Effect of Opioids on All-cause Mortality and Sustained Opioid Use in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: a Korea Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to assess the use of opioids before and after hip fracture in elderly patients in order to determine the effect of opioid use on all-cause mortality, and to analyze how the history of opioid use before fracture increases the risk of sustained use following hip fracture using a Korea nationwide cohort.

METHODS

Our study identified hip fracture patients from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort. The index date was defined as 90-days after admission to the acute care hospital that fulfilled the eligibility criteria of elderly hip fracture. Patients were classified into past user, current user, and sustained user according to the use of opioid at each period based on the time of admission and index date. The opioids were classified into strong opioids and tramadol. A generalized estimating equation model with a Poisson distribution and logarithmic link function was performed to estimate the adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between past use and sustained use. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate the effects of strong opioid and tramadol use on all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 12,927 patients were included in our study. There were 7,384 (57.12%) opioid past-users, 11,467 (88.71%) opioid current-users, and 7,172 (55.48%) sustained users. In comparison of the death risk according to current use or the defined daily dose of the opioids or past opioid use, there were no significant differences in the adjusted hazard ratio for death in all groups, compared to the current non-users (P > 0.05). Among survivors 1 year after hip fracture, opioid past-use increased the risk of opioid sustained use by 1.52-fold (aRR; 95% CI, 1.45-1.8; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Current use and past use of opioid did not increase all-cause mortality after hip fracture in elderly patients over 65 years of age. Past use of opioid before hip fracture increased risk of sustained use of opioid compared to the current opioid used without past use.

Underutilization of Hospital-based Cardiac Rehabilitation after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Korea

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is recommended as a mandatory intervention in several national clinical practice guidelines published in America, Europe, and Korea to reduce recurrence and mortality. However, underutilization of CR is an established worldwide issue. In Korea, the promotion of CR is expected due to coverage by National Health Insurance. Nevertheless, the national status of CR use has not been reported. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the current status of CR use in patients with AMI using nationwide data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea.

METHODS

Patients with AMI admitted with the diagnosis of 'I21' code (from International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification) from July 1st, 2017 to June 30th, 2018 were included. CR use was defined as CR treatment or evaluation being performed during an outpatient follow-up period within 6 months after discharge. Participation rate and density were calculated nationally and by administrative division. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the influencing factors of CR participation.

RESULTS

Nationally, 1.5% of AMI patients (960/64,982) underwent CR during outpatient treatment after discharge. CR density was approximately 10. Logistic regression analysis revealed that influencing factors included old age, female sex, rural residence, and low Charlson comorbidity index.

CONCLUSION

Hospital-based CR after AMI is underutilized despite its coverage by the National Health Insurance. More CR facilities have to be installed according to the needs of CR in various regions.

Chasms in Achievement of Recommended Diabetes Care among Geographic Regions in Korea

BACKGROUND

Although effective care for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is well known, considerable inadequate care has been still existed. Variations in achievement of the recommended quality indicators inT2DM care among small areas are not well known in Korea. This study examined the quality of care T2DM care and its geographical variations.

METHODS

We used the national health insurance database and national health screening database. Seven quality indicators were used to evaluate continuity of care (medication possession ratio), process of care (hemoglobin A1c test, lipid profile, microalbuminuria test, and eye examination), and intermediate outcome (blood pressure control, and low-density lipoprotein control). Crude and age-standardized proportions were calculated for each 252 districts in Korea.

RESULTS

All quality indicators failed to achieve the recommended level. Only about 3% and 15% of the patients underwent eye examination and microalbuminuria test, respectively. Other indicators ranged from 48% to 68%. Wide variation in the quality existed among districts and indicators. Eye examination and microalbuminuria test varied the most showing tenfold (0.9%-9.2%) and fourfold (6.3%-28.9%) variation by districts, respectively. There were 32.4 and 42.7 percentage point gap between the best and the worst districts in hemoglobin A1c test and blood pressure control, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Considerable proportion of T2DM patients were not adequately managed and quality of care varied substantially district to district. To improve the quality of diabetes care, it is necessary to identify the poor performance areas and establish a well-coordinated care system tailored to the need of the district.