1
|
Zhi H, Ji X, Zhao Z, Liang H, Zhong S, Luo Y, Zhong M, Zhan C, Gao Y, Deng X, Li S, Li J, Zhong N, Jiang M, Chen R. Risk factors for impaired pulmonary diffusion function in convalescent COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 49:101473. [PMID: 35663303 PMCID: PMC9137275 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term prognosis of COVID-19 survivors remains poorly understood. It is evidenced that the lung is the main damaged organ in COVID-19 survivors, most notably in impairment of pulmonary diffusion function. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the potential risk factors for impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in convalescent COVID-19 patients. METHODS We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid databases for relevant studies from inception until January 7, 2022, limited to papers involving human subjects. Studies were reviewed for methodological quality. Fix-effects and random-effects models were used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. The publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021265377. FINDINGS A total of eighteen qualified articles were identified and included in the systematic review, and twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our results showed that female (OR: 4.011; 95% CI: 2.928-5.495), altered chest computerized tomography (CT) (OR: 3.002; 95% CI: 1.319-6.835), age (OR: 1.018; 95% CI: 1.007-1.030), higher D-dimer levels (OR: 1.012; 95% CI: 1.001-1.023) and urea nitrogen (OR: 1.004;95% CI: 1.002-1.007) were identified as risk factors for impaired DLCO. INTERPRETATION Pulmonary diffusion capacity was the most common impaired lung function in recovered patients with COVID-19. Several risk factors, such as female, altered chest CT, older age, higher D-dimer levels and urea nitrogen are associated with impairment of DLCO. Raising awareness and implementing interventions for possible modifiable risk factors may be valuable for pulmonary rehabilitation. FUNDING This work was financially supported by Emergency Key Program of Guangzhou Laboratory (EKPG21-29, EKPG21-31), Incubation Program of National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars by Guangzhou Medical University (GMU2020-207).
Collapse
Key Words
- ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
- ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome
- CIs, confidence intervals
- COVID-19
- COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019
- CT, computerized tomography
- DLCO
- DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide
- DLNO, diffusion capacity for nitric oxide
- GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation
- HR, hazard ratio
- MERS, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
- Meta-analysis
- NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa scale
- OR, odds ratio
- PFTs, pulmonary function tests
- Pulmonary diffusion function
- RASI, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors
- RR, relative risk
- RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
- Risk factors
- SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
- TSS, total severity score
- WHO, World Health Organization
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haopeng Zhi
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaolong Ji
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Zifan Zhao
- Nanshan College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China
| | - Hanwen Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuxin Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Yiting Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingyu Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Chen Zhan
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Yi Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Xilong Deng
- Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, 510060, Guangdong, China
| | - Shiyue Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Corresponding authors.
| | - Nanshan Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Guangzhou Laboratory, Bio-Island, Guangzhou, 510320, Guangdong, China
- Corresponding authors.
| | - Mei Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Guangzhou Laboratory, Bio-Island, Guangzhou, 510320, Guangdong, China
- Corresponding authors.
| | - Ruchong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
- Guangzhou Laboratory, Bio-Island, Guangzhou, 510320, Guangdong, China
- Lead contact: State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health; Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. 151, Yanjiangxi Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iijima H, Takahashi M. Microcurrent Therapy as a Therapeutic Modality for Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review Accelerating the Translation From Clinical Trials to Patient Care. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2021; 3:100145. [PMID: 34589695 PMCID: PMC8463469 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To summarize the level of knowledge regarding the effects of microcurrent therapy (MCT) on musculoskeletal pain in adults. Data Sources The PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi database were searched from the time of their inception to December 2020. Study Selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of MCT on musculoskeletal pain were included. Additionally, non-RCTs were included to assess the adverse events. Data Extraction The primary outcomes were pain and adverse events related to MCT. To assess the reproducibility of MCT, we evaluated the completeness of treatment description using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. We also assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Data Synthesis A comprehensive assessment of 4 RCTs and 5 non-RCTs that met the inclusion criteria revealed that MCT significantly improved shoulder pain (1 study, 40 patients) and knee pain (1 study, 52 patients) compared with sham MCT without any severe adverse events. MCT has clinically significant benefits for knee pain. This study also revealed a clinically significant placebo response in treating knee pain. This evidence highlights the substantial effect of placebo response in clinical care. These treatment effects on knee pain are further supported by the high quality of evidence in GRADE with high reproducibility in TIDieR. Conclusions The findings of this meta-analysis highlight the effect of placebo response in treating knee pain. MCT is a potential, core nonpharmacologic treatment option in clinical care with minimal adverse events and should be further investigated. This study proposes a framework for the future investigation of the effect of MCT on musculoskeletal pain to enhance the study quality and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotaka Iijima
- Department of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaki Takahashi
- Department of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|