Effect of the KCa3.1 blocker, senicapoc, on cerebral edema and cardiovascular function after cardiac arrest - A randomized experimental rat study

•

Senicapoc was successfully administered intravenously.

•

Senicapoc did not reduce cerebral edema 4 h after cardiac arrest.

•

Senicapoc did not increase mean arterial pressure within 4 h from resuscitation.

Aim

Formation of cerebral edema and cardiovascular dysfunction may worsen brain injury following cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that administration of the intermediate calcium-activated potassium (KCa3.1) channel blocker, senicapoc, would reduce cerebral edema and augment mean arterial pressure in the early post-resuscitation period.

Method

Male Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 11–15 weeks, were utilized in the study. Rats were exposed to 8 min of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Shortly after resuscitation, rats were randomized to receive either vehicle or senicapoc (10 mg/kg) intravenously. The primary outcome was cerebral wet to dry weight ratio 4 h after resuscitation. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, norepinephrine dose, inflammatory cytokines and neuron specific enolase levels. Additionally, a sub-study was conducted to validate intravenous administration of senicapoc.

Results

The sub-study revealed that senicapoc-treated rats maintained a significantly higher mean arterial pressure during administration of SKA-31 (a KCa3.1 channel opener).

The plasma concentration of senicapoc was 1060 ± 303 ng/ml 4 h after administration. Senicapoc did not reduce cerebral edema or augment mean arterial pressure 4 h after resuscitation. Likewise, cardiac function and norepinephrine dose did not vary between groups. Inflammatory cytokines and neuron specific enolase levels increased in both groups after resuscitation with no difference between groups. Senicapoc enhanced the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio significantly 4 h after resuscitation.

Conclusion

Senicapoc was successfully administered intravenously after resuscitation, but did not reduce cerebral edema or increase mean arterial pressure in the early post-resuscitation period.

A case report combining Dunbar syndrome and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Background

Dunbar syndrome or median arcuate ligament syndrome is a rare disorder. In this disorder, a malposition of the arcuate ligament compresses the celiac trunk and causes nonspecific symptoms including postprandial pain, abdominal bruit and weight loss. Surgical management is the primary treatment.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETS) are also rare. It comprises about 1–3% of pancreatic neoplasm. The patient could be symptomatic or asymptomatic depends on the tumor being functional or nonfunctional. In addition, surgical therapy is the choice.

Case presentation

In this paper, we report a case of 28 old female patient complaining from a long term of recurrent abdominal pain that doesn't releive on any kind of treatment, the multislices computerised tomography scan showed compress of the median arcuate ligament with an incidental mass in the tail of pancreas turned out to be a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Conclusions

The Dunbar syndrome and the Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors must be kept in mind of phyciciens while the differential diagnosis of any recurrent abdominal pain.

•

Dunbar syndrome or median arcuate ligament syndrome is a rare disorder which presented with abdominal pain.

•

Celiac artery compression can be diagnosed with Multi slices computer tomography and selective catheter angiography, surgery is the treatment of choice.

•

The Dunbar syndrome and the Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors must be kept in mind during differential diagnosis of recurrent abdominal pain.

Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have been applied to many research issues because these stimulation techniques can modulate neural activity in the human brain painlessly and non-invasively with weak electrical currents. However, there are no formal safety guidelines for the selection of stimulus parameters in either tDCS or tACS. As a means of gathering the information that is needed to produce safety guidelines, in this article, we summarize the adverse events of tDCS and tACS. In both stimulation techniques, most adverse effects are mild and disappear soon after stimulation. Nevertheless, several papers have reported that, in tDCS, some adverse events persist even after stimulation. The persistent events consist of skin lesions similar to burns, which can arise even in healthy subjects, and mania or hypomania in patients with depression. Recently, one paper reported a pediatric patient presenting with seizure after tDCS, although the causal relationship between stimulation and seizure is not clear. As this seizure is the only serious adverse events yet reported in connection with tDCS, tDCS is considered safe. In tACS, meanwhile, no persistent adverse events have been reported, but considerably fewer reports are available on the safety of tACS than on the safety of tDCS. Therefore, to establish the safety of tDCS and tACS, we need to scan the literature continuously for information on the adverse events of both stimulation techniques. Further safety investigations are also required.

Braf mutation in interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature

Interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma is an extremely rare tumor. The diagnosis is difficult and is based on clinical, pathological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Differential diagnosis includes melanoma, mesenchymal and hematological malignancies. The mainstay of treatment is surgery for limited disease and different chemotherapy combinations have been tested for advanced disease. No evidence from prospective trials is currently available. We report the case of a 59 year-old male patient who experienced axillary lymphadenopathy with initial diagnosis of large-cell lung cancer on tumor biopsy. He underwent surgical resection with radical intent. Pathological diagnosis of interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma was obtained on surgical samples. Nine months after radical surgery, he experienced systemic recurrence of disease and underwent chemotherapy with epirubicin and ifosfamide for 4 courses. During chemotherapy, he developed brain disease progression and underwent whole-brain radiotherapy. Systemic progression was then observed and molecular characterization was performed. B-RAF evaluation resulted positive for V600E mutation and the patient was treated with Vemurafenib according to molecular findings. He thus obtained initial clinical benefit but eventually died of brain hemorrhage. In conclusion, we report a case of B-RAF mutation detected in an interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma patient treated with targeted therapy. B-RAF pathway could have a role in pathogenesis and evolution of this rare disease and could open new perspectives of treatment.

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease with a prion protein gene codon 180 mutation presenting asymmetric cortical high-intensity on magnetic resonance imaging

Here we report a genetically confirmed case of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with a prion protein gene codon 180 mutation presenting atypical magnetic resonance imaging findings. The present case exhibited an acute onset and lateralized neurologic signs, and progressive cognitive impairment. No myoclonus or periodic synchronous discharges on electroencephalography were observed. Diffusion-weighted images revealed areas of high signal intensity in the right frontal and temporal cortices at onset that extended to the whole cortex and basal ganglia of the right cerebral hemisphere at 3 months. Although the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was initially negative for neuron specific enolase, tau protein, 14-3-3 protein, and abnormal prion protein, the CSF was positive for these brain-derived proteins at 3 months after onset.

Grade 4 unclassified renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid component expressing S-100 protein. A case report with peculiar diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Grade 4 unclassified renal cell carcinoma, with a sarcomatoid component (URCCSC) is a rare high grade tumor presumptively derived from all histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Even though rare, URCCSC generates a great deal of interest, as it is a particularly aggressive variant of RCC, that is poorly responsive to chemo-immunotherapy. Whether it originates from a separate sarcomatoid cell clone within the tumor or from true cell dedifferentiation from RCC has yet to be established. The diagnosis of URCCSC is usually based on morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the neoplastic cells which show transitional epithelial/mesenchymal features. In fact, the frequent loss of epithelial markers and gain of mesenchymal phenotypes, can result in difficulties in interpreting diagnostic data. Consequently assigning the optimal therapeutic treatments can be hindered due to this biological "complexity." Here we present the clinicopathological records of a 51 year-old patient who underwent an excision of a periureteral retroperitoneal mass, and whose first pathological diagnosis was malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Eleven months after surgery, a CT-scan revealed a local recurrence of the disease. Later on the patient was admitted to our hospital and a systemic, sarcoma-oriented, treatment was initiated. A partial remission was observed but only with a dacarbazine based regimen administered as a third line therapy, after which a second surgery took place. The removed tumor was diagnosed as URCCSC based on the peculiar morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of the cells. Pathological assessment of the first intervention was re-evaluated, resulting in a diagnosis of URCCSC. This case-report therefore highlights the implications that an erroneous pathologic diagnosis can have for the clinical management of this disease. Furthermore, the unexpected response to a dacarbazine based regimen, indicates that this drug should be included among the therapeutic options available against this type of renal carcinoma.