Haplo-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Plus Cord Blood Grafts for Hematologic Malignancies Might Lead to Lower Relapse Compared with Haplo-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Plus Bone Marrow Grafts

To compare the outcomes between peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)+cord blood and PBSC+bone marrow (BM) grafts in the setting of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation, 110 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 54 recipients of haplo-PBSC+cord transplants and 56 recipients of haplo-PBSC+BM transplants. Chimerism analyses revealed that by day 30 post-transplantation, 94.3% of surviving patients in the haplo-PBSC+cord group had achieved full haploidentical chimerism and 5.7% had <10% cord chimerism, whereas 100% of surviving patients in the haplo-PBSC+BM group had achieved full donor chimerism. The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment at 30 days was 92.6% in the haplo-PBSC+cord group versus 89.3% in the haplo-PBSC+BM group (P =.024), that of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 31.5% versus 48.2% (P =.060), and 1-year relapse was 13.0% versus 25.0% (P =.027), nonrelapse mortality was 9.3% versus 12.5% (P =.76), disease-free survival (DFS) was 77.7% versus 62.5% (P =.028), and overall survival (OS) was 81.4% versus 69.6% (P =.046). Multivariate analysis identified haplo-PBSC+cord transplantation as a protective factor for relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .31; P =.007), DFS (HR, .40; P =.007), and OS (HR, .44; P =.016). Overall, haplo-PBSC+cord transplantation led to faster platelet engraftment, lower relapse, and superior DFS and OS compared with haplo-PBSC+BM transplantation and thus might be a better transplant mode in the setting of HID transplantation.

Natural Killer Cell Alloreactivity Predicted By Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Ligand Mismatch Does Not Impact Engraftment in Umbilical Cord Blood and Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation

Natural killer cell alloreactivity is determined by killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) ligands in donor and recipient pairs. A small, single institution study suggested that the risk of primary graft failure after cord blood hematopoietic cell transplantation (CBT) can be predicted by host-versus-graft (HvG)-directed natural killer cell alloreactivity. In the haploidentical transplantation (Haplo HCT) cohort, graft failures were observed only in graft-versus-host (GvH) KIR ligand mismatched pairs. A subsequent study was designed to explore the association between HvG and GvH KIR ligand mismatching and engraftment in both CBT and Haplo HCT using the large, multicenter transplant population of the Center for International Blood and Transplant Research database. Nine hundred single CBT (sCBT), 954 double CBT (dCBT), and 671 Haplo HCT performed between 2008 and 2017 for acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndrome were examined. Several models of KIR-L interactions were analyzed by multiple regression analyses for their association with engraftment, overall survival (OS), and transplant-related mortality (TRM). In sCBT, although HvG or bidirectional KIR ligand mismatch (KIR-L-MM) was initially associated with higher TRM in the first 6 months after transplantation, this effect was nullified after 6 months such that long-term survival was not different compared to GvH KIR-L-MM or KIR-L matched (KIR-L-M) pairs. There was no significant difference in neutrophil and platelet engraftment. In dCBT, no significant differences were seen in engraftment, OS and TRM. In the Haplo cohort there was faster platelet recovery in the GvH KIR-L-MM/KIR-L-M pairs versus HvG KIR-L-MM or bidirectional mismatch (HR 1.23, P= .0116). There was no significant association with OS, TRM, or neutrophil engraftment. In this large registry study, KIR-L mismatching did not significantly impact engraftment, TRM, or survival in CBT and Haplo HCT, although an association with platelet engraftment in Haplo HCT was demonstrated.

[Comparison of the clinical outcomes of haploidentical and matched-sibling donor stem cell transplantation for T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in complete remission]

目的

比较亲缘单倍型造血干细胞移植（HIDT）和同胞相合造血干细胞移植（MSDT）治疗完全缓解期（CR）急性T淋巴细胞白血病（T-ALL）的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2012年5月至2017年5月间在河北燕达陆道培医院接受HIDT（81例）和MSDT（17例）的CR期T-ALL患者的临床特点和预后。

结果

HIDT组、MSDT组移植后100 d Ⅱ～Ⅳ度急性GVHD发生率分别为51.9％（95％CI42.0％～64.0％）、29.4％（95％CI 14.1％～61.4％）（P＝0.072），Ⅲ/Ⅳ度急性GVHD发生率分别为9.8％（95％CI 5.1％～19.1％）、11.8％（95％CI 3.2％～43.3％）（P＝1.000），巨细胞病毒（CMV）血症发生率分别为53.1％（95％CI 43.3％～65.2％）、29.4％（95％CI 14.1％～61.4％）（P＝0.115），EB病毒（EBV）血症发生率分别为35.8％（95％CI 26.8％～47.9％）、11.8％（95％CI 3.2％～43.3％）（P＝0.048）。HIDT、MSDT两组移植后5年总生存（OS）率分别为60.5％（95％CI 5.4％～49.0％）、68.8％（95％CI 11.8％～40.0％）（P＝0.315），无白血病生存（LFS）率分别为58.0％（95％CI 5.5％～46.5％）、68.8％（95％CI11.8％～40.0％）（P＝0.258），累积复发率分别为16.1％（95％ CI 9.8％～26.4％）、11.8％（95％ CI3.2％～43.3％）（P＝0.643），非复发死亡率（NRM）分别为25.9％（95％CI 17.9％～37.5％）、19.4％（95％CI6.9％～54.4％）（P＝0.386）。

结论

对于CR期T-ALL患者，当缺乏合适供者时，HIDT可作为替代选择。

Haploidentical donor is preferred over matched sibling donor for pre-transplantation MRD positive ALL: a phase 3 genetically randomized study

Background

Previous reports suggest a benefit associated with haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) compared to matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) in certain contexts, and the choice of optimal candidates warrants further investigation.

Methods

We designed a prospective genetically randomized study to evaluate donor options between acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients positive for measurable residual disease (MRD) pre-transplantation who underwent HIDT (n = 169) or MSDT (n = 39).

Results

The cumulative incidence of positive MRD post-transplantation was 26% (95% CI, 19–33%) and 44% (95% CI, 28–60%) for HIDT and MSDT, respectively (P = 0.043). Compared to the HIDT cohort, the MSDT cohort had a higher 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 47%, 95% CI, 31–63% vs. 23%, 95% CI, 17–29%; P = 0.006) and lower 3-year probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS; 43%, 95% CI, 27–59% vs. 65%, 95% CI, 58–72%; P = 0.023) and overall survival (OS; 46%, 95% CI, 30–62% vs. 68%, 95% CI, 61–75%; P = 0.039), without a difference in non-relapse-mortality (10%, 95% CI, 1–19% vs. 11%, 95% CI, 6–16%; P = 0.845). Multivariate analysis showed that HIDT is associated with a low CIR (HR = 0.364; 95% CI, 0.202–0.655; P = 0.001) and better LFS (HR = 0.414; 95% CI, 0.246–0.695; P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.380; 95% CI, 0.220–0.656; P = 0.001).

Conclusions

HIDT is better than MSDT in view of favorable anti-leukemia activity for patients with pre-transplantation MRD positive ALL. The current study paves the way to determine that haploidentical donors are the preferred choice regardless of available matched sibling donors in a subgroup population.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02185261. Registered July 9, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02185261?term=NCT02185261&draw=2&rank=1.