Valid consent in the acute hospital setting: perspectives of patients and members of the public

BACKGROUND

People who interact with healthcare services have an ethical and legal right to control their own lives, to make informed decisions, and to consent to what happens to them. For consent to be considered ethically and legally valid, three key criteria must be met: consent must be given voluntarily; people must be sufficiently informed of all options; and people should have capacity to make the decision to give or withhold their consent.

AIM

This study set out to explore, through the use of surveys, the perspectives of patients and public in relation to consent.

METHOD

Surveys were developed for patients and the public and administered paper based (patients) and through social media (public).

RESULTS

One hundred and forty surveys were posted to patients, with a 38% response rate; 104 responses were received from the public. Ninety-six percent of patients were satisfied that the decision they made was informed; 100% felt they had made a voluntary decision; 98% felt the clinician seemed knowledgeable about the procedure. What matters most to the public were being informed about the risks associated with the proposed procedure and being assured that whatever choice they make they will receive the best care possible.

CONCLUSIONS

The results highlight interesting similarities and differences in relation to consent between members of the public thinking about a possible treatment, surgery, or procedure and those patients who have actually been through the process in the past 12 months. Recommendations have been developed on the basis of these findings to co-design improvements in consent practices.

How midwives facilitate informed decisions in the third stage of labour - an exploration through portraiture

PROBLEM

Midwifery philosophy promotes informed decision-making. Despite this, midwives report a lack of informed decision-making in standard maternity care systems.

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown a woman's ability to make informed decisions within her maternity care significantly impacts her childbearing experience. When informed decision-making is facilitated, women report positive experiences, whereas when lacking, there is an increased potential for birth trauma.

AIM

To explore midwives' experiences of facilitating informed decision-making, using third-stage management as context.

METHODS

Five midwives from Victoria, Australia, were interviewed about their experiences with informed decision-making. These interviews were guided by portraiture methodology whereby individual narrative portraits were created. This paper explores the shared themes among these five portraits.

FINDINGS

Five individual narrative portraits tell the stories of each midwife, providing rich insight into their philosophies, practices, barriers and enablers of informed decision-making. These are then examined as a whole dataset to explore shared themes, and include; 'informed decision-making is fundamental to midwifery practice' 'the system', and 'navigating the system'. The system contained the sub-themes; hierarchy in hospitals, the medicalisation of birth, and the impact on midwifery practice, and 'navigating the system' - contained; safety of the woman and safety of the midwife, and the gold-standard of midwifery.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Midwives in this study valued informed decision-making as fundamental to their philosophy but also faced barriers in their ability to facilitate it. Barriers to informed decision-making included: power-imbalances; de-skilling in physiological birth; fear of blame, and interdisciplinary disparities. Conversely enablers included continuity models of midwifery care, quality antenatal education, respectful interdisciplinary collaboration and an aim toward a resurgence of fundamental midwifery skills.

Getting animated about trauma - Using video animation as part of informed consent

INTRODUCTION

Trauma patients are often required to make an informed decision about surgery within a short space of time. Coming to terms with their injury may mean they have limited bandwidth for absorbing information, and it may be that they don't appreciate the risks and benefits of surgery discussed during consent. Current consent practice puts the emphasis on the clinician to ensure that all reasonable steps have been taken to explain risks and benefits to patients. We propose the use of video animations that patients can watch prior to surgery as a means of improving their understanding and overall experience.

METHODS

The video script was written and evaluated so that a high standard was achieved using the "Discern" instrument. The experiences of a focus group of 5 patients were used to guide script content. Using GoAnimate (GoAnimate Inc., San Mateo) a video was made with voice over provided by local drama students. The video was shown to 30 consecutive patients over a 2 month period. We included any patient with an ankle fracture managed operatively who had been consented (form 1). Evaluation consisted of interview with patients consisting of 2 focussed questions and one open. Responses to the questions were collated and grouped into positive and negative descriptors.

RESULTS

68 (81%) positive descriptors were recorded from patients' interviews versus 16 (19%) negative. Positive descriptors related to improved retention, information giving, technical detail, consolidations of information given during consent. Negatives were caveats that video couldn't replace face-to-face consent, the degree of detail being off-putting and not adding anything to standard consent.

CONCLUSION

The video was well received by patients with subjective improvements being made to their understanding, retention and sharing of technical detail. The face-to-face discussion between patient and doctor remains very important to them and the video should look to augment this.

Unconscious Bias, Racism, and Trauma-Informed Policing: an Address and Message to the Connecticut Racial Profiling Prohibition Project Advisory Board

As a community member of the Connecticut Racial Profiling Prohibition Project Advisory Board, I wish to acknowledge the group for its work, but to make clear there is much more to be done. While the state's data show more parity across departments, we know that unconscious bias and racism still exists. I wish to advocate for the committee's work to focus on answering three new questions. 1. How does the community feel about its relationship with the police? 2. How do those who are stopped by the police feel about their experience? 3. To what extent do the police understand the principles of unconscious bias, racism, and trauma-informed policing? How effectively do they use that knowledge to help work with communities in policing?

Should patients be informed about the side effects of psychotropic drugs? According to us: Yes

BACKGROUND

In our daily clinical practice, we observe that patients who were informed about the probable side effects of any medication experience less side effects. For this reason, we decided to examine this in a systematic investigation.

METHODS

We divided patients into two groups, the informed and uninformed one about side effects of the drugs. During the control examination, tolerability of the drugs given was questioned in detail.

RESULTS

At the end of one month, the mean total UKU score was statistically significantly lower in patients from the informed group compared to that of the uninformed one (p < 0.05). The proportion of patients who discontinued the drug during the one month-period was statistically significantly higher in the uninformed group compared to informed group 9% in the informed group vs. 25% in the uninformed group) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Finally, we found that giving information about the side effects of a psychopharmacological agent seems to be useful and to provide beneficial effects on the tolerability of the drug, independent of the kind of psychotropic agent.