1
|
Calder CN, Kwan ATH, Teopiz KM, Wong S, Rosenblat JD, Mansur RB, Rhee TG, Ho R, Cao B, McIntyre RS. Number needed to treat (NNT) for ketamine and esketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2024; 356:753-762. [PMID: 38636712 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ketamine has been established as efficacious in adults living with Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD). Toward providing a quantifiable estimate of the clinical meaningfulness of the therapeutic benefit of ketamine, herein, we conduct a systematic review that aims to report the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and the Number Needed to Harm (NNH). METHODS This systematic review searched Embase, Medline/Pubmed, PsycINFO and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception up to October 15th 2023, for placebo-controlled, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) assessing racemic ketamine or esketamine therapy for unipolar TRD. We calculated NNT and NNH for ketamine treatments over various time points. RESULTS A total of 21 studies with 2042 participants were included. Racemic ketamine treatments had pooled NNTs for response of 7 at 4 h, 3 from one day to one week and 9 for studies at four weeks. Esketamine treatment was found to have a similar efficacy with an NNT of 2 at one day and 11 at four weeks. NNH values indicated low risk for ketamine treatments. LIMITATIONS Limitations in the data used include the possibility of functional unblinding and selective reporting bias. Moreover, the meta-analysis may have been limited in its precision by including low threshold definitions of treatment resistance (≥ 1 failed antidepressant) and low-dose ketamine treatments. CONCLUSION Herein, we determined that the NNT for ketamine treatment in adults living with TRD across different intervals of observation was <10. We conclude that the NNTs observed herein are highly clinically meaningful in this difficult to treat disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela T H Kwan
- Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Kayla M Teopiz
- Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Sabrina Wong
- Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Joshua D Rosenblat
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Rodrigo B Mansur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Taeho Greg Rhee
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
| | - Roger Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Institute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Bing Cao
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Faculty of Psychology, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China.
| | - Roger S McIntyre
- Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
MacDaniels JS, Schwartz TL. Effectiveness, tolerability and practical application of the newer generation anti-obesity medications. Drugs Context 2016; 5:212291. [PMID: 27114740 PMCID: PMC4831638 DOI: 10.7573/dic.212291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of five newer anti-obesity medications to guide clinical decision making, examining bupropion-naltrexone combination, liraglutide, lorcaserin, orlistat, and phentermine-topiramate combination. METHODS A brief literature review and internet search for high-powered, randomized and placebo-controlled drug trials was conducted. Drug trial information was established for five currently approved anti-obesity medications. Secondarily, a statistical comparison of medications through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH) analyses were attempted as a way to provide a clinical analysis across these varied medications. Finally, a commentary about clinical application is issued for each agent accounting for typical side-effects, serious side-effects, mechanism of action and ease of use. RESULTS All five agents are currently approved oral medications to lower weight. The NNT range was 3-12, and NNH range was 4-17. The agent with the best NNT is phentermine-topiramate combination (NNT=3) and the agent with the best NNH is bupropion-naltrexone combination (NNH=17). CONCLUSION When considering each patient's clinical presentation, knowledge of each drug's mechanism of action, side-effect profile, efficacy, and NNT and NNH values can help in selecting an anti-obesity medication to augment his or her weight loss efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas L Schwartz
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, College of Medicine, Syracuse, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|