[Diagnostics, treatment and aftercare of anal cancer]

Despite the increasing incidence, anal cancer is still a rare gastrointestinal tumor, so that due to the broadness of the primary care there is often little experience in the care of affected patients. Squamous cell cancer (SCC) constitutes more than 90% of all anal cancers and is nearly always associated with an infection by the human papillomavirus. This article concentrates on SCC of the anal canal and anal margin. The focus is on the primary diagnostics, surgical treatment, response assessment and aftercare. Treatment is carried out according to the decision of the interdisciplinary tumor board, independent of the tumor location and stage. Anal margin cancer in stage I (and IIa) can be successfully treated by an R0 excision. Combined chemoradiotherapy as the standard treatment in stages II and III is briefly summarized. The article is essentially based on the new German S3 guidelines on anal cancer.

Purse string closure of perineal defects after abdominoperineal excision

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe a new technique of perineal closure following abdominoperineal excision (APE) using purse-string perineal skin closure (PSPC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and May 2021, 15 consecutives patients who had an APE procedure were included in this retrospective single-center study. All indications of APE were considered, as well as all types of APE. We analyzed the patient characteristics and peri-operative features, including overall (Clavien 1 to 5) and severe (Clavien 3 and 4) postoperative morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and long-term results (median time to perineal wound closure and rate of perineal incisional hernia).

RESULTS

The patients included 11 men and four women, with a mean age of 64 ± 13 [33-80] years. The indication of APE was an epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal (n = 5) or an adenocarcinoma of the rectum (n = 10). The mean operating time was 220 ± 88.64 [70-360] min. The overall morbidity rate was 60%, the severe morbidity rate 26%, and reoperation rate 26%. The median length of stay was 9 ± 6.5 days. After a mean follow-up of 23.5 ± 20.3 months, the median time to perineal wound closure was 96 ± 60 days, the persistent perineal sinus rate was 6% (n = 2), and one patient developed a perineal incisional hernia.

CONCLUSION

Purse-string closure of perineal wounds is a safe and effective technique for perineal wound closure after APE. The short LOS allowed an early return home.

The role of perineal application of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy for prevention of wound-related complications after abdomino-perineal resection: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Closed perineal wounds often fail to heal by primary intention after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and are often complicated by surgical site infection (SSI) and/or wound dehiscence. Recent evidence showed encouraging results of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) for prevention of wound-related complications in surgery. Our objective was to gather and discuss the early existing literature regarding the use of pNPWT to prevent wound-related complications on perineal wounds after APR.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for original publications and congress abstracts reporting the use of pNPWT after APR on closed perineal wounds.

RESULTS

Seven publications were included for analysis. Two publications reported significantly lower incidence of SSI in pNPWT patients than in controls with a risk reduction of about 25-30%. Two other publications described similar incidences of SSI between the two groups of patients but described SSI in pNPWT patients to be less severe. One study reported significantly lower incidence of wound dehiscence in pNPWT patients than in controls.

CONCLUSION

The largest non-randomized studies investigating the effect of pNPWT on the prevention of wound-related complications after APR showed encouraging results in terms of reduction of SSI and wound dehiscence that deserve further investigation and confirmation.

The management of perineal hernia following abdomino-perineal excision for cancer

PURPOSE

Perineal hernia (PH) is a tardive complication following abdomino-perineal resection (APR). Many repair methods are described and evidences are lacking. The aim of this study was to report PH management, analyze surgery outcomes and review the available literature.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all consecutive PH repair after APR performed between 2001 and 2017. We recorded data on APR surgery, PH symptoms and repair, and follow-up (recurrence and morbidity). Literature review included published articles on PubMed between 1960 and 2017.

RESULTS

24 PH repairs were included. The approach was perineal N = 16, abdominal N = 5 and combined N = 3. A biological mesh was used for 17, a synthetic for 5 and a flap for 2 patients. The median follow-up was 25 months. Overall morbidity was 37.5% (N = 9): 37.5% for the perineal, 20% for the abdominal, and 66.7% for the combined approach. Complications occurred in 35.3% of biological and 20% of synthetic mesh repairs. Recurrence rate was 41.7%, similar for biological (n = 8, 47.1%) and synthetic meshs (n = 2; 40%). No recurrence occurred in the flap group. Depending of the approach, we found 50% for perineal (n = 8) and 40% of the abdominal cohort (N = 2). Among twelve studies, recurrence rates ranged from 0 to 66.7%. Abdominal or laparoscopic approach with synthetic mesh was associated with less recurrences (0 and 12.5% respectively) and complications (37.5% and 9.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrences following PH repair are high irrespective of the repair technique. More studies are necessary to identify PH risk factors and decide the appropriate perineal reconstruction.

Anorectal Malignant Melanoma-Defining the Optimal Surgical Treatment and Prognostic Factors. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018;9:519-523. [PMID: 30538382 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0791-1]

Patients with anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) have a poor prognosis. Optimal surgical treatment is not defined. The aim of the study was to define the surgical treatment for ARMM, to compare the overall survival (OS) of abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and wide local excision (WLE) and to study various prognostic factors. Thirty patients of ARMM were managed, 20 with locoregional disease, 10 metastatic. Of the 20 patients with locoregional disease, 15 underwent APR and 5 WLE. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates (by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) in the APR group were 67, 40, 40, and 32%, and in WLE group were 100, 100, 67, and 67% respectively. Median survival for APR and WLE groups were 13 and 36 months and were not significant (p 0.48). Node-negative patients had better survival than node positive in the APR group (56 vs. 13 months) (p 0.017). Patients with tumor size < 2cm, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion negative, and margin-negative and with superficial infiltration had a trend toward better survival than their counterparts. WLE gives an equivalent oncological outcome and can be offered for patients with smaller ARMM and APR for locally advanced, larger tumors or as a salvage following recurrence after WLE.

Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; an opportunity in sphincter preserving procedure for rectal cancer

AIM

The present study was designed to assess the impact of neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the possibility of utilizing sphincter preserving techniques in rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND

For both patients and surgeons anal sphincter preserving surgery serves as the ideal procedure to treat rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer who were admitted to Shohadaye Tajrish hospital between 2001 and 2011 and underwent sphincter preserving or non-preserving surgery were identified. They were divided into those who had received neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy prior to surgery and those who didn't, and the type of surgical procedure they underwent was compared between the two arms. Data regarding tumor pathology, tumor size and distance from anal verge before and after neo-adjuvant therapy, together with the duration of chemo-radiotherapy were also assessed.

RESULTS

103 patients with documented rectal cancer were included in our analysis. Among 47 patients who had not received neo-adjuvant therapy, 26 (55%) underwent APR while 15(32%) and 6(13%) patients were treated with LAR and VLAR respectively. Of the 56 patients who had gone through chemo-radiotherapy prior to surgery, 30 (53%) underwent APR while 14 (25%) and 10 (18%) patients were treated with LAR and VLAR respectively. 2 patients had unresectable tumor. Tumor staging before and after neo-adjuvant therapy showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherpy can decrease tumor size, increase the distance between the tumor and anal verge, and downgrade the staging. However, it does not necessarily increase the possibility of performing sphincter preserving surgery on patients suffering from low-lying tumors.

Abdomino-Perineal Resection for Low Rectal and Anal Malignancies in Ibadan, SOUTHWEST NIGERIA

BACKGROUND

Colonic tumours are the third most common tumours in the Nigerian cancer registry after breast and cervical carcinoma. Tumours involving the distal rectum and anus are increasingly a significant portion of all colorectal and anal malignancies in Nigeria. The patients frequently present with advanced disease. Abdomino-Perineal resection (APR), is thus an essential modality of treatment alongside chemo-radiation. The aim of the study was to review the surgical outcomes of APR done for low rectal and anal malignancies in a resource poor setting in sub-Saharan Africa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The demographic data, clinical features, management offered and outcomes of all patients who had had abdomino-perineal resection for colonic and anal malignancies at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria between 2007 and 2013 were included in this study.

RESULTS

Over the 6-year period, 61 patients had abdomino-perineal resection for low colonic and anal malignancies in our institution. The indications were primary rectal carcinoma in 46 (75.4%) patients and anal carcinoma in 15 (24.6%) patients. The age ranged from 19-77 years with a mean of 48 years and median of 54 years. Majority were males in 33 (54.1%) patients. A fifth (20%) of the patients presented as emergency with large bowel obstruction that necessitated initial colostomy. Bleeding per rectum in 45 patients (73.8%), Weight loss in 26 patients (42.6%) and Tenesmus in 16 patients (26.2%) patients were the predominant complaints. All the patients were at stage AJCC 2A-3C (Duke Stage C or D) at presentation. Almost a third (66%) of the patients was incontinent of feaces. Palliative surgery was done for all the patients. The duration of follow up was between 3-36 months with a mean of 22 months. A total of 53 (86.9%) patients are alive after an average post-operative duration of 24 months, with 14 pts (23%) having local recurrence, and 22(36.1%) patients with hepatic metastases. Lymph nodal involvement was statistically significantly related to the survival status of the patients. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemo-radiation did not affect outcomes in terms of local recurrence and survival.

CONCLUSION

Abdomino-perineal resection is still the option of treatment in this environment for low rectal and anal malignancies in this environment. Early presentation and effective treatment shall improve the outcome.

Robotic rectal cancer surgery: technique of abdomino-perineal resection

Rectal cancer surgery using a minimally invasive technique has been regarded as a challenging procedure. Since the introduction of the robotic surgical system into the operating theater, totally robotic rectal surgery has been attempted with several techniques. Abdomino-perineal resection might be a more reliable indication for totally robotic surgery than low anterior resection. Because the range of dissection is confined to the pelvic cavity and mobilization of the sigmoid colon, problems during totally robotic surgery can be minimized. With our technique, totally robotic surgery can be performed successfully. Technical advantages of the current robotic system can be reflected in patient benefits after totally robotic abdomino-perineal resection.

Melanoma of the rectum: A rare entity

A 41-year-old man presented with a 6-mo history of changed defecation and rectal bleeding. A 3-cm polypoid tumor of the lower rectum was found at rectosigmoidoscopy, which proved to be a leiomyosarcoma upon biopsy. Dissemination studies did not show any metastases. He was underwent to an abdomino-perineal resection (APR). Histopathology of the specimen showed a melanoma (S-100 stain positive). Two years after the resection, metastases in the abdomen and right lung were found. He died one and half years later. Primary anorectal melanoma is a rare and very aggressive disorder. According to current data, one should always perform a S-100 stain when anorectal sarcoma is suspected. A positive S-100 stain suggests the tumour to be most likely a melanoma. Subsequently, thorough dissemination studies need to be performed. Depending on the outcome of the dissemination studies, a surgical resection has to be performed. Nowadays, a sphincter-saving local excision combined with adjuvant loco-regional radiotherapy should be preferred in case of small tumors. The same loco-regional control is achieved with less “loss of function” compared to non-sphincter saving surgery. Only in the case of large and obstructing tumors an abdomino-perineal resection is the treatment of choice.