POS1381 ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF ENTHESOPATHY IN IDIOPATHIC DIFFUSED SKELETAL HYPEROSTOSIS. APPLICABILITY OF THE MASEI INDEX

Background

In Diffuse idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH) o Forestier-Rotés disease the enthesis is also the hallmark of extraspinal manifestations. Despite being a characteristic hallmark of the disease, it has been poorly investigated.

Objectives

To assess the usefulness of the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) to classify patients with DISH and to analyse the ultrasound findings in hyperostotic entheses.

Methods

We recruited 35 patients with DISH, according to Resnick classification criteria, who were compared with 33 healthy patients age, sex and body mass index-matched. An ultrasound was performed strictly following the MASEI protocol. The ultrasound examiners, with extensive experience in musculoskeletal ultrasound (ECOCAT group), were blinded to the diagnosis of the patients. The interobserver reliability of MASEI index measured by an ICC was 0.97 (95%, CI 89-99) [1]. Demographic, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical, radiological and MASEI-related variables were collected. We categorized into MASEI- inflammatory (MASEI-I) and MASEI-damage (MASEI-D) as previously published [2]but also into MASEI-DISH, which included the variables of thickness, structure and calcification. In the statistical analysis, patients’ data were depicted by using descriptive statistics and the comparison between groups with the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the T-Student test for numerical variables. The validity of the index was examined using the area under the ROC curve and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The optimal cut-off point was defined as the one that maximizes sensitivity (S) and specificity. (Spe). The statistical program used was R software.

Results

In the analysis of the elemental lesions, the alterations in structure, thickness and calcification of the distal quadriceps (DQT) and Achilles tendons (AQT) stood out (p <0.05). In the total MASEI, the ultrasound score of ≥ 16.50 (S80%, Spe 85%), obtained with an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.96), was the best cut-off to differentiate patients from healthy subjects. In the categorized indices, MASEI-I: cut-off 5.50 (S 89%, Spe 76%) and AUC 0.835 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.94); MASEI-D: 7.50 (S 86%, Spe 76%) and AUC 0.850 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.94) and MASEI-DISH: 16.50 (S 74%, Spe 91%) and AUC (95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). The total MASEI in the DISH group was 27.46 (SD 14.4) compared to 10.30 (SD 6.4) in healthy controls (p<0.001) as well as in those categorized as MASEI-I, MASEI-D or MASEI-DISH (p <0.001).

Conclusion

Entheses lesions of the AQT and the DQT mark the differences between DISH and healthy patients. The optimal cut-off point was 16.50, and we did not observe any advantages in establishing MASEI categorizations that could be useful in clinical practice. Although the MASEI is an index designed to classify patients with spondyloarthritis, our study shows that it also allows differentiating DISH patients from healthy subjects. It would also be interesting to analyse the capacity of the MASEI to distinguish DISH from spondyloarthritis.

References

[1]Moya Alvarado P, et al. Rheumatol Int. 2020.

[2]Eder L et al. J Rheumatol. 2014; 41(3): 466-72.

This study has received a grant from the Catalan Rheumatology Society (2019)

Acknowledgements

Investigation Unit Sociedad Española de Reumatología

Catalan Rheumatology Society (Grant)

Disclosure of Interests

Teresa Clavaguera Speakers bureau: 2021 Jansen, UCB, Novartis, Marta Valls Speakers bureau: 2021 Lilly, Nordic, Maria Buxó: None declared, MANEL PUJOL BUSQUETS Speakers bureau: abbvie, pfizer, lilly, UCB, Janssen, Novartis, Georgina Salvador Alarcon Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Roche, abbvie, Sanofi, Eulàlia Armengol Speakers bureau: Novartis, Jansen, Xavier González-Giménez: None declared, Mireia Moreno Speakers bureau: Many: Novartis, MSD, Marta Arévalo: None declared, Vicenç Torrente: None declared, Lourdes Mateo: None declared, Susana Holgado: None declared, Xabier Michelena: None declared, Juan José De Agustín De Oro: None declared, Meritxell Sallés Lizarzaburu Speakers bureau: Lilly, Sanofi, Sonia Mínguez: None declared, ANDRES PONCE FERNANDEZ: None declared, Rosa Morlà: None declared, Paula Estrada: None declared, D Reina-Sanz Speakers bureau: Novartis, UCB, Patricia Moya: None declared, Hector Corominas Speakers bureau: Gebro, Abbvie, Fresenius, Judith Font Urgellés: None declared, Patricia Reyner Speakers bureau: Lilly, Sanofi, Nordic

Incidence, associated factors and clinical impact of severe infections in a large, multicentric cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the incidence of severe infection and investigate the associated factors and clinical impact in a large systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) retrospective cohort.

METHODS

All patients in the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) who meet ≥4 ACR-97 SLE criteria were retrospectively investigated for severe infections. Patients with and without infections were compared in terms of SLE severity, damage, comorbidities, and demographic characteristics. A multivariable Cox regression model was built to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for the first infection.

RESULTS

A total of 3658 SLE patients were included: 90% female, median age 32.9 years (DQ 9.7), and mean follow-up (months) 120.2 (±87.6). A total of 705 (19.3%) patients suffered ≥1 severe infection. Total severe infections recorded in these patients numbered 1227. The incidence rate was 29.2 (95% CI: 27.6-30.9) infections per 1000 patient years. Time from first infection to second infection was significantly shorter than time from diagnosis to first infection (p < 0.000). Although respiratory infections were the most common (35.5%), bloodstream infections were the most frequent cause of mortality by infection (42.0%). In the Cox regression analysis, the following were all associated with infection: age at diagnosis (HR = 1.016, 95% CI: 1.009-1.023), Latin-American (Amerindian-Mestizo) ethnicity (HR = 2.151, 95% CI: 1.539-3.005), corticosteroids (≥10mg/day) (HR = 1.271, 95% CI: 1.034-1.561), immunosuppressors (HR = 1.348, 95% CI: 1.079-1.684), hospitalization by SLE (HR = 2.567, 95% CI: 1.905-3.459), Katz severity index (HR = 1.160, 95% CI: 1.105-1.217), SLICC/ACR damage index (HR = 1.069, 95% CI: 1.031-1.108), and smoking (HR = 1.332, 95% CI: 1.121-1.583). Duration of antimalarial use (months) proved protective (HR = 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe infection constitutes a predictor of poor prognosis in SLE patients, is more common in Latin-Americans and is associated with age, previous infection, and smoking. Antimalarials exerted a protective effect.

Comprehensive description of clinical characteristics of a large systemic lupus erythematosus cohort from the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) with emphasis on complete versus incomplete lupus differences

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by multiple organ involvement and pronounced racial and ethnic heterogeneity. The aims of the present work were (1) to describe the cumulative clinical characteristics of those patients included in the Spanish Rheumatology Society SLE Registry (RELESSER), focusing on the differences between patients who fulfilled the 1997 ACR-SLE criteria versus those with less than 4 criteria (hereafter designated as incomplete SLE (iSLE)) and (2) to compare SLE patient characteristics with those documented in other multicentric SLE registries.RELESSER is a multicenter hospital-based registry, with a collection of data from a large, representative sample of adult patients with SLE (1997 ACR criteria) seen at Spanish rheumatology departments. The registry includes demographic data, comprehensive descriptions of clinical manifestations, as well as information about disease activity and severity, cumulative damage, comorbidities, treatments and mortality, using variables with highly standardized definitions.A total of 4.024 SLE patients (91% with ≥4 ACR criteria) were included. Ninety percent were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 35.4 years and a median duration of disease of 11.0 years. As expected, most SLE manifestations were more frequent in SLE patients than in iSLE ones and every one of the ACR criteria was also associated with SLE condition; this was particularly true of malar rash, oral ulcers and renal disorder. The analysis-adjusted by gender, age at diagnosis, and disease duration-revealed that higher disease activity, damage and SLE severity index are associated with SLE [OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.08-1.20 (P < 0.001); 1.29; 95% CI: 1.15-1.44 (P < 0.001); and 2.10; 95% CI: 1.83-2.42 (P < 0.001), respectively]. These results support the hypothesis that iSLE behaves as a relative stable and mild disease. SLE patients from the RELESSER register do not appear to differ substantially from other Caucasian populations and although activity [median SELENA-SLEDA: 2 (IQ: 0-4)], damage [median SLICC/ACR/DI: 1 (IQ: 0-2)], and severity [median KATZ index: 2 (IQ: 1-3)] scores were low, 1 of every 4 deaths was due to SLE activity.RELESSER represents the largest European SLE registry established to date, providing comprehensive, reliable and updated information on SLE in the southern European population.