Exploring the Effects of Ixekizumab on Pain in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Based on Objective Measures of Inflammation: Post Hoc Analysis from a Large Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the improvement in spinal pain with ixekizumab, placebo, and adalimumab based on objective measures of inflammation response in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

The COAST-V 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial examined the efficacy of ixekizumab in patients with active AS; adalimumab was used as an active reference arm. Treatment effects on reduction in pain were assessed by objective measures of controlled and persisting inflammation (defined by magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], C-reactive protein [CRP], or MRI + CRP status). Pathway analysis was used to analyze treatment effect that was not attributable to reduction in inflammation biomarkers.

RESULTS

In patients with AS, when inflammation was controlled as assessed by MRI, patients treated with ixekizumab experienced a reduction in spinal pain at night (SP-N, numeric rating scale, ixekizumab mean = - 3.9, p < 0.001, adalimumab mean = - 2.6, p < 0.05) compared to placebo (mean =  - 1.6) at week 16. When inflammation was controlled as assessed by MRI + CRP, ixekizumab and adalimumab had numerically greater reductions at week 16 in SP-N versus placebo. All ixekizumab groups had further improvements at week 52. When inflammation was persisting as assessed by MRI + CRP, ixekizumab-treated patients had significant reduction in SP-N (mean = - 3.7, p < 0.001) versus placebo (mean = - 1.7), improvement with adalimumab did not reach significance (mean = - 2.6, p = 0.06). In the pathway analysis at week 16, ixekizumab had a greater effect on pain outcomes compared to adalimumab.

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis is supportive of the hypothesis that ixekizumab reduces pain in AS by additional mechanisms other than the reduction of measurable inflammation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02696785.

The OMERACT whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (WIPE) in spondyloarthritis - reference image atlas for the knee region

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reference image atlas for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (OMERACT MRI-WIPE) of the knee region.

METHODS

Image examples of each pathology, location and grade, were collected and discussed at web-based, interactive meetings within the OMERACT MRI in Arthritis Working Group. Subsequently, reference images were selected by consensus.

RESULTS

Reference images for each grade, pathology and location are depicted, along with definitions, reader rules and recommended MRI-sequences.

CONCLUSION

The atlas guides scoring whole-body MRIs for inflammation in joints and entheses of the knee region according to MRI-WIPE methodology in clinical trials and cohorts.

Hip and pelvis region MRI reference image atlas for scoring inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses according to the OMERACT-MRI WIPE scoring system in patients with spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reference image atlas for scoring the hip/pelvis region according to the OMERACT whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (MRI-WIPE).

METHODS

We collected image examples of each pathology, location and grade, discussed them at web-based, interactive meetings and, finally, selected reference images by consensus.

RESULTS

Reference images for each grade and location of osteitis, synovitis and soft tissue inflammation are provided, as are definitions, reader rules and recommended MRI-sequences.

CONCLUSION

A reference image atlas was created to guide scoring whole-body MRIs for arthritis and enthesitis in the hip/pelvis region in spondyloarthritis/psoriatic arthritis clinical trials and cohorts.

OMERACT validation of a deep learning algorithm for automated absolute quantification of knee joint effusion versus manual semi-quantitative assessment

OBJECTIVE

To begin evaluating deep learning (DL)-automated quantification of knee joint effusion-synovitis via the OMERACT filter.

METHODS

A DL algorithm previously trained on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) knee MRI automatically quantified effusion volume in MRI of 53 OAI subjects, which were also scored semi-quantitatively via KIMRISS and MOAKS by 2-6 readers.

RESULTS

DL-measured knee effusion correlated significantly with experts' assessments (Kendall's tau 0.34-0.43) CONCLUSION: The close correlation of automated DL knee joint effusion quantification to KIMRISS manual semi-quantitative scoring demonstrated its criterion validity. Further assessments of discrimination and truth vs. clinical outcomes are still needed to fully satisfy OMERACT filter requirements.

Erosions on T1-weighted MRI vs Radiography of Sacroiliac Joints in Recent-onset Axial SpA: 2-year Data (EMBARK Trial and DESIR Cohort)

OBJECTIVE

To (1) compare the capacity to detect sacroiliac joint (SIJ) erosions and baseline-to-Week-104 change in erosions between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs in recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); (2) compare treatment discriminatory capacities of MRI and radiographic scores for erosion detection in patients receiving etanercept in the EMBARK trial vs controls in the DESIR cohort.

METHODS

Anonymized SIJ MRI and radiographs were assessed at patient and joint surface levels. Three readers evaluated MRI; 3 different readers evaluated radiographs. Final scores for comparison of radiographs and MRI for detection of erosions were assigned based on agreement of ≥2 of 3 readers' assessments.

RESULTS

At baseline, discordance in erosion detection between imaging methods was more frequent for MRI erosions in the absence of radiographic erosions (48/224 [21.4%] patients) than for radiographic erosions in the absence of MRI erosions (14/224 [6.3%] patients; P<0.001). After 104 weeks, decrease in erosions was observed on MRI but not radiographs in 49 (22.2%) patients and on radiographs but not MRI in 6 (2.7%) (P<0.001). In the treatment-discriminant capacity analysis, the largest standardized differences between etanercept and control cohorts at Week 104 were changes in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI erosion discrete score, erosion average score, and meeting the modified New York criteria on radiographs, with unadjusted/adjusted Hedge's G effect sizes of 0.40/0.50, 0.40/0.56, and 0.40/0.43, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In recent-onset axSpA, SIJ erosions and erosion change were observed more frequently on MRI than radiography. The significance of interval improvement of MRI erosions warrants further research.

Systematic calibration reduces sources of variability for the preliminary OMERACT juvenile idiopathic arthritis MRI- sacroiliac joint score (OMERACT JAMRIS-SIJ)

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether systematic calibration enhances scoring proficiency of the OMERACT juvenile idiopathic arthritis MRI-Sacroiliac Joint score (JAMRIS-SIJ) and whether contrast-enhancement enhances its performance.

METHODS

MRI SIJ scans of 50 cases with juvenile spondyloarthritis were scored by 7 raters after calibration with 3 different knowledge transfer tools.

RESULTS

Calibrated readers achieved greater reliability for scoring certain inflammatory and structural lesions. Sensitivity and reliability for scoring inflammatory lesions was greater on fluid-sensitive compared to contrast-enhanced sequences.

CONCLUSION

Systematic calibration should be implemented prior to the use of JAMRIS-SIJ for clinical trials. It is unlikely that contrast-enhanced MRI will improve the performance of this method.

Thresholds for unacceptable work state in radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis of four presenteeism and two clinical outcome measurement instruments

OBJECTIVES

To a) identify threshold values of presenteeism measurement instruments that reflect unacceptable work state in employed r-axSpA patients; b) determine whether those thresholds accurately predict future adverse work outcomes (AWO) (sick leave or short/long-term disability); c) evaluate the performance of traditional health-outcomes for r-axSpA; d) explore whether thresholds are stable across contextual factors.

METHODS

Data from the multinational AS-PROSE study was used. Thresholds to determine whether patients consider themselves in an 'unacceptable work state' were calculated at baseline for four instruments assessing presenteeism and two health-outcomes specific for r-axSpA. Different approaches derived from the receiver operating characteristic methodology were used. Validity of the optimal thresholds was tested across contextual factors and for predicting future AWO over 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 366 working patients, 15% reported an unacceptable work state; 6% experienced at least one AWO in 12 months. Optimal thresholds were: WPAI-presenteeism ≥40 (AUC 0.85), QQ-method <97 (0.76), WALS ≥0.75 (AUC 0.87), WLQ-25 ≥ 29 (AUC 0.85). BASDAI and BASFI performed similarly to the presenteeism instruments: ≥4.7 (AUC 0.82) and ≥3.5 (AUC 0.79), respectively. Thresholds for WALS and WLQ-25 were stable across contextual factors, while for all other instruments they overestimated unacceptable work state in lower educated persons. Proposed thresholds could also predict future AWO, although with lower performance, especially for QQ-method, BASDAI and BASFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Thresholds of measurement instruments for presenteeism and health status to identify unacceptable work state have been established. These thresholds can help in daily clinical practice to provide work related support to r-axSpA patients at risk for AWO.

Bimekizumab treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety from the randomised parallel phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2 studies

OBJECTIVES

Bimekizumab (BKZ), a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, has demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo in patients with non-radiographic (nr-) and radiographic (r-) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) at Week 16. Here, the objective is to report the efficacy and safety of BKZ at Week 52.

METHODS

BE MOBILE 1 (nr-axSpA; NCT03928704) and BE MOBILE 2 (r-axSpA; NCT03928743) comprised a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, then a 36-week maintenance period. From Week 16, all patients received subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Improvements versus placebo in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society ≥40% response (primary endpoint), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and MRI inflammation of the sacroiliac joints/spine at Week 16 were sustained to Week 52 in BKZ-randomised patients. At Week 52, responses of patients switching from placebo to BKZ at Week 16 were comparable to BKZ-randomised patients. At Week 52, ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 183 (75.0%) and 249 (75.5%) patients with nr-axSpA and r-axSpA, respectively. Serious TEAEs occurred in 9 (3.7%) patients with nr-axSpA and 20 (6.1%) patients with r-axSpA. Oral candidiasis was the most frequent fungal infection (nr-axSpA: 18 (7.4%); r-axSpA: 20 (6.1%)). Uveitis occurred in three (1.2%) and seven (2.1%) patients with nr-axSpA and r-axSpA, and inflammatory bowel disease in two (0.8%) and three (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

At Week 52, dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with BKZ resulted in sustained efficacy across the axSpA spectrum; the safety profile was consistent with the known safety of BKZ.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03928704; NCT03928743.

A novel biomarker of MMP-cleaved cartilage intermediate layer protein-1 is elevated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and osteoarthritis

Rheumatic joints have an altered cartilage turnover. Cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 (CILP-1) is secreted from articular chondrocytes and deposited into the cartilage extracellular matrix. We developed an immunoassay targeting a Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)-generated neo-epitope of CILP-1, named CILP-M. Human articular cartilage was cleaved with proteolytic enzymes and CILP-M levels were measured. We also quantified CILP-M in two studies from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and osteoarthritis (OA) and explored the monitoring and prognostic potential of CILP-M in TNF-α inhibitory treatment and modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS) progression. CILP-M was generated by MMP-1, -8 and -12. In the discovery study, CILP-M was significantly higher in patients with RA, AS and OA than healthy donors (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.05) with an area under the curve (AUC) between the diseased groups and healthy donors > 0.95 (p < 0.001). In the validation study, patients with RA and AS had significantly higher CILP-M levels than healthy controls (p < 0.001) and AUC > 0.90 (p < 0.001). Patients with AS treated with TNF- α inhibitory treatment in the validation study had significantly lower CILP-M levels after treatment (p = 0.004). CILP-M may provide useful insights into cartilage degradation processes in rheumatic diseases.

Advances in the Evaluation of Peripheral Enthesitis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

Enthesitis is a key disease manifestation in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that considerably contributes to pain, lower physical function, and reduced quality of life. Clinical assessment of enthesitis lacks sensitivity and specificity, and therefore better methods are urgently needed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows detailed assessment of the components of enthesitis, and consensus-based validated MRI scoring systems exist. These include the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Heel Enthesitis MRI Scoring System (HEMRIS) method, which assesses the entheses of the heel region in a detailed manner, and the OMERACT MRI Whole-Body Score for Inflammation in Peripheral Joints and Entheses (MRI-WIPE) method, which provides an overall assessment of the inflammatory burden in the peripheral entheses and joints in the entire body using whole-body MRI. At an MRI workshop at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2022 meeting in Brooklyn, the MRI appearances of peripheral enthesitis were described, as were the scoring methods. The utility of MRI for improved assessment of enthesitis was demonstrated with examples of patient cases. Clinical trials in PsA that evaluate enthesitis by MRI as a key endpoint should include the presence of MRI enthesitis as an inclusion criterion, and apply validated MRI outcomes to assess the effect of therapeutics on enthesitis are recommended.

Consensus-Driven Definition for Unequivocal Sacroiliitis on Radiographs in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Radiography is still used worldwide for the detection of sacroiliitis in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA), despite its low sensitivity and reliability. We aimed to define unequivocal evidence of sacroiliitis on pelvic radiography in skeletally immature youth for use in classification criteria when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unavailable.

METHODS

Subjects were a retrospective cohort of juvenile patients with spondyloarthritis with a radiograph and MRI as part of a diagnostic evaluation for axial disease. Six musculoskeletal imaging experts underwent an iterative consensus process to define unequivocal sacroiliitis on radiography in skeletally immature youth. Radiographs were graded using the modified New York (mNY) criteria and the unequivocal sacroiliitis criteria. Interrater agreement was assessed with the Fleiss [Formula: see text] statistic. Specificity, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), and sensitivity of the 2 measures were tested using 2 MRI reference standards.

RESULTS

A total of 112 subjects, with a median age of 14.9 (range 6.7-20.1) years, were included. The Fleiss [Formula: see text] was fair for the mNY criteria (0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.67) and the unequivocal sacroiliitis criteria (0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.69). The unequivocal sacroiliitis criteria achieved > 90% specificity using both MRI reference standards. Sensitivity (59.26 and 57.14 vs 44.83 and 43.33) and AUROC (0.76 and 0.76 vs 0.71 and 0.71) were higher, for both reference standards, for the unequivocal sacroiliitis in youth definition than for the mNY criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we propose the first consensus-derived definition to our knowledge of unequivocal sacroiliitis by radiography in skeletally immature youth. This definition achieved excellent specificity and had higher AUROC and sensitivity values than the mNY criteria using both MRI reference standards. This definition has applicability to the JSpA axial disease classification imaging criterion when MRI is unavailable.

Stricter treat-to-target in RA does not result in less radiographic progression: a longitudinal analysis in RA BIODAM

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy.

METHODS

Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval.

CONCLUSIONS

In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome.

Tofacitinib Reduces Spinal Inflammation in Vertebral Bodies and Posterolateral Elements in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results from a Phase 2 Trial

INTRODUCTION

This post hoc analysis of phase 2 trial data assessed the efficacy of tofacitinib on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes with the detailed anatomy-based Canada-Denmark (CANDEN) MRI scoring system and evaluated tofacitinib suppression of spinal inflammation in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Patients with active AS (per modified New York criteria) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 2, 5, or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo, in a 16-week, phase 2, double-blind clinical trial. Spine MRI assessments were performed at baseline and week 12. For post hoc analysis, MRI images from patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID, or placebo, were re-evaluated by two readers blinded to time point/treatment and assessed by the CANDEN MRI scoring system. Least squares mean changes from baseline to week 12 were reported for CANDEN-specific MRI outcomes, with analysis of covariance used for comparisons of pooled tofacitinib and tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID versus placebo. p values without multiplicity adjustment were reported.

RESULTS

MRI data from 137 patients were analyzed. At week 12, CANDEN spine inflammation score and vertebral body, posterior elements, corner, non-corner, facet joint, and posterolateral inflammation subscores were significantly reduced with pooled tofacitinib versus placebo (p < 0.0001; except non-corner subscore, p < 0.05). Total spine fat score was numerically increased with pooled tofacitinib versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AS, tofacitinib treatment was associated with significant reductions in MRI scores of spinal inflammation versus placebo, as assessed by the CANDEN MRI scoring system. Tofacitinib reduced inflammation in posterolateral elements of the spine and facet joints, which has not been described previously.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT01786668).

Comparative validation of the knee inflammation MRI scoring system and the MRI osteoarthritis knee score for semi-quantitative assessment of bone marrow lesions and synovitis-effusion in osteoarthritis: an international multi-reader exercise

Background

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with symptoms and predict degeneration of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA). Validated methods for their semiquantitative assessment on MRI are available, but they all have similar scoring designs and questionable sensitivity to change. New scoring methods with completely different designs need to be developed and compared to existing methods.

Objectives

To compare the performance of new web-based versions of the Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS) with the MRI OA Knee Score (MOAKS) for quantification of BMLs and synovitis-effusion (S-E).

Design

Retrospective follow-up cohort.

Methods

We designed web-based overlays outlining regions in the knee that are scored for BML in MOAKS and KIMRISS. For KIMRISS, both BML and S-E are scored on consecutive sagittal slices. The performance of these methods was compared in an international reading exercise of 8 readers evaluating 60 pairs of scans conducted 1 year apart from cases recruited to the OA Initiative (OAI) cohort. Interobserver reliability for baseline status and baseline to 1 year change in BML and S-E was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Feasibility was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).

Results

Mean change in BML and S-E was minimal over 1 year. Pre-specified targets for acceptable reliability (ICC ⩾ 0.80 and ⩾ 0.70 for status and change scores, respectively) were achieved more frequently for KIMRISS for both BML and synovitis. Mean (95% CI) ICC for change in BML was 0.88 (0.83-0.92) and 0.69 (0.60-0.78) for KIMRISS and MOAKS, respectively. KIMRISS mean SUS usability score was 85.7 and at the 95th centile of ranking for usability versus a score of 55.4 and 20th centile for MOAKS.

Conclusion

KIMRISS had superior performance metrics to MOAKS for quantification of BML and S-E. Both methods should be further compared in trials of new therapies for OA.

The bone marrow side of axial spondyloarthritis

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is characterized by the infiltration of innate and adaptive immune cells into entheses and bone marrow. Molecular, cellular and imaging evidence demonstrates the presence of bone marrow inflammation, a hallmark of SpA. In the spine and the peripheral joints, bone marrow is critically involved in the pathogenesis of SpA. Evidence suggests that bone marrow inflammation is associated with enthesitis and that there are roles for mechano-inflammation and intestinal inflammation in bone marrow involvement in SpA. Specific cell types (including mesenchymal stem cells, innate lymphoid cells and γδ T cells) and mediators (Toll-like receptors and cytokines such as TNF, IL-17A, IL-22, IL-23, GM-CSF and TGFβ) are involved in these processes. Using this evidence to demonstrate a bone marrow rather than an entheseal origin for SpA could change our understanding of the disease pathogenesis and the relevant therapeutic approach.

Evidence in support of the bone marrow as the primary lesion in axial spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past several decades, the concept that the primary lesion accounting for the development of axSpA is an enthesopathy has been widely accepted. However, the hallmark abnormality of axSpA occurs in the sacroiliac joint at the interface of cartilage and bone at a location remote from any anatomical enthesis. Both imaging and histopathological data from the sacroiliac joint point to immunopathogenetic events in the bone marrow as being of primary importance. Here, we discuss new developments in our understanding of immune events in the bone marrow relevant to axSpA that reinforce the need for a change in our conceptual paradigm for the pathogenesis of axSpA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Human spinal enthesis samples contain myeloperoxidase-expressing cells, a marker of neutrophils, and mucosal-associated invariant T cells in the perientheseal bone marrow, which may be activated by stromal cells and circulating microbial products to express IL-17A and IL-17F and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Evaluation of transcriptomes of monocytes from patients with axSpA demonstrates a lipopolysaccharide/TNF signature characterized by the expression of genes associated with granulocytopoietic bone marrow cells. This neutrophil-like phenotype is more evident in established and more severe axSpA and may be activated by microbial products from the gut. A similar expansion of granulocyte-monocyte progenitor-driven hematopoiesis occurs in the SKG mouse driven by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from ankylosing spondylitis patients are more likely to exhibit osteogenic differentiation than MSCs from healthy donors, which may be mediated by the formation of specific clusters of transcriptional factors, super enhancers, regulated by axSpA-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms located mostly in noncoding regions. TNF-α may enhance directional migration of AS-MSC compared with MSC from healthy controls from the bone marrow to entheseal soft tissue, which is mediated by increased expression of engulfment and cell motility protein 1 (ELMO1). TNF and IL-17A display differential effects on adipogenesis and osteogenesis of MSC in perientheseal bone marrow and soft tissue.

SUMMARY

Bone marrow has the capacity to undergo rapid adaptation in terms of cell composition, differentiation, and immune function, resulting in inflammation and osteogenesis in axSpA.

Sustained low functional impairment in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): which are the primary outcomes that should be targeted to achieve this?

OBJECTIVES

To (i) determine whether sustained disease activity states, as measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), impact function, and (ii) evaluate characteristics predicting sustained low functional impairment in a prospective axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) cohort.

METHODS

Biologic Treatment Registry Across Canada (BioTRAC) was a multi-center, prospective registry that collected real-world data on axSpA patients receiving infliximab or golimumab between 2006 and 2017. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to test baseline characteristics, treatment, and duration (at 6 and 12 months vs. only at 6 or 12 months vs. neither) of low BASDAI (< 3), ASDAS-inactive disease (ID)(< 1.3), and ASDAS-low disease activity (LDA) in predicting sustained low Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)(< 3) between 12 and 18 months. The adjusted impact of achieving low disease state at 6 and/or 12 months on BASFI at 18 months was analyzed by generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Eight hundred ten patients were enrolled. 33.7%, 13.4%, and 24.7% achieved sustained low BASDAI, ASDAS-ID, and ASDAS-LDA, respectively. In univariable GEE of baseline variables, age and baseline BASDAI, BASFI, and ASDAS significantly predicted sustained low BASFI. In multivariable GEE, sustained low BASDAI (p < 0.001), low BASDAI only at 6 or 12 months (p = 0.001), and baseline BASFI (p < 0.001) were the only predictors of sustained low BASFI. Sustained ASDAS-ID (p = 0.040) and ASDAS-LDA (p < 0.001) were also predictors when forced into the model. Similar results were obtained when evaluating the BASFI score at 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Sustained BASDAI < 3 may be a valid and feasible target for a treat-to-target strategy in axSpA having function as treatment goal.

Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results of two parallel phase 3 randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a complex disease with diverse manifestations, for which new treatment options are warranted. BE MOBILE 1 (non-radiographic (nr)-axSpA) and BE MOBILE 2 (radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA)) are double-blind, phase 3 trials designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a novel dual interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F inhibitor, across the axSpA spectrum.

METHODS

In parallel 52-week trials, patients with active disease were randomised 1:1 (nr-axSpA) or 2:1 (r-axSpA) to bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks:placebo. From week 16, all patients received bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks. Primary (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society ≥40% improvement (ASAS40)) and secondary endpoints were assessed at week 16. Here, efficacy and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported up to week 24.

RESULTS

254 patients with nr-axSpA and 332 with r-axSpA were randomised. At week 16, primary (ASAS40, nr-axSpA: 47.7% bimekizumab vs 21.4% placebo; r-axSpA: 44.8% vs 22.5%; p<0.001) and all ranked secondary endpoints were met in both trials. ASAS40 responses were similar across TNFi-naïve and TNFi-inadequate responder patients. Improvements were observed in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) states and objective measures of inflammation, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and MRI of the sacroiliac joints and spine. Most frequent TEAEs with bimekizumab (>3%) included nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngitis, diarrhoea, headache and oral candidiasis. More fungal infections (all localised) were observed with bimekizumab vs placebo; no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or active tuberculosis were reported. Incidence of uveitis and adjudicated inflammatory bowel disease was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab resulted in significant and rapid improvements in efficacy outcomes vs placebo and was well tolerated in patients with nr-axSpA and r-axSpA.

Data-Driven Magnetic Resonance Imaging Definitions for Active and Structural Sacroiliac Joint Lesions in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Typical of Axial Disease: A Cross-Sectional International Study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine quantitative sacroiliac (SI) joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cutoffs for active and structural lesions that will be incorporated as imaging domains in classification criteria of axial disease in juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

MRI scans from an international cross-section of juvenile SpA patients were reviewed by 6 musculoskeletal imaging experts blinded to clinical details. Raters globally assessed the presence/absence of lesions typical of axial SpA and performed SI joint quadrant- or joint-based scoring. Sensitivity and specificity of lesion cutoffs were calculated using a rater majority (≥4 of 6 raters) on a global assessment of the presence/absence of active or structural lesions typical of axial SpA with high confidence as the reference standard. Cutoffs were validated in an independent cohort.

RESULTS

Imaging from 243 subjects, 61% male, median age 14.9 years, had sequences available for detailed MRI scoring. Optimal cutoffs for defining lesions typical of axial disease in juvenile SpA were: 1) inflammatory lesion: bone marrow edema in ≥3 SI joint quadrants across all SI joint MRI slices (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 96.5%); 2) structural lesions: erosion in ≥3 quadrants or sclerosis or fat lesion in ≥2 SI joint quadrants or backfill or ankylosis in ≥2 joint halves across all SI joint MRI slices (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 95.5%). Sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoffs in the validation cohort were excellent.

CONCLUSION

We propose data-driven cutoffs for active inflammatory and structural lesions on MRI typical of axial disease in juvenile SpA that have high specificity and sensitivity using central imaging global assessment as the reference standard and excellent reliability.

Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy in Patients With Non‐Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Stratified by Baseline MRI and C‐Reactive Protein Status: An Analysis From the C‐axSpAnd Study

Objective

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are an effective treatment for non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA). To be eligible, however, many authorities require patients with nr‐axSpA to show active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or an elevated C‐reactive protein (CRP) level, possibly resulting in a perception that patients with nr‐axSpA without both factors have only low responses to TNFi treatment. We evaluated clinical responses to certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with nr‐axSpA stratified by baseline MRI/CRP status.

Methods

C‐axSpAnd was a phase 3, multicenter study on CZP in adult patients with active nr‐axSpA and objective signs of inflammation. This analysis assessed efficacy of CZP over the 52‐week randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled period in patients stratified into subgroups based on the presence of active sacroiliitis on MRI and CRP level at baseline.

Results

CZP‐treated patients across all MRI/CRP subgroups achieved clinical responses greater than placebo. Across outcome measures, CZP‐treated MRI+/CRP+ patients demonstrated the greatest clinical responses, but substantial improvements were also observed in CZP‐treated MRI+/CRP− and MRI−/CRP+ patients. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement response rates at week 52 among CZP‐treated patients (75.6% MRI+/CRP+; 47.5% MRI−/CRP+; and 29.7% MRI+/CRP−) were higher than rates in placebo groups (range: 3.9%‐12.5%). Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Functional Index had similar response patterns, although differences between the CZP‐treated MRI/CRP subgroups were smaller. Clinical responses among CZP‐treated patients were also observed in additional subgroups, including those with low Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and those with normal baseline CRP levels.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that CZP treatment benefits patients with nr‐axSpA across MRI+/CRP+, MRI−/CRP+, and MRI+/CRP− subgroups.

Effects of ixekizumab treatment on structural changes in the sacroiliac joint: MRI assessments at 16 weeks in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

There is limited understanding regarding the inhibition of structural damage in the sacroiliac joint of patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. This study evaluated the effect of the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab versus placebo on structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints as assessed by MRI at week 16 in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis from the COAST-X study.

METHODS

COAST-X was a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study done at 107 sites in 15 countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with active axial spondyloarthritis without definite radiographic sacroiliitis (non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis), objective signs of inflammation (via MRI or C-reactive protein), and an inadequate response or intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly allocated to placebo or double-blind ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 2 weeks (Q2W), with an 80 mg or 160 mg starting dose. We report a post-hoc analysis of 266 patients with available MRI scans from baseline and week 16. MRI scans were scored using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) sacroiliac joint structural score (SSS) method independently by two masked readers. Treatment comparisons used analysis of covariance based on observed cases. Correlations were evaluated among changes in SPARCC SSS for erosion, fat lesions, and backfill, and between changes in SPARCC SSS and sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and clinical measures. COAST-X was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02757352.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 2, 2016, and Jan 29, 2018, 303 patients were enrolled to the COAST-X study. 290 (96%) of 303 participants completed the week 16 visit (95 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, 98 in the ixekizumab Q2W group, and 97 in the placebo group), and MRI scans were available for 266 patients at baseline and week 16 (85 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, 91 in the ixekizumab Q2W group, and 90 in the placebo group). Changes from baseline to week 16 in mean SPARCC SSS for erosion were -0·39 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·003 vs placebo), -0·40 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·002), and 0·16 for placebo; for fat lesions: 0·16 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·013), 0·10 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·067), and -0·04 for placebo; and for backfill: 0·21 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·011), 0·22 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·006), and -0·10 for placebo. Ankylosis did not change. Effects of ixekizumab versus placebo on structural changes were most pronounced in patients with baseline inflammation in the sacroiliac joints. Changes from baseline at week 16 in erosion, fat lesions, and backfill were correlated.

INTERPRETATION

Although the clinical relevance is not yet clear, patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis receiving ixekizumab had significant reductions in erosions and increases in fat lesions and backfill in the sacroiliac joints versus placebo at week 16, suggesting an early repair process with ixekizumab treatment.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

Comparing MRI and conventional radiography for the detection of structural changes indicative of axial spondyloarthritis in the ASAS cohort

OBJECTIVES

To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional radiography of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) for detection of structural lesions typical for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Adult patients from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) cohort with symptoms suggestive of axSpA and both SIJ MRIs and radiographs available for central reading were included. Radiographs were evaluated by three readers according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria grading system. The presence of structural damage on radiographs was defined as 1) fulfilment of the radiographic mNY criterion and 2) additionally, a lower threshold for sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 unilaterally. MRI scans were assessed for the presence of structural changes indicative of axSpA by 7 readers. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity-Se, specificity-Sp, positive and negative predictive values-PPV and NPV-and positive and negative likelihood ratios-LR+ and LR-) of MRI and radiographs (vs rheumatologist's diagnosis of axSpA) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 183 patients were included, 135 (73.7%) were diagnosed with axSpA. Structural lesions indicative of axSpA on MRI had Se 38.5%, Sp 91.7%, PPV 92.9%, NPV 34.6%, LR + 4.62, LR- 0.67. Sacroiliitis according to the mNY criteria had Se 54.8%, Sp 70.8%, PPV 84.1%, NPV 35.8%, positive LR + 1.88, LR- 0.64. Radiographic sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 unilaterally had Sn 65.2%, Sp 50.0%, PPV 78.6%, NPV 33.8%, LR + 1.30, LR- 0.69.

CONCLUSION

Structural lesions of SIJ detected by MRI demonstrated better diagnostic performance and better inter-reader reliability compared with conventional radiography.

Deep Learning Detects Changes Indicative of Axial Spondyloarthritis at MRI of Sacroiliac Joints

Background MRI is frequently used for early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, evaluation is time-consuming and requires profound expertise because noninflammatory degenerative changes can mimic axSpA, and early signs may therefore be missed. Deep neural networks could function as assistance for axSpA detection. Purpose To create a deep neural network to detect MRI changes in sacroiliac joints indicative of axSpA. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included MRI examinations of five cohorts of patients with clinical suspicion of axSpA collected at university and community hospitals between January 2006 and September 2020. Data from four cohorts were used as the training set, and data from one cohort as the external test set. Each MRI examination in the training and test sets was scored by six and seven raters, respectively, for inflammatory changes (bone marrow edema, enthesitis) and structural changes (erosions, sclerosis). A deep learning tool to detect changes indicative of axSpA was developed. First, a neural network to homogenize the images, then a classification network were trained. Performance was evaluated with use of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. P < .05 was considered indicative of statistically significant difference. Results Overall, 593 patients (mean age, 37 years ± 11 [SD]; 302 women) were studied. Inflammatory and structural changes were found in 197 of 477 patients (41%) and 244 of 477 (51%), respectively, in the training set and 25 of 116 patients (22%) and 26 of 116 (22%) in the test set. The AUCs were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) for all inflammatory changes, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95) for inflammatory changes fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society definition, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) for structural changes indicative of axSpA. Sensitivity and specificity on the external test set were 22 of 25 patients (88%) and 65 of 91 patients (71%), respectively, for inflammatory changes and 22 of 26 patients (85%) and 70 of 90 patients (78%) for structural changes. Conclusion Deep neural networks can detect inflammatory or structural changes to the sacroiliac joint indicative of axial spondyloarthritis at MRI. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SELECT-AXIS 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

The SELECT-AXIS 2 non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis study was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 113 sites across 23 countries (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, and the USA). Eligible adults had active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, with objective signs of inflammation based on MRI or elevated C-reactive protein and an inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo using interactive response technology. Random treatment assignment was stratified by MRI inflammation in the sacroiliac joints and screening high-sensitivity C-reactive protein status (MRI-positive and C-reactive protein-positive, MRI-positive and C-reactive protein-negative, and MRI-negative and C-reactive protein-positive) and previous exposure to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (yes vs no). Treatment assignment was masked from patients, investigators, study site personnel, and the study sponsor. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 (ASAS40) response at week 14. Analyses were performed on the full analysis set of patients, who underwent random allocation and received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04169373.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 26, 2019, and May 20, 2021, 314 patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis were enrolled into the study, and 313 received study drug (156 in the upadacitinib group and 157 in the placebo group); 295 (94%) patients (145 in the upadacitinib group and 150 in the placebo group) received treatment for the full 14 weeks. A significantly higher ASAS40 response rate was achieved with upadacitinib compared with placebo at week 14 (70 [45%] of 156 patients vs 35 [23%] of 157 patients; p<0·0001; treatment difference 22%, 95% CI 12-32). The rate of adverse events up to week 14 was similar in the upadacitinib group (75 [48%] of 156 patients) and placebo group (72 [46%] of 157 patients). Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug occurred in four (3%) of 156 patients in the upadacitinib group and two (1%) of 157 patients in the placebo group. Few patients had serious infections or herpes zoster in either treatment group (each event occurred in two [1%] of 156 patients in the upadacitinib group and one [1%] of 157 patients in the placebo group). Five (3%) of 156 patients in the upadacitinib group had neutropenia; no events of neutropenia occurred in the placebo group. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, or deaths were reported with upadacitinib treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Upadacitinib significantly improved the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis compared with placebo at week 14. These findings support the potential of upadacitinib as a new therapeutic option in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

FUNDING

AbbVie.

Upadacitinib in active ankylosing spondylitis: results of the 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled SELECT-AXIS 1 study and open-label extension

Introduction

Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has not been previously reported.

Methods

In SELECT-AXIS 1, patients receiving placebo were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily at week 14 while patients initially randomised to upadacitinib continued their regimen through week 104. Efficacy was assessed using as-observed (AO) and non-responder imputation (NRI).

Results

Of 187 patients randomised, 144 patients (77%) completed week 104. Among patients receiving continuous upadacitinib, 85.9% (AO) and 65.6% (NRI) achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response (ASAS40) at week 104. Similar magnitude of ASAS40 responses were observed among patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib (88.7% and 63.8%, respectively). The mean change from baseline to week 104 in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI spine and sacroiliac joint inflammation scores were –7.3 and –5.3, respectively, in the continuous upadacitinib group and –7.9 and –4.9 in the placebo-to-upadacitinib switch group. The mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 104 in the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score was 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) in the total group. Adverse event rate was 242.7/100 patient-years. No serious infections, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, lymphoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, or gastrointestinal perforations were observed.

Conclusions

Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily showed sustained and consistent efficacy over 2 years for ASAS40 and other clinically relevant endpoints. A low rate of radiographic progression was observed and no new safety findings were observed.

Plain Radiographic Instruments for Structural Damage in Peripheral Joints in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Report From the GRAPPA-OMERACT Working Group

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Set working group is focused on the development of a core set of instruments used to assess the domains described in the 2016 PsA Core Domain Set. At the 2021 annual meeting, the group presented an update on the domain of structural damage. In this report, we discuss the steps taken to assess the domain match and feasibility of plain radiographic instruments in the assessment of structural damage in PsA.

Filgotinib decreases both vertebral body and posterolateral spine inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis: results from the TORTUGA trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of filgotinib on inflammatory and structural changes at various spinal locations, based on MRI measures in patients with active AS in the TORTUGA trial.

METHODS

In the TORTUGA trial, patients with AS received filgotinib 200 mg (n = 58) or placebo (n = 58) once daily for 12 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, spine MRIs were evaluated using the Canada-Denmark (CANDEN) MRI scoring system to assess changes from baseline to week 12 in total spine and subscores for inflammation, fat, erosion and new bone formation (NBF) at various anatomical locations. Correlations were assessed between CANDEN inflammation and clinical outcomes and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores and between baseline CANDEN NBF and baseline BASFI and BASMI scores.

RESULTS

MRIs from 47 filgotinib- and 41 placebo-treated patients were evaluated. There were significantly larger reductions with filgotinib vs placebo in total spine inflammation score and most inflammation subscores, including posterolateral elements (costovertebral joints, transverse/spinous processes, soft tissues), facet joints and vertebral bodies. No significant differences were observed for corner or non-corner vertebral body inflammation subscores, spine fat lesion, bone erosion or NBF scores. In the filgotinib group, the change from baseline in the total inflammation score correlated positively with the SPARCC spine score. Baseline NBF scores correlated with baseline BASMI but not BASFI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, filgotinib treatment was associated with significant reductions in MRI measures of spinal inflammation, including in vertebral bodies, facet joints and posterolateral elements.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT03117270.

MRI lesions of the spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: an update of lesion definitions and validation by the ASAS MRI working group

OBJECTIVES

Spinal MRI is used to visualise lesions associated with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The ASAS MRI working group (WG) updated and validated the definitions for inflammatory and structural spinal lesions in the context of axSpA.

METHODS

After review of the existing literature on all possible types of spinal MRI pathologies in axSpA, the group (12 rheumatologists and two radiologists) consented on the required revisions of lesion definitions compared with the existing nomenclature of 2012. In a second step, using 62 MRI scans from the ASAS classification cohort, the proposed definitions were validated in a multireader campaign by global (absent/present) and detailed (inflammation and structural) lesion assessment at the vertebral corner (VC), vertebral endplate, facet joints, transverse processes, lateral and posterior elements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Revisions were made for both inflammatory (bone marrow oedema, BMO) and structural (fat, erosion, bone spur and ankylosis) lesions, including localisation (central vs lateral), extension (VC vs vertebral endplate) and extent (minimum number of slices needed), while new definitions were suggested for the type of lesion based on lesion maturity (VC monomorphic vs dimorphic). The most reliably assessed lesions were VC fat lesion and VC monomorphic BMO (ICC (mean of all 36 reader pairs/overall 9 readers): 0.91/0.92; 0.70/0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The lesion definitions for spinal MRI lesions compatible with SpA were updated by consensus and validated by a group of experienced readers. The lesions with the highest frequency and best reliability were fat and monomorphic inflammatory lesions at the VC.

Impact of filgotinib on sacroiliac joint magnetic resonance imaging structural lesions at 12 weeks in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (TORTUGA trial)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of filgotinib, which preferentially inhibits Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), on MRI measures of structural change in the SI joint in patients with active AS in the TORTUGA trial.

METHODS

Adults with active AS and inadequate response/intolerance to two or more NSAIDs were randomized 1:1 to filgotinib 200 mg (n = 58) or placebo (n = 58) once daily for 12 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, T1-weighted MRI scans of the SI joint were evaluated by two independent readers using Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS) definitions for erosion, backfill, fat metaplasia and ankylosis. Correlations between SPARCC SSS and improvement in clinical outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

MRI scans from 87 patients (48 filgotinib, 39 placebo) were evaluated. At baseline there were no notable differences between filgotinib and placebo for any MRI structural lesion types. From baseline to week 12, filgotinib was associated with a significant reduction in SI joint erosion score (P = 0.02) and an increase in backfill score (P = 0.005) vs placebo, with no significant between-group differences for ankylosis (P = 0.46) or fat metaplasia (P = 0.17). At week 12, the change in SPARCC MRI SI joint inflammation scores correlated positively with erosion scores but negatively with backfill scores.

CONCLUSION

The significant changes in MRI structural lesions induced by filgotinib in the SI joint by week 12 demonstrate that tissue repair can be observed very soon after starting treatment with a JAK1 preferential inhibitor. This could have prognostic implications for development of ankylosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03117270.

OA34 Post-hoc analysis of spinal MRI SPARCC inflammation scores in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis treated with ixekizumab: results from the COAST-V study at week 16

Background/Aims

Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) irrespective of baseline local inflammation as measured by spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) inflammation scores. This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of ixekizumab in patients with r-axSpA categorized by MRI SPARCC score at baseline and 16-week change from baseline (CFB).

Methods

COAST-V (NCT02696785) was a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial enrolling patients with active r-axSpA naïve to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, randomized 1:1:1:1 to 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, 80-mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W), adalimumab, or placebo for the 16-week blinded treatment period. Three categories were defined according to spinal MRI SPARCC inflammation score at baseline and CFB (based on published minimally important change): 1) low baseline (baseline SPARCC score &lt;5.0 points), 2) low responder (baseline SPARCC score ≥5.0 points and CFB &lt;5.0 points), 3) high responder (baseline SPARCC score ≥5.0 points and CFB ≥5.0 points). Proportions of patients achieving Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% (ASAS40), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) &lt;2.1, and BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) 50 were determined. Means at baseline and week-16 least squares means of CFBs were calculated for ASDAS, BASDAI, Spinal Pain, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and 36-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS). Non-responder imputation and modified baseline observation carried forward were used for missing week-16 data in discrete and continuous variables, respectively.

Results

Of 78 patients receiving ixekizumab Q4W, 35 (44.9%), 11 (14.1%), and 32 (41.0%), were MRI SPARCC low baseline, low responders, and high responders, respectively. Similar proportions of ixekizumab-treated patients in all categories achieved ASAS40, ASDAS&lt;2.1, and BASDAI50 week-16 responses; week-16 improvements in other efficacy endpoints were broadly similar, with high responders showing greater improvements in ASAS40 and ASDAS CFB (Table). In adalimumab-treated patients, week-16 improvements were less pronounced in the low baseline and low responder categories.

Conclusion

Patients with r-axSpA receiving ixekizumab Q4W showed broadly similar reduction in the signs and symptoms of r-axSpA irrespective of their spinal MRI SPARCC inflammation score category at week 16.

Disclosure

H. Marzo-Ortega: Honoraria; Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB, Biogen. Grants/research support; Janssen, Novartis. W. Tsai: Consultancies; Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche. H. Kameda: Consultancies; Abbvie, Asahikasei Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Chugai, Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Asahikasei Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Chugai, Pfizer. A. Konomi: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. Other; Employment - Eli Lilly and Company. A.J. Bradley: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. Other; Employment - Eli Lilly and Company. K. Ng: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. Other; Employment - Eli Lilly and Company. Y. Schymura: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. Other; Employment - Eli Lilly and Company. S. Liu-Leage: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. Other; Employment - Eli Lilly and Company. W.P. Maksymowych: Corporate appointments; CARE Arthritis Limited. Consultancies; Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. M. Østergaard: Consultancies; Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis.

Long-term safety and clinical outcomes of certolizumab pegol treatment in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 3-year results from the phase 3 C-axSpAnd study

Background

52-week results from C-axSpAnd demonstrated the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and objective signs of inflammation (sacroiliitis on MRI and/or elevated C-reactive protein levels). Long-term safety and clinical outcomes, including MRI assessments, are evaluated up to 3 years for CZP-treated patients with nr-axSpA.

Methods

C-axSpAnd was a phase 3 study comprising a 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled period and 2-year open-label safety follow-up extension (SFE). At baseline, 317 patients were randomised 1:1 to placebo or CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks. Patients completing the double-blind phase who enrolled into the SFE received open-label CZP for an additional 104 weeks. Long-term safety and clinical outcomes are reported to Week 156. Continuous outcomes are presented as observed case (OC) and dichotomous outcomes as OC and with non-responder imputation.

Results

243/317 (76.7%) patients entered the SFE, during which 149 (61.3%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 15 (3.3/100 patient-years) experienced serious TEAEs. Continuous outcome scores (including Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS]: 1.8; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]: 2.7) at Week 52 were maintained at Week 156 (ASDAS: 1.8; BASDAI: 2.6) for the initial CZP-randomised group. Mean SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint inflammation scores for these patients decreased at Week 52 (baseline: 7.6; Week 52: 1.7), remaining low at Week 156 (2.4).

Conclusions

CZP treatment was well tolerated up to 3 years, with no new safety signals versus previous reports. Clinical outcomes achieved after 1 year were sustained to 3 years.

Trial registration number

NCT02552212.

What Constitutes a Positive MRI for Clinical Trial Recruitment of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients With Axial Involvement?

There has been a resurgence of interest in defining the axial inflammation component of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) since recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) raised the possibility that this entity may respond differentially to therapeutics compared to patients with axial spondyloarthritis. A workshop was conducted during the 2021 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis annual meeting to review the literature on diagnosing PsA and to determine which criteria might be most appropriate. There was quite strong agreement that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had an important role to play in helping to define axial inflammation in PsA and that a data-driven methodology for generating optimal MRI quantitative cut-offs for lesions in the sacroiliac joints and/or spine that reflect imaging typical of axial inflammation in PsA would be most desirable.

Spinal Radiographic Progression and Predictors of Progression in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Receiving Ixekizumab Over 2 Years

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effect of ixekizumab (IXE) on radiographic changes in the spine in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) by measuring change from baseline through 2 years in modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS), and to identify potential predictors of progression.

METHODS

This study evaluates patients from COAST-V (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02696785, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve) and COAST-W (NCT02696798, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced) who had mSASSS data at baseline in the originating studies and 108 weeks after baseline in the extension study COAST-Y (NCT03129100). We examined the proportion of patients who did not have spinal radiographic progression through 2 years (108 weeks) of treatment with IXE (80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks) and the change from baseline to year 2 in mSASSS. Potential predictors of spinal radiographic progression were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Among patients with evaluable radiographs who were originally assigned to IXE (n = 230), mean (SD) change in mSASSS from baseline at year 2 was 0.3 (1.8). The proportion of nonprogressors over 2 years was 89.6% if defined as mSASSS change from baseline < 2 and 75.7% if defined as mSASSS change from baseline ≤ 0. Predictors of structural progression at year 2 (mSASSS change > 0) were age ≥ 40, baseline syndesmophytes, HLA-B27 positivity, and male sex. Week 52 inflammation in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada spine was also a predictor of radiographic progression at year 2 in patients with magnetic resonance imaging data in COAST-V (n = 109).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with r-axSpA receiving IXE had no radiographic progression in the spine through 2 years of treatment. Predictors were generally consistent with previous studies.

Ixekizumab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis with and without elevated C-reactive protein or positive magnetic resonance imaging

Objective

To evaluate response rates at week 16 with ixekizumab in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and elevated or normal/low baseline inflammation, measured by serum C-reactive protein (CRP) or spinal MRI, using data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials.

Methods

Biologic-naive (COAST-V) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced (COAST-W) adults with active r-axSpA received 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) or placebo (PBO); or active reference (40 mg adalimumab Q2W; ADA) in COAST-V. At week 16, patients receiving ixekizumab continued as assigned; patients receiving PBO or ADA were re-randomized 1:1 to IXEQ2W or IXEQ4W through week 52. ASAS40 response rates were examined by baseline CRP (≤5 or &gt; 5 mg/l) and SPARCC MRI spine inflammation score (&lt;2 or ≥ 2).

Results

In the COAST-V/W integrated dataset (N = 567), significantly more patients treated with ixekizumab achieved ASAS40 response at week 16 by CRP ≤5 mg/l (27% IXEQ4W p&lt;0.05, 35% IXEQ2W p&lt;0.01 vs 12% PBO), CRP &gt;5 mg/l (39% IXEQ4W p&lt;0.001, 43% IXEQ2W p&lt;0.001 vs 17% PBO), SPARCC MRI spine score &lt;2 (40% IXEQ4W p&lt;0.01, 52% IXEQ2W p&lt;0.001 vs 16% PBO), and SPARCC MRI spine score ≥2 (44% IXEQ4W p&lt;0.001, 47% IXEQ2W p&lt;0.001 vs 19% PBO). ASAS40 response was observed with CRP ≤5 mg/l and SPARCC MRI spine score &lt;2 with IXEQ4W (29%) and was significant with IXEQ2W (48%, p&lt;0.05) vs PBO (13%).

Conclusion

Ixekizumab demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis/r-axSpA in patients with and without elevated CRP or evidence of spinal inflammation on MRI.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02696785, NCT02696798

Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis cohort (AXIS): the protocol of a joint project of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)

BACKGROUND

Involvement of the axial skeleton (sacroiliac joints and spine) is a relatively frequent manifestation associated with psoriatic skin disease, mostly along with involvement of peripheral musculoskeletal structures (peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis), which are referred to as psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Data suggest that up to 30% of patients with psoriasis have PsA. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of axial involvement varies from 25% to 70% of patients with PsA. However, there are currently no widely accepted criteria for axial involvement in PsA.Objective: The overarching aim of the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) study is to systematically evaluate clinical and imaging manifestations indicative of axial involvement in patients with PsA and to develop classification criteria and a unified nomenclature for axial involvement in PsA that would allow defining a homogeneous subgroup of patients for research.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, multinational, cross-sectional study.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

In this multicenter, multinational, cross-sectional study, eligible patients [adult patients diagnosed with PsA and fulfilling Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) with musculoskeletal symptom duration of ⩽10 years not treated with biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs] will be recruited prospectively. They will undergo study-related clinical and imaging examinations. Imaging will include radiography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations of sacroiliac joints and spine. Local investigators will evaluate for the presence of axial involvement based on clinical and imaging information which will represent the primary outcome of the study. In addition, imaging will undergo evaluation by central review. Finally, the central clinical committee will determine the presence of axial involvement based on all available information.

ETHICS

The study will be performed according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The study protocol will be approved by the individual Independent Ethics Committee / Institutional Review Board of participating centers. Written informed consent will be obtained from all included patients.Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04434885.

Predictors of long-term clinical response in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis receiving certolizumab pegol

BACKGROUND

Identification of predictive clinical factors of long-term treatment response may contribute to improved management of non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) patients. This analysis aims to identify whether any baseline characteristics or Week 12 clinical outcomes in nr-axSpA patients with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enrolled in the C-axSpAnd study are predictive of achieving clinical response after 1 year of certolizumab pegol (CZP).

METHODS

C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) was a phase 3, multicentre study, including a 52-Week double-blind, placebo-controlled period. Enrolled patients were randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W or placebo. Predictors of Week 12 (CZP group only) and Week 52 clinical response were identified using a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Response variables included Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score major improvement (ASDAS-MI), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% response (ASAS40), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50% response (BASDAI50) and ASDAS inactive disease (ASDAS-ID). Predictive factors assessed included demographic and baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes at Week 12. A p-value <0.05 was required for forward selection into the model and p ≥0.1 for backward elimination. Missing data or values collected after switching to open-label treatment were accounted for using non-responder imputation. Sensitivity analyses accounted for patients with changes in non-biologic background medication.

RESULTS

Of 317 enrolled patients, 159 and 158 were randomised to CZP and placebo, respectively. Younger age and male sex were identified as predictors of Week 12 response across all assessed efficacy outcomes in CZP-treated patients. Consistent predictors of Week 52 response, measured by ASDAS-MI, ASAS40 and BASDAI50, included human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 positivity and sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline. MRI positivity was also predictive of achieving ASDAS-ID at Week 52. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the primary analysis. In placebo-treated patients, no meaningful predictors of Week 52 response were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In this 52-Week, placebo-controlled study in nr-axSpA patients with elevated CRP and/or active sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline, MRI sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 positivity, but not elevated CRP or responses at Week 12, were predictive of long-term clinical response to CZP. Findings may support rheumatologists to identify patients suitable for TNFi treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02552212 . Registered on 15 September 2015.

A review of JAK-STAT signalling in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis and the role of JAK inhibition

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) comprises a group of chronic inflammatory diseases with overlapping clinical, genetic and pathophysiological features including back pain, peripheral arthritis, psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis. Several cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of SpA, variously contributing to each clinical manifestation. Many SpA-associated cytokines, including IL-23, IL-17, IL-6, type I/II interferon and tumour necrosis factor signal directly or indirectly via the Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway. JAK signalling also regulates development and maturation of cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Accordingly, disruption of this signalling pathway by small molecule oral JAK inhibitors can inhibit signalling implicated in SpA pathogenesis. Herein we discuss the role of JAK signalling in the pathogenesis of SpA and summarize the safety and efficacy of JAK inhibition by reference to relevant SpA clinical trials.

Development of an environmental contextual factor item set relevant to global functioning and health in patients with axial Spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of an Environmental contextual factors (EF) Item Set (EFIS) accompanying the disease specific Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI).

METHOD

First, a candidate item pool was developed by linking items from existing questionnaires to 13 EF previously selected for the ICF/ASAS Core Set. Second, using data from two international surveys, which contained the EF item pool as well as the items from the ASAS HI, the number of EF-items was reduced based on the correlation between the item and the ASAS HI sum score combined with expert opinion. Third, the final English EFIS was translated into 15 languages and cross-culturally validated.

RESULTS

The initial item pool contained 53 EF addressing 4 ICF EF-chapters: products and technology (e1), support and relationship (e3), attitudes (e4) and health services (e5). Based on 1754 responses of axial spondyloarthritis patients in an international survey, 44 of 53 initial items were removed based on low correlations to the ASAS HI or redundancy combined with expert opinion. 9 items of the initial item pool (range correlation 0.21-0.49) form the final EFIS. The EFIS was translated into 15 languages and field tested in 24 countries.

CONCLUSIONS

An EFIS is available complementing the ASAS HI and helps to interpret the ASAS HI results by gaining an understanding of the interaction between a health condition and contextual factors. The EFIS emphasizes the importance of support and relationships, as well as attitudes of the patient and health services in relation to self-reported health.

Targeting the Interleukin-23/Interleukin-17 Inflammatory Pathway: Successes and Failures in the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis

The IL-23/IL-17 pathway has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of axial spondyloarthritis through studies of genetic polymorphisms associated with disease, an animal model with over-expression of IL-23 that resembles human disease, and observations that cytokines in this pathway can be found at the site of disease in both humans and animal models. However, the most direct evidence has emerged from clinical trials of agents targeting cytokines in this pathway. Monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-17A have been shown to ameliorate signs and symptoms, as well as MRI inflammation in the spine and sacroiliac joints, in patients with radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. This was evident in patients refractory to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents as well as patients failing treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies. Treatment with a bispecific antibody targeting both IL-17A and IL-17F was also effective in a phase II study. Post-hoc analyses have even suggested a potential disease-modifying effect in reducing development of spinal ankylosis. However, benefits for extra-articular manifestations were limited to psoriasis and did not extend to colitis and uveitis. Conversely, trials of therapies targeting IL-23 did not demonstrate any significant impact on signs, symptoms, and MRI inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis. These developments coincide with recent observations that expression of these cytokines is evident in many different cell types with roles in innate as well as adaptive immunity. Moreover, evidence has emerged for the existence of both IL-23-dependent and IL-23-independent pathways regulating expression of IL-17, potentially associated with different roles in intestinal and axial skeletal inflammation.

Improving domain definition and outcome instrument selection: Lessons learned for OMERACT from imaging

OBJECTIVES

Imaging is one of the most rapidly evolving fields in medicine. Unfortunately, many imaging technologies have been applied as measurement instruments without rigorous evaluation of the evidence supporting their truth, discriminatory capability and feasibility for that context of use. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 Instrument Selection Algorithm (OFISA) is used to evaluate such evidence for use of an instrument in a research setting. The objectives of this work are to: [1] define and describe the key conceptual aspects that are essential for the evaluation of imaging as an outcome measurement instrument and [2] describe how these aspects can be assessed through OFISA.

METHODS

Experts in imaging and/or methodology met to formalize concepts and define key steps. These concepts were discussed with a team of patient research partners with interest in imaging to refine technical and methodological aspects into comprehensible information. A workshop was held at OMERACT2020 and feedback was incorporated into existing OMERACT process for domain and instrument selection.

RESULTS

Three key lessons were identified: (1) a clear definition of the domain we want to measure is a necessary prerequisite to the selection of a good instrument, (2) the sources of variability that can directly influence the instrument should be clearly identified, (3) incorporating these first two lessons into OFISA improves the quality of every instrument selection process.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of these lessons in the updated OMERACT Filter (now 2.2) will improve the quality of the selection process for all types of outcome measurement instruments.

The ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for axial spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

The current core outcome set for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has had only minor adaptations since its development 20 years ago. Considering the significant advances in this field during the preceding decades, an update of this core set is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To update the ASAS-OMERACT core outcome set for AS into the ASAS-OMERACT core outcome set for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Following OMERACT and COMET guidelines, an international working group representing key stakeholders (patients, rheumatologists, health professionals, pharmaceutical industry and drug regulatory agency representatives) defined the core domain set for axSpA. The development process consisted of: i) Identifying candidate domains using a systematic literature review and qualitative studies; ii) Selection of the most relevant domains for different stakeholders through a 3-round Delphi survey involving axSpA patients and axSpA experts; iii) Consensus and voting by ASAS; iv) Endorsement by OMERACT. Two scenarios are considered based on the type of therapy investigated in the trial: symptom modifying therapies and disease modifying therapies.

RESULTS

The updated core outcome set for axSpA includes 7 mandatory domains for all trials (disease activity, pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, physical function, overall functioning and health, and adverse events including death). There are 3 additional domains (extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, peripheral manifestations and structural damage) that are mandatory for disease modifying therapies and important but optional for symptom modifying therapies. Finally, 3 other domains (spinal mobility, sleep, and work and employment) are defined as important but optional domains for all trials.

CONCLUSION

The ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for AS has been updated into the ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for axSpA. The next step is the selection of instruments for each domain.

Atlas of MRI findings of sacroiliitis in pediatric sacroiliac joints to accompany the updated preliminary OMERACT pediatric JAMRIS (Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis MRI Score) scoring system: Part I: Active lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an increasingly important tool for identifying involvement of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The key feature for diagnosing active sacroiliitis is bone marrow edema (BME), but other features of active arthritis such as joint space inflammation, inflammation in an erosion cavity, capsulitis and enthesitis can be seen as well. Structural changes may also be seen. Systematic MRI assessment of inflammation and structural damage may aid in monitoring the disease course, choice of therapeutics and evaluating treatment response. In this pictorial essay, we illustrate normal MRI findings and growth-related changes of the SIJ in the pediatric population, as well as the different MRI features of SIJ inflammation. This atlas demonstrates fundamental MRI disease features of active inflammation in a format that can serve as a reference for assessing SIJ arthritis according to the updated preliminary JAMRIS (Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis MRI Score) scoring system proposed by the MRI in JIA working group of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Clinical Trials (OMERACT). The atlas is intended to be read in conjunction with its companion Part 2, Structural Lesions.

Upadacitinib in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: 1-Year Results From the Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled SELECT-AXIS 1 Study and Open-Label Extension

OBJECTIVE

To report efficacy and safety of upadacitinib through 1 year in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

In the SELECT-AXIS 1 study, adults with active AS and inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) or placebo. At week 14, patients continued in the open-label extension and received upadacitinib up to week 104; reported here are interim data up to week 64.

RESULTS

Of 187 patients, 178 completed week 14 on study drug and entered the open-label extension. Similar proportions of patients in either group (continuous upadacitinib or placebo-to-upadacitinib) achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) low-disease activity at week 64: ≥70% of patients achieved these endpoints based on non-responder imputation (NRI) and ≥81% based on as-observed (AO) analyses. Furthermore, ≥34% (NRI) and ≥39% (AO) of patients achieved ASDAS inactive disease or ASAS partial remission at week 64. Mean changes from baseline (week 0) to week 64 in pain, function, and inflammation showed consistent improvement or sustained maintenance through the study. Among 182 patients receiving upadacitinib (237.6 PY), 618 adverse events (260.1/100 PY) were reported. No serious infections, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal perforation, or deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib 15 mg QD showed sustained and consistent efficacy over 1 year. Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 14 showed similar efficacy versus those who received continuous upadacitinib.

Joint and entheseal inflammation in the knee region in spondyloarthritis - reliability and responsiveness of two OMERACT whole-body MRI scores

OBJECTIVE

To perform region-based development of whole-body MRI through validation of knee region scoring systems in spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

Assessment of knee inflammatory pathologies using 2 systems, OMERACT MRI Whole-body score for Inflammation in Peripheral joints and Entheses (MRI-WIPE) and Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS), in 4 iterative multi-reader exercises.

RESULTS

In the final exercise, reliability was mostly good for readers with highest agreement in previous exercise. Median pairwise single-measure ICCs for osteitis and synovitis/effusion status/change were 0.71/0.48 (WIPE-osteitis), 0.48/0.77 (WIPE-synovitis/effusion), 0.59/0.91 (KIMRISS-osteitis) and 0.92/0.97 (KIMRISS-synovitis/effusion). SRMs were 0.74 (WIPE-synovitis/effusion) and 0.78 (KIMRISS-synovitis/effusion).

CONCLUSION

MRI-WIPE and KIMRISS may both be useful in SpA whole-body evaluation studies.

The OMERACT Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System: Validation of quantitative methodologies and tri-compartmental overlays in osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To validate a revised version of the KIMRISS method for quantification of BML and synovitis-effusion in the knee by comparison with an established method, MOAKS.

METHODS

Novel calibration tools were developed for both methods. We compared reliability for status and change scores of BML and synovitis-effusion on baseline and one-year MRI scans.

RESULTS

Significant increase in both BML and synovitis-effusion was evident using KIMRISS but only for synovitis-effusion using MOAKS. Pre-specified targets for acceptable reliability (≥0.80 and ≥0.70 for status and change scores, respectively) were achieved more frequently for KIMRISS for both BML and synovitis.

CONCLUSION

Per OFISA criteria, KIMRISS should progress to assessment of discrimination.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Reduce Spinal Radiographic Progression in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Longitudinal Analysis From the Alberta Prospective Cohort

Objective

To investigate whether tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) impact spinal radiographic progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and whether this is coupled to their effect on inflammation.

Methods

Patients with axial SpA fulfilling the modified New York criteria were included in a prospective cohort (the ALBERTA Follow Up Research Cohort in Ankylosing Spondylitis Treatment). Spine radiographs, performed every 2 years for up to 10 years, were scored by 2 central readers, using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The indirect effect of TNFi on mSASSS was evaluated with generalized estimating equations by testing the interaction between TNFi and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at the start of each 2‐year interval (t). If significant, the association between ASDAS at t and mSASSS at the end of the interval (t+1) was assessed in 1) patients treated with TNFi at all visits, 2) patients treated with TNFi at some visits, and 3) patients who were never treated with TNFi. In addition, the association between TNFi at t and mSASSS at t+1 (adjusting for ASDAS at t) was also tested (direct effect).

Results

In total, 314 patients were included. A gradient was seen for the effect of ASDAS at t on mSASSS at t+1 (interaction P = 0.10), with a higher progression in patients never treated with TNFi (β = 0.41 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.13, 0.68]) compared to those continuously treated (β = 0.16 [95% CI 0.00, 0.31]) (indirect effect). However, TNFi also directly slowed progression, as treated patients had on average an mSASSS 0.85 units lower at t+1 compared to untreated patients (β = −0.85 [95% CI −1.35, −0.35]).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that TNFi reduce spinal radiographic progression in patients with radiographic axial SpA, which might be partially uncoupled from their effects on inflammation as measured by the ASDAS.

Arthritis and enthesitis in the hip and pelvis region in spondyloarthritis - OMERACT validation of two whole-body MRI methods

OBJECTIVE

To validate reliability, correlation and responsiveness of two whole-body MRI scores for the hip/pelvis region in spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

Assessment of hip/pelvis inflammation in 4 multi-reader exercises using the OMERACT MRI Whole-body score for Inflammation in Peripheral joints and Entheses (MRI-WIPE) and Hip Inflammation Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (HIMRISS).

RESULTS

In exercises 3-4 (11/20 cases, respectively; 9 readers) reliability was mostly good for the 3 best calibrated readers. Median pairwise single-measure ICC for status were 0.58-0.65 (WIPE-osteitis), 0.10-0.88 (HIMRISS-osteitis) and for status/change 0.38-0.72/0.52-0.60 (WIPE-synovitis/effusion) and 0.68-0.89/0.78-0.85 (HIMRISS-synovitis/effusion). SRM was 1.23 for WIPE-osteitis, while lower for WIPE-synovitis/effusion and HIMRISS.

CONCLUSION

MRI-WIPE and HIMRISS may after further validation be useful in future spondyloarthritis trials.