-line and second-line ULT. Finally, patients’ believes and preferences are explicitly addressed before making the shared decision.

Conclusion

This study provides initial support for usability of a DA for gout patients eligible for starting ULT.

A first dedicated heart valve unit: safe and streamlined patient care for the rapidly growing field of transcatheter heart valve interventions

Background

A dedicated Heart Valve Unit was launched in 2018 to meet the demands of the growing transcatheter heart valve program by optimizing patient care in a single dedicated unit.

Purpose

To assess the performance of the heart valve unit (all steps of patient care in a single unit with intermediate care facilities) over a conventional approach (preparation on a normal ward, postprocedural intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring and transfer to an additional monitoring ward before discharge) in a high volume center.

Methods

Retrospective analysis including patients undergoing transcatheter mitral or tricuspid valve repair who were admitted to the Heart Valve Unit (02/2018–01/2020) compared to a conventional patient care approach (02/2016–01/2018). Patients who were already preprocedurally admitted to the ICU or in whom ICU monitoring postprocedurally was mandatory (direct annuloplasty, valve replacement) were excluded. The Heart Valve Unit patient care algorithm is presented in figure 1. We assessed procedural numbers, length of hospital stay, length and need for ICU monitoring, patient transfers between wards and periprocedural safety including in-hospital mortality.

Results

We observed a 164% increase in procedures (521 vs. 316 in total, 369 vs 282 with mitral valve procedures and 152 vs 34 tricuspid valve procedures) with the launch of the Heart Valve Unit over the 2-year-interval compared to the earlier time period. Length of in-hospital stay was significantly decreased compared to a conventional approach (9±7 vs. 12±11 days, p<0.001). In particular, postprocedural stay could be shortened from 7±7 to 5±6 days (p<0.001). Patients were less transferred between different wards in the Heart Valve Unit setting (p<0.001). Whereas all patients were postprocedurally transferred to the ICU in the conventional setting, only 16% of patients required an ICU bed immediately after the procedure due to complex interventions, intraprocedural events or high-risk comorbidities. The length of stay on ICU declined from 1.4±1.4 to 0.5±2.2 days. Among the patients re-transferred to the Heart Valve Unit directly after the procedure, 2% (10 patients) required an ICU bed in the further course due to hemodynamic instability (2), severe bleeding (4), seizures (1), ventricular fibrillation (1), anaesthetic overhang (1) or after urgent surgery due to a atrioventricular fistula (1). After stabilization, all patients were re-transferred to the Heart Valve Unit and discharged hereinafter. There was no intra-hospital death among these patients.

Conclusions

A dedicated Heart Valve Unit allows a safe and optimized patient care structure for transcatheter valvular interventions by combining all pre- and postprocedural steps in a single unit, thereby decreasing length of in-hospital stay to meet increasing economic demands. ICU capacity can be specifically used for complex procedures aftercare and complication monitoring.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

POS1053 COMPARISON OF BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN PATIENTS CONTINUING OR DISCONTINUING APREMILAST AT TWELVE MONTHS IN THE REWARD STUDY (THE NETHERLANDS)

Background:

Previous analysis of the REWARD study reported that patients with limited joint involvement have a considerable burden of disease1. Recent data suggest that patients with moderately active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and a limited joint involvement have a high likelihood of achieving treatment goals when treated with apremilast2. According to EULAR recommendations a PDE4 inhibitor may be considered in patients with mild disease and an inadequate response to at least one csDMARD, in whom neither a bDMARD nor a JAK inhibitor is appropriate and the value of apremilast may be found in treating patients with relatively mild disease (oligoarticular)3.

Objectives:

The objective of this prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study is to describe patient reported outcomes, effectiveness and real-life use of apremilast in patients with PsA. Patients will be followed up for a maximum of 12 months. This interim analysis compared the baseline characteristics and experience on apremilast for two subgroups of patients, those remaining on apremilast versus the ones that discontinued.

Methods:

In this interim analysis we included patients with data available at cut-off date of 03 November 2020. Patient enrollment and follow up of current subjects is ongoing. Descriptive statistics (n’s and percents for categorical data, means for continuous data) were used to summarize the baseline data by subgroup. Kaplan Meier plots are presented to show patients’ experience on apremilast by subgroup.

Results:

85 patients were included in the analysis. 30 patients have completed the study, 39 patients have discontinued and 16 are ongoing. At baseline 22 (26%) patients were biologic experienced and 62 (74%) were biologic naïve. Both groups had a comparable disease activity measured with clinical disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (cDAPSA) scores. Biologic experienced patients had a longer disease duration compared to biologic naïve patients (mean 9.7 vs 6.2 years). Inefficacy of previous medication was the main reason for starting apremilast in both subgroups. Overall, 86% (n=69) of patients were still receiving apremilast at month 3, 60% (n=46) at month 6, and 41% (n=26) at month 12 (Figure 1). Drug survival (length of time until discontinuation of apremilast) for biologic naïve patients was 93% at month 3, 73% at month 6 and 58% at month 12. Drug survival of biologic experienced patients was 67%, 20%, and 0% at months 3, 6, and 12, respectively. At baseline mean values of body mass index (BMI), swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), psoriatic arthritis impact of disease (PsAID) were comparable between both groups (Table 1). Reasons for discontinuation were mainly lack of efficacy (49%) and adverse events (44%). In this analysis the nature and frequency of adverse events is in line with the known profile of apremilast.

Conclusion:

In this interim analysis, patients who were biologic naïve had a better probability to remain on treatment than those who were biologic experienced. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, apart from disease duration that was longer in the biologic experienced group. Best drug survival is achieved when apremilast is prescribed earlier in the PsA treatment course, before biologics and after csDMARDs, as per apremilast EU label.

References:

[1]Jansen TL, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:913 [abstract FRI0442]

[2]Mease PJ, et al. Arthritis Care Res 2020 72 6 814–821

[3]Gossec L, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:700–712

Disclosure of Interests:

Reinhard Bos Consultant of: AbbVie BV, Genzyme Europe, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Tim Jansen Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation – consultant, Speakers bureau: Grunenthal, Sobi – speakers bureau, Grant/research support from: ReumaNederland, Olatec, Grunenthal – grant/research support, Sylvia de Jong Shareholder of: Employee of Amgen Inc, Employee of: Employee of Amgen Inc, Antonio Castiglia Shareholder of: Employee of Amgen Inc, Employee of: Employee of Amgen Inc, Marijn Vis Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

POS1124 IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DEPOSITION DISEASE (CPPD): RESULTS FROM THE INITIAL PHASES

Background:

Classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) will facilitate clinical research on this common crystalline arthritis. ACR/EULAR are jointly sponsoring development of CPPD classification criteria using a multi-phase process.

Objectives:

To report preliminary results from the first two phases of a four-phase process for developing CPPD classification criteria.

Methods:

CPPD classification criteria development is overseen by a 12-member Steering Committee. Item generation (Phase I) included a scoping literature review of five literature databases and contributions from a 35-member Combined Expert Committee and two Patient Research Partners. Item reduction and refinement (Phase II) involved a Combined Expert Committee meeting, discussions among Clinical, Imaging, and Laboratory Advisory Groups, and an item rating exercise to assess the influence of individual items toward classification. The Steering Committee reviewed the modal rating score for each item (range -3 [strongly pushes away from CPPD] to +3 [strongly pushes toward CPPD]) to determine items to retain for future phases of criteria development.

Results:

Item generation yielded 420 items (312 from the literature, 108 from experts/patients). The Advisory Groups eliminated items they agreed were unlikely to distinguish between CPPD and other forms of arthritis, yielding 127 items for the item rating exercise. Fifty-six items, most of which had a modal rating of +/- 2 or 3, were retained for future phases (see Table 1). As numerous imaging items were rated +3, the Steering Committee recommended focusing on imaging of the knee, wrist, and one additional affected joint for calcification suggestive of CPP crystal deposition.

Conclusion:

The ACR/EULAR CPPD classification criteria working group has adopted both data- and expert-driven approaches, leading to 56 candidate items broadly categorized as clinical, imaging, and laboratory features. Remaining steps for criteria development include domain establishment, item weighting through a multi-criteria decision analysis exercise, threshold score determination, and criteria validation.

Table 1.

Categories of items retained for future phases of classification criteria development

Age in decade at symptom onsetAcute inflammatory arthritis (e.g. knee, wrist, 1st MTP joint*)Recurrence and pattern of joint involvement (e.g. 1 self-limited episode, >1 self-limited episode)Physical findings (e.g. palpable subcutaneous tophus*, psoriasis*)Co-morbidities and family history (e.g. Gitelman disease, hemochromatosis, familial CPPD)Osteoarthritis location and features (e.g. 2nd or 3rd MCP joint, wrist)Synovial fluid findings (e.g. CPP crystals present, CPP crystals absent on 1 occasion* or 2 occasions*, monosodium urate crystals present*)Laboratory findings (e.g. hypomagnesemia, hyperparathyroidism, rheumatoid factor*, anti-CCP*)Plain radiograph: calcification in regions of fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Plain radiograph: calcification of the synovial membrane/capsule/tendon+Conventional CT: calcification in regions of fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Conventional CT: calcification of the synovial membrane/capsule/tendon+Ultrasound: CPP crystal deposition in fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Ultrasound: CPP crystal deposition in synovial membrane/capsule/tendons+Dual-energy CT: CPP crystal deposition in fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Dual-energy CT: CPP crystal deposition in synovial membrane/capsule/tendon+

*Potential negative predictor +Assessed in the knee, wrist, and/or 1 additional affected joint

Disclosure of Interests:

Sara Tedeschi Consultant of: NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Tristan Pascart: None declared, Augustin Latourte Consultant of: Novartis, Cattleya Godsave: None declared, Burak Kundaki: None declared, Raymond Naden: None declared, William Taylor: None declared, Nicola Dalbeth Speakers bureau: Abbvie and Janssen, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Dyve, Selecta, Horizon, Arthrosi, and Cello Health, Tuhina Neogi: None declared, Fernando Perez-Ruiz: None declared, Ann Rosenthal: None declared, Fabio Becce Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics, Grant/research support from: Siemens Healthineers, Eliseo Pascual: None declared, Mariano Andrés: None declared, Thomas Bardin: None declared, Michael Doherty: None declared, Hang Korng Ea: None declared, Georgios Filippou: None declared, John FitzGerald: None declared, Marwin Gutierrez: None declared, Annamaria Iagnocco: None declared, Tim Jansen Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Grunenthal, Olatec, Sanofi Genzyme, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Grunenthal, Olatec, Sanofi Genzyme, Minna Kohler Speakers bureau: Lilly, Consultant of: Novartis, Frederic Lioté: None declared, Mark Matza: None declared, Geraldine McCarthy Consultant of: PK Med, Roberta Ramonda: None declared, Anthony Reginato: None declared, Pascal Richette: None declared, Jasvinder Singh Speakers bureau: Simply Speaking, Consultant of: Crealta/Horizon, Medisys, Fidia, UBM LLC, Trio health, Medscape, WebMD, Adept Field Solutions, Clinical Care options, Clearview healthcare partners, Putnam associates, Focus forward, Navigant consulting, Spherix, Practice Point communications, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Alexander So: None declared, Lisa Stamp: None declared, Janeth Yinh: None declared, Chio Yokose: None declared, Robert Terkeltaub Consultant of: Sobi, Horizon Therapeutics, Astra-Zeneca, Selecta, Grant/research support from: Astra-Zeneca, Hyon Choi: None declared, Abhishek Abhishek Consultant of: NGM Biopharmaceuticals.

AB0915-PARE DEVELOPMENT AND USABILITY OF A WEB-BASED PATIENT-TAILORED TOOL TO SUPPORT ADHERENCE TO URATE-LOWERING THERAPY IN GOUT PATIENTS

Background:

Adherence to prescribed urate-lowering therapy (ULT) among gout patients is considered to be among the poorest of all chronic conditions. eHealth programs can be a possible opportunity to foster ULT adherence.

Objectives:

This study describes the development and usability evaluation of a web-based tool to support ULT adherence among gout patients, specifically designed for a complement to usual care.

Methods:

The Integrated Change (I-Change) model was used as theoretical basis for the development. The model combines various socio-cognitive theories and differentiates between three phases: a pre-motivational, a motivational, and a post-motivational phase. In practices, the I-Change gout tool contains three sessions, following the three phases of the I-Change model. Patients receive tailored feedback based on their answers in the form of animated videos and text messages after each session, and are prompted to set specific goals and action plans for their ULT adherence. The content and development of the I-Change gout tool was determined along an iterative process within a steering group of clinicians and researchers, supported by patient interviews and gout specific literature related to key aspects of medication adherence behavior. A cross-sectional mixed methods design was used to test usability of the support tool consisting of a think aloud method and a usability questionnaire.

Results:

The steering group decided on the content of the three sessions of the I-Change gout tool. Depending on the intention to change ULT adherence behavior patients were navigated through the I-Change gout tool, patients with a low intention go through all 3 sessions and patients with a high intention go through the pre- and post-motivational session (figure 1). In total, the I-Change gout tool contains three sessions with 80 questions, 66 tailored textual feedback messages, and 40 tailored animated videos.

Figure 1.

Flowchart of the computer-tailored I-Change gout tool for urate-lowering therapy adherence.

Twenty gout patients and seven healthcare professionals participated in the usability tests. The program end score rating for the gout tool was on average 8.4±0.9 (range 6-10) for patients and 7.7±1.0 (range 6-9) for healthcare professionals. Furthermore, participants reported a high intention to use and/or recommend the program in the future. Yet, participants identified some issues for further improvement of the systems user-friendliness by addressing barriers (e.g. more explicitly navigation) and weaknesses (e.g. technical and health literacy). The I-Change gout tool was updated according suggestions of improvements of the participants.

Conclusion:

This study provides initial support for the usability by patients and healthcare professionals of a ULT adherence I-Change gout tool. Further studies need to be conducted to assess its efficacy and (cost-) effectiveness in daily practice.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Veno-arterial thrombosis and microcirculation imaging in a patient with COVID-19

The Coronavirus pandemic has brought new challenges in intensive care medicine. Understanding of the pathophysiology of the vascular complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection could bring new resuscitation and therapeutic options. In this case report, we present a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia, who was admitted to our ICU and treated with high-flow nasal cannula, dexamethasone, remdesivir and high-dose prophylactic low molecular weight heparin. During ICU admission, substantial venous and arterial thrombosis developed. Meanwhile the microcirculation showed more than double amount of organ perfusion with very high total vessel density. We hypothesize that this might be a compensatory mechanism for the generalized prothrombic state in which the microcirculation increases the oxygen extraction capacity preventing multi-organ failure.

Managing COVID-19 within and across health systems: why we need performance intelligence to coordinate a global response

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic is a complex global public health crisis presenting clinical, organisational and system-wide challenges. Different research perspectives on health are needed in order to manage and monitor this crisis. Performance intelligence is an approach that emphasises the need for different research perspectives in supporting health systems’ decision-makers to determine policies based on well-informed choices. In this paper, we present the viewpoint of the Innovative Training Network for Healthcare Performance Intelligence Professionals (HealthPros) on how performance intelligence can be used during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Discussion

A lack of standardised information, paired with limited discussion and alignment between countries contribute to uncertainty in decision-making in all countries. Consequently, a plethora of different non-data-driven and uncoordinated approaches to address the outbreak are noted worldwide. Comparative health system research is needed to help countries shape their response models in social care, public health, primary care, hospital care and long-term care through the different phases of the pandemic. There is a need in each phase to compare context-specific bundles of measures where the impact on health outcomes can be modelled using targeted data and advanced statistical methods. Performance intelligence can be pursued to compare data, construct indicators and identify optimal strategies. Embracing a system perspective will allow countries to take coordinated strategic decisions while mitigating the risk of system collapse.A framework for the development and implementation of performance intelligence has been outlined by the HealthPros Network and is of pertinence. Health systems need better and more timely data to govern through a pandemic-induced transition period where tensions between care needs, demand and capacity are exceptionally high worldwide. Health systems are challenged to ensure essential levels of healthcare towards all patients, including those who need routine assistance.

Conclusion

Performance intelligence plays an essential role as part of a broader public health strategy in guiding the decisions of health system actors on the implementation of contextualised measures to tackle COVID-19 or any future epidemic as well as their effect on the health system at large. This should be based on commonly agreed-upon standardised data and fit-for-purpose indicators, making optimal use of existing health information infrastructures. The HealthPros Network can make a meaningful contribution.

Attitudes of Dutch intensive care unit clinicians towards oxygen therapy

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, there has been an increasing awareness for the potential harm of the administration of too much oxygen. We aimed to describe self-reported attitudes towards oxygen therapy by clinicians from a large representative sample of intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands.

METHODS

In April 2019, 36 ICUs in the Netherlands were approached and asked to send out a questionnaire (59 questions) to their nursing and medical staff (ICU clinicians) eliciting self-reported behaviour and attitudes towards oxygen therapy in general and in specific ICU case scenarios.

RESULTS

In total, 1361 ICU clinicians (71% nurses, 24% physicians) from 28 ICUs returned the questionnaire. Of responding ICU clinicians, 64% considered oxygen-induced lung injury to be a major concern. The majority of respondents considered a partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) of 6-10 kPa (45-75 mmHg) and an arterial saturation (SaO2) of 85-90% as acceptable for 15 minutes, and a PaO2 7-10 kPa (53-75 mmHg) and SaO2 90-95% as acceptable for 24-48 hours in an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patient. In most case scenarios, respondents reported not to change the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) if SaO2 was 90-95% or PaO2 was 12 kPa (90 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

A representative sample of ICU clinicians from the Netherlands were concerned about oxygen-induced lung injury, and reported that they preferred PaO2 and SaO2 targets in the lower physiological range and would adjust ventilation settings accordingly.

AB0784 COMPARABLE IMPACT AND BURDEN OF DISEASE OF PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WITH LIMITED JOINT INVOLVEMENT VS. THOSE WITH MORE EXTENSIVE JOINT INVOLVEMENT: INTERIM RESULTS FROM THE REWARD STUDY, A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER, REAL-WORLD STUDY IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH APREMILAST

Background:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is associated with a high burden of disease and an increased risk of comorbidities. Recent data suggest that patients with moderate PsA benefit most from apremilast (APR) treatment.1Results from an earlier analysis of the REWARD study suggest that patients with limited joint involvement may benefit from APR treatment, with improvements in the perceived impact of disease.2Patients with limited joint involvement or comorbidities are underrepresented in randomised controlled trials; therefore, evidence from real-world patient cohorts is needed to assess and compare the impact and burden of disease on patients with limited vs. extensive joints who may also have comorbidities.

Objectives:

To compare the burden of disease and comorbidities in patients with PsA who have limited joint involvement with patients with PsA who have extensive joint involvement.

Methods:

The prospective, multicenter, observational REWARD study assessed the impact of using the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire (score range: 0-10), presence of domains of PsA (enthesitis, dactylitis, skin psoriasis, nail psoriasis, axial involvement), and ongoing or history of comorbidities of interest on PsA patients considered for apremilast treatment in The Netherlands. This interim analysis compared results in patients with limited joint involvement (swollen joint count [SJC] ≤4) vs. more extensive joint involvement (SJC >4).

Results:

Currently, 77 patients have been included in the analysis (SJC ≤4: n=53; SJC >4: n=24) (Table 1). Mean baseline PsAID scores were 4.4 vs. 4.8 for the SJC ≤4 vs. SJC >4 groups (Figure 1). The proportions of patients who were not in the PsAID-defined Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were 58.7% for the SJC ≤4 group and 62.5% for the SJC >4 group. Mean pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores (0-100 mm) were 45.9 vs. 53.4 for the SJC ≤4 group vs. for the SJC >4 group. Mean scores for the individual PsAID domains for the SJC ≤4 vs. SJC >4 groups were generally comparable (Figure 2). Presence of specific manifestations of PsA for patients in the SJC ≤4 group vs. the SJC >4 group, respectively, were: moderate to severe psoriasis (psoriasis-involved body surface area [BSA] >3: 31.4% vs. 21.7%), nail psoriasis (45.3% vs. 41.7%), enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index >0: 43.4% vs. 45.8%), dactylitis (18.9% vs. 33.3%), and axial involvement (3.8% vs 8.3%). Comorbidities in ≥5% of either group (SJC ≤4 vs. SJC >4) included hypertension (30.2% vs. 37.5%), hypercholesterolemia (13.2% vs. 16.7%), uveitis (1.9% vs. 8.3%), malignancy (0.0% vs. 8.3%), heart failure (5.7% vs. 8.3%), and depression (5.7 vs. 4.2%).

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

DemographicsSJC ≤4n=53SJC >4n=24Age, mean53.154.4Female, %46.266.7Body mass index, mean, kg/m228.628.7PsA CharacteristicsSJC, mean1.210.2TJC, mean4.313.7PsAID, mean4.44.8Pain VAS, mean45.953.4Moderate to severe psoriasis (BSA >3), %31.421.7Dactylitis, %18.933.3Enthesitis, %43.445.8Nail psoriasis, %45.341.7Axial spondyloarthritis, %3.88.3ComorbiditiesHypertension, %30.237.5Hypercholesteremia, %13.216.7Uveitis, %1.98.3Malignancy, %0.08.3Heart failure, %5.78.3Depression, %5.74.2

Conclusion:

In this real-world study, no strong associations between SJC and patient-reported impact of disease or pain were observed. Similar to patients with more extensive joints involvement, patients with limited joint involvement had an associated substantial burden of disease, with more than half not achieving PsAID PASS.

References:

[1]Mease PJ, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jan 7. Epub. 2. Jansen TL, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:913. Abstract FRI0442.

Disclosure of Interests:

Tim Jansen Grant/research support from: Olatec, Grunenthal – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation – consultant, Speakers bureau: Grunenthal, Sobi – speakers bureau, Arie Van Vliet Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene – employment at the time of study conduct, Marijn Vis Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer – consultant

ARoCuS Web application promotes standardized treatment and documentation of rotator cuff tears

Purpose

To program a Web application for simplified calculation of the Advanced Rotator Cuff tear Score (ARoCuS), which is a 5-part, 18-item treatment-oriented intraoperative scoring system for intraoperative evaluation of rotator cuff tears.

Methods

ARoCuS characteristics (torn tendon, tear size, tissue quality and tear pattern) were assessed intraoperatively on 40 consecutive patients with rotator cuff tears for calculation of defect category ΔV. Video recordings were used to re-calculate the ARoCuS after surgery and to assess inter-observer reliability.

Results

The Web application “ARoCuS App” was built using Angular and transformed to a native iOS application. The intraoperative use of the app proved to be simple and intuitive. There were inter-/intra-observer differences neither in ARoCuS defect categories ΔV nor in ARoCuS characteristics (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The ARoCuS app is a supportive tool for integration of standardized treatment procedures and documentation of rotator cuff tears in clinical routine.

Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) consensus statement regarding labels and definitions of disease states of gout

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of standardisation in the terminology used to describe gout. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus statement describing the recommended nomenclature for disease states of gout.

METHODS

A content analysis of gout-related articles from rheumatology and general internal medicine journals published over a 5-year period identified potential disease states and the labels commonly assigned to them. Based on these findings, experts in gout were invited to participate in a Delphi exercise and face-to-face consensus meeting to reach agreement on disease state labels and definitions.

RESULTS

The content analysis identified 13 unique disease states and a total of 63 unique labels. The Delphi exercise (n=76 respondents) and face-to-face meeting (n=35 attendees) established consensus agreement for eight disease state labels and definitions. The agreed labels were as follows: 'asymptomatic hyperuricaemia', 'asymptomatic monosodium urate crystal deposition', 'asymptomatic hyperuricaemia with monosodium urate crystal deposition', 'gout', 'tophaceous gout', 'erosive gout', 'first gout flare' and 'recurrent gout flares'. There was consensus agreement that the label 'gout' should be restricted to current or prior clinically evident disease caused by monosodium urate crystal deposition (gout flare, chronic gouty arthritis or subcutaneous tophus).

CONCLUSION

Consensus agreement has been established for the labels and definitions of eight gout disease states, including 'gout' itself. The Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network recommends the use of these labels when describing disease states of gout in research and clinical practice.

2018 updated European League Against Rheumatism evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout

Although gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis, it is still frequently misdiagnosed. New data on imaging and clinical diagnosis have become available since the first EULAR recommendations for the diagnosis of gout in 2006. This prompted a systematic review and update of the 2006 recommendations. A systematic review of the literature concerning all aspects of gout diagnosis was performed. Recommendations were formulated using a Delphi consensus approach. Eight key recommendations were generated. A search for crystals in synovial fluid or tophus aspirates is recommended in every person with suspected gout, because demonstration of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals allows a definite diagnosis of gout. There was consensus that a number of suggestive clinical features support a clinical diagnosis of gout. These are monoarticular involvement of a foot or ankle joint (especially the first metatarsophalangeal joint); previous episodes of similar acute arthritis; rapid onset of severe pain and swelling; erythema; male gender and associated cardiovascular diseases and hyperuricaemia. When crystal identification is not possible, it is recommended that any atypical presentation should be investigated by imaging, in particular with ultrasound to seek features suggestive of MSU crystal deposition (double contour sign and tophi). There was consensus that a diagnosis of gout should not be based on the presence of hyperuricaemia alone. There was also a strong recommendation that all people with gout should be systematically assessed for presence of associated comorbidities and risk factors for cardiovascular disease, as well as for risk factors for chronic hyperuricaemia. Eight updated, evidence-based, expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis of gout are proposed.

Efficacy and safety of lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricemia in gout

The aim of this review is to present current evidence about the efficacy and safety of lesinurad in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) in the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. Gout is the most common inflammatory form of arthritis. It is caused by an elevated concentration of serum uric acid (UA) that leads to the formation of monosodium urate crystals in joints and different tissues. The goal of therapy is to maintain serum UA levels at <6 mg/dL (0.36 mmol/L), to prevent the formation and deposition of monosodium urate crystals, and to dissolve existing crystals. Lesinurad, a new uricosuric, increases renal urate excretion by selectively inhibiting the renal uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1). Lesinurad is indicated in adults, in combination with a XOI, for the adjunctive treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout (with or without tophi) who have not achieved target serum UA levels with an adequate dose of a XOI alone. With the combination strategy, serum UA targets could be reached with the consequence of inhibiting formation of new crystals and promoting dissolution of existing crystals and, therefore, inducing improvement of outcomes such as flares and tophi. The approval of lesinurad was based on data from three pivotal phase III studies (CLEAR 1, CLEAR 2, and CRYSTAL). These clinical studies assessed lesinurad 200 and 400 mg doses. As only lesinurad 200 mg/day dose was finally approved and commercialized, it will be the focus of this paper. In the pivotal clinical trials, the target serum UA level was achieved by significantly more patients in lesinurad 200 mg plus allopurinol group (CLEAR 1 and CLEAR 2 trials) or lesinurad 200 mg plus febuxostat group (CRYSTAL study) compared with patients who received either XOI alone. In these trials, the safety profile of lesinurad 200 mg plus a XOI was comparable to allopurinol or febuxostat alone. Lesinurad, in combination with a XOI, is an effective and safe treatment that covers unmet needs in adults with gout who have not achieved target serum UA levels with a XOI alone.

Temporary epiphysiodesis using the FlexTack™ implant (tension band) featuring a modified explantation technique

OBJECTIVE

Presenting the implantation of the PediatrOS™ FlexTack™ (Merete, Berlin, Germany) for growth guidance and a modified explantation procedure to facilitate explantation and prevent bone and soft tissue damage.

INDICATIONS

Implantation: Genua vara and valga, coxa vara, varus and valgus deviation of the ankle joint, the elbow joint and the wrist Modified Explantation: Removal of the implant after successful limb correction or dislocation of the implant.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Implantation: Closed growth plates, insufficient remaining growth potential, acute or chronic infection, insufficient osseous structures, severe muscular, nervous or vessel diseases endangering the respective limb Explantation: General inoperability of the patient.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Implantation: Localization of the growth plate. Insertion of K‑wire parallel to joint line on the joint side. Setting of the implant. Insertion of second K‑wire and insertion with the implantation instrument and hammer. Modified Explantation: Cutting of the implant bridging part. Both ends of the bridging part are bent vertically to prevent soft tissue damage. Dissection of both implant arms from the bone with the chisel. Extraction in 360° motion using tooth extraction pliers.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Implantation: Full weight bearing. X‑ray controls every 3 months to control growth correction. Explantation: Full weight bearing.

RESULTS

Complications such as breaking of the k‑wires, breaking of the chisel or extraction of adhering bone tissue occurred in 14 of the 64 (21.9%) explanted FlexTack implants. Complication-free removal using the original instruments provided by the manufacturer was possible for five implants. The modified explantation procedure as described above was applied in 45 explanted implants (70.3%) with complete removal of the implant without further complications within the follow up period.

A Critical Note on Treatment of a Severe Diltiazem Intoxication: High-Dose Calcium and Glucagon Infusions

The morbidity and mortality of a severe calcium channel blocker intoxication is high due to serious toxic cardiac effects. Its treatment is supported by low-quality evidence from the heterogeneous literature. We describe a case of a severe diltiazem intoxication and critically appraise the efficacy and role of high-dose calcium and glucagon infusions. A 53-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department with a cardiogenic shock with complete AV block, not responding to atropine, isoprenaline and an external pacemaker. Later on, it became clear that she had a severe diltiazem intoxication which was successfully treated with isotone fluids, inotropes, vasopressors and continuous infusion of high-dose calcium and glucagon. The patient developed, however, an acute, necrotizing pancreatitis, probably related to iatrogenic high calcium levels. This case demonstrates lack of consensus regarding target levels of serum calcium for treatment of a severe diltiazem intoxication. Goal-directed tapering of calcium should prevent side effects of iatrogenic hypercalcaemia. The contribution of glucagon infusions is doubtful due to the instability of solubilized glucagon. This might explain why the effect of glucagon is variable in the literature.

What Should Be the Cut Point for Classification Criteria of Studies in Gout? A Conjoint Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the acceptable level of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for classification criteria for gout, given the type of study.

METHODS

We conducted an international web-based survey with 91 general practitioners and rheumatologists experienced in gout. Conjoint analysis was used as the framework for designing and analyzing pairs of 2 profiles, each describing a study type, a PPV, and an NPV. There were 5 study types presented: a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug versus prednisone for acute gout flares, a phase III RCT of a biologic agent for acute gout flares, a phase II RCT of a novel uricosuric drug of unknown efficacy and limited toxicity data, a case-control, genome-wide association study of gout, and a cohort study examining long-term outcomes of gout. PPV and NPV both had 5 levels ranging from 60-99%.

RESULTS

The panelists in majority were male (65%) rheumatologists (93%) with an average of 19 years of practice, seeing 5 to 60 gout patients monthly. PPV was most highly weighted in decision making: the relative importance was 59% for PPV, 29% for NPV, and 13% for study type. The preferred PPV was 90% or 80%, with an accompanying NPV of 70% or 80%, dependent on study type.

CONCLUSION

Preferred PPVs and NPVs range between 70% and 90% and differ by study type. A single cut point can be a reasonable approach for all study types if a PPV of 90% and NPV of 80% is approximated.

Tapering and discontinuation of methotrexate in patients with RA treated with TNF inhibitors: data from the DREAM registry

Objectives

To study the number of patients that taper or discontinue concomitant methotrexate (MTX) in daily practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and to analyse the effects of that adaption on disease activity and drug survival.

Methods

Data were collected from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) registry. Patients who started their first TNFi were included in the study. Treatment effectiveness after MTX tapering or discontinuation was analysed using Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS28). Drug survival of the TNFi was analysed using the Cox proportional hazard model with a time-dependent covariate.

Results

In 458 patients (34%), MTX was tapered, 126 patients (10%) discontinued MTX and 747 patients (56%) continued MTX at the same dose. On average, DAS28 improved after tapering MTX (−0.40, −0.45) and after stopping MTX (−0.28, −0.12) at 6 and 12 months. In the taper group, 21% of the patients relapsed (DAS28 increase >0.6), and in the discontinuation group this was 21% and 24% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Patients who taper and discontinue MTX have a similar DAS28 score over time as patients who continue MTX. Moreover, there was no influence of tapering or discontinuation of MTX on long-term drug survival of TNFi.

Conclusions

In daily practice, tapering or discontinuation of concomitant MTX in patients with RA treated with TNFi frequently occurs and it does not seem to influence the average DAS28 over time or the long-term TNFi drug survival. It appears that in daily clinical practice the correct patients are selected to taper or discontinue MTX.

[A Comparison of Dorsal Decompression and Dorsal Decompression Combined with the Dynamic Stabilisation Device LimiFlex™]

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis is commonly treated by dorsal decompression. However, resection of posterior elements increases the biomechanical instability and may lead to further complications. In order to prevent this, fusion of the involved segments is often performed. But further complications may be associated with this, for example, highly reduced flexibility. In order to overcome fusion-related problems, dynamic stabilisation devices, like the new LimiFlex™ Paraspinous Tension Band (PSB), have been developed. This prospective study compares dorsal decompression without stabilisation and dorsal decompression with stabilisation using the PSB in patients with lumbar canal stenosis.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with stenosis involving one or two lumbar vertebral levels were treated with dorsal decompression. Forty received the PSB following decompression surgery. Back, hip and leg pain as well as patient's degree of disability were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively for all patients. Evaluations were conducted using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Adverse events during the study period were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients who received the PSB experienced a better pain relief and improvement in disability compared to patients who received treatment through decompression only. A significant difference of VAS and ODI development was found between both groups when treating two vertebral levels. Furthermore, the total number of adverse events was lower in the PSB group compared to the decompression group.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic stabilisation using the PSB delivers better results in terms of VAS and ODI values when compared to only dorsal decompression. In addition, it is also associated with a lower number of complications. The PSB is most favourable when 2 levels are treated.

Assessment of Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Psychometric Comparison of Single-item, Multiitem, and Multidimensional Measures

Objective.

To compare the psychometric functioning of multidimensional disease-specific, multiitem generic, and single-item measures of fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods.

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and longitudinal item response theory (IRT) modeling were used to evaluate the measurement structure and local reliability of the Bristol RA Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ), the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) vitality scale, and the BRAF Numerical Rating Scales (BRAF-NRS) in a sample of 588 patients with RA.

Results.

A 1-factor CFA model yielded a similar fit to a 5-factor model with subscale-specific dimensions, and the items from the different instruments adequately fit the IRT model, suggesting essential unidimensionality in measurement. The SF-36 vitality scale outperformed the BRAF-MDQ at lower levels of fatigue, but was less precise at moderate to higher levels of fatigue. At these levels of fatigue, the living, cognition, and emotion subscales of the BRAF-MDQ provide additional precision. The BRAF-NRS showed a limited measurement range with its highest precision centered on average levels of fatigue.

Conclusion.

The different instruments appear to access a common underlying domain of fatigue severity, but differ considerably in their measurement precision along the continuum. The SF-36 vitality scale can be used to measure fatigue severity in samples with relatively mild fatigue. For samples expected to have higher levels of fatigue, the multidimensional BRAF-MDQ appears to be a better choice. The BRAF-NRS are not recommended if precise assessment is required, for instance in longitudinal settings.