Tumor Mutational Burden Is a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a dismal prognosis. This multisite, single-institution study analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced BTC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospectively maintained institutional database was searched for patients with advanced BTC. Electronic medical records of the patients with advanced BTC treated with an ICI that included programmed death-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 blockers were retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics including molecular biomarkers, detailed treatment, response characteristics, survival, and toxicities. The analysis included overall response rate, survival, and correlation between survival and molecular biomarkers.

RESULTS

The institutional database query identified 47 patients with advanced BTC who received at least one dose of an ICI; 11 (24%) patients in the first-line setting and the rest of the patients had refractory disease. The median age of the cohort was 62 years, and 51% were female. The overall response rate was 10.6%, with a disease control rate of 53.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 3.6 months and 6.9 months, respectively. Biomarker analysis revealed improved PFS in patients with tumor mutational burden > 5 mutations per megabase (median PFS: 6.4 v 2.2 months; P = .0027). No unexpected adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

ICIs are well tolerated and have modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC. The study result supports the exploration of tumor mutational burden as a potential predictive biomarker for response to ICIs in patients with advanced BTC.

HPV Status and Survival in Non-Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

BACKGROUND/AIM

HPV-mediated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with an increased survival. The prognostic value of HPV status for other primary sites is unclear. We aimed to assess the effect of HPV status on overall survival in patients with non-oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (non-OPSCC) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with non-OPSCC [gum, lip, floor of mouth, tongue (excluding base), hypopharynx, nasopharynx, other pharynx] and known HPV status were included in our study. Associations between HPV status, primary site, patient characteristics and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

HPV positivity was associated with a better OS compared to HPV-negative patients (HR=0.83, 95%CI=0.74-0.93, p<0.001). Female gender, gum, lip, nasopharynx primaries, and private insurance predicted for improved OS.

CONCLUSION

HPV positivity and female gender are good prognostic factors in non-OPSCC. Routine HPV testing should be considered for HPV positive non-OPSCC, as well as studies evaluating de-escalation of treatment if this association is confirmed.