The impact of PD-L1 as a biomarker of cancer responses to combo anti-PD-1/CTLA-4

Combination therapy of solid tumors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a promising and rapidly evolving area of clinical research. Combo nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy has demonstrated potent efficacy in recent years, and PD-L1 expression profile has shown to play a key role in determining the most optimal immunotherapeutic regimen in advanced cancer patients. Here, the focus is over the impact of PD-L1 on combo nivolumab-ipilimumab in advanced solid cancer patients. Interpretations of this review indicate that patient responses to combo nivolumab-ipilimumab can be affected from different levels of PD-L1 expression states. A point required attention is the variations in responses among diverse cancer types or between different doses of the immunotherapy drugs. In general, higher rates of responses are seen with higher PD-L1 expression levels in many cancer types. This, however, is not coincided with survival of patients. Taken all into consideration, it could be asserted that considering PD-L1 as a solo biomarker may not be reliable for predicting clinical efficacy of combo nivolumab-ipilimumab. Thus, a search for other biomarkers or combination of PD-L1 with other factors may be considered for predicting patient responses.

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 in circumventing checkpoint inhibitor responses: Updated

Metabolic alterations occur commonly in tumor cells as a way to adapt available energetic sources for their proliferation, survival and resistance. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an intracellular enzyme catalyzing tryptophan degradation into kynurenine. IDO1 expression shows a rise in the stroma of many types of human cancers, and it provides a negative feedback mechanism for cancer evasion from immunosurveillance. Upregulation of IDO1 correlates with cancer aggression, poor prognosis and shortened patient survival. The increased activity of this endogenous checkpoint impairs effector T cell function, increases regulatory T cell (Treg) population and induces immune tolerance, so its inhibition potentiates anti-tumor immune responses and reshapes immunogenic state of tumor microenvironment (TME) presumably through normalizing effector T cell activity. A point is that the expression of this immunoregulatory marker is upregulated after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, and that it has inducible effect on expression of other checkpoints. These are indicative of the importance of IDO1 as an attractive immunotherapeutic target and rationalizing combination of IDO1 inhibitors with ICI drugs in patients with advanced solid cancers. In this review, we aimed to discuss about the impact of IDO1 on tumor immune ecosystem, and the IDO1-mediated bypass of ICI therapy. The efficacy of IDO1 inhibitor therapy in combination with ICIs in advanced/metastatic solid tumors is also a focus of this paper.

Immune microenvironment modulation unmasks therapeutic benefit of radiotherapy and checkpoint inhibition

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for solid tumors, including those targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), have shown impressive clinical efficacy, however, most patients do not achieve durable responses. One major therapeutic obstacle is the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Thus, we hypothesized that a strategy combining tumor-directed radiation with TIME immunomodulation could improve ICI response rates in established solid tumors.

METHODS

Using a syngeneic mouse model of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated head and neck cancer, mEER, we developed a maximally effective regimen combining PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition, tumor-directed radiation, and two existing immunomodulatory drugs: cyclophosphamide (CTX) and a small-molecule inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor, L-n6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine (L-NIL). We compared the effects of the various combinations of this regimen on tumor growth, overall survival, establishment of immunologic memory, and immunologic changes with flow cytometry and quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

We found PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade, and radiotherapy alone or in combination, incapable of clearing established tumors or reversing the unfavorable balance of effector to suppressor cells in the TIME. However, modulation of the TIME with cyclophosphamide (CTX) and L-NIL in combination with dual checkpoint inhibition and radiation led to rejection of over 70% of established mEER tumors and doubled median survival in the B16 melanoma model. Anti-tumor activity was CD8+ T cell-dependent and led to development of immunologic memory against tumor-associated HPV antigens. Immune profiling revealed that CTX/L-NIL induced remodeling of myeloid cell populations in the TIME and tumor-draining lymph node and drove subsequent activation and intratumoral infiltration of CD8+ effector T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study demonstrates that modulation of the immunosuppressive TIME is required to unlock the benefits of ICIs and radiotherapy to induce immunologic rejection of treatment-refractory established solid tumors.