Generating human prostate cancer organoids from leukapheresis enriched circulating tumour cells

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumour cell (CTC)-derived organoids have the potential to provide a powerful tool for personalised cancer therapy but are restrained by low CTC numbers provided by blood samples. Here, we used diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) to enrich CTCs from patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) and explored whether organoids provide a platform for ex vivo treatment modelling.

METHODS

We prospectively screened 102 patients with mPCa and performed DLA in 40 patients with ≥5 CTCs/7.5 mL blood. We enriched CTCs from DLA using white blood cell (WBC) depletion alone or combined with EpCAM selection. The enriched CTC samples were cultured in 3D to obtain organoids and used for downstream analyses.

RESULTS

The DLA procedure resulted in a median yield of 5312 CTCs as compared with 22 CTCs in 7.5 mL of blood. Using WBC depletion, we recovered 46% of the CTCs, which reduced to 12% with subsequent EpCAM selection. From the isolated and enriched CTC samples, organoid expansion succeeded in 35%. Successful organoid cultures contained significantly higher CTC numbers at initiation. Moreover, we performed treatment modelling in one organoid cell line and identified substantial tumour heterogeneity in CTCs using single cell DNA sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

DLA is an efficient method to enrich CTCs, although the modest success rate of culturing CTCs precludes large scale clinical application. Our data do suggest that DLA and subsequent processing provides a rich source of viable tumour cells. Therefore, DLA offers a promising alternative to biopsy procedures to obtain sufficient number of tumour cells to study sequential samples in patients with mPCa.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL6019.

Analysis of circulating cell-free DNA after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Recently, increase in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration or newly detected KRAS mutation after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy were reported to be related to the occurrence of new distant metastasis. In this study, we investigated whether cfDNA concentration increased with the release of tumor components into the blood after EUS-FNA and whether its increase was related to prognosis.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients underwent EUS-FNA and were pathologically confirmed as having pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We measured plasma cfDNA concentration and the copy number of KRAS mutation in 68 patients and circulating tumor cells in 8 before and after EUS-FNA.

RESULTS

The average cfDNA concentration after EUS-FNA (672.5 ± 919.6 ng/mL) was significantly higher than that before EUS-FNA (527.7 ± 827.3 ng/mL) (P < 0.001). KRAS mutation in plasma was detected in 8 patients (11.8%), however a significant increase in cfDNA concentration after EUS-FNA was not related to the change in KRAS-mutant copy number. Minimal increase in circulating tumor cells was observed in 3 of 8 patients. New distant metastasis was observed within 286 days to initial metastasis detection in 6 of 12 patients with ≥2-fold increase in cfDNA concentration and 26 of 56 patients with <2-fold increase within 185 days. In 32 patients who underwent surgery, ≥2-fold increase in cfDNA did not affect early recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in cfDNA concentration after EUS-FNA was not caused by tumor cell components released into blood vessels. Hence, the risk of seeding via the blood stream after EUS-FNA may need not be considered.

[Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer : An overview of ctDNA analysis in tumour diagnostics]

In current routine diagnostics, the gold standard to determine the genomic profile of colorectal cancers (CRCs) is using biopsy or surgically resected tissues. However, such a tissue sample cannot represent the entire tumour heterogeneity, because it only shows a local and temporal snapshot. As a complement to tumour tissue genotyping, liquid biopsies enable minimally invasive detection of all potential tumour-specific mutations and their dynamic changes for molecular profiling. Furthermore, they can be repeated in certain intervals for monitoring response to treatment, occurrence of drug resistance and detection of relapse. This review focusses on analyzing circulating cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA), which is mostly released from apoptotic or necrotic tumour cells into the bloodstream or by active secretion of circulating tumour cells (CTCs). Nevertheless, there are some challenges in analyzing ctDNA. First, ctDNA represents only a small fraction of total circulating DNA, because there is an enormous wild-type background of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released by healthy cells. Second, ctDNA is highly fragmented and the amount of ctDNA in the blood is very low. In this review, we discuss the potential, fields of application as well as challenges and limitations of liquid biopsy approaches. In more detail, we discuss the possibility of using liquid biopsies as a future application for molecular characterization of CRCs, particularly for monitoring CRC patients during anti-EGFR therapy to detect resistance mutations (e.g. KRAS mutations) or further therapy-relevant mutations. In addition, we investigate whether blood-based molecular profiling is a reliable addition to routine diagnostic approaches of tissue-based molecular characterization.

[Circulating tumor cells in pancreatic cancer : Results of morphological and molecular analyses and comparisons with the primary tumor]

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a disease with a poor prognosis. PDAC shows characteristic mutations within codon 12/13. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) detected in blood samples of patients with cancer are hypothesized as the means of systemic tumor spread. But less is known about morphological/molecular characteristics or the pathophysiological meaning of PDAC CTC.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was a cytomorphological and genetic analysis of CTC from patients with PDAC followed by the correlation of the results with those of the corresponding tumor in the pancreas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Blood samples of 58 patients with PDAC and 10 "normal" control donors were processed through a size-based CTC isolation. KRAS-mutation analyses were performed for CTC and the primary tumor and the results were compared. Furthermore, their potential as a prognostic marker was evaluated.

RESULTS

In patients with different UICC stages CTC were detected, but not in normal control patients. There was a trend for a worse median overall survival (OS) for patients with >3 CTC/ml. Patients with a KRAS^G12V mutation showed a trend for a better median OS compared to those with other KRAS mutations (10 months) or even without KRAS mutation. Fifty-eight percent of the patients presented concordant KRAS mutations in the primary tumor and corresponding CTC, while 42% were discordant. The median OS for both groups was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection and characterization of CTC (for example by KRAS mutation analysis) may be useful for prognosis. Furthermore, it expands our knowledge of tumor biology and may detect possible tumor heterogeneity regarding the mutation profile of some cancer types.

Current Status of the Use of Salvaged Blood in Metastatic Spine Tumour Surgery

To review the current status of salvaged blood transfusion (SBT) in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS), with regard to its safety and efficacy, contraindications, and adverse effects. We also aimed to establish that the safety and adverse event profile of SBT is comparable and at least equal to that of allogeneic blood transfusion. MEDLINE and Scopus were used to search for relevant articles, based on keywords such as "cancer surgery," "salvaged blood," and "circulating tumor cells." We found 159 articles, of which 55 were relevant; 20 of those were excluded because they used other blood conservation techniques in addition to cell salvage. Five articles were manually selected from reference lists. In total, 40 articles were reviewed. There is sufficient evidence of the clinical safety of using salvaged blood in oncological surgery. SBT decreases the risk of postoperative infections and tumour recurrence. However, there are some limitations regarding its clinical applications, as it cannot be employed in cases of sepsis. In this review, we established that earlier studies supported the use of salvaged blood from a cell saver in conjunction with a leukocyte depletion filter (LDF). Furthermore, we highlight the recent emergence of sufficient evidence supporting the use of intraoperative cell salvage without an LDF in MSTS.

[Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolisms]

The term nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism (NTPE) is defined as embolization of pulmonary arteries caused by foreign bodies (e. g. detached catheter fragments), biological substances (e. g. septic thrombus) or exogenous substances (e. g. gas). The frequency of NTPE is underestimated. Symptoms can cover the spectrum from undetectable to sudden death. In addition to mechanical obstruction of the pulmonary arteries, some NTPEs trigger an inflammatory cascade that causes deterioration of vascular, pulmonary and cardiac function. Radiological imaging in combination with the medical history of patients is sufficient to identify most NTPEs with certainty. The aim of this article is to make readers aware of the symptoms, frequency, relevance, classification, pathophysiology, laboratory findings and radiological findings of the most frequent forms of NTPE. The spectrum of forms presented here includes pulmonary embolisms due to foreign bodies (intravascular, intracorporeal and extracorporeal), amniotic fluid, endogenous tissue, fat, tumors, septic thrombi, hydatids, cement, metallic mercury, gas, silicone and particles.

Circulating Aneuploid Cells Detected in the Blood of Patients with Infectious Lung Diseases

The identification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is clinically important for diagnosing cancer. We have previously developed a size-based filtration platform followed by epithelial cell adhesion molecule immunofluorescence staining for detecting CTCs. To characterize CTCs independently of cell surface protein expression, we incorporated a chromosomal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to detect abnormal copy numbers of chromosomes in cells collected from peripheral blood samples by the size-based filtration platform. Aneuploid cells were detected in the peripheral blood of patients with lung cancer. Unexpectedly, aneuploid cells were also detected in the control group, which consisted of peripheral blood samples from patients with benign lung diseases, such as empyema necessitatis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. These findings suggest that chromosomal abnormalities are observed not only in tumor cells, but also in benign infectious diseases. Thus, our findings present new considerations and bring into light the possibility of false positives when using FISH for cancer diagnosis.

Cytokeratin 20 positive cells in blood of colorectal cancer patients as an unfavorable prognostic marker

OBJECTIVES

Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) is one of the most investigated markers for the detection of circulating colorectal cancer (CRC) cells by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic value of RT-PCR detection of circulating CRC cells using CK20 as a marker, and to compare the value of preoperative and postoperative blood sample analysis for that purpose.

METHODS

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was isolated from mononuclear cell fraction of blood samples taken from 95 CRC patients before and after tumor resection and from 23 healthy volunteers and assayed by real-time RT-PCR for CK20 expression.

RESULTS

In patients positive for CK20 postoperatively both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were significantly shorter than in patients negative for CK20 postoperatively, while the difference between patients positive and negative for CK20 preoperatively was not statistically significant in terms of neither PFS nor overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our results have shown prognostic value of circulating cancer cells detected in postoperative blood samples from CRC patients using CK20 as marker for RT-PCR, which has potential implications for treatment of these patients. In clinical practice, CK20 expression profile could be a factor in weighting treatment options in CRC patients. In cases where multiple treatment options are possible, patients with positive postoperative CK20 expression could be candidates to receive more aggressive treatment.

A New Cell Block Method for Multiple Immunohistochemical Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Liver Cancer

PURPOSE

We developed a new method of detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in liver cancer patients by constructing cell blocks from peripheral blood cells, including CTCs, followed by multiple immunohistochemical analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell blockswere constructed from the nucleated cell pellets of peripheral blood afterremoval of red blood cells. The blood cell blocks were obtained from 29 patients with liver cancer, and from healthy donor blood spikedwith seven cell lines. The cell blocks and corresponding tumor tissues were immunostained with antibodies to seven markers: cytokeratin (CK), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), CK18, α-fetoprotein (AFP), Glypican 3, and HepPar1.

RESULTS

The average recovery rate of spiked SW620 cells from blood cell blocks was 91%. CTCs were detected in 14 out of 29 patients (48.3%); 11/23 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), 1/2 cholangiocarcinomas (CC), 1/1 combined HCC-CC, and 1/3 metastatic cancers. CTCs from 14 patients were positive for EpCAM (57.1%), EMA (42.9%), AFP (21.4%), CK18 (14.3%), Gypican3 and CK (7.1%, each), and HepPar1 (0%). Patients with HCC expressed EpCAM, EMA, CK18, and AFP in tissue and/or CTCs, whereas CK, HepPar1, and Glypican3 were expressed only in tissue. Only EMA was significantly associated with the expressions in CTC and tissue. CTC detection was associated with higher T stage and portal vein invasion in HCC patients.

CONCLUSION

This cell block method allows cytologic detection and multiple immunohistochemical analysis of CTCs. Our results show that tissue biomarkers of HCC may not be useful for the detection of CTC. EpCAM could be a candidate marker for CTCs in patients with HCC.

Simultaneous Detection of Disseminated and Circulating Tumor Cells in Primary Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) from bone marrow (BM) are a surrogate of minimal residual disease (MRD) in primary breast cancer (PBC) patients and associated with an adverse prognosis. However, BM sampling is an invasive procedure. Although there is growing evidence that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from the blood are also suitable for monitoring MRD, data on the simultaneous detection of DTCs and CTCs are limited.

Materials and Methods

We determined the presence of DTCs using immunocytochemistry and the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. CTCs were determined simultaneously using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction–based assay (AdnaTest Breast Cancer) and CellSearch (at least one CTC per 7.5 mL blood). We compared the detection of DTCs and CTCs and evaluated their impact on disease-free and overall survival.

Results

Of 585 patients, 131 (22%) were positive for DTCs; 19 of 202 (9%) and 18 of 383 (5%) patients were positive for CTCs, as shown by AdnaTest and CellSearch, respectively. No significant association was observed between DTCs and CTCs (p=0.248 and p=0.146 as shown by AdnaTest and CellSearch, respectively). The presence of DTCs (p=0.046) and the presence of CTCs as shown by CellSearch (p=0.007) were predictive of disease-free survival.

Conclusion

Our data confirm the prognostic relevance of DTCs and CTCs in patients with PBC. As we found no significant relationship between DTCs and CTCs, prospective trials should include their simultaneous detection. Within those trials, the question of whether or not DTCs and CTCs are independent subpopulations of malignant cell clones should be determined by molecular characterization.