Fungal Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Reported Cases

Fungal osteomyelitis is considered a rare disease, and the published literature mainly comprises case reports, case series and narrative reviews. A systematic review was undertaken to provide a practice-based global perspective on this disease, focusing on epidemiology and treatment strategies. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library between the 3rd and 8th of March 2023 using a predefined search string. We included studies with at least one patient with a diagnosis of fungal osteomyelitis published before the 1st of January 2023. We included all study designs except for reviews, and we excluded non-English languages and grey literature. After exclusion, 678 studies, mostly case reports, were included. Descriptive analysis was performed on 1072 patients. The most common aetiological agent was Aspergillus (26.5%), followed by Candida (20.7%) and Mucor (16.8%), and the bones most frequently involved were the vertebrae. We described the characteristics of patients divided by site of infection, and we found that diabetes mellitus, disseminated fungal infection, surgery and local lesion were major risk factors. We also successfully associated duration of treatment with outcome. We provided a general overview of this rare disease, and we highlighted the need for high-quality investigations on the subject.

US-Elastography With Different Techniques for Thyroid Nodule Characterization: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Thyroid nodules are frequent in adult population and thyroid cancer incidence has increased dramatically over the past three decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the US-Elastosonography (USE) diagnostic performance in assessing the thyroid nodules malignancy risk.

Methods

PubMed and Embase databases were searched from January 2011 to July 2021. We extracted data from selected studies and calculated the overall diagnostic accuracy of qualitative USE, semi-quantitative USE and quantitative USE. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was elaborated to show the results. All statistical tests were performed using Metadisc and Medcal software package.

Results

Finally 72 studies with 13,505 patients and 14,015 thyroid nodules (33% malignant) undergoing elastography were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 84%, 81%, and 0.89 respectively for qualitative USE; 83%, 80%, and 0.93 for semi-quantitative USE and 78%, 81% and 0.87, for quantitative USE. The qualitative and semiquantitative USE present very similar diagnostic accuracy values and both better than the quantitative USE.

Conclusions

USE is a useful imaging tool for thyroid nodule characterization. In accordance with recent guidelines and meta-analyses, the USE could be used daily in thyroid nodule malignancy risk stratification.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO: CRD42021279257.

A Review of the EUSO-Balloon Pathfinder for the JEM-EUSO Program

EUSO-Balloon is a pathfinder for JEM-EUSO, the mission concept of a spaceborne observatory which is designed to observe Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray (UHECR)-induced Extensive Air Showers (EAS) by detecting their UltraViolet (UV) light tracks "from above." On August 25, 2014, EUSO-Balloon was launched from Timmins Stratospheric Balloon Base (Ontario, Canada) by the balloon division of the French Space Agency CNES. After reaching a floating altitude of 38 km, EUSO-Balloon imaged the UV light in the wavelength range ∼290-500 nm for more than 5 hours using the key technologies of JEM-EUSO. The flight allowed a good understanding of the performance of the detector to be developed, giving insights into possible improvements to be applied to future missions. A detailed measurement of the photoelectron counts in different atmospheric and ground conditions was achieved. By means of the simulation of the instrument response and by assuming atmospheric models, the absolute intensity of diffuse light was estimated. The instrument detected hundreds of laser tracks with similar characteristics to EASs shot by a helicopter flying underneath. These are the first recorded laser tracks measured from a fluorescence detector looking down on the atmosphere. The reconstruction of the direction of the laser tracks was performed. In this work, a review of the main results obtained by EUSO-Balloon is presented as well as implications for future space-based observations of UHECRs.

A multicenter LArge retrospectIve daTabase on the personalization of Stereotactic ABlative Radiotherapy use in lung metastases from colon-rectal cancer: the LaIT-SABR study

INTRODUCTION

stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival in oligometastatic disease, but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to identify potential predictive factors of SBRT response through a multicenter large retrospective database and to investigate the progression to the polymetastatic disease (PMD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

the study involved 23 centers, and was approved by the Ethical Committee (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT). 1033 lung metastases were reported. Clinical and biological parameters were evaluated as predictive for local progression-free survival (FLP). Secondary end-point was the time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC).

RESULTS

Two-year FLP was 75.4%. Two-year FLP for lesions treated with a BED <100 Gy, 100-124 Gy, and ≥125 Gy was 76.1%, 70.6%, and 94% (p=0.000). Two-year FLP for lesion measuring ≤10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm was 79.7%, 77.1%, and 66.6% (p=0.027). At the multivariate analysis a BED ≥125 Gy significantly reduced the risk of local progression (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.51; p=0.000). Median tPMC was 26.8 months. Lesions treated with BED ≥125 Gy reported a significantly longer tPMC as compared to lower BED. The median tPMC for patients treated to 1, 2-3 or 4-5 simultaneous oligometastases was 28.5, 25.4, and 9.8 months (p=0.035).

CONCLUSION

The present is the largest series of lung colorectal metastases treated with SABR. The results support the use of SBRT in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients as it might delay the transition to PMD or offer relatively long disease-free period in selected cases. Predictive factors were identified for treatment personalization.

Impact of COVID-19 on patient-doctor interaction in a complex radiation therapy facility

PURPOSE

In the last months, Italy faced a COVID-19 emergency and implemented preventive measures in order to protect patients and healthcare providers from a disease outbreak. The pandemic control strategies impacted patient experience directly. Questionnaires evaluating patients reported measures (PREMs) may assess critical issues and represent a helpful tool to measure the patient perception of healthcare service. Our aim was to prospectively assess patient satisfaction about doctor-patient interaction in a high-volume radiation therapy and oncology center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Cancer patients receiving either systemic and/or radiation treatment underwent a survey. Two validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACIT-TS-G version 1) and 14 specific questions evaluating patients' perception of COVID-19 measures were administered.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five patients admitted to our department from 1-30 April 2020 completed the questionnaires. The majority (66.4%) of patients were women and the most common disease was breast cancer (40%). The average Global Health Status (GHS) of EORTC QLQ-C30 was 61.67. Emotional functioning, social, and cognitive domains obtained scores of 75.48, 80.13, and 84.67, respectively. FACIT-TS-G results revealed 120 patients rated the treatments effective and 108 patients thought the side effects were the same as expected or better. Most (89.6%) rated their treatment good, very good, or excellent. Concerning COVID-19-related questions, patients reported overall very good level of information.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the introduction of strict COVID-19 control measures, there was a high level of cancer outpatient satisfaction. The satisfaction levels may influence compliance, continuity of treatments, and patient-doctor communication, impacting the quality of clinical care in the next phases of the pandemic.

Endocrine toxicity in cancer patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab: results of a large multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) agents anti-T lymphocytes-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1/PD-L2) have opened a new scenario in the treatment of cancer. These agents can induce immuno-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect the endocrine system.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence and the course of endocrine irAEs in cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicentre study, involving cancer patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab or pembrolizumab at reference Oncology Centres. One hundred and seventy-nine consecutive patients with different types of cancer (mostly non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, kidney cancer) were included in the study. Patients had received nivolumab (70.9%) or pembrolizumab (29.1%) for 2-33 months. The study evaluated clinical data records until the established date of July 15, 2018. The primary end point was the assessment of endocrine toxicity and possible predictive factors.

RESULTS

Endocrine toxicity occurred in 54 out of 179 patients (30.2%) and was related to thyroid dysfunction, with the exception of one case of diabetes mellitus. Thyroid toxicity occurred mostly within 2 months from the initiation of immunotherapy (83% of cases). A pre-existing thyroid dysfunction was a significant predictor of disease flare.

CONCLUSIONS

Thyroid alterations are frequently associated with anti PD-1 treatment in cancer patients. Regular thyroid assessment should be performed, particularly in the first months of treatment and in patients with a pre-existing thyroid disease.

1029 Anthracycline and trastuzumab-induced subclinical cardiac damage and its prevention in the SAFE trial. Myocardial strain imaging and 3D echo interim analysis data

Background

Benefit of anthracyclines and trastuzumab therapies on disease-free survival in breast cancer is well known. Cardiotoxicity is a feared potential complication of both drugs. It usually progresses from cardiomyocyte injury to silent left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) which often becomes symptomatic and irreversible. Therefore, its prevention and early detection are of paramount importance in these cancer patients.

Purpose

SAFE trial (CT registry ID: NCT2236806) is a randomized phase 3, four-arm, single-blind, placebo-controlled study that aims to evaluate the effects of Bisoprolol (B) (5 mg, twice daily), Ramipril (R) (5 mg, twice daily) or the combination of the two (R + B), compared to placebo (P), on subclinical heart heart damage. Interim data of left ventricular function monitored with 3D Echo and Myocardial Strain Imaging are presented.

Methods

Out of 225 patients asked to participate, 191 were enrolled (mean age 48.9 ± 9.0 years). Follow-up monitoring (at 3, 6, 12 months[m]) comprised 3D ejection fraction (3D-LVEF) and Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS). One patient had sub-acute anthracyclines cardiotoxicity. Data at one year of 123 patients were available (34 P, 28 R, 31 B, 30 R + B).

Results

At time 0, no significant differences in age, body mass index, hemodynamic parameters were observed among arms. Data of 3D-LVEF and GLS at time 0 and during follow-up are reported in the figure (p level versus time 0 – GLS repeated measures). There was a significant reduction in 3D LVEF and increase in GLS in P arm (3D LVEF: 3m: -3.3%, 6m: - 5.2%, 12m: -3.7%; GLS: 3m: +5,7%, 6m: +7.8%, 12m: + 7,1%). A similar, though less significant, worsening of 3D LVEF (-2.4%,-1.9%,-2.2% at 3, 6, 12m, respectively) and GLS (+2.7%, +3.2% at 3 and 6m, respectively) was found in R arm. In B and B +R arms there was a worsening at 6m (3D LVEF -2.5%, GLS +2.7%), whereas at 12m only GLS increased (+3.2%) in B, not in B + R. Arm differences were significant (repeated measures two ways) both for 3D LVEF (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, p level = 0.038, observed power 0.855) and GLS (p level = 0.002, observed power 0.973).

Conclusions

This interim analysis of the SAFE trial shows that demonstration of subclinical cardiotoxicity is feasible with 3D echo and myocardial strain imaging. Significant subclinical damage potentially leading to LVD is present at one year. Both B alone on in combination with R may be a successful cardioprotective strategy in patients treated with anthracyclines and trastuzumab.

Abstract 1029 Figure. Time course of GLS and 3D LVEF

Real-world outcomes according to treatment strategies in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: an Italian retrospective study

PURPOSE

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement confers sensitivity to ALK inhibitors (ALKis) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several drugs provided an impressive outcome benefit, the most effective sequential strategy is still unknown. We describe outcomes of real-life patients according to the treatment strategy received.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively collected 290 ALK rearranged advanced NSCLC diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 in 23 Italian institutions.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 26 months, PFS for crizotinib and a new generation ALKis were 9.4 [CI 95% 7.9-11.2] and 11.1 months [CI 95% 9.2-13.8], respectively, while TTF were 10.2 [CI 95% 8.5-12.6] and 11.9 months [CI 95% 9.7-17.4], respectively, being consistent across the different settings. The composed outcomes (the sum of PFS or TTF) in patients treated with crizotinib followed by a new generation ALKis were 27.8 months [CI 95% 24.3-33.7] in PFS and 30.4 months [CI 95% 24.7-34.9] in TTF. The median OS from the diagnosis of advanced disease was 39 months [CI 95% 31.8-54.5]. Patients receiving crizotinib followed by a new generation ALKis showed a higher median OS [57 months (CI 95% 42.0-73.8)] compared to those that did not receive crizotinib [38 months (CI 95% 18.6-NR)] and those who performed only crizotinib as target agent [15 months (CI 95% 11.3-34.0)] (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The sequential administration of crizotinib and a new generation ALKis provided a remarkable clinical benefit in this real-life population, being an interesting option to consider in selected patients.

P970DK-crush is the best treatment strategy to reduce stent oriented clinical outcome, results from a network meta-analysis of twenty-six randomized clinical trials comparing different stent techniques

Background

Coronary bifurcation disease (CBD) accounts for approximately 20% of all and is associated with worse short- and long- term clinical outcomes. Provisional stenting (PS) is the preferred choice, however, this approach may not be suitable in all CBD anatomies, therefore several elective two-stents techniques have been described, however there is lack of randomized evidence to guide interventionalist across different stent techniques. Objectives. To identify the best percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) technique for CBD.

Methods

We systematically review randomized clinical (RCTs) of patients receiving CBD PCI with either PS or six type of elective two-stent techniques (DK-crush, TAP, culotte, dedicated bifurcation stents, crushing, T-stenting) and compare device oriented clinical events (DOCE) in a network meta-analysis. DOCE was defined as composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization OR target vessel revascularisation.

Results

We included 26 RCTs leading to a pooled population of 10339 patients-years with 1229 DOCE. Compared to PS, the DK-crush technique had a lower DOCE with RR=0.62, [0.42–0.92]. Figure. DK-crush had the highest likelihood (model likelihood=90.2%, SUCRA=98.0%) of being the best treatment to reduce DOCE.

Figure 1

Conclusions

In the management CBD, when a two-stent technique is required as upfront strategy, the DK- Crush technique should be privileged as it showed to reduce stent-related clinical outcomes (DOCE) when compared to other bifurcation techniques.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques for Bifurcation Disease: Network Meta-analysis Reveals Superiority of Double-Kissing Crush

BACKGROUND

Provisional T-stenting (PS) is generally recommended to treat patients with coronary bifurcation disease (CBD) percutaneously, but PS may not fit all complex bifurcation anatomies. Therefore, several types of up-front 2-stent techniques have been described. We aimed to identify the best percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technique to manage patients with CBD.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients undergoing CBD PCI which included several types of PCI techniques-PS, double-kissing (DK) crush, T-stenting and protrusion, culotte, dedicated bifurcation stents, crushing, and T-stenting-and we compared device-oriented clinical events (DOCEs), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target-lesion or target-vessel revascularization, in a network meta-analysis. We included 26 RCTs, leading to a pooled population of 10,339 patient-years and a total of 1229 DOCEs.

RESULTS

The DK-crush technique was associated with the lowest DOCE rate, with a relative risk of 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.92) compared with the PS technique. DK-crush had the highest probability (model likelihood 90.2%, area under the cumulative ranking curve 98.0%) of being the best technique among those explored to reduce DOCEs in patients receiving CBD PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

When a 2-stent strategy is considered in a patient with CBD, the DK-crush technique reduces DOCEs compared with other bifurcation techniques based on all available RCTs.

Diagnostic Performance and Accuracy of the 3 Interpreting Methods of Breast Strain Elastography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

There are 3 methods of interpreting breast strain elastography: the elastographic-to-B-mode length ratio (E/B), a 5-point color scale (5P), and the strain ratio (SR). This meta-analysis assessed which method is superior to the others. A systematic search of the medical literature was performed in July 2017. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) had biopsy-proven or long-term stability as the reference standard; (2) used either the E/B, 5P, or SR to interpret results; and (3) had at least 50 cases. A total of 220 records were retrieved; 60 full-text articles were examined, and 46 were included in the meta-analysis. Publication years ranged from 2007 and 2017. The quality of studies was generally high. The mean age of women was 48 years; 12,398 lesions (4242 malignant) were analyzed. For the 5P method, the sensitivity was 77%; specificity, 87%; positive likelihood ratio (LR), 5.3; and negative LR, 0.24. For the SR method, sensitivity was 87%; specificity, 81%; positive LR, 4.8; and negative LR, 0.16. For the E/B method, sensitivity was 96%; specificity, 88%; positive LR, 7.1; and negative LR, 0.03. Of the 3 methods, the E/B had the highest sensitivity, and the E/B and 5P had the highest specificity. With a negative LR of 0.03, the E/B method can downgrade lesions with a pretest probability of 50% to a 2% probability of malignancy.

Drug-eluting compared to bare metal stents in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis: a meta-analysis

AIMS

To systematically review literature comparing bare metal stent (BMS) to drug-eluting stent (DES) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis. ESRD patients on dialysis often suffer from accelerated atherosclerosis and higher rate of stent-related complications including major adverse cardiovascular events. Because dialysis usually qualifies ineligibility for randomized clinical trials, an evidenced-based stent choice for these patients is scarce.

METHODS

PUBMED, CINHAL, COCHRANE, EMBASE and WEB OF SCIENCE were searched for studies comparing BMS vs. DES outcome in ESRD patients on dialysis.

RESULTS

Twenty studies including 64 232 patients were considered. The use of DES was significantly associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.89], death from a cardiovascular cause (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.84) and target lesion revascularization/target vessel revascularization (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.00). No significant difference was found in stent thrombosis (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.50-2.33) and myocardial infarction incidence (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows a significant reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with the use of DES over BMS in dialyzed patients. Despite the lack of randomized studies, systematic use of DES in these high-risk patients should thus reasonably be considered as a first option in percutaneous coronary intervention candidates.

Abstract P3-12-07: Conservative breast reconstruction: Outcomes of 146 consecutive cases of prepectoral, subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction in a single-Institution series

Aims. To evaluate acute and late toxicity-related factors among breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction (BR).

Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of BC patients who underwent therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy from October 2012 to May 2016 at our Center. We recorded individual patient-related features (i.e. age, body mass index [BMI], smoke-history, comorbidity, BRCA-carrier), BC-related treatments characteristics (i.e. axillary surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy [RT], adjuvant chemotherapy, primary systemic therapy [PST], endocrine therapy, and use of trastuzumab). Toxicity profile was evaluated in terms of complications related to BR; we recorded acute and late toxicity data and prosthesis/implant explant rate.

Results. We analyzed 146 consecutive BC patients treated with subcutaneous BR, 117 therapeutic and 29 prophylactic mastectomies. Thirty-seven patients received postmastectomy RT. Significant factors related to acute toxicity were: previous RT (34.5% [RT] vs 8.5% [no RT]; p=0.001), BMI (31.3% [BMI ≥25] vs 8.8% [&lt;25]; p=0.003), previous breast surgery (22.2% [surgery] vs 8.7% [no surgery]; p=0.027), and diabetes (100% [diabetes] vs 11.9% [no diabetes]; p=0.002). Factors significantly correlated to implant/prosthesis explant were: current or previous smoking exposition (13.8% [smokers] vs 2.6% [non-smokers]; p=0.029) and PST (18.8% [PST] vs 3.5% [no PST]; p=0.022); axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was significantly related to late toxicity (5.7% [ALND] vs 0%; p=0.04). At a 3-year median follow up, three deaths, five locoregional recurrences (LRR), and fourteen distant metastasis (DM) occurred among 117 patients treated by therapeutic mastectomy. Overall survival was 78.1%, LRR free-survival was 95%, and DM free-survival was 71.6%. Postmastectomy RT was not significantly related to acute, late toxicity, and explant occurrence.

Conclusions. In our experience prepectoral subcutaneous implant-based BR is a safe and effective approach, with low rates of acute toxicity. Major risk factors were evidenced for patients previously treated with RT or surgery, and in case of diabetes or BMI ≥25; postmastectomy RT seems not to be related to higher rate of toxicity. ALND seems to be the only factor significantly related to late toxicity. PST, and smoking exposition were significantly associated with higher rate of implant/prosthesis explant. However, further investigations and mature follow-up are warranted to confirm these encouraging results.

Citation Format: Meattini I, Bernini M, Saieva C, Desideri I, Scotti V, Salvestrini V, Visani L, Mariotti M, Delli Paoli C, Olmetto E, Maragna V, Orzalesi L, Sanchez L, Nori J, Bianchi S, Livi L. Conservative breast reconstruction: Outcomes of 146 consecutive cases of prepectoral, subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction in a single-Institution series [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-07.

Abstract P4-16-04: Oral ibandronate for osteopenic breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: secondary 5-year survival outcomes analysis of the single-center phase 2 BONADIUV trial

Background. Several randomized trials demonstrated aromatase inhibitors (AI) superiority in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) compared to tamoxifen treatment for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) patients. Anyway, AI toxicity profile is a concern due to estrogen suppression. Pivotal trials demonstrated a significant bone mineral density (BMD) loss due to AI, with a consistent 5-year risk of bone fractures, thus impacting on patients' quality of life. Bisphosphonates represent an effective treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis fractures prevention. However, an adequate patient's selection for adjuvant bisphosphonates treatment during AI endocrine therapy is still a challenge. Final results of BONADIUV trial presented at San Antonio Breast cancer Symposium in 2016 showed that treatment with ibandronate, as compared to placebo, significantly improved BMD change in osteopenic women treated with adjuvant AI, and consistently protected patients' bone loss. We present the secondary 5-year analysis on survival outcomes of the trial.

Patients and methods. The BONADIUV trial is a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study designed to evaluate the impact of ibandronate treatment on BMD in osteopenic women taking AI. Between January 2011 and May 2014, 171 osteopenic patients (lumbar spine [LS] and/or trochanter -1&lt; T-score &lt;-2.5), were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either placebo or oral monthly ibandronate (150 mg). Treatment duration was 2 years, with 6-months evaluation. Primary endpoint was the mean BMD difference between the two arms at a 2-year follow up. Secondary analysis on survival outcomes (overall survival [OS] and invasive DFS [iDFS]) have been performed at 5-year median follow-up time. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02616744.

Results. At the database cutoff time for the present analysis on May 4, 2018, median follow up was 63.3 months (mean 61.2; range 2.7-87.3) for whole series, 64.9 months (range 33.8-84.0) for the placebo arm, and 62.2 months (range 24.2-87.3) for the ibandronate arm. Ten patients in the placebo group and 17 patients in the ibandronate group withdrew the allocated arm before any follow up data collection, and so were excluded from the analysis, performed on 144 patients (72 patients per arm). At the database cutoff time, the OS rate was 97.2% in the placebo group and 100% in the ibandronate arm. We observed four loco-regional relapse (three in the placebo arm, one in the ibandronate arm; p=0.33), three distant metastases (none in the placebo arm, three in the ibandronate arm; p=0.075), and three contralateral BC (one in the placebo arm, two in the ibandronate arm; p=0.65). The number of iDFS events did not differ between groups: four in the placebo group and six in the ibandronate group (p=0.56). Up to data cutoff, two deaths have occurred; none in the placebo arm and two in the ibandronate arm (p=0.15). The OS rate did not differ between arms.

Conclusions. The secondary analysis of survival outcomes showed no difference between arms in terms of OS and iDFS rates. Further large investigations and mature follow-up from the published ones are awaited.

Citation Format: Meattini I, Scotti V, Desideri I, Saieva C, Visani L, Salvestrini V, Cecchini S, De Feo ML, Mariotti M, Olmetto E, Delli Paoli C, Francolini G, Bernini M, Orzalesi L, Sanchez L, Nori J, Bianchi S, Livi L. Oral ibandronate for osteopenic breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: secondary 5-year survival outcomes analysis of the single-center phase 2 BONADIUV trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-04.

Abstract P3-12-09: Dosimetric analysis of the pattern of local recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy

Background

This study aims to identify spatial and dosimetric patterns of breast cancer relapse in a mono-institutional large series of patients treated with mastectomy and various forms of breast reconstruction.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 196 patients with Stage II-III breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy between 1995 and 2016 at the Radiotherapy Department of Careggi Hospital, Florence. All patients performed Skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate or delayed breast reconstruction and subsequently received post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Systemic therapy was prescribed as per local and international guidelines both in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. All patients were treated with 3DCRT technique. Diagnostic imaging (e.g. CT, MRI) obtained at recurrence were registered with the original planning computed tomography (pCT) for the dosimetric analysis. Recurrence gross tumor volume (rGTV) were delineated and co-registered with pCT. All rGTV were compared dosimetrically to planned dose and spatially with planning target volumes. Locoregional recurrence (LR) were divided in three categories relative to the high dose region, 95% of prescription dose (D95%). We defined “in field LR” those with more than 90% of their volume within D95% region,“marginal LR” when recurrence volume was between 20 and 90% within D95% and “outfield LR” those with less than 20% of their volume D95%.

Results

The median age was 49 years (range, 26 - 83 years).163 women (83 %) were classified as stage III; 118 women (60 %) had more than three positive axillary nodes. The majority of lesions were estrogen receptor positive ( 75 %), grade 3 (52%) ,with the presence of LVI (60 %). Adjuvant RT at chest wall were performed in all patients, most of whom underwent a RT of chest wall +infra- supraclavicular nodes (71%).Prescribed RT dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. With a median follow-up of 60 months (range, 12-240 months), 22 (11%) patients experienced a locoregional relapse: 10 patients in the chest wall; 7 in ipsilateral axillary region +/- chest wall; 3 in internal mammary nodes -/+ chest wall; one locoregional relapse was observed in the supraclavicular nodes. Most of relapses were G3 (75%) with documented LVI (79%). The topographic analysis of the local failure patterns showed: thirteen (59 %) were “in-field LR”; 9 (41%) were “out-field LR” . For the spatial analysis, all relapses on the chest wall were observed above the breast tissue expander or mammary prosthesis. Free time from recurrence disease was 30 months (range 5-86 months).

Conclusion

This study suggests that chest wall recurrences are rare after PMRT and are related to biologic aggressiveness of the disease than to inadequate irradiation of target volumes. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the relationship between treatment volumes and patterns of recurrences in order to refine new delineation guidelines for women undergoing PMRT and breast reconstruction.

Citation Format: Desideri I, Meattini I, Becherini C, Francolini G, Scotti V, Olmetto E, Perna M, Topulli J, Livi L. Dosimetric analysis of the pattern of local recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-09.

Accuracy of administrative databases in detecting primary breast cancer diagnoses: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To define the accuracy of administrative datasets to identify primary diagnoses of breast cancer based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th or 10th revision codes.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library (April 2017).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were: (a) the presence of a reference standard; (b) the presence of at least one accuracy test measure (eg, sensitivity) and (c) the use of an administrative database.

DATA EXTRACTION

Eligible studies were selected and data extracted independently by two reviewers; quality was assessed using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy criteria.

DATA ANALYSIS

Extracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.

RESULTS

From 2929 records screened 21 studies were included (data collection period between 1977 and 2011). Eighteen studies evaluated ICD-9 codes (11 of which assessed both invasive breast cancer (code 174.x) and carcinoma in situ (ICD-9 233.0)); three studies evaluated invasive breast cancer-related ICD-10 codes. All studies except one considered incident cases.The initial algorithm results were: sensitivity ≥80% in 11 of 17 studies (range 57%-99%); positive predictive value was ≥83% in 14 of 19 studies (range 15%-98%) and specificity ≥98% in 8 studies. The combination of the breast cancer diagnosis with surgical procedures, chemoradiation or radiation therapy, outpatient data or physician claim may enhance the accuracy of the algorithms in some but not all circumstances. Accuracy for breast cancer based on outpatient or physician's data only or breast cancer diagnosis in secondary position diagnosis resulted low.

CONCLUSION

Based on the retrieved evidence, administrative databases can be employed to identify primary breast cancer. The best algorithm suggested is ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes located in primary position.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015026881.