Validating Goal Attainment in Veterans Undergoing Decompressive Laminectomy: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

Although decompressive laminectomy (DL) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common procedure among older adults, it is unclear whether surgical definitions of success translate into patient-defined success. Using goal attainment scaling (GAS) to compare goal achievement between individuals, we investigated the relationship between surgical-defined functional recovery and achievement of personalized goals in patients who underwent DL for LSS.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-eight community-dwelling veterans scheduled to undergo DL.

METHODS

Participants were interviewed over the phone to set 1-year post-DL goals within 30 days before undergoing DL. Brigham Spinal Stenosis (BSS) score, comorbidities, cognitive function, and psychological factors also were assessed. GAS and BSS were repeated 1 year after DL. GAS scores were transformed into GAS-T scores (T-score transformation) to standardize achievement between patients and GAS-T change scores to compare study variables.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 28 participants had successful DL outcomes by BSS standards, though none of the participants achieved all of their GAS goals, with follow-up GAS-T scores averaging 44.5 ± 16.8. All three BSS scales positively correlated with GAS-T change scores: severity change r = 0.52, P = 0.005; physical function change r = 0.51, P = 0.006; and satisfaction r = 0.70, P < 0.001. Covariate analysis revealed a negative correlation between GAS-T change score and fear-avoidance beliefs: r = -0.41, P = -0.029.

CONCLUSION

There was congruent validity between GAS and the BSS in older veterans undergoing DL for LSS. Given the need for patient-centered care in older adults, future investigations exploring GAS in larger studies that target additional pain conditions and include participants with greater demographic diversity are warranted.

[Concepts and assessment methods in lower urinary tract symptoms: From symptom score to Patient-Reported Outcomes and Outcomes (PRO)]

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of pelvic perineal treatments has changed significantly in recent years. Initially focused on the assessment of symptoms, quality of life or patient satisfaction, it has gradually turned to new concepts, such as Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) and Goal Attainment (GA).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the different concepts and methods of assessment available, in recent years, in the context of urinary functional pathologies such as bladder overactivity or urinary incontinence.

METHODS

We conducted a non-systematic literature review to identify the main questionnaires and tools available to evaluate treatment outcomes. Oncology and pediatrics questionnaire has been excluded.

RESULTS

In functional pathology (overactive bladder or incontinence), the objective of treatment is to meet the expectations of patients and it is important to be able to assess the feelings of patients. In this context, new specific questionnaires have been developed to evaluate the PROs. For about ten years, these subjective criteria, are more and more widespread in the evaluation of treatments. A new field then appeared, namely Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) and Self Appreciation Goal Attainment (SAGA), allowing to determine with the patient, the expected objectives of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

These concepts of PRO and GAS open up a new domain in the evaluation of treatments, with a subjective view of the results. They deserve to be integrated into the usual, objective evaluations, in order to adapt the treatment of the patients, according to the real impact of the treatment.

Mid- and long-term effects of family constellation seminars in a general population sample: 8- and 12-month follow-up

In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), short-term efficacy of family constellation seminars (FCSs) in a general population sample was demonstrated. In this article, we examined mid- and long-term stability of these effects. Participants were 104 adults (M = 47 years; SD = 9; 84% female) who were part of the intervention group in the original RCT (3-day FCS; 64 active participants and 40 observing participants). FCSs were carried out according to manuals. It was predicted that FCSs would improve psychological functioning (Outcome Questionnaire OQ-45.2) at 8- and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, we assessed the effects of FCSs on psychological distress, motivational incongruence, individuals' experience in their personal social systems, and overall goal attainment. Participants yielded significant improvement in psychological functioning (d = 0.41 at 8-month follow-up, p = .000; d = 0.40 at 12-month follow-up, p = .000). Results were confirmed for psychological distress, motivational incongruence, the participants' experience in their personal social systems, and overall goal attainment. No adverse events were reported. This study provides first evidence for the mid- and long-term efficacy of FCSs in a nonclinical population. The implications of the findings are discussed.