The histone acetyltransferase Mof regulates Runx2 and Osterix for osteoblast differentiation

Osteoblast differentiation is regulated by various transcription factors, signaling molecules, and posttranslational modifiers. The histone acetyltransferase Mof (Kat8) is involved in distinct physiological processes. However, the exact role of Mof in osteoblast differentiation and growth remains unknown. Herein, we demonstrated that Mof expression with histone H4K16 acetylation increased during osteoblast differentiation. Inhibition of Mof by siRNA knockdown or small molecule inhibitor, MG149 which is a potent histone acetyltransferase inhibitor, reduced the expression level and transactivation potential of osteogenic key markers, Runx2 and Osterix, thus inhibiting osteoblast differentiation. Besides, Mof overexpression also enhanced the protein levels of Runx2 and Osterix. Mof could directly bind the promoter region of Runx2/Osterix to potentiate their mRNA levels, possibly through Mof-mediated H4K16ac to facilitate the activation of transcriptional programs. Importantly, Mof physically interacts with Runx2/Osterix for the stimulation of osteoblast differentiation. Yet, Mof knockdown showed indistinguishable effect on cell proliferation or apoptosis in MSCs and preosteoblast cells. Taken together, our results uncover Mof functioning as a novel regulator of osteoblast differentiation via the promotional effects on Runx2/Osterix and rationalize Mof as a potential therapeutic target, like possible application of inhibitor MG149 for the treatment of osteosarcoma or developing specific Mof activator to ameliorate osteoporosis.

Modulation of H4K16Ac levels reduces pro-fibrotic gene expression and mitigates lung fibrosis in aged mice

Histone H4 lysine16 acetylation (H4K16Ac) modulates chromatin structure by serving as a switch from a repressive to a transcriptionally active state. This euchromatin mark is associated with active transcription. In this study, we investigated the effects of H4K16Ac on the expression of pro-fibrotic genes in lung fibroblasts from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and in an aging murine model of lung fibrosis. Methods: The lung tissues and fibroblasts from human IPF/non-IPF donors and from aged mice with/without bleomycin induced lung fibrosis were used in this study. The H4K16Ac levels were examined by immunohistochemistry or western blots. RNA silencing of H4K16Ac acetyltransferase Mof was used to reduce H4K16Ac levels in IPF fibroblasts. The effects of reduced H4K16Ac on pro-fibrotic gene expression were examined by western blots and real-time PCR. The association of H4K16Ac with these genes' promoter region were evaluated by ChIP assays. The gene expression profile in siRNA Mof transfected IPF cells were determined by RNA-Seq. The impact of H4K16Ac levels on lung fibrosis was evaluated in an aging murine model. Results: Aged mice with bleomycin induced lung fibrosis showed increased H4K16Ac levels. Human lung fibroblasts with siRNA Mof silencing demonstrated reduced H4K16Ac, and significantly down-regulated profibrotic genes, such as α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), collagen I, Nox4, and survivin. ChIP assays confirmed the associations of these pro-fibrotic genes' promoter region with H4K16Ac, while in siRNA Mof transfected cells the promoter/H4K16Ac associations were depleted. RNA-seq data demonstrated that Mof knockdown altered gene expression and cellular pathways, including cell damage and repair. In the aging mice model of persistent lung fibrosis, 18-month old mice given intra-nasal siRNA Mof from week 3 to 6 following bleomycin injury showed improved lung architecture, decreased total hydroxyproline content and lower levels of H4K16Ac. Conclusions: These results indicate a critical epigenetic regulatory role for histone H4K16Ac in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis, which will aid in the development of novel therapeutic strategies for age-related diseases such as IPF.

Mof acetyltransferase inhibition ameliorates glucose intolerance and islet dysfunction of type 2 diabetes via targeting pancreatic α-cells

BACKGROUND

Previously, we reported that Mof was highly expressed in α-cells, and its knockdown led to ameliorated fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glucose tolerance in non-diabetic mice, attributed by reduced total α-cell but enhanced prohormone convertase (PC)1/3-positive α-cell mass. However, how Mof and histone 4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16ac) control α-cell and whether Mof inhibition improves glucose handling in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) mice remain unknown.

METHODS

Mof overexpression and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequence (ChIP-seq) based on H4K16ac were applied to determine the effect of Mof on α-cell transcriptional factors and underlying mechanism. Then we administrated mg149 to α-TC1-6 cell line, wild type, db/db and diet-induced obesity (DIO) mice to observe the impact of Mof inhibition in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, western blotting and TUNEL staining were used to examine α-cell apoptosis and function. In vivo, glucose tolerance, hormone levels, islet population, α-cell ratio and the co-staining of glucagon and PC1/3 or PC2 were examined.

RESULTS

Mof activated α-cell-specific transcriptional network. ChIP-seq results indicated that H4K16ac targeted essential genes regulating α-cell differentiation and function. Mof activity inhibition in vitro caused impaired α-cell function and enhanced apoptosis. In vivo, it contributed to ameliorated glucose intolerance and islet dysfunction, characterized by decreased fasting glucagon and elevated post-challenge insulin levels in T2DM mice.

CONCLUSION

Mof regulates α-cell differentiation and function via acetylating H4K16ac and H4K16ac binding to Pax6 and Foxa2 promoters. Mof inhibition may be a potential interventional target for T2DM, which led to decreased α-cell ratio but increased PC1/3-positive α-cells.

Mof regulates glucose level via altering different α-cell subset mass and intra-islet glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon secretion

BACKGROUND

Males absent on the first (Mof) is implicated in gene control of diverse biological processes, such as cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis and autophagy. However, the relationship between glucose regulation and Mof-mediated transcription events remains unexplored. We aimed to unravel the role of Mof in glucose regulation by using global and pancreatic α-cell-specific Mof-deficient mice in vivo and α-TC1-6 cell line in vitro.

METHODS

We used tamoxifen-induced temporal Mof-deficient mice first to show Mof regulate glucose homeostasis, islet cell proportions and hormone secretion. Then we used α-cell-specific Mof-deficient mice to clarify how α-cell subsets and β-cell mass were regulated and corresponding hormone level alterations. Ultimately, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to knockdown Mof in α-TC1-6 and unravel the mechanism regulating α-cell mass and glucagon secretion.

RESULTS

Mof was mainly expressed in α-cells. Global Mof deficiency led to lower glucose levels, attributed by decreased α/β-cell ratio and glucagon secretion. α-cell-specific Mof-deficient mice exhibited similar alterations, with more reduced prohormone convertase 2 (PC2)-positive α-cell mass, responsible for less glucagon, and enhanced prohormone convertase 1 (PC1/3)-positive α-cell mass, leading to more glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion, thus increased β-cell mass and insulin secretion. In vitro, increased DNA damage, dysregulated autophagy, enhanced apoptosis and altered cell fate factors expressions upon Mof knockdown were observed. Genes and pathways linked to impaired glucagon secretion were uncovered through transcriptome sequencing.

CONCLUSION

Mof is a potential interventional target for glucose regulation, from the aspects of both α-cell subset mass and glucagon, intra-islet GLP-1 secretion. Upon Mof deficiency, Up-regulated PC1/3 but down-regulated PC2-positive α-cell mass, leads to more GLP-1 and insulin but less glucagon secretion, and contributed to lower glucose level.

Tip60 complex binds to active Pol II promoters and a subset of enhancers and co-regulates the c-Myc network in mouse embryonic stem cells

Background

Tip60 (KAT5) is the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) of the mammalian Tip60/NuA4 complex. While Tip60 is important for early mouse development and mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) pluripotency, the function of Tip60 as reflected in a genome-wide context is not yet well understood.

Results

Gel filtration of nuclear mESCs extracts indicate incorporation of Tip60 into large molecular complexes and exclude the existence of large quantities of “free” Tip60 within the nuclei of ESCs. Thus, monitoring of Tip60 binding to the genome should reflect the behaviour of Tip60-containing complexes. The genome-wide mapping of Tip60 binding in mESCs by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) shows that the Tip60 complex is present at promoter regions of predominantly active genes that are bound by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and contain the H3K4me3 histone mark. The coactivator HAT complexes, Tip60- and Mof (KAT8)-containing (NSL and MSL), show a global overlap at promoters, whereas distinct binding profiles at enhancers suggest different regulatory functions of each essential HAT complex. Interestingly, Tip60 enrichment peaks at about 200 bp downstream of the transcription start sites suggesting a function for the Tip60 complexes in addition to histone acetylation. The comparison of genome-wide binding profiles of Tip60 and c-Myc, a somatic cell reprogramming factor that binds predominantly to active genes in mESCs, demonstrate that Tip60 and c-Myc co-bind at 50–60 % of their binding sites. We also show that the Tip60 complex binds to a subset of bivalent developmental genes and defines a set of mESC-specific enhancer as well as super-enhancer regions.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the Tip60 complex functions as a global transcriptional co-activator at most active Pol II promoters, co-regulates the ESC-specific c-Myc network, important for ESC self-renewal and cell metabolism and acts at a subset of active distal regulatory elements, or super enhancers, in mESCs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0039-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.