Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

This retrospective analysis reports on the treatment outcomes of women diagnosed with high-risk breast cancer treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy before the surgical removal of the tumor. It is well established that the lack of visible tumor cells in the pathological tumors analysis by the time of surgery (known as pathological complete response, pCR) is a factor that improves survival without the tumor reappearing in the body. However, it is unknown whether that is only true when giving systemic therapy or when pCR is achieved with the help of radiotherapy. We collected patient information and survival times to analyze the outcome in our patient group. We found that women with a pCR treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy can expect favorable long-term survival. This was true across different types of breast cancer and chemotherapy substances.

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naCT) has been used for locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer or to allow breast conserving surgery (BCS). Retrospective analyses suggest that naRT + naCT might result in an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR rate and disease-free survival). pCR is a surrogate parameter for improved event-free and overall survival (OS) and allows for the adaption of the post-neoadjuvant therapy regimens. However, it is not clear whether pCR achieved with the addition of naRT has the same prognostic value. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective re-analysis of 356 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naCT with a long-term follow-up. Patients underwent naRT on the breast and regional lymph nodes combined with a boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy with different agents was given either sequentially or concomitantly to naRT. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of pCR in our cohort in different subgroups as well as chemotherapy protocols. Clinical response markers correlating with OS were also analyzed. Results: For patients with median follow-ups of 20 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, and 25 years, OS rates were 69.7%, 60.6%, 53.1%, and 45.1%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 31.1% of patients and associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.58; CI-95%: 0.41–0.80; p = 0.001). The prognostic impact of pCR was evident across breast cancer subtypes and chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate analysis showed that age, clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy, and pCR were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: NaCT and naRT prior to surgical resection achieve good long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer. pCR after naRT maintains its prognostic value in breast cancer subtypes and across different subgroups. pCR driven by naRT and naCT independently influences long-term survival.

International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017.

METHODS

Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22).

CONCLUSION

Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.

Quality of life after preoperative radio-/chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients

e12083

Background: Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (PRT/PCRT) represents an increasingly used clinical strategy in different tumor sites. However, concerns regarding a possible unfavorable influence on the clinical outcome still exist. The aim of the current study was to examine the long-term global health status in our series of LABC patients treated with PRT/PCRT followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME). Methods: Of the 315 patients treated with PRT/PCRT in the years 1991 and 1999, 203 patients were still alive at long-term follow up of mean 17.7 years (range 14-21). Thirty-seven patients were lost to follow up and 58 patients refused to be contacted, which resulted in 107 patients (64 patients after BCS and 43 after mastectomy) being available and willing to undergo further clinical assessment. PRT/PCRT consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/ infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with a consecutive electron boost or (in case of BCS) a 10-Gy interstitial brachytherapy boost with Ir-192 prior to EBRT. Overall, chemotherapy was administered either prior to RT or concomitantly in the majority of patients. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires for overall QoL and EORTC QLQ-BR23 for breast-specific QoL. Results are reported using functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, and future perspective) and symptom-related items (systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset by hair loss). The results were compared to a published reference cohort of n=2028 healthy adults (16-92 years), including n=1139 women (age 16-92 years). EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scales were also analyzed between different subgroups including an age-matched analysis with a two sided paired t-test. Results: In comparison with this healthy control group of 1139 women, we did not detect any significant differences for the functional scales measured by physical function, emotional well-being, cognitive, and social function as well as the symptom scales: fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain, diarrhea and financial difficulties for both groups. However, significant inferior scores were found in the present study group regarding obstipation (p=0.013), loss of appetite (0.038), sleeping disorder (p=0.01) and dyspnoe (p=0.01). Conclusions: Taken together, retrospective as well as prospective data underline the feasibility of preoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Abstract P3-12-09: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in breast cancer- A safe and effect method for patients

BACKGROUND:

Neoaduvant radiochemotherapy (NRT-CHT) is the standard of care for many solid tumors. It could be also an alternative option for treating patients with locally advanced non inflammatory breast cancer (LABC). Surgeons are afraid of wound healing problems and fear bad cosmetic results. The purpose of this investigation was to find out if there are any acute or late side effects in breast conserving and mastectomy patients after NRT-CHX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

From 1991 to 1998 a total of 315 LABC patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N1) were treated with NRT-CHX. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with a consecutive electron boost in 214 cases or - in case of breast conservation - a 10-Gy interstitial boost with (192)Ir afterloading before EBRT. Chemotherapy was given prior to RT in 192 patients, and concomitantly in 113; 10 patients received no chemotherapy. Also we investigated the acute side effects in 10 patients with NRT-CHX who were treated with this method from 2012-2015.

The cosmetic outcome was assessed by patient questionnaire, panel evaluation, and breast retraction assessment (BRA). Quality-of-life was investigated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 and acute and late radiation side effects by LENT/SOMA scale

RESULTS:

The long term results of 64 patients after breast conserving surgery and 152 patients after mastectomy were available. Most patients rated their overall cosmetics as excellent or good (94% breast conserving, 55.8% mastectomy). Patient and panel ratings on all cosmetic outcomes were similar between the two groups. After a follow up of 14-23 years we did not detect any grade III or IV fibrosis in any of our groups. The median BRA score after breast conserving surgery was 2.9 and the over-all quality of life (QLQ-C30) was rated "excellent" or good in 82%. Furthermore we did not detect any grade 3 or 4 acute side effects in our 10 patients who were recently treated with NRT-CHX.

CONCLUSION:

NRT-CHX is safe method and it is not associated with severe grade 3 or 4 acute or late side effects.

Citation Format: Matuschek C, Boelke E, Budach W, Audretsch W, Wollandt S, Speer V, Nestle-Krämling C. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in breast cancer- A safe and effect method for patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-09.

Abstract P6-05-03: Evaluation of predictive markers for clinical outcome after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND:

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NRT-CHX) in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) is an innovative method in treating patients. Proliferation markers make up the majority of genes included in RNA-based prognostic gene signatures applied for breast cancer patients. In this subgroup analysis long-term clinical outcome data and predictive factors were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

During 1991-1998, a total of 315 LABC patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N1) were treated with NRT-CHX. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with an electron boost in 214 cases afterwards or -in case of breast conservation- a 10-Gy interstitial boost with (192)Ir after loading before EBRT. Chemotherapy was administered prior to RT in 192 patients, and concomitantly in 113; 10 patients received no chemotherapy. The impact of age, tumor grade, nodal status, hormone and growth factor receptor status (ER, PR, EGFR), p53, ki-67, HER2/neu, and bcl-2 on pathological complete response pCR and disease-free survival were examined in uni- and multivariate terms.

RESULTS:

Hormone receptor status, proliferative activity, bcl-2, EGFR-status and clinical tumor size had a significant impact on predicting neoadjuvant therapy success. Age, cN, grading, p53, and HER2/neu status failed to reach a significant correlation to complete remission. All examined immunohistochemical factors with the exception of EGFR, and all clinical factors displayed an univariately significant impact on DFS (disease free survival). Particularly, while HER-2/neu had no predictive value for pCR it displayed the highest impact on DFS after complete response (n = 92), even in a multivariate setting with clinical tumor size and nodal status. Complementary, p53 was the most superior immunhistochemical factor for prognosis after neoadjuvant incomplete remission (n = 223).

CONCLUSION:

Her2/neu is a predictive marker for overall survival independent from the pCR. It has no predictive value for the pCR. P53 is a prognostic marker for patients with incomplete remission. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate their use for decisions to further individualize adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-05-03.

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with DIEP flap after breast-conserving therapy

BACKGROUND

Currently about 70% of women who suffer from breast cancer undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) without removing the entire breast. Thus, this surgical approach is the standard therapy for primary breast cancer. If corrections are necessary, the breast surgeon is faced with irritated skin and higher risks of complications in wound healing. After radiation, an implant-based reconstruction is only recommended in selected cases. Correction of a poor BCT outcome is often only solved with an additional extended operation using autologous reconstruction.

MATERIAL/METHODS

In our plastic surgery unit, which focuses on breast reconstruction, we offer a skin-sparing or subcutaneous mastectomy, followed by primary breast reconstruction based on free autologous tissue transfer to correct poor BCT outcomes. Between July 2004 and May 2011 we performed 1068 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps for breast reconstruction, including 64 skin-sparing or subcutaneous mastectomies, followed by primary DIEP breast reconstruction procedures after BCT procedures.

RESULTS

In all free flap-based breast reconstruction procedures, we had a total flap loss in 0.8% (9 cases). Within the group of patients after BCT, we performed 41 DIEP flaps and 23 ms-2 TRAM flaps after skin-sparing or subcutaneous mastectomies to reconstruct the breast. Among this group we had of a total flap loss in 1.6% (1 case).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of large tumour sizes and/or difficult tumour locations, the initial oncologic breast surgeon should inform the patients of a possibly poor cosmetic result after BCT and radiation. In our opinion a skin-sparing mastectomy with primary breast reconstruction should be discussed as a valid alternative.

Long-term outcome after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer and predictive factors for a pathologic complete remission: Results of a multivariate analysis

154

Background: An earlier published series of neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (NRT-CHX) in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) has now been updated with a follow-up of more than 15 years. Long-term outcome data and predictive factors for pathologic complete response (PCR) were analyzed. Methods: 315 LABC patients (cT1-cT4 /cN0-N1) were treated during 1991-1998 with NRT-CHX. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with an electron boost in 214 cases afterwards or—in case of breast conservation—a 10-Gy interstitial boost with 192Ir afterloading before EBRT. Chemotherapy was administered prior to RT in 192 patients, and concomitantly in 113; 10 patients received no chemotherapy. The update of all follow up ended in November 2011. Age, tumor grade, nodal status, hormone receptor status, simultaneous vs. sequential CHX and the time interval between end of RT and surgery were examined in multivariate terms with as endpoint pCR and overall survival. Results: The total PCR rate after neoadjuvant RT-CHX reached 29.2 % with LABC breast conservation becoming possible in 50.8%. In initially node-positive cases (cN+), a complete nodal response (pN0) after NRT-CHX was observed in 56% (89/159). The multivariate analysis revealed that a longer time interval to surgery increased the probability for a pCR (HR 1,17 [95% CI 1,05-1,31], p<0,01). However, in large tumors (T3-T4) a significantly reduced pCR rate (HR 0.89 [95% CI 0.80 to 0.99], p = 0.03) could be obtained. Importantly, a pCR was the strongest prognostic factor for long-term survival (HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.19-0.56], p<0.001). Conclusions: A PCR identifies patients with a significant better prognosis for long-term survival. However, a long time interval to surgery (> 2 months) increases the probability of a pCR after NRT-CHX.

Long-term outcome after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer and predictive factors for a pathologic complete remission : results of a multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

An earlier published series of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NRT-CHX) in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) has now been updated with a follow-up of more than 15 years. Long-term outcome data and predictive factors for pathologic complete response (pCR) were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 1991-1998, 315 LABC patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N1) were treated with NRT-CHX. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with an electron boost in 214 cases afterwards or-in case of breast conservation-a 10-Gy interstitial boost with (192)Ir afterloading before EBRT. Chemotherapy was administered prior to RT in 192 patients, and concomitantly in 113; 10 patients received no chemotherapy. The update of all follow-up ended in November 2011. Age, tumor grade, nodal status, hormone receptor status, simultaneous vs. sequential CHX, and the time interval between end of RT and surgery were examined in multivariate terms with pCR and overall survival as end point.

RESULTS

The total pCR rate after neoadjuvant RT-CHX reached 29.2%, with LABC breast conservation becoming possible in 50.8% of cases. In initially node-positive cases (cN+), a complete nodal response (pN0) after NRT-CHX was observed in 56% (89/159). The multivariate analysis revealed that a longer time interval to surgery increased the probability for a pCR (HR 1.17 [95% CI 1.05-1.31], p < 0.01). However, in large tumors (T3-T4) a significantly reduced pCR rate (HR 0.89 [95% CI 0.80-0.99], p = 0.03) was obtained. Importantly, pCR was the strongest prognostic factor for long-term survival (HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.19-0.56], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

pCR identifies patients with a significantly better prognosis for long-term survival. However, a long time interval to surgery (> 2 months) increases the probability of pCR after NRT-CHX.

Predictive factors for achieving a pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer: Results of a multivariant analysis

e11556

Background: In contrast to neoadjuvant chemotherapy they are no predictive factors to estimate the pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate after preoperative chemotherapy (NRT-CHX) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods: 315 LABC patients were included in this trial. They were treated during 1991-1998. The last follow up was in November 2011. Radiotherapy was applied with 50 Gy (5x2 Gy / week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes. 101 patients received a 10 Gy interstitial boost (breast conservation). Chemotherapy (CMF, EC or Mitoxantron was applied in 192 patients prior to radiotherapy and in 113 patients simultaneously. Ten patients had no chemotherapy. Age, tumor grade, nodal status, hormone receptor status, simultaneous vs. sequential CHX and the time period up to surgery were examined in multivariate terms for pCR and overall survival. Results: The pCR rate for NRT-CHX after surgery was 29.2%. In multivariante analysis a longer time interval to surgery increased the probability of a pCR (HR 1,17 [95% CI 1,05-1,31], p<0,01). In term of overall survival, the achievement of a pCR is the strongest predictor for long term survival (HR 0,28 [95% CI 0,19-0,56], p<0,001). Conclusions: A long time interval to surgery (> 2 months) increases the probability of a pCR after NRT-CHX. Like in neoadjuvant CHX the achievement of a pCR is an important prognostic factor for long term survival.

Retrospective study of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer : survival advantage in cT2 category by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

This retrospective study compares patients treated between 1991 and 1998 with neoadjuvant radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy (RCT) or adjuvant RCT for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancers (LABC) in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR), 10-year relapse-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative RCT in 315 and adjuvant RCT in 329 cases consisted in 50 Gy (5 x 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes. 101 neoadjuvant patients received - in case of breast conservation - a 10-Gy interstitial boost with (192)Ir afterloading before and 214 neoadjuvant patients a preoperative electron boost after external-beam radiotherapy. In the neoadjuvant RCT group, chemotherapy was applied prior to radiotherapy in 192 patients, and simultaneously in 113; ten had no chemotherapy. In the adjuvant RCT group, chemotherapy was applied to 44 patients before surgery and to 166 after surgery; 119 had no chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Breast conservation became possible in 50.8% after neoadjuvant RCT for LABC with a pCR rate at surgery of 29.2%. A complete nodal remission (pN0) after RCT was observed in 56% (89/159) of the cN+ (clinically node-positive) neoadjuvant patients. There were trends in favor of preoperative RCT for RFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; p = 0.09 for RFS; HR = 0.8130; p = 0.1037 for OS). For patients with cT2 tumors the RFS and OS were statistically significantly better (HR = 0.5090; p = 0.0130 for RFS; HR = 0.4390; p = 0.0026 for OS) after neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant RCT.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant RCT achieved a pCR rate of 29.2% and a statistically significantly better RFS and OS in patients with cT2-category breast cancer.

[Case reports of operative management of very large, benign phylloid tumors--is a safety margin necessary?]

The phylloid tumor (PT, formerly called cystosarcoma phylloides) is a rare neoplasia of the female breast. Usually the PT is treated with breast-conserving surgery. In spite of progress in early diagnosis, PTs recur frequently--independently of tumor's degree of malignancy. Especially in cases of malignant PT, complete resection with tumor-free margins is seen as the only predictive marker for tumor recurrence or metastases. Benign PT is also often resected with wide tumor-free margins. Because of the tumor's occasionally enormous dimensions, this therapy concept makes breast-conserving surgery almost impossible. A simple enucleation of benign PT is an option to facilitate the preservation of breast tissue and a cosmetically satisfactory breast reconstruction. In the case of particularly large benign PT, enucleation even without wide margins prevents tumor recurrence.

Improved safety of autologous breast reconstruction surgery by stabilisation of microsurgical vessel anastomoses using fibrin sealant in 349 free DIEP or fascia-muscle-sparing (fms)-TRAM flaps: a two-centre study

BACKGROUND

We routinely perform free DIEP flap and fascia-muscle-sparing (fms) TRAM flap procedures using fibrin sealant to stabilise anastomosed vessels, thus avoiding some of the difficulties associated with microsurgical anastomoses.

METHODS

Women undergoing elective, autologous breast reconstruction with free DIEP flaps or fms-TRAM flaps between June 2004 and June 2007 in two Interdisciplinary Breast Centres were included in a retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

A total of 349 breast reconstructions were performed in 325 women. Of these, 201 (57.6%) were free DIEP flap procedures and 148 (42.4%) were fms-TRAM flap procedures. Average hospital stay was 9.8 days. Complete flap loss was seen in 3 cases (0.9%). Low rates of post-operative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical breast reconstruction using free DIEP flaps and fms-TRAM flaps, with fibrin sealant for stabilisation of microvascular anastomoses, provides good post-operative outcome featuring a low incidence of flap loss or other common post-operative complications.

Guidelines on the standards for the training of specialised health professionals dealing with breast cancer

According to EUSOMA position paper 'The requirements of a specialist breast unit', each breast unit should have a core team made up of health professionals who have undergone specialist training in breast cancer. In this paper, on behalf of EUSOMA, authors have identified the standards of training in breast cancer, to harmonise and foster breast care training in Europe. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the increase in the level of care in a breast unit, as the input of qualified health professionals increases the quality of breast cancer patient care.

The management of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Is LCIS the same as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?

Lobular carcinoma in situ was first described over 60 years ago. Despite the long history, it continues to pose significant difficulties in screening, diagnosis, management and treatment. This is partly due its multi-focal and bilateral presentation, an incomplete understanding of its biology and natural history and perpetuation of misconceptions gathered over the last decades. In this review, the working group on behalf of EUSOMA has attempted to summarise the current thinking and management of this interesting lesion.

Predictive biological markers for response of invasive breast cancer to anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based primary (radio-)chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The role of biological markers for the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radio-chemotherapy may be evaluated using pathological complete response [pCR] in patients with invasive breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To investigate this, pre-treatment biopsies from 517 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were analyzed for expression of estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PgR], Her-2/neu, epidermal growth factor receptor [EGF-R], p53, Bcl-2 and MIB-1 by immunohistochemistry [IHC], and these data were compared to the pathological response after preoperative epirubicine/cyclophosphamide [EC] chemotherapy (+/- radiotherapy).

RESULTS

pCR was more frequent (28.30%, 56/198) in tumors that received radio-chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone (11.9%, 38/319, p < 0.0001). Patients with high grading, lower ER, PgR, Bcl-2 or a higher proliferation had a significantly greater benefit from chemotherapy. The overexpressions of Her2/neu or EGF-R were weakly correlated to pCR, while p53 staining did not have any predictive value. Younger patients, with negative PgR and high proliferation index, had the highest benefit from EC therapy (56% pCR). The different multivariate indices of binary regression, PLS-DA and SIMCA, had similar predictive quality and were slightly superior to univariate factors.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the value of traditional biological markers and Bcl-2 for use in the individual selection of a primary therapy regimen.

Predictors of primary breast cancers responsiveness to preoperative epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy: translation of microarray data into clinically useful predictive signatures

Background

Our goal was to identify gene signatures predictive of response to preoperative systemic chemotherapy (PST) with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in patients with primary breast cancer.

Methods

Needle biopsies were obtained pre-treatment from 83 patients with breast cancer and mRNA was profiled on Affymetrix HG-U133A arrays. Response ranged from pathologically confirmed complete remission (pCR), to partial remission (PR), to stable or progressive disease, "No Change" (NC). A primary analysis was performed in breast tissue samples from 56 patients and 5 normal healthy individuals as a training cohort for predictive marker identification. Gene signatures identifying individuals most likely to respond completely to PST-EC were extracted by combining several statistical methods and filtering criteria. In order to optimize prediction of non responding tumors Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test were also applied. An independent cohort of 27 patients was used to challenge the predictive signatures. A k-Nearest neighbor algorithm as well as two independent linear partial least squares determinant analysis (PLS-DA) models based on the training cohort were selected for classification of the test samples. The average specificity of these predictions was greater than 74% for pCR, 100% for PR and greater than 62% for NC. All three classification models could identify all pCR cases.

Results

The differential expression of 59 genes in the training and the test cohort demonstrated capability to predict response to PST-EC treatment. Based on the training cohort a classifier was constructed following a decision tree.

First, a transcriptional profile capable to distinguish cancerous from normal tissue was identified. Then, a "favorable outcome signature" (31 genes) and a "poor outcome signature" (26 genes) were extracted from the cancer specific signatures. This stepwise implementation could predict pCR and distinguish between NC and PR in a subsequent set of patients. Both PLS-DA models were implemented to discriminate all three response classes in one step.

Conclusion

In this study signatures were identified capable to predict clinical outcome in an independent set of primary breast cancer patients undergoing PST-EC.

Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease

PURPOSE

Our goal was to identify genes undergoing expressional changes shortly after the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The biopsies were taken from patients with primary breast cancer prior to any treatment and 24 hours after the beginning of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expression analyses from matched pair samples representing 25 patients were carried out with Clontech filter arrays. A subcohort of those 25 paired samples were additionally analyzed with the Affymetrix GeneChip platform. All of the transcripts from both platforms were queried for expressional changes.

RESULTS

Performing hierarchical cluster analysis, we clustered pre- and posttreatment samples from individual patients more closely to each other than the samples taken from different patients. This reflects the rather low number of transcripts responding directly to the drugs used. Although transcriptional drug response occurring during therapy differed between individual patients, two genes (p21(WAF1/CIP1) and MIC-1) were up-regulated in posttreatment samples. This could be validated by semiquantitative and real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Partial least- discriminant analysis based on approximately 25 genes independently identified by either Clontech or Affymetrix platforms could clearly discriminate pre- and posttreatment samples. However, correlation of certain gene expression levels as well as of differential patterns and clusters as determined by a different platform was not always satisfying.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated the potential of monitoring posttreatment changes in gene expression as a measure of the pharmacodynamics of drugs. As a clinical laboratory model, it can be useful to identify patients with sensitive and reactive tumors and to help for optimized choice for sequential therapy and obviously improve relapse- free and overall survival.

Remission rates in breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Evaluation of remission rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or followed by preoperative radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

194 women with 198 biopsy-proven breast tumors were evaluated in this retrospective study. Of the 198 cases evaluated, 64 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant irradiation (CT group). In 134 cases, sequential preoperative chemo-/radiotherapy (CT-RT group) was given. In both groups, endocrine treatment was initiated in case of positive hormone receptor status after chemotherapy. The whole breast was homogeneously irradiated using 2-Gy fractions up to a total dose of 50 Gy, followed by a boost of 6-11 Gy to the tumor.

RESULTS

A histologically proven complete remission (pCR) was achieved in 3% (2/64) in the CT and in 42% (56/134) in the CTRT group. The logistic regression analysis, including clinical tumor category (cT), lymph node (cN) and metastasis status (cM), grading (G), hormone receptor status (HRS), number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles, preoperative tumor volume, and preoperative radiotherapy, revealed that HRS (p = 0.0232) and radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) were significant factors for achieving pCR.

CONCLUSION

Combination of neoadjuvant chemo-/radiotherapy results in significantly higher rates of complete remission than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The significance for tumor-free and overall survival has to be evaluated.

Remission rates following preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate remission and breast-conservation rates after preoperative chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with 74 biopsy-proven invasive breast cancers prospectively entered the protocol. Eighteen patients were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant irradiation (chemotherapy group). Fifty-five patients with 56 tumors were treated with combined neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, followed by surgery (chemo-radiotherapy group). Most patients of both treatment groups received 4 cycles of EC chemotherapy. In some patients with large tumors 3 cycles of CMF were added. Chemotherapy was followed by hormonal treatment with tamoxifen or LHRH agonists in case of positive hormone-receptor status. Preoperative radiotherapy was administered using 2 Gy fractions up to a total dose of 50 Gy, followed by a tumor boost of 6 to 11 Gy. The median overall treatment time was 41 days (range: 35 to 55 days). The median time interval between end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 11 weeks (range: 10 to 22 weeks) and 27 weeks (range: 11 to 41 weeks) for the chemotherapy- and chemo-radiotherapy group. The median time interval between end of chemotherapy and the beginning of irradiation ranged between 2 and 8 weeks (median 4 weeks) in the chemo-radiotherapy group.

RESULTS

Side-effects due to chemo- or radiotherapy were moderate and reversible. In the chemotherapy group 17/18 patients (94%) achieved a partial (pPR) and 1/18 patients (6%) a complete histopathological response (pCR). In the chemo-radiotherapy group 32/56 (57%) showed a pPR and 24/56 (43%) a pCR. The difference in complete remission is significant (Fisher's Exact Test: p = 0.004). In 45/74 cases (61%) the breast was preserved, immediate breast reconstructions with rectus myocutaneous flaps (TRAM) after mastectomy were performed in 8/74 cases (11%) and modified radical mastectomies without reconstruction were required in 21/74 cases (28%). The breast conservation rates were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the small number of patients in the present protocol does not permit definite conclusions, the results of combined modality treatment seem promising with regard to tumor remission within the treated breast and as a tool for breast conservation in advanced stage disease. On the basis of these encouraging data a prospective Phase-III study has been initiated.

The Estrogen Receptor Paradox in Breast Cancer: Association of High Receptor Concentrations with Reduced Overall Survival

Occasional reports have suggested an unfavorable effect of high estrogen receptor (ER) concentrations in primary breast cancer. In a population-based study we identified a subgroup explicitly exhibiting this seemingly paradoxical effect. ER concentrations were prospectively measured in a single laboratory by multipoint DCC assay. The relative risk of death in relation to the concentration of the interval-scaled variables ER and PgR was continually estimated by serial Cox regression analyses. Thus we circumvented loss of information due to primary categorization and avoided assumptions about relations between factor and risk. Based on 2,735 consecutively accrued primary breast cancer cases (median follow-up 56 months) we identified node-negative patients up to 60 years of age as the relevant subpopulation. High (>/=300 fmol/mg protein) ER concentrations exhibited an even more unfavorable impact (p < 0.03) on overall survival than ER concentrations of less than 10 fmol/mg protein. The well-known association of age and ER concentration was definitely excluded as an underlying biological cause for the increased risk. Differences in the distribution of other prognostic factors (HER-2/neu, Ki-67, DNA ploidy) were also excluded. As we observed a preponderance of pT2 tumors in the high ER group, we repeated the analysis, selectively focusing on pT2 tumors in the relevant subgroup, but the effect remained unchanged. In contrast, node-positive patients adjusted for age significantly (p = 0.02) profited from high ER concentrations as compared to the ER-negative group. As the phenomenon did not occur in node-positive patients, receptor defects in the high-ER group seem unlikely. To the contrary, we suspect that ER overexpressing cells are hypersensitive even to low levels of estrogens. Once they have sneaked past local barriers prior to primary surgery, they may cause early death in the absence of appropriate adjuvant endocrine therapy.

An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects

In many cases, breast deformity caused by partial mastectomy can be reduced or corrected by plastic surgery. Partial breast reconstruction is best performed immediately after the partial mastectomy using an approach determined by the size of the breast and the defect. Small defects in large breasts usually need no reconstruction. For larger defects in large breasts, breast reshaping (similar to reduction mammaplasty) combined with a contralateral breast reduction is usually the best option. For medium-sized or smaller breasts with small to moderate-sized defects, local flaps from the subaxillary region are very useful. If the defect is too large for correction with local tissue, a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is usually the best choice. Using these techniques, patients can achieve aesthetically better outcomes from breast-conservation therapy, even when larger tumors are being treated or when wider margins are taken to reduce the risk of tumor recurrence. By working together with an oncologic surgeon and facilitating the removal of larger tumors, the plastic surgeon can widen the indications for both breast-conservation therapy and breast reconstruction at the same time.

Optimal scan time for fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) has proven useful in the differentiation of various tumour entities, including breast cancer. In patients with primary breast cancer we performed a 3-h imaging protocol to examine possible improvements in tumour detectability and image contrast. Twenty-nine patients with primary breast cancer with a diameter of >/=2 cm that was demonstrated to be malignant by biopsy or surgery were injected with 370-740 MBq 18F-FDG and scanned in the prone position. Data were acquired 0-40 min, 1.5 h and 3.0 h after injection. After correction for measured attenuation, decay and scatter and iterative reconstruction, standardised uptake values (SUVs) and tumour-to-non-tumour and tumour-to-organ ratios were calculated. Visual analysis was performed using transverse, sagittal and coronal slices as well as 3D reprojection images. Tumour-to-non-tumour and tumour-to-organ ratios were significantly higher for the 3-h images than for the 1.5-h images. SUVs did not increase to the same extent. Lesion detectability was 83% in 1.5-h images compared to 93% in 3-h images. We conclude that tumour contrast in breast cancer is improved by starting the PET acquisition at 3 h p.i. rather than at 1.5 h p.i.

Induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy to avoid mastectomy in stage IIA-IIIA breast cancer

The aim of the presented protocol was to investigate tumour remission and breast conservation rates with and without flap supported surgery after preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hyperthermia. 101 patients with stage IIA-IIIA breast cancers were initially treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hyperthermia. 96 patients underwent salvage surgery. Complete pathologic response was not related to tumour diameter at diagnosis, the applied chemotherapy regime, number of chemotherapy cycles, overall radiation treatment time and time interval between radiotherapy and surgery. A breast conserving approach was possible in 55 patients (54%). After a median follow-up of 18 months no patient developed an isolated local recurrence.

[Preoperative irradiation and interstitial radiotherapy-hyperthermia boost in breast tumors > or = 3 cm. The Düsseldorf experience]

AIM

The aim of this protocol was to investigate breast conservation rates with and without flap-supported surgery after preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hyperthermia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-eight patients with stage IIA-IV breast cancers were initially treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Radiation treatment consisted of an interstitial boost of 10 Gy 192Ir-afterloading therapy and a course of external beam radiotherapy of 50 Gy, using 5 x 2 Gy/week. Local hyperthermia with 43.5-44.5 degrees C over 60 minutes was delivered immediately before interstitial radiotherapy.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients underwent salvage surgery. A breast-conserving approach was possible in 74 patients (52%). Fifty-three patients (37%) underwent flap-supported surgery. After a median follow-up of 20 months, one patient developed isolated local recurrence. In 14 cases, locoregional recurrences occurred in combination with distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

In about 50%, breast conservation was achieved by chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hyperthermia. The low isolated local recurrence rate of 0.6% (1/158) has to be substantiated by further follow-up.

[MR mammography of fatty tissue necrosis]

PURPOSE

To evaluate MR-imaging for the differentiation of fatty necrosis (FN) of the breast.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 1016 MR mammographies FN was found in 13 patients aged 44 to 69 years. In all studies we used a proton-weighted fat suppressed sequence (STIR) and serial T1-weighted gradient echo sequences before and after bolus injection of Gd-DTPA, MRI was correlated to ultrasound and in 8 cases to mammographic findings.

RESULTS

All 15 FN displayed fat-isointense signal on T1-weighted and on proton-weighted, fat-suppressed sequences. They were delineated by a more or less wide rim of low signal intensity with sharp border to the center. After intravenous injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine they showed no increase of signal intensity in the centre and no increase, or only a minor increase, of the rim. Ultrasound could not distinguish FN from recurrent tumour in 6 cases. 7 FN looked like atypical cysts.

CONCLUSION

MR-mammography is very promising in the diagnosis of FN.

[MR-mammography assessment of tumor response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of locally advanced breast carcinoma]

PURPOSE

We investigated the role of magnetic resonance mammography in monitoring tumour response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

17 patients with LABS had a magnetic resonance mammography and ultrasonography before and after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy 14 patients showed in MR-mammography less pronounced and prolonged enhancement without washout. After treatment three patients had signal intensity-time curves still characteristic for tumour. Ultrasonography was true negative in two patients, true positive in 12 and false positive in three patients.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance mammography is suitable for monitoring tumour response after radiochemotherapy of LABC. However, a negative MRI does not exclude a residual tumour. Ultrasonography is of limited value in monitoring therapy of LABC.

[Initial experiences with MR-mammography in after-care following surgical flap treatment of breast carcinoma]

PURPOSE

To demonstrate typical MR mammographic findings after plastic surgery of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postoperative (7-38 months, median 13) MR mammographic examinations of 25 patients operated for breast cancer (11 latissimus dorsi-flaps (LAT), 14 rectus abdominis myocutaneous-flaps (TRAM)), were reevaluated. The examinations were performed with a breast coil at 1 T. The sequences applied were a fat-suppressed 2-D turbo IR-sequence proton-weighted and a T1-weighted FLASH 3-D sequence as dynamic series.

RESULTS

Scars between the myocutaneous flap and the remaining breast tissue always appeared in form of a ligament or septum. Signal and perfusion characteristics of scar tissue and muscle stalk in this investigation were clearly different from those of tumour. One tumour recurrence and one fat necrosis was found and rectified by biopsy.

CONCLUSION

MR mammography is a very valuable diagnostic method for postoperative evaluation of myocutaneous flap-based therapy of breast cancer.

[Radiotherapy following a breast-preserving operation in breast carcinoma]

Between 1980 and 1988, 116 patients with invasive breast cancer were treated by limited surgery with axillary node dissection followed by radiation therapy. Radiotherapy was performed by individually computerized treatment planning. The target volume dose was 50 Gy to the whole breast followed by an electron boost of 10 Gy to the tumor bed. The median follow-up period was 59 months. The actuarial overall survival rate is 93%, and the disease-free survival 75.2%. Ten (8.6%) breast recurrences occurred. Analysis of clinical and pathological prognostic factors revealed that local control was impaired by young age, negative hormone receptors, G3-4 tumors and intraductal growth. The recurrence rate for T3- and T4-tumors was 12.5%.