Benralizumab efficacy and safety in severe asthma: A randomized trial in Asia

BACKGROUND

Benralizumab is indicated as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled, severe eosinophilic asthma; it has not yet been evaluated in a large Asian population with asthma in a clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with severe asthma in Asia.

METHODS

MIRACLE (NCT03186209) was a randomized, Phase 3 study in China, South Korea, and the Philippines. Patients aged 12-75 years with severe asthma receiving medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonists, stratified (2:1) by baseline blood eosinophil count (bEOS) (≥300/μL; <300/μL), were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab 30 mg or placebo. Endpoints included annual asthma exacerbation rate (AAER; primary endpoint), change from baseline at Week 48 in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1) and total asthma symptom score (TASS). Safety was evaluated ≤ Week 56.

RESULTS

Of 695 patients randomized, 473 had baseline bEOS ≥300/μL (benralizumab n = 236; placebo n = 237). In this population, benralizumab significantly reduced AAER by 74% (rate ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.19, 0.36], p < 0.0001) and significantly improved pre-BD FEV1 (least squares difference [LSD] 0.25 L [95% CI 0.17, 0.34], p < 0.0001) and TASS (LSD -0.25 [-0.45, -0.05], p = 0.0126) versus placebo. In patients with baseline bEOS <300/μL, there were numerical improvements in AAER, pre-BD FEV1, and TASS with benralizumab versus placebo. The frequency of adverse events was similar for benralizumab (76%) and placebo (80%) in the overall population.

CONCLUSIONS

MIRACLE data reinforces the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma in an Asian population, consistent with the global Phase 3 results.

Predictive value of the red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio for hepatic fibrosis

AIMS

The red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) has been reported to be an indicator of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBV), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or chronic hepatitis C (HCV). However, no research has explored the RPR in all patients with hepatic fibrosis. There is a recognized need to establish whether the RPR could assess hepatic fibrosis and reflect the severity of fibrosis, regardless of the patient's etiology.

METHODS

Quantitative data from 1282 patients who underwent liver biopsy between January 2010 and December 2014 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were included. The etiologies included HBV or HCV infection, NAFLD, schistosomiasis, granulomatous liver disease, and vascular abnormalities. Five noninvasive models were calculated for all patients based on laboratory parameters. The degrees of fibrosis severity were evaluated based on the Metavir scoring scale.

RESULTS

The RPR demonstrated the best accuracy of predicting hepatic fibrosis among the selected five models (0.75, p < .001) regardless of etiology. In addition, the RPR values increased with advanced hepatic fibrosis progression. Furthermore, combining the RPR with the white blood cell (WBC) count improved the accuracy of grading hepatic fibrosis as reflected by the likelihood ratio (LR + 9.03, LR - 0.49).

CONCLUSION

The RPR is a useful indicator for hepatic fibrosis, regardless of etiology, and can reflect the severity of fibrosis. This study supports further clinical development of the RPR both in a stepwise manner or in combination with inflammatory parameters to improve the accuracy of scoring hepatic fibrosis.