Survey assessing policies regarding patient age and provision of fertility treatment in the United States

PURPOSE

To determine what policies exist regarding age and provision of fertility treatment in United States fertility clinics.

METHODS

Medical directors of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member clinics were surveyed regarding clinic demographics and current policies pertaining to age and provision of fertility treatment. Univariate comparisons were performed using Chi-square and Fisher exact tests as appropriate, with significance set at P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 366 clinics surveyed, 18.9% (69/366) responded. A majority of clinics who responded 88.4% (61/69) reported having a policy regarding patient age and provision of fertility treatment. Responding clinics with an age policy did not differ from those without a policy on the basis of geographical location, (p = 0.5), insurance mandate status (p = 0.9), practice type (p = 0.4), or annual number of ART cycles (p = 0.7). Of all clinics who responded, 73.9% (51/69) had a maximum maternal age for autologous IVF, with a median of 45 years (range 42-54). Similarly, 79.7% (55/69) of responding clinics had a maximum maternal age for donor oocyte IVF, with a median of 52 years (range 48-56). Slightly under half, 43.4% (30/69) of responding clinics had a maximum maternal age for fertility treatment other than IVF (including ovulation induction or ovarian stimulation with or without IUI) with a median of 46 years (range 42-55). Of note, only 4.3% (3/69) of responding clinics had a policy with respect to maximum paternal age, with a median of 55 years (range 55-70). The most commonly cited reasons for having an age-limit policy were maternal risks of pregnancy, lower ART success rates, fetal/neonatal risks, and concerns about patients' ability to parent at an older age. More than half 56.5% (39/69) of responding clinics reported making exceptions to these policies, most commonly for patients who have pre-existing embryos. The majority of medical directors who responded to the survey believed there should be an ASRM guideline regarding maximum maternal age for autologous IVF 71% (49/69), donor oocyte IVF 78% (54/69) and other fertility treatments 62% (43/69).

CONCLUSIONS

Most fertility clinics who responded to this national survey reported having a policy regarding maternal age (but not paternal age) and provision of fertility treatment. Policies were based on risk of maternal/fetal complications, lower success rates at older age, and concerns about patients' ability to parent at an older age. The majority of medical directors of responding clinics believed there should be an ASRM guideline regarding age and provision of fertility treatment.

Comparison of IVF/ICSI outcomes in advanced reproductive age patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and advanced reproductive age normal controls: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

At present, there are few studies on whether there is reproductive advantage in advanced polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, and the existing research results are also controversial. Some research results show that the reproductive window of advanced reproductive age patients with polycystic ovary syndrome is longer than that of the normal control group, and the clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization / intracytoplasmic sperm injection(IVF/ICSI)are higher. However, some studies have contradicted the results, and believed that the clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate in IVF/ICSI in advanced PCOS patients and normal control groups were roughly similar. This retrospective study aimed to compare IVF/ICSI outcomes in advanced reproductive age patients with PCOS and in advanced reproductive age patients with tubal factor infertility alone.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on advanced reproductive age (age ≥ 35 years) patients who received their first IVF/ICSI cycle between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. This study was divided into two groups, one group was PCOS group, the other group was control group, namely tubal factor infertility group, a total of 312 patients and 462 cycles were enrolled. Compare the differences in outcomes such as cumulative live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups.

RESULTS

In fresh embryo transfer cycles(ET), there was no statistically significant difference in live birth rate [19/62 (30.6%) vs. 34/117 (29.1%), P = 0.825] and clinical pregnancy rate [24/62 (38.7%) vs. 43/117 (36.8%), P = 0.797] between the PCOS and control groups.In the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, the difference in cumulative live birth rate [63/217 (29.0%) vs. 14/66 (21.2%), P = 0.211] and clinical pregnancy rate [74/217 (34.1%) vs. 18/66 (27.3%), P = 0.300] were not statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The IVF/ICSI outcomes of advanced reproductive age patients with PCOS are similar to those of advanced reproductive age patients with tubal factor infertility alone, and the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate are roughly the same. Age is an important factor that affects clinical pregnancy rate. It is recommended that patients with PCOS complicated by infertility seek medical treatment as soon as possible to obtain better pregnancy outcomes.

Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

The objective of this review is to define live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) for women ≥ 40 undergoing ovulation induction (OI)/intrauterine insemination (IUI).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Google Scholar. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were LBR and CPR, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 636 studies screened of which 42 were included. In 8 studies which provided LBR for partner sperm, LBR/cycle ranged from 0 to 8.5% with majority being ≤ 4%. Cumulative LBR was 3.6 to 7.1% over 6 cycles with the majority of pregnancies in the first 4. In the four studies providing LBR for donor sperm cycles, LBR/cycle ranged from 3 to 7% with cumulative LBR of 12 to 24% over 6 cycles. The majority of pregnancies occurred in the first 6 cycles. There were three studies with LBR or CPR/cycle ≥ 1% for women ≥ 43. No studies provided data above this range for women ≥ 45. In 4 studies which compared OI/IUI and IVF, the LBR from IVF was 9.2 to 22% per cycle. In 7 studies which compared outcomes by stimulation protocol, no significant differences were seen.

CONCLUSION

For women ≥ 40 using homologous sperm, the highest probability of live birth is via IVF. However, if IVF is not an option, OI/IUI may be considered for up to 4 cycles in those using partner sperm or 6 cycles with donor sperm. For women > 45, OI/IUI is likely futile but a limited trial may be considered for psychological benefit while encouraging consideration of donor oocyte IVF or adoption. Use of gonadotropins does not appear to be more effective than oral agents in this age group.

Individual and community factors associated with unintended pregnancies among women of advanced reproductive age in Nigeria

Studies have examined individual and community level factors associated with unintended pregnancies. However, existing studies tends to focus the general population of reproductive age women without isolating women of advanced reproductive age (women at the age range of 35-49 years) for specific research attention. There is need for specific attention on this group of women because pregnancies among them whether intended or unintended elevate obstetric risks for both mother and child. This study examines associated individual and community factors of unintended pregnancies among women of advanced reproductive age in Nigeria. Data were extracted from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. A weighted sample of 12,509 women was analyzed. Three multilevel logistic regression models were estimated. The study revealed a 10.3% prevalence of unintended pregnancies. Individual characteristics such as maternal age, number of living children, delayed marriage, and community characteristics such as high community poverty and high community unmet contraceptive need were significantly associated with unintended pregnancies. Variations in unintended pregnancies across the communities were more attributable to individual factors. Interventions should develop specific strategies tailored toward women of advanced reproductive age.

Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Several studies suggest that luteinizing hormone (LH) could improve IVF outcome in women of advanced reproductive age by optimizing androgen production. In this review, we assessed the role of recombinant-human LH (r-hLH) and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age candidates for assisted reproduction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using a preregistered protocol we systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Scopus and the ISI Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials in which r-hFSH monotherapy protocols were compared with r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment in women ≥35 years undergoing fresh IVF cycles. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data and the weight mean difference (WMD) for continuous data with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI). The meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effect model. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Subgroup analyses of all primary and secondary outcomes were performed only in women aged 35-40 years.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were identified. In women aged between 35 and 40 years, r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.45, CI 95% 1.05-2.00, I² = 0%, P = 0.03) and implantation rates (OR 1.49, CI 95% 1.10-2.01, I² = 13%, P = 0.01) versus r-hFSH monotherapy. Fewer oocytes were retrieved in r-hFSH/r-hLH-treated patients than in r-hFSH-treated patients both in women aged ≥35 years (WMD -0.82 CI 95% -1.40 to - 0.24, I² = 88%, P = 0.005) and in those aged between 35 and 40 years (WMD -1.03, CI - 1.89 to - 0.17, I² = 0%, P = 0.02). The number of metaphase II oocytes, miscarriage rates and live birth rates did not differ between the two groups of women overall or in subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although more oocytes were retrieved in patients who underwent r-hFSH monotherapy, this meta-analysis suggests that r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment improves clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in women between 35 and 40 years of age undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technology. However, more RCTs using narrower age ranges in advanced age women are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Never too late? Quadruplets at the age of 65 years

Background

We discuss the challenges of multiple pregnancy at very advanced reproductive age.

Case presentation

We present the case of a quadruplet pregnancy at the maternal age of 65 following in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with donor eggs and sperm, involving cross-border reproductive care. All children born were at 25 weeks’ gestation and survived; however, poor neurodevelopmental outcome remains a major concern in one child.

Conclusions

The use of reproductive technology to achieve a multiple pregnancy at such an advanced post-menopausal age generated a debate on ethical, psychosocial and medical questions. We share this debate and highlight the need to reconsider international guidelines for women of advanced reproductive age.

Effect of Dexamethasone Co-Treatment During Ovarian Stimulation in Women of Different Reproductive Age With Elevated Early Follicular Phase Progesterone Level: a Prospective Longitudinal Study

The aim of this paper was to estimate the effect of dexamethasone during ovarian stimulation in women of different reproductive age with elevated early follicular phase progesterone level undergoing fresh IVF cycle. This study is a prospective longitudinal analysis of consecutive women who underwent fresh IVF cycles at a single center, between January 2012 to December 2013. Women with early follicular phase progesterone above 0.50 ng/ml, assessed in day 0 or day 5 of stimulation, were included. Study group (n = 113) included women who underwent dexamethasone supplementation until the day of triggering. Women who did not undergo dexamethasone treatment formed the control group (n = 109). We further stratified our study population according to age ranges: (1) ≤ 34 years, (2) between 35 and 39 years, and (3) ≥ 40 years. Significantly lower progesterone levels were observed in study than in control group (0.59 ± 0.21 vs 0.94 ± 0.42, p < 0.001). Such difference is not observed in women above 39 years old. Higher, albeit not significant, live birth rate was detected in the study versus control group, considering the overall population. In women ≤ 34 years old, a significantly higher live birth rate was observed in women who underwent dexametasone treatment than in the control group (67.5% vs 47.2%, p = 0.04). Conversely, live birth rates were similar between groups in women above 34 years old. Our data suggest that dexamethasone helps to modulate progesterone levels during the follicular phase and might improve live birth rate of women below 34 years old.

Cancer in IVF patients treated at age 40 years and older: long term follow-up

RESEARCH QUESTION

Current knowledge of cancer risk among women who undergo IVF is based mainly on studies of women treated in their thirties, frequently with short follow-up periods. Therefore, information about cancer risk among infertile menopausal women is limited. We aimed to evaluate the risk of cancer among IVF patients treated at age 40 years and older, followed up for an extended period.

DESIGN

Historical cohort study of all IVF patients treated at the age of 40 years or older at two university-affiliated IVF units in Jerusalem, Israel, between 1994 and 2002. Data were cross-linked with the Israel National Cancer Registry to 2016. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals were computed by comparing the observed number of cancer cases with the expected cancer rate in the general Israeli population adjusted for age and year of birth. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to account for the length of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were included in the analysis, with mean follow-up of 16.7 ± 3.7 years (range 2-22 years). Mean age at first IVF cycle was 42.3 years (±2.1). Mean number of IVF cycles was 3.2 ± 2.6 (range 1-15). Thirty-six women (7.2%) developed invasive cancer, compared with 47.2 expected cases; SIR 0.76 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.06); 22 women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, compared with 19.84 expected; SIR 1.11 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Older women undergoing IVF treatment were not significantly associated with an excess risk of cancer at long-term follow up. Further studies, however, are needed to confirm these findings.

One thousand seventy-eight autologous IVF cycles in women 45 years and older: the largest single-center cohort to date

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine IVF outcomes in women 45 years and older using autologous oocytes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study reviewing all IVF cycles in women ≥ 45 years old from January 1995 to June 2015 that were conducted at one academic medical center. One thousand seventy-eight fresh, autologous IVF cycles met inclusion criteria. PGD/S, natural IVF, and donor egg cycles were excluded. Outcomes were analyzed for the different age groups (age 45, n = 773; age 46, n = 221; age 47, n = 57; age 48, n = 22; age 49, n = 5). Primary outcome measures included IVF cycle characteristics, total pregnancy loss, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates, and were stratified according to patient age.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients in the study cohort was 45.4 ± 0.72. 11.7% of patients did not start due to an elevated FSH or cyst and 28.5% of patients were canceled prior to oocyte retrieval. The overall pregnancy rate per transfer was 18.7% (117/626), of which 82.1% ended in a pregnancy loss. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per transfer were 9.6 and 3.4%, respectively, which did not differ between age groups. Per cycle start women aged 45 had significantly higher positive pregnancy rates compared to women aged 46 and 47 (14.1 vs. 8.6 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.04). For women 45 years old, the live birth rate was 2.9% per cycle start and was 4.4% per embryo transfer. Of the 21 live births, 20 were in women aged 45 and one live birth was in a 46-year-old woman. There were no live births in any patient with ≤ 4 oocytes retrieved.

CONCLUSION

Autologous IVF in women aged 45 with acceptable ovarian reserve is not futile; however, it does carry very low prognosis. Patients aged 46 and older should be counseled appropriately that a live birth seems highly unlikely.

The dilemma of counseling patients about poor prognosis: live birth after IVF with autologous oocytes in a 43-year-old woman with FSH levels above 30 mIU/mL

Providing reasonable expectations to patients with diminished ovarian reserve prior to attempting pregnancy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) is one of the most challenging aspects of fertility care. In some instances, advice from the clinician to pursue more effective treatment, such as donor oocytes, may not be acceptable to the patient. In this case report, a patient is presented who represents a poor prognosis candidate for IVF treatment. She was 43 years old with six prior failed IVF cycles and repetitive basal FSH values above 30 mIU/mL. Presented are the challenges in patient counseling and decision making. In her seventh IVF cycle, which she was strongly counseled against pursuing, the patient experienced the desired outcome of live birth. Increasing reports are emerging of live birth using autologous oocytes among women of advanced reproductive age. These instances, as well as the case of our patient, raise issues commonly encountered in patient counseling in poor prognosis patients. This discussion should include an emphasis on patient goals as well as an acknowledgement that no test for ovarian reserve has a 100% positive predictive value.

Factors influencing contraceptive use and non-use among women of advanced reproductive age in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Factors influencing contraceptive use and non-use among women of advanced reproductive age have been insufficiently researched in Nigeria. This study examines factors influencing contraceptive use and non-use among women of advanced reproductive age in Nigeria.

METHODS

Secondary data were pooled and extracted from 2008 and 2013 Nigeria Demographic and Health Surveys (NDHS). The weighted sample size was 14,450 women of advanced reproductive age. The dependent variable was current contraceptive use. The explanatory variables were selected socio-demographic characteristics and three control variables. Analyses were performed using Stata version 12. Multinomial logistic regression was applied in four models.

RESULTS

Majority of the respondents are not using any method of contraceptive; the expected risk of using modern contraceptive relative to traditional method reduces by a factor of 0.676 for multiparous women (rrr = 0.676; CI: 0.464-0.985); the expected risk of using modern contraceptive relative to traditional method reduces by a factor of 0.611 for women who want more children (rrr = 0.611; CI: 0.493-0.757); the relative risk for using modern contraceptive relative to traditional method increases by a factor of 1.637 as maternal education reaches secondary education (rrr = 1.637; CI: 1.173-2.285); the relative risk for using modern contraceptive relative to traditional method increases by a factor of 1.726 for women in richest households (rrr = 1.726; CI: 1.038-2.871); and the expected risk of using modern contraceptive relative to traditional method increases by a factor of 1.250 for southern women (rrr = 1.250; CI: 1.200-1.818).

CONCLUSIONS

Socio-demographic characteristics exert more influence on non-use than modern contraceptive use. The scope, content and coverage of existing BCC messages should be extended to cover the contraceptive needs and challenges of women of advanced reproductive age in the country.

Predicting suitable timing for artificial reproductive technology treatment in aged infertile women

It has been widely accepted that the age of women plays a fundamental role in fecundity, and age-related fertility decline has one of the most significant and detrimental effects on the success rate of infertility treatment. Therefore, treatment cycles of non-in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment for infertile women of advanced aged have been limited due to their lack of efficacy, and they are often optimized, compared to IVF/ICSI treatment. Recent trends in infertility treatment apparently indicate that IVF/ICSI treatment, including egg donation, is frequently offered to aged women for first-line management, despite its heavy burden, but hasty IVF/ICSI treatment should be avoided, considering its socioeconomic problems. It is important to distinguish women who could conceive by non-IVF/ICSI treatment, although the optimization of non-IVF/ICSI treatment protocols remains poorly understood. This review focuses on extracting aged patients who have higher chance of conceiving with non-IVF/ICSI treatment and providing necessary and sufficient infertility treatment. After initial evaluation for fertility, including tubal factor, male factor, the presence of endometriosis and/or adenomyosis, and ovarian reserve, the outcomes of fertility treatment can be predicted to some extent in aged infertile women.

Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health

Advanced age is a risk factor for female infertility, pregnancy loss, fetal anomalies, stillbirth, and obstetric complications. These concerns are based on centuries-old observations, yet women are delaying childbearing to pursue educational and career goals in greater numbers than ever before. As a result, reproductive medicine specialists are treating more patients with age-related infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss, while obstetricians are faced with managing pregnancies often complicated by both age and comorbidities. The media portrayal of a youthful but older woman, able to schedule her reproductive needs and balance family and job, has fueled the myth that "you can have it all," rarely characterizing the perils inherent to advanced-age reproduction. Reproductive medicine specialists and obstetrician/gynecologists should promote more realistic views of the evidence-based realities of advanced maternal age pregnancy, including its high-risk nature and often compromised outcomes. Doctors should also actively educate both patients and the public that there is a real danger of childlessness if individuals choose to delay reproduction.

Sequential protocol with urinary-FSH/recombinant-FSH versus standard protocol with recombinant-FSH in women of advanced age undergoing IVF

A stimulation protocol mimicking the physiological pattern of FSH release may improve IVF outcome in women of advanced age. Urinary-FSH delivers a wider range of isoforms including the most acidic produced during the early follicular phase when oestradiol level is low, a common condition in women of advanced reproductive age. We hypothesized that a stimulation protocol using urinary-FSH during the early follicular phase and then shifting toward recombinant-FSH may improve oocyte quality and pregnancy rate in 35-40 years old patients in IVF program. A retrospective study was performed: after a standard down-regulation with GnRH-analogue, 115 women underwent stimulation with urinary-FSH for 6 days according to a step-down approach and then shifting to recombinant-FSH (group A), 115 women underwent a stimulation protocol with only recombinant-FSH (group B). Days of stimulation were lower in group A than in group B, a higher proportion of MII oocytes and of grade 1 embryos, higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate were observed in group A versus group B. We conclude that a sequential protocol using urinary-FSH in the early days of stimulation and subsequently recombinant-FSH may improve the IVF outcome in patients of advanced reproductive age.

Mini-dose GnRH-a long versus short protocol in patients ≥ 35 years old undergoing in vitro fertilization

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical result of mini-dose GnRH-a long protocol with short protocol in older patients undergoing IVF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Four hundred and sixty-one women aged above 35-year-old in first cycle were assigned to two groups: GnRH-a short protocol (n=359); and mini-dose GnRH-a long protocol (n=102). Both groups were divided based on their age, into groups over and under 38 years old. Primary outcome include live birth rate per started cycle. Other clinical outcomes were good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

Patients treated with mini-dose GnRH-a protocol and those treated with short protocol showed similar live birth rate. In the mini-dose long protocol group aged 35-38 years old, patients showed significantly thicker endometrium at the day of hCG administration, higher number of good embryos obtained and higher good-quality embryo rate (56.3% versus 46.5%) compared with short protocol. The implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were higher versus short protocol group, but this result was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION(S)

Mini-dose GnRH-a long protocol for older women is at least as effective as short protocol, especially in patients aged 35-38 years, with a better good-quality embryo rate and higher number of good embryos obtained, therefore mini-dose GnRH-a long protocol can be considered as an alternative protocol for patients above 35 years age.

A randomized clinical trial to determine optimal infertility treatment in older couples: the Forty and Over Treatment Trial (FORT-T)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal infertility therapy for women at the end of their reproductive potential.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Academic medical centers and private infertility center in a state with mandated insurance coverage.

PATIENT(S)

Couples with ≥ 6 months of unexplained infertility; female partner aged 38-42 years.

INTERVENTION(S)

Randomized to treatment with two cycles of clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/IUI, or immediate IVF, followed by IVF if not pregnant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Proportion with a clinically recognized pregnancy, number of treatment cycles, and time to conception after two treatment cycles and at the end of treatment.

RESULT(S)

We randomized 154 couples to receive CC/IUI (N = 51), FSH/IUI (N = 52), or immediate IVF (N = 51); 140 (90.9%) couples initiated treatment. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates per couple after the first two cycles of CC/IUI, FSH/IUI, or immediate IVF were 21.6%, 17.3%, and 49.0%, respectively. After all treatments, 110 (71.4%) of 154 couples had conceived a clinically recognized pregnancy, and 46.1% had delivered at least one live-born baby; 84.2% of all live-born infants resulting from treatment were achieved via IVF. There were 36% fewer treatment cycles in the IVF arm compared with either COH/IUI arm, and the couples conceived a pregnancy leading to a live birth after fewer treatment cycles.

CONCLUSION(S)

A randomized controlled trial in older women with unexplained infertility to compare treatment initiated with two cycles of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/IUI versus immediate IVF demonstrated superior pregnancy rates with fewer treatment cycles in the immediate IVF group.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00246506.

Alternative strategies to in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment for aged infertile women

Purpose

This study aimed to maximize the chance of pregnancy and provide an optimal protocol for infertile female patients of advanced reproductive age as an alternative to in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 432 infertile women aged ≥38 at the beginning of the treatment. Stepwise non-IVF/ICSI treatments using timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination, with or without controlled ovarian stimulation, were adopted for all patients. In this population, we extracted 8 representative infertility factors and examined these effects on fertility rate by calculating clinical pregnancy rate.

Results

The prognosis for infertile women possessing at least one of the three factors, 'advanced female age (≥42 years)', 'endometriosis/adenomyosis', and 'tubal infertility' was apparently poor because only 5 out of 155 women were able to conceive (1.02% per cycle). In contrast, 95 patients without the four factors, 'advanced female age', 'endometriosis/adenomyosis', 'tubal infertility', and 'male infertility', were more likely to conceive (9.14% per cycle).

Conclusions

Fertility centers can offer appropriate protocols for non-IVF/ICSI treatment and establish guidelines for aged infertile patients by examining infertility factors and considering their combinations.