1
|
Abdellatife OE, Makowsky MJ. Factors influencing Implementation of point-of-care testing for acute respiratory infectious diseases in community pharmacies: A scoping review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation research. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:1-24. [PMID: 38431516 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence suggests pharmacy-based point-of-care (POC) testing for acute respiratory infectious diseases is beneficial, but not widely implemented. A theory-informed review to understand the factors influencing service Implementation is lacking. OBJECTIVE To examine the extent, range, and nature of research available on enablers and barriers to POC testing Implementation for infectious respiratory diseases in community pharmacies and identify their underpinning theoretical constructs using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHODS Scoping review guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. A comprehensive search from inception to June 28th, 2022 was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest dissertations without date or language restriction. Eligible articles investigated barriers and/or facilitators to strep throat, influenza, C-reactive protein, and COVID-19 POC testing in community pharmacies. Two reviewers independently performed title & abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction. Content analysis was conducted according to a pre-established Framework and concepts were mapped to the CFIR. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included. Most originated from the USA (n = 24; 56%) and investigated strep throat. The majority were testing/initial Implementation projects (n = 23; 54%) conducted in urban centers (n = 17; 40%). Thirty-six (84%) studies used quantitative methodology, while 6 (14%) were qualitative. Only four studies (9%) used theory to guide their inquiry. The 124 identified Implementation factors mapped onto 21 CFIR constructs, covering all 5 domains. The domain "Outer setting" (n = 35/43; 81%) was most prevalent as were the constructs "Patient needs and resources," (n = 21/43; 49%) "External policy & incentives," (n = 17/43; 40%) and "Relative advantage" (n = 17/43; 40%). CONCLUSION A large volume of research explores factors influencing the Implementation of pharmacy-based respiratory infectious disease POC testing services, but few studies use qualitative or theory-informed methods. Knowledge of the wide range of facilitators and barriers identified can help pharmacy managers and researchers design strategies to support successful service Implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar E Abdellatife
- Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1C9
| | - Mark J Makowsky
- Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1C9.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Labbé D, Heider A, Eisenberg Y, Gould R, Jones R. Reflection on the application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to a national policy to improve inclusion of people with disabilities. Eval Program Plann 2024; 102:102367. [PMID: 37708627 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
People with disabilities face many barriers in the built environment impacting their mobility, health, and social participation. In the US, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), municipalities were required to develop and implement barrier-removal plans for pedestrian infrastructure, called ADA transition plans, but very few have done so. Many communities know they need a plan but do not know how to get it done because of a lack of understanding of the many different implementation considerations. Implementation science offers a useful approach for understanding complex policy implementation such as ADA plans. This paper provides a reflection on the adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to evaluate the implementation of ADA transition planning. To apply the CFIR, we tailored the construct definitions and modified them to fit the specific context of the ADA transition planning process. We documented the constructs that were more challenging to apply, those that were not relevant, and those that were particularly useful. This paper can serve as a valuable example that other researchers can use when considering adapting the CFIR or other implementation frameworks for the evaluation of complex social policy beyond the ADA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Labbé
- Great Lakes ADA Center, Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1640 W. Roosevelt Rd. M/C 626, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.
| | - Amy Heider
- Great Lakes ADA Center, Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1640 W. Roosevelt Rd. M/C 626, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
| | - Yochai Eisenberg
- Great Lakes ADA Center, Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1640 W. Roosevelt Rd. M/C 626, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
| | - Robert Gould
- Great Lakes ADA Center, Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1640 W. Roosevelt Rd. M/C 626, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
| | - Robin Jones
- Great Lakes ADA Center, Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1640 W. Roosevelt Rd. M/C 626, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hareem A, Lee J, Stupans I, Park JS, Wang K. Benefits and barriers associated with e-prescribing in community pharmacy - A systematic review. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm 2023; 12:100375. [PMID: 38145236 PMCID: PMC10746557 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The utilization of electronic prescribing is growing, prompted by lockdown measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, despite this increasing adoption, there is a notable dearth of consolidated evidence regarding the challenges and opportunities associated with the integration of electronic prescribing systems within the daily clinical practices of community pharmacists. Objective This paper aims to systematically review the community pharmacists' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to electronic prescribing, addressing the significant need for understanding how electronic prescribing impacts the workflow and decision-making processes of pharmacists, ultimately influencing the quality of patient care. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to October 25, 2022, using search terms related to electronic prescribing, computerised physician order entry, community/retail pharmacies, and pharmacists. Results A total of 28 studies were included in the systematic review. In these studies, community pharmacists perceived that design, interoperability, attitude towards e-prescribing technology, information quality, workflow, productivity, and accessible resources facilitated e-prescribing. In addition, the included studies emphasized the importance of technological support for the successful implementation of electronic prescribing systems. The system's design characteristics significantly improve e-prescribing technology's favourable effects. According to our review, it has been proposed that a poorly designed e-prescribing system can have a negative impact on the quality of care, implementation, and user satisfaction. In contrast, a well-designed system can significantly contribute to improvements. Conclusions The review highlighted that e-prescribing has both barriers and facilitators, with the quality of the system and its implementation influencing these factors. Technical issues and user acceptance (patient/prescribers/pharmacists) can act as barriers or enablers, highlighting the need for comprehensive consideration and monitoring of e-prescribing to identify and address potential issues.
Collapse
|
4
|
Scheffler B, Schimböck F, Schöler A, Rösner K, Spallek J, Kopkow C. Current physical therapy practice and implementation factors regarding the evidence-based 'Rehabilitation of Mobility after Stroke (ReMoS)' guideline in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:284. [PMID: 35907809 PMCID: PMC9338587 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02780-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of the current physical therapy practice for German stroke rehabilitation with respect to the 'Rehabilitation of Mobility after Stroke (ReMoS)' guideline recommendations and the associated implementation factors. METHODS A descriptive cross-sectional study employing an online survey was performed among German physical therapists in 2019. The survey consisted of three sections with open and closed questions: 1) self-reported use of ReMoS recommendations, 2) barriers of guideline use and 3) socio-demographic characteristics. The benchmark level for guideline adherent physical therapy was set at > 80%. RESULTS Data from 170 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Participants' mean age was 41.6 years, 69.4% were female, while 60.1% had no academic degree. The ReMoS guideline was unknown to 52.9% of the responders. Out of all the 46 ReMoS guideline recommendations, only 'intensive walking training without a treadmill' was reported to be performed in a guideline adherent manner. Respondents usually denied any personal limitations, such as limited knowledge, or that the ReMoS guideline did not fit their routine practice. CONCLUSIONS Among German physical therapists, the ReMoS guideline is not well-known and many interventions are not performed as recommended, illustrating the discrepancies between the ReMoS guideline recommendations and current physical therapy practice. Interventions aimed at overcoming this gap should consider both knowledge of existing barriers and facilitators of guideline usage. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered to the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00026681 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Scheffler
- Department of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Universitaetsplatz 1, 01968, Senftenberg, Germany.
| | - Florian Schimböck
- Department of Nursing Sciences and Clinical Nursing, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Almut Schöler
- Department of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Universitaetsplatz 1, 01968, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Rösner
- Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Luebeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jacob Spallek
- Department of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- Department of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Universitaetsplatz 1, 01968, Senftenberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cooper J, Murphy J, Woods C, Van Nassau F, McGrath A, Callaghan D, Carroll P, Kelly P, Murphy N, Murphy M. Barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based physical activity interventions: a qualitative systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2021; 18:118. [PMID: 34493306 PMCID: PMC8422651 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01177-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over the past decade several physical activity (PA) interventions have been shown to be efficacious in a controlled research setting, however there is a continued lack of evidence for how to successfully implement these PA interventions in real-world settings such as the community. This review aims to explore the barriers and facilitators that affect the implementation of community-based PA interventions and make recommendations to improve implementation from the included studies. Methods A systematic literature search of EBSCOhost, Scopus, PUBMED and Web of Science was conducted to identify articles that reported qualitative data on the implementation factors of community-based interventions where PA was a primary outcome. Data were extracted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guide. Implementation factors and recommendations were then mapped onto the 5 domains of the CFIR and synthesised thematically. Results From 495 articles, a total of 13 eligible studies were identified, with 6 studies using a mixed methods approach, and 7 reporting qualitative methods only. There were 82 implementation factors identified, including 37 barriers and 45 facilitators, and a further 26 recommendations from the papers across all 5 domains of the CFIR. More barriers than facilitators were identified within the CFIR domain inner setting, in contrast to all other domains where facilitator numbers outweighed barriers. Conclusions This review identified many facilitators and barriers of implementing physical activity interventions in the community. A key finding of this review was the impact of implementation strategies on successful implementation of community PA interventions. From the evidence, it was clear that many barriers to implementation could have been negated or reduced by an implementation plan in which several strategies are embedded. The findings of this review also suggest more attention to individual’ skills and involvement is needed to improve self-efficacy and knowledge. The role of individuals across all organisational levels, from providers to leaders, can impact on the implementation of an intervention and its success. Trial registration PROSPERO - CRD42020153821. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01177-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemima Cooper
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Physical Education & Sport Sciences Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Joey Murphy
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Physical Education & Sport Sciences Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Catherine Woods
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Physical Education & Sport Sciences Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. .,Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Femke Van Nassau
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aisling McGrath
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland
| | | | - Paula Carroll
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Paul Kelly
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Niamh Murphy
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Marie Murphy
- Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Ulster University, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moussa L, Benrimoj S, Musial K, Kocbek S, Garcia-Cardenas V. Data-driven approach for tailoring facilitation strategies to overcome implementation barriers in community pharmacy. Implement Sci 2021; 16:73. [PMID: 34281587 PMCID: PMC8290596 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01138-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation research has delved into barriers to implementing change and interventions for the implementation of innovation in practice. There remains a gap, however, that fails to connect implementation barriers to the most effective implementation strategies and provide a more tailored approach during implementation. This study aimed to explore barriers for the implementation of professional services in community pharmacies and to predict the effectiveness of facilitation strategies to overcome implementation barriers using machine learning techniques. Methods Six change facilitators facilitated a 2-year change programme aimed at implementing professional services across community pharmacies in Australia. A mixed methods approach was used where barriers were identified by change facilitators during the implementation study. Change facilitators trialled and recorded tailored facilitation strategies delivered to overcome identified barriers. Barriers were coded according to implementation factors derived from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Tailored facilitation strategies were coded into 16 facilitation categories. To predict the effectiveness of these strategies, data mining with random forest was used to provide the highest level of accuracy. A predictive resolution percentage was established for each implementation strategy in relation to the barriers that were resolved by that particular strategy. Results During the 2-year programme, 1131 barriers and facilitation strategies were recorded by change facilitators. The most frequently identified barriers were a ‘lack of ability to plan for change’, ‘lack of internal supporters for the change’, ‘lack of knowledge and experience’, ‘lack of monitoring and feedback’, ‘lack of individual alignment with the change’, ‘undefined change objectives’, ‘lack of objective feedback’ and ‘lack of time’. The random forest algorithm used was able to provide 96.9% prediction accuracy. The strategy category with the highest predicted resolution rate across the most number of implementation barriers was ‘to empower stakeholders to develop objectives and solve problems’. Conclusions Results from this study have provided a better understanding of implementation barriers in community pharmacy and how data-driven approaches can be used to predict the effectiveness of facilitation strategies to overcome implementation barriers. Tailored facilitation strategies such as these can increase the rate of real-time implementation of innovations in healthcare, leading to an industry that can confidently and efficiently adapt to continuous change. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01138-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Moussa
- Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
| | - Shalom Benrimoj
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Katarzyna Musial
- Advanced Analytics Institute, School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
| | - Simon Kocbek
- Advanced Analytics Institute, School of Software, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
| | - Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
- Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moecker R, Terstegen T, Haefeli WE, Seidling HM. The influence of intervention complexity on barriers and facilitators in the implementation of professional pharmacy services - A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 17:1651-1662. [PMID: 33579611 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacies increasingly offer professional pharmacy services, whose implementation is often influenced by facilitating or obstructive implementation factors. The occurrence and composition of implementation factors vary among different services with discrete characteristics and complexity of the intervention, making it difficult to foresee potential barriers in implementation. OBJECTIVE(S) This paper investigates potential associations between intervention complexity and occurring implementation factors. METHODS A systematic literature search on the implementation factors and intervention complexity of professional pharmacy services in the community setting was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) throughout December 2018. Implementation factors were extracted from semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and surveys with community pharmacists and categorized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The complexity of each service was assessed using the following complexity parameters: (I) number of involved healthcare professions, (II) number of service components such as recruiting of patients, screening intervention, and follow-up, (III) frequency of the service, (IV) expenditure of time per patient (encounter), and (V) workflow distortion, i.e. booking appointments for intervention with the patient. Finally, the association between implementation factors and intervention complexity was analyzed by quantifying implementation factors and by relating them to specific intervention characteristics using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS 15 studies covering a broad spectrum of professional pharmacy services were included. There was a trend that in services with higher complexity more implementation factors occurred (p = 0.094). Single key complexity parameters can trigger specific implementation factors. For instance, general practitioner and pharmacy technician involvement were significantly associated with interprofessional communication and leadership engagement, respectively. CONCLUSION Key implementation factors and associated complexity parameters seem to be of similar or more importance than the total number of implementation factors with regard to successful implementation. By assessing various complexity parameters of an intervention, potential key barriers could be identified and subsequently addressed prior to implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Moecker
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Theresa Terstegen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Walter E Haefeli
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Hanna M Seidling
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pérez-Escamilla B, Benrimoj SI, Martínez-Martínez F, Gastelurrutia MÁ, Varas-Doval R, Musial-Gabrys K, Garcia-Cardenas V. Using network analysis to explore factors moderating the implementation of a medication review service in community pharmacy. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020; 18:2432-2443. [PMID: 33461944 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation factors are hypothesised to moderate the implementation of innovations. Although individual barriers and facilitators have been identified for the implementation of different evidence-based services in pharmacy, relationships between implementation factors are usually not considered. OBJECTIVES To examine how a network of implementation factors and the position of each factor within this network structure influences the implementation of a medication review service in community pharmacy. METHODS A mixed methods approach was used. Medication review with follow-up service was the innovation to be implemented over 12 months in community pharmacies. A network analysis to model relationships between implementation factors was undertaken. Two networks were created. RESULTS Implementation factors hindering the service implementation with the highest centrality measures were time, motivation, recruitment, individual identification with the organization and personal characteristics of the pharmacists. Three hundred and sixty-nine different interrelationships between implementation factors were identified. Important causal relationships between implementation factors included: workflow-time; characteristics of the pharmacy-time; personal characteristics of the pharmacists-motivation. Implementation factors facilitating the implementation of the service with highest centrality scores were motivation, individual identification with the organization, beliefs, adaptability, recruitment, external support and leadership. Four hundred and fifty-six different interrelationships were identified. The important causal relationships included: motivation-external support; structure-characteristics of the pharmacy; demographics-location of the pharmacy. CONCLUSION Network analysis has proven to be a useful technique to explore networks of factors moderating the implementation of a pharmacy service. Relationships were complex with most implementation factors being interrelated. Motivation and individual identification with the organisation seemed critical factors in both hindering and facilitating the service implementation. The results can inform the design of implementation programs and tailored strategies to promote faster implementation of innovations in pharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Pérez-Escamilla
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Grupo de Investigación en Atención Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Sección de Farmacia Asistencial, Social y Legal, 5(a) planta, 18011, Granada, Spain.
| | - Shalom I Benrimoj
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Grupo de Investigación en Atención Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Sección de Farmacia Asistencial, Social y Legal, 5(a) planta, 18011, Granada, Spain.
| | - Fernando Martínez-Martínez
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Grupo de Investigación en Atención Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Sección de Farmacia Asistencial, Social y Legal, 5(a) planta, 18011, Granada, Spain.
| | - Miguel Ángel Gastelurrutia
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Grupo de Investigación en Atención Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Sección de Farmacia Asistencial, Social y Legal, 5(a) planta, 18011, Granada, Spain.
| | - Raquel Varas-Doval
- General Pharmaceutical Council of Spain, Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos, Calle Villanueva 11, 7(a) planta, 28001, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Katarzyna Musial-Gabrys
- University of Technology Sydney, School of Computer Science, Advanced Analytics Institute, School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
- University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kilburn JE, Shapiro CJ, Hardin JW. Linking implementation of evidence-based parenting programs to outcomes in early intervention. Res Dev Disabil 2017; 70:50-58. [PMID: 28889071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In the field of early intervention, only a few studies of parenting interventions include both participant and facilitator behaviors. Fidelity and supervision (facilitator characteristics) and dosage and satisfaction (participant characteristics) were tested on the outcome of improved parenting style in a sample of 36 parents of young children with disabilities. Results indicated that the facilitator behavior of fidelity was significantly and negatively related to the program outcome of parenting style; no effect was found for the facilitator behavior of supervision. For the participant behaviors, both dosage and satisfaction had non-significant relationships with the program outcome of parenting style at follow-up. The surprising negative relationship between content fidelity and parenting style was discussed.Two possible explanations were: (1) process or quality of intervention delivery is more influential than content fidelity, which considers only adherence to the intervention manual, and (2) the developmental stage of early intervention families calls for more focus on relationships between facilitators and parents and less on content of the specific intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice E Kilburn
- South Carolina First Steps to School Readiness, 1300 Sumter Street, Suite 100, Columbia, SC 29201, United States.
| | - Cheri J Shapiro
- Institute for Families in Society, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States
| | - James W Hardin
- Biostatistics Collaborative Unit, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Main CJ, Nicholas MK, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs. J Occup Rehabil 2016; 26:448-464. [PMID: 27796914 PMCID: PMC5104783 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9677-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, "Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability", held October 14-16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4 ) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Main
- Arthritis Care UK Primary Care Center, Keele University, North Staffordshire, UK
| | - Michael K Nicholas
- Pain Management Research Institute, Sydney Medical School - Northern, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - William S Shaw
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Glenn Pransky
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|