Emotional fear of COVID-19, but not physiological expressions of fear, explains variability in COVID-19's impact on individuals' lives

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound and robust impact on individuals' lives and has particularly negatively affected individuals' experiences with fear of catching COVID-19. To measure this fear, researchers created the unidimensional Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S). However, some exploratory factor analysis studies suggested the presence of two factors, which are 1) emotional fear and 2) physiological expressions of fear. In the current exploratory study, we aimed to confirm this factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis and to examine how these two new factors of the FCV-19S explain variability in the impacts of COVID-19 on nine life domains (i.e., finances, loved ones, job, safety, school, mental health, physical health, social activities, and quality of life). Participants were undergraduate students (n = 224) from a Midwestern University (White: 60.7%; Male: 48.0%) who participated in the study for course credit. The results revealed that the two-factor model had an excellent fit for the FCV-19S, both subscales had excellent psychometric properties, and the emotional fear subscale significantly explained variability in all nine life domains (7% to 54%). However, the physiological fear subscale only significantly explained variability in the physical health domain along with emotional fear (28%). The findings suggested that emotional fear of COVID-19 may explain more variability in the impact of COVID-19 across life domains, while physiological fear may only explain the effects of COVID-19 on physical health. We further discussed implications, limitations, and future directions.

Amygdala size varies with stress perception

Stress is inevitably linked to life. It has many and complex facets. Notably, perception of stressful stimuli is an important factor when mounting stress responses and measuring its impact. Indeed, moved by the increasing number of stress-triggered pathologies, several groups drew on advanced neuroimaging techniques to explore stress effects on the brain. From that, several regions and circuits have been linked to stress, and a comprehensive integration of the distinct findings applied to common individuals is being pursued, but with conflicting results. Herein, we performed a volumetric regression analysis using participants’ perceived stress as a variable of interest. Data shows that increased levels of perceived stress positively associate with the right amygdala and anterior hippocampal volumes.

•

Discrepant stress effects on morphology are reported in the literature.

•

Stress definition and analysis software are the main causes of conflicting findings.

•

Psychological measures and multi-technique analysis are highly recommended.

•

We found that perceived stress positively associates with right amygdala volumes.

Voice Tremor Response to Deep Brain Stimulation in Relation to Electrode Location in the Posterior Subthalamic Area

Background

Deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) shows promising results for patients with voice tremor, although only for about 50% of patients. There are indications that voice tremor requires more focused stimulation within the target area compared with hand tremor. The objective of the present study was to determine the most efficient location for reducing voice tremor within the PSA.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients with essential tremor were evaluated off stimulation and in a set of experimental conditions with unilateral stimulation at increasing amplitude levels. Two listeners performed blinded assessments of voice tremor from recordings of sustained vowel productions.

Results

Twenty-five patients (68%) had voice tremor. Unilateral stimulation reduced voice tremor for the majority of patients, and only 6 patients had poor outcomes. Contacts yielding efficient voice tremor reduction were deeper relative to the midcommissural point (MCP) and more posterior relative to the posterior tip of the subthalamic nucleus (pSTN) (z^MCP = -3.1, y^pSTN = -0.2) compared with poor contacts (z^MCP = -0.7, y^pSTN = 1.0). High-amplitude stimulation worsened voice tremor for 7 patients and induced voice tremor in 2 patients. Hand tremor improved to a greater extent than voice tremor, and improvements could be seen throughout the target area.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that efficient voice tremor reduction can be achieved by stimulating contacts located in the inferior part of the PSA, close or slightly posterior to the pSTN. We observed cases in which voice tremor was induced by high-amplitude stimulation.