The management of perioperative pain in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic literature review of the current practices and guidelines for the future

Background

Craniosynostosis is a condition characterized by a premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. The surgical repair of craniosynostosis causes significant pain for the child. A key focus of craniosynostosis repair is developing effective strategies to manage perioperative pain. This study aimed to review perioperative pain control strategies for craniosynostosis repair systematically.

Methods

Guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used in the design of this review. In May 2022, the following databases were used to conduct the literature search: MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. A search was performed using MeSH terms “craniosynostosis,” “pain management,” and “cranioplasty.”

Results

The literature review yielded 718 publications. After applying our inclusion criteria, 17 articles were included, accounting for a total of 893 patients. During the postoperative period, most studies used multimodal analgesia, primarily opioids, and acetaminophen. In the postoperative period, oral ibuprofen was the most commonly used NSAID, rectal codeine, and acetaminophen were the most commonly used weak opioids, and continuous remifentanil infusion was the most commonly used potent opioid.

Conclusion

The authors determined the best pain management options for pediatric patients undergoing cranioplasty by analyzing the most commonly used analgesics. A high-quality clinical trial comparing different types of analgesic combinations would be a valuable addition to the present literature.

Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis: indications and expectations

Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) in patients with craniosynostosis serves to correct abnormal skull morphology and increase intracranial volume to prevent or treat pathologic increases in intracranial pressure (Taylor and Bartlett, Plast Reconstr Surg 140: 82e-93e, 2017). Distraction osteogenesis is a well-established technique for bony repositioning and growth stimulation in the facial and long bones, in which the gradual separation of bony segments at an osteotomy site results in generation of new bone and subsequent bone lengthening (Greene, 2018). While initially described in the orthopedic literature, the relevance and applicability of distraction osteogenesis to craniofacial surgery has been well-studied and is now well-established (Steinbacher et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 127: 792-801, 2011). Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) was introduced as a treatment option for cranial vault expansion in patients with craniosynostosis in 2009 by White et al., based upon the premise that posterior vault distraction could provide greater intracranial volume expansion than fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR), but that acute posterior cranial vault expansions were limited by the soft tissue envelope of the infant scalp and prone to relapse related to the supine positioning typical of infants (White et al., Childs Nerv Syst 25: 231-236, 2009). Since this introduction, significant evidence has accrued regarding the safety of, and outcomes after, PVDO. PVDO is now known to provide larger increases in intracranial volume in comparison to anterior cranial vault remodeling procedures (Derderian et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1665-1672, 2015) and to provide morphologic improvements in both the posterior and anterior cranial vaults (Goldstein et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1367-1375, 2013). Perioperative major morbidity is comparable to conventional vault remodeling (Taylor et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 129:674e-680e, 2012) and the procedure has been safely applied to patients of various ages with syndromic and non-syndromic craniosynostosis (Zhang et al., J Craniofac Surg 29:566-571, 2018; Li et al., J Craniofac Surg 27:1165-1169, 2016). Many high-volume craniofacial centers now consider PVDO the preferred first operation in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis, and indications for this procedure continue to expand as evidence accrues regarding its utility and safety (Steinbacher et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 127: 792-801, 2011; Swanson et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 137:829e-841e, 2016).

Revisiting the Resolution of Chiari Malformation in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: A Case of Posterior Cranial Vault Reconstruction in Secondary Pan-Suture Synostosis

BACKGROUND

While commonly seen in syndromic craniosynostosis, the incidence of Chiari malformation (CM) in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis has been reported at 5% and there is a lack of understanding of the pathophysiology and management of CM in this patient population.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present a 5-year-old male patient who underwent a sagittal craniosynostosis repair at the age of 5 months and returned at the age of 5 years with daily headaches associated with behavioral changes. He was found to have pan-synostoses and radiographic evidence of increased intracranial pressure, including a Chiari malformation. Neurologic and genetic workup was unremarkable. A cranial vault reconstruction was performed, and subsequent imaging demonstrated resolution of previously noted Chiari malformation.

CONCLUSIONS

In our case, we provided a unique window into the underlying pathophysiology for CM in patients with concurrent nonsyndromic craniosynostosis that we hope will add to the current foundation of literature supporting the intricate relation between cranial vault compliance and Chiari malformation or hindbrain herniation. Furthermore, we provide insight into the management of acquired CM and support isolated cranial vault reconstruction in those who do not appear to have symptomatic suboccipital compression.

Cranial Vault Reconstruction and Evacuation of Hemorrhage After a Bifrontal Gunshot Wound to the Brain

Civilian gunshot wounds to the brain are associated with high overall mortality; however, outcomes can vary significantly depending on bullet trajectory. This report details the outcome of a patient who sustained a bifrontal gunshot wound with multiple associated calvarial and frontal sinus fractures. Although surgery for penetrating brain injury is most frequently employed for relief of mass effect and decompression of vital structures, this case report describes a more comprehensive technique involving duroplasty, obliteration of the frontal sinus, and cranial vault reconstruction with the aim of decreasing the rate of cerebrospinal fluid leak, infection, reoperation, and readmission.

Low-cost customized cranioplasty using a 3D digital printing model: a case report

Background

Cranial defects usually occur after trauma, neurosurgical procedures like decompressive craniotomy, tumour resections, infection and congenital defects. The purpose of cranial vault repair is to protect the underlying brain tissue, to reduce any localized pain and patient anxiety, and improve cranial aesthetics. Cranioplasty is a frequent neurosurgical procedure achieved with the aid of cranial prosthesis made from materials such as: titanium, autologous bone, ceramics and polymers. Prosthesis production is often costly and requires complex intraoperative processes. Implant customized manufacturing for craniopathies allows for a precise and anatomical reconstruction in a shorter operating time compared to other conventional techniques. We present a simple, low-cost method for prosthesis manufacturing that ensures surgical success.

Case presentation

Two patients with cranial defects are presented to describe the three-dimensional (3D) printing technique for cranial reconstruction. A digital prosthesis model is designed and manufactured with the aid of a 3D computed tomography. Both the data of large sized cranial defects and the prosthesis are transferred to a 3D printer to obtain a physical model in poly-lactic acid which is then used in a laboratory to cast the final customised prosthesis in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA).

Conclusions

A precise compliance of the prosthesis to the osseous defect was achieved. At the 6 month postoperative follow-up no complications were observed i.e. rejection, toxicity, local or systemic infection, and the aesthetic change was very significant and satisfactory. Customized 3D PMMA prosthesis offers cost advantages, a great aesthetic result, reduced operating time and good biocompatibility.

Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis and Deformational Head Shape Disorders

This article provides an overview of etiology, epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, including sagittal, metopic, coronal, lambdoid, and complex synostosis. Detailed discussion is presented regarding indications for surgical intervention and management options, including frontoorbital advancement, cranial vault reconstruction, endoscopic strip craniectomy, spring-assisted strip craniectomy, and cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Deformational plagiocephaly is also presented with treatment options including repositioning, physical therapy, and helmet therapy.

Use of tranexamic acid in craniosynostosis surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) administration has been used to abate blood loss in a variety of surgical procedures. Several recent studies have supported its efficacy in reducing transfusion requirements in pediatric cranial vault reconstruction (CVR).

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a retrospective chart review to determine whether a significant reduction in packed red blood cell (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions exists when TXA is used.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 28 patients who underwent CVR for sagittal craniosynostosis was performed. Transfusion requirements for 14 patients who did not receive TXA were compared with 14 patients who did. Predictors of increased blood product transfusion were also studied.

RESULTS

Total volume of PRBC transfusion was reduced by 50% with the use of TXA (P=0.004) with a 34% reduction in intraoperative PRBC transfusion (P=0.017) and a 67% reduction in postoperative PRBC transfusion (P<0.001). Total volume of FFP transfusion was reduced by 46% (P=0.002) and postoperative FFP transfusion was reduced by 100% (P=0.001). The use of TXA was associated with a lower total volume of PRBC (P=0.003) and FFP (P=0.003) transfusions. Older patient age was associated with lower total volume of PRBC transfused (P=0.046 and P=0.002), but not with FFP (P=0.183 and P=0.099) transfusion volumes. Increasing patient weight was associated with lower PRBC (P=0.010 and P=0.020) and FFP (P=0.045 and P=0.016) transfusion volumes.

CONCLUSION

TXA decreased blood product transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CVR for sagittal craniosynostosis, and should be a routine part of the strategy to reduce blood loss in these procedures.