Benefit-Risk Assessment of Chinese Medicine Injections for Primary Liver Cancer Based on Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit-risk of 3 commonly used Chinese medicine injections, Aidi Injection (ADI), Cinobufagin Injection (CINI) and Compound Kushen Injection (CKI), in the treatment of primary liver cancer (PLC), so as to provide a reference for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADI, CINI and CKI in the treatment of PLC published in the databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were retrieved from January 2020 to October 2022. The data of benefit and risk indicators were combined to obtain the effect value. The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model was applied to build the decision tree. The benefit value, risk value and benefit risk value of the 3 injections in PLC treatment were calculated. Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to calculate the 95% confidence interval and probability of differences among the 3 injections, so as to optimize the evaluation results.

RESULTS

A total of 71 RCTs were included. The benefit values of ADI, CINI and CKI combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) were 42, 38 and 36, respectively. The risk values were 42, 25 and 37, respectively. The benefit risk values were 42, 31 and 37, respectively. The benefit risk differences of ADI vs. CINI, ADI vs. CKI, and CKI vs. CINI were 11 (-0.86, 17.75), 5 (-5.01, 11.09), and 6 (-1.87, 12.63), respectively. The probability that ADI superior to CINI, ADI superior to CKI, and CKI superior to CINI was 96.26%, 77.27%, and 92.62%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of MCDA model, CINI combined with TACE has the greatest risk in the treatment of the PLC. Considering the efficacy and safety, the possible priority of the 3 Chinese medicine injections combined with TACE in the treatment of PLC is ADI, CKI and CINI.

The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of the COVID-19 pandemic in Henan Province: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Since 2020, novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed serious threats to health systems and led to tremendous economic decline worldwide. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is considered a promising treatment strategy for COVID-19 in China and is increasingly recognized as a key participant in the battle against COVID-19. Clinicians also need accurate evidence regarding the effectiveness of TCM treatments for COVID-19.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with COVID-19 by collected from the electronic medical records of the hospitals in Henan Province from January 19, 2020, to March 2, 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, frequency analysis of Chinese patent medicines (CPMs), Chinese medicine injections (CMIs), evaluation of baseline symptom scores, nucleic acid negative conversion, length of hospitalization, and mortality rates were studied.

RESULTS

Between 15 January 2020 and 2 March 2020, 131 hospitals with 1245 patients were included. Survey response Chinese herbal decoction, CPMs, and CMIs combined with conventional Western medicine (CWM) used for the treatment of COVID-19. The top 8 CPMs were Lianhua Qingwen capsules, Shuanghuanglian oral liquid, Pudilan Xiaoyan oral liquid, Banlangen granules, Lanqin oral liquid, compound licorice tablets, Bailing capsules, montmorillonite powder. The most frequently used CMIs were Xuebijing, Tanreqing, Reduning, Xiyanping and Yanhuning. TCM combined with CWM improved the patients' symptom scores for fever, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and fatigue. Nucleic acid negative conversion occurred at11.55 ± 5.91 d and the average length of hospitalization was 14.92 ± 6.15 d. The mortality rate was approximately 1.76%, which is a reduction in patient mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

TCM combined with CWM improved clinical symptoms and reduced hospitalization and mortality rates.

Comparative efficacy of five Chinese medicine injections for treating dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) are widely used by clinicians in China as an adjuvant treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure (DCM-HF). However, comprehensive and systematic evidence supporting the beneficial effects of CMIs combined with Western medicine (WM) against DCM-HF was lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of five different CMIs in the treatment of DCM-HF.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Allied and Alternative Medieine Database (AMED), Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP) were comprehensively searched from their inception to March 10, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on the use of CMIs combined with WM to treat DCM-HF. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. Bayesian network meta-analysis were designed to access the effectiveness of different CMIs.

RESULTS

A total of 38 eligible RCTs involving 3247 patients were enrolled. The study showed that Huangqi injection, Shengmai injection, Shenfu injection, Shenmai injection, and Xinmailong injection combined with WM significantly improved performance compared with WM alone in treating DCM-HF. Xinmailong injection + WM had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment in terms of the improvement in the clinical effectiveness rate, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and 6-min walking distance. Huangqi injection + WM had the highest probability of being the best treatment on account of the enhancement of left ventricular ejection fraction. Shenmai injection + WM had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment considering the improvement in cardiac output and the reduction in brain natriuretic peptide.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination between CMIs and WM exerted a more positive effect in DCM-HF treatment. Xinmailong injection + WM had the best performance in treating DCM-HF, followed by Shenmai injection and Huangqi injection. However, due to the low qualities of the original studies, more high-quality studies are needed to support the findings.

[Current status and prospects of implementing GAP in Chinese medicine injection materials]

Chinese medicine injections(CMIs) have higher requirements for quality consistency and controllability than other traditional Chinese medicine products. The implementation of Good Agricultural Practice of Medicinal Plants and Animals(GAP) is an important factor that guarantees the quality stability of raw Chinese medicinal materials and affects the quality of CMIs. Through literature review, data research, expert consultation, and statistical analysis, this paper analyzes the current status of GAP management of key CMIs and the impact of GAP management of raw medicinal materials on the quality consistency and controllability of CMIs. Furthermore, it demonstrates the rationality, necessity, and feasibility of the full implementation of GAP on the basis of CMIs safety re-evaluation.

[Network Meta-analysis of 3 kinds of Chinese medicine injections in treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections( CMI) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease( AECOPD). PubMed,Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,Wan Fang and VIP database( since the date of database establishment to July 2018) were retrieved through computer for controlled randomized trials( CRTs) of 3 kinds of traditional Chinese medicine injections( Chuankezhi Injection,Tanreqing Injection,Xuebijing Injection) for AECOPD. After the methodological quality of included researches were evaluated,and the valid data were extracted,statistical analysis was performed with Stata 14,RevMan 5.3 is used for risk bias map. There were including 4 RCTs and 20 quasi-RCTs,which involving 579 patients.The results of network Meta-analysis showed that: ①there were significant differences in the forced expiratory volume in the first second between the 3 CMI and control groups,and there was no significant difference between CMI; ②3 kinds of CMI adjuvant therapy AECOPD,According to the forced expiratory volume in the first second of the probability ranking results,Tanreqing Injection is more effective,followed by Xuebijing Injection and Chuankezhi Injection. Based on the present evidence,3 kinds of CMI can improve the forced expiratory volume in the first second on the basis of Western medicine routine treatment of AECOPD,having better safty. In addition,the conclusion of this study still needs a large number of RCTs with reasonable design and proper method to confirm it.