Inadvertently enriched cyanobacteria prompted bacterial phosphorus uptake without aeration in a conventional anaerobic/oxic reactor

The enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process requires alternate anaerobic and aerobic conditions, which are regulated respectively by aeration off and on. Recently, in an ordinary EBPR reactor, an abnormal orthophosphate concentration (PO43--P) decline in the anaerobic stage (namely non-aerated phosphorus uptake) aroused attention. It was not occasionally but occurred in each cycle and lasted for 101 d and shared about 16.63 % in the total P uptake amount. After excluding bio-mineralization and surface re-aeration, indoor light conditions (180 to 260 lx) inducing non-aerated P uptake were confirmed. High-throughput sequencing analysis revealed that cyanobacteria could produce oxygen via photosynthesis and were inhabited inside wall biofilm. The cyanobacteria (Pantalinema and Leptolyngbya ANT.L52.2) were incubated in a feeding transparent silicone hose, entered the reactor along with influent, and outcompeted Chlorophyta, which existed in the inoculum. Eventually, this work deciphered the reason for non-aerated phosphorus uptake and indicated its potential application in reducing CO2 emissions and energy consumption via the cooperation of microalgal-bacterial and biofilm-sludge.

Microalgal-bacterial biofilms for wastewater treatment: Operations, performances, mechanisms, and uncertainties

Microalgal-bacterial biofilms have been increasingly considered of great potential in wastewater treatment due to the advantages of microalgal-bacterial synergistic pollutants removal/recovery, CO2 sequestration, and cost-effective biomass-water separation. However, such advantages may vary widely among different types of microalgal-bacterial biofilms, as the biofilms could be formed on different shapes and structures of attachment substratum, generating "false hope" for certain systems in large-scale wastewater treatment if the operating conditions and pollutants removal properties are evaluated based on the general term "microalgal-bacterial biofilm". This study, therefore, classified microalgal-bacterial biofilms into biofilms formed on 2D substratum, biofilms formed on 3D substratum, and biofilms formed without substratum (i.e. microalgal-bacterial granular sludge, MBGS). Biofilms formed on 2D substratum display higher microalgae fractions and nutrients removal efficiencies, while the adopted long hydraulic retention times were unacceptable for large-scale wastewater treatment. MBGS are featured with much lower microalgae fractions, most efficient pollutants removal, and acceptable retention times for realistic application, yet the feasibility of using natural sunlight should be further explored. 3D substratum systems display wide variations in operating conditions and pollutants removal properties because of diversified substratum shapes and structures. 2D and 3D substratum biofilms share more common in eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbial community structures, while MGBS biofilms are more enriched with microorganisms favoring EPS production, biofilm formation, and denitrification. The specific roles of stratified extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in nutrients adsorption and condensation still require in-depth exploration. Nutrients removal uncertainties caused by microalgal-bacterial synergy decoupling under insufficient illumination, limited microbial community control, and possible greenhouse gas emission exacerbation arising from microalgal N2O generation were also indicated. This review is helpful for revealing the true potential of applying various microalgal-bacterial biofilms in large-scale wastewater treatment, and will provoke some insights on the challenges to the ideal state of synergistic pollutants reclamation and carbon neutrality via microalgal-bacterial interactions.