Pediatric foot fractures on radiographs: distribution and predictors of surgery

PURPOSE

To examine the distribution and characteristics of pediatric foot fractures on radiographs with respect to age and skeletal maturation, and to identify predictors of surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children (≤ 18 years) with foot fractures, who underwent radiographic examinations (2020-2022). Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic and clinical data. Fracture characteristics, including anatomic location, presence of displacement, angulation, articular involvement, and, if skeletally immature, physeal involvement and Salter-Harris fracture pattern were collected. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of surgery.

RESULTS

1,090 (596-boys, 494-girls; mean age, 11.0 ± 4.0 years) patients with 1,325 (59.8% metatarsal, 33.8% phalangeal, and 6.4% tarsal) fractures were included. Fractures of 1st metatarsal were more common among younger children whereas fractures of 2nd-4th and 5th metatarsals were more common among older children (median ages: 5.9 years vs. 10.3 years and 12.4 years, p < 0.001). Intra-articular fractures were more common among maturing and mature than immature bones (25.3% and 20.4% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001). Physeal involvement was uncommon (162/977, 16.6%) and the most common pattern was Salter-Harris type II (133/162, 82.1%). A minority (47/1090, 4.3%) of patients required surgery and independent predictors of surgery included physeal involvement (OR = 5.12, 95% CI: 2.48-10.39, p < 0.001), multiple fractures (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.67-8.53, p = 0.001), fracture displacement (OR = 9.16, 95% CI:4.43-19.07, p < 0.001), and articular involvement (OR = 2.72, 95% CI:1.27-5.72, p = 0.008). Using these predictors, the likelihood for surgery ranged between 8.0% with 1 and 86.7% with 3 predictors.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric foot fracture patterns differed based on age and regional skeletal maturation. Physeal involvement, multiple fractures, fracture displacement, and articular involvement were independent predictors of surgery in our study group.

A systematic analysis on global epidemiology and burden of foot fracture over three decades

PURPOSE

To comprehensively analyze the geographic and temporal trends of foot fracture, understand its health burden by age, sex, and sociodemographic index (SDI), and explore its leading causes from 1990 to 2019.

METHODS

The datasets in the present study were generated from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2019, which included foot fracture data from 1990 to 2019. We extracted estimates along with the 95% uncertainty interval (UI) for the incidence and years lived with disability (YLDs) of foot fracture by location, age, gender, and cause. The epidemiology and burden of foot fracture at the global, regional, and national level was exhibited. Next, we presented the age and sex patterns of foot fracture. The leading cause of foot fracture was another focus of this study from the viewpoint of age, sex, and location. Then, Pearson's correlations between age-standardized rate (ASR), SDI, and estimated annual percentage change were calculated.

RESULTS

The age-standardized incidence rate was 138.68 (95% UI: 104.88 - 182.53) per 100,000 persons for both sexes, 174.24 (95% UI: 134.35 - 222.49) per 100,000 persons for males, and 102.19 (95% UI: 73.28 - 138.00) per 100,000 persons for females in 2019. The age-standardized YLDs rate was 5.91 (95% UI: 3.58 - 9.25) per 100,000 persons for both genders, 7.35 (95% UI: 4.45 - 11.50) per 100,000 persons for males, and 4.51 (95% UI: 2.75 - 7.03) per 100,000 persons for females in 2019. The global incidence and YLDs of foot fracture increased in number and decreased in ASR from 1990 to 2019. The global geographical distribution of foot fracture is uneven. The incidence rate for males peaked at the age group of 20 - 24 years, while that for females increased with advancing age. The incidence rate of older people was rising, as younger age incidence rate declined from 1990 to 2019. Falls, exposure to mechanical forces, and road traffic injuries were the 3 leading causes of foot fracture. Correlations were observed between ASR, estimated annual percentage change, and SDI.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of foot fracture remains high globally, and it poses an enormous public health challenge, with population ageing. It is necessary to allocate more resources to the high-risk populations. Targeted realistic intervention policies and strategies are warranted.

Return to play and performance in the National Basketball Association after undergoing operative or nonoperative treatment for foot fracture

Background

The incidence of distal lower extremity fractures in National Basketball Association (NBA) athletes continues to increase. There is a paucity of data regarding return-to-play (RTP) rates and performance after sustaining foot fractures in these athletes. The purpose of this study is to quantify RTP rates and performance in NBA players after sustaining a foot fracture.

Methods

Sixty-two NBA athletes suffered foot fractures between 2005 and 2021 according to publicly accessible online data. Each athlete was matched to a control player based on age at start of career, age at index injury year, body mass index (BMI), and position played. Performance statistics from 3 seasons prior and 3 seasons following the index injury season were recorded.

Results

We found that players who suffered foot fracture injuries are expected to make a full recovery and reach their previous level of performance within three years. 100% of players treated nonoperatively returned to play; meanwhile only 90% of players who were treated operatively returned to play. This difference is statistically significant.

Conclusion

NBA athletes have a high RTP rate after sustaining a foot fracture. Players may experience an initial decrease in playing time and performance when returning to play, however, these variables were found to return to baseline over time. After three seasons, player statistics returned to baseline in mostly every category, including player efficiency rating (PER). We found that players are expected to make a full recovery and return to their previous level of performance, regardless of whether they were treated operatively or not. Players treated nonoperatively returned to play at a rate of 100% meanwhile those treated operatively returned at a rate of 90%. Therefore, it is our recommendation that players opt for nonoperative treatment when possible.

Navicular Fracture

The tarsal navicular is an essential component of the Chopart joint and crucial for most of hindfoot motion. Most fractures are low-energy dorsal avulsions that may be treated nonoperatively. Displaced comminuted fractures require open reduction and internal fixation, sometimes with external fixation, bridge plating, and bone grafting. Diagnosis of stress fractures is commonly delayed. Conservative treatment is associated with good results, but surgery allows for quicker return-to-play in athletes. Nonunion in acute and stress fractures needs open debridement, grafting, and stable fixation. Müller-Weiss disease may present with a fragmented navicular and mimic an acute or a stress fracture.

Population-based incidence and epidemiology of 5912 foot fractures

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to report a full overview of the incidence and epidemiology of foot fractures.

METHOD

Population-based epidemiological cohort study including all foot fractures over 5 years. All patient charts and radiology were manually assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 4938 patients sustained 5912 foot fractures during the study period. Patients' mean age at the time of fracture was 36.1 (21.7 SD) years. The overall incidence of foot fractures was 142.3/100,000/year. The hind foot incidence was 13.7/100,000/year, the mid foot incidence 6.5/100,000/year, and the fore foot incidence 123.9/100,000/year. The most common mode of injury was due to low energy trauma (98.7%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows an overall incidence of foot fractures to be 142.3/100,000/year. The hind foot incidence is 13.7/100,000/year, the mid foot incidence 6.5/100,000/year, and the fore foot incidence 123.9/100,000/year.