Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and holistic patient management in 2023

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring. In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants. The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term "lines of therapy" no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset.

High-efficacy therapies reduce clinical and radiological events more effectively than traditional treatments in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

People with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (pwNMOSD) experience debilitating neurological attacks, resulting in permanent disability.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if high-efficacy treatment was better than traditional agents at preventing disease advancement in pwNMOSD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of pwNMOSD at one academic center was performed. Timelines were created for treatments subjects were exposed to along with clinical/radiological events related to disease worsening. High-efficacy treatments included eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab, tocilizumab, and sarilumab while therapies such as azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil were classified as traditional agents. Poisson regression and mixed effects logistics models were constructed, and a subject-specific random intercept was used for intrasubject correlation.

RESULTS

Of 189 pwNMOSD identified, 161 were aquaporin-4 IgG positive (AQP4 +) with 92 (77 female; median disease duration (MDD) (range) of 6.6 years (y) (1.2-18.6)) exposed only to high-efficacy therapy, 33 (28 female; 10.4 y (0.8-32.7)) only to traditional therapy, and 64 (54 female; 10.8 y (0.7-20.2)) to both. High-efficacy treatments reduced the rate of MRI advancement by 62.4% (95% CrI = [- 86.9%, - 16.8%]), relapses by 99.8% (95% CrI = [- 99.9%, - 99.6%]), and hospitalizations by 99.3% (95% CrI = [- 99.6%, - 98.8%]) when compared to traditional treatments. For AQP4 + subjects, a 655.7-fold increase in the odds of new spinal cord lesion development (95% CrI = [+ 37.4-fold, + 3239.5-fold]) was observed with traditional agents (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

High-efficacy treatments maximize opportunity for preventing disease advancement in newly diagnosed and established pwNMOSD.