Up-regulation of ABCG2 by MYBL2 deletion drives Chlorin e6-mediated photodynamic therapy resistance in colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer at an early stage. However, malignant cells' resistance to photodynamic agents can lead to treatment failure. MYBL2 (B-Myb) is an oncogene in colorectal carcinogenesis and development, for which little research has focused on its effect on drug resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present work, a colorectal cancer cell line with a stable knockdown of MYBL2 (ShB-Myb) was constructed first. Chlorin e6 (Ce6) was utilized to induced PDT. The anti-cancer efficacy was measured by CCK-8, PI staining, and Western blots. The drug uptake of Ce6 was assayed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. The ROS generation was detected by the CellROX probe. DDSB and DNA damage were assayed through comet experiment and Western blots. The over-expression of MYBL2 was conducted by MYBL2 plasmid.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that the viability of ShB-Myb treated with Ce6-PDT was not decreased compared to control SW480 cells (ShNC), which were resistant to PDT. Further investigation revealed reduced photosensitizer enrichment and mitigated oxidative DNA damage in colorectal cancer cells with depressed MYBL2. It turned out that SW480 cells knocking down MYBL2 showed phosphorylation of NF-κB and led to up-regulation of ABCG2 expression thereupon. When MYBL2 was replenished back in MYBL2-deficient colorectal cancer cells, phosphorylation of NF-κB was blocked and ABCG2 expression up-regulation was suppressed. Additionally, replenishment of MYBL2 also increased the enrichment of Ce6 and the efficacy of PDT.

CONCLUSION

In summary, MYBL2 absence in colorectal cancer contributes to drug resistance by activating NF-κB to up-regulate ABCG2 and thereby leading to photosensitizer Ce6 efflux. This study provides a novel theoretical basis and strategy for how to effectively improve the anti-tumor efficacy of PDT.

The Negative Impact of Cancer Cell Nitric Oxide on Photodynamic Therapy

Numerous studies have shown that low-flux nitric oxide (NO) in tumors produced mainly by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) can signal for angiogenesis, inhibition of apoptosis, and promotion of cell growth, migration, and invasion. Studies in the authors' laboratory have revealed that iNOS-derived NO in various cancer cell types elicits resistance to cytotoxic photodynamic therapy (PDT) and moreover endows PDT-surviving cells with more aggressive proliferation and migration/invasion. In this chapter, we describe how cancer cell iNOS/NO in vitro can be monitored in different PDT model systems (e.g., a targeted cell-bystander cell model) and how pharmacologic interference with basal and PDT-upregulated iNOS/NO can significantly improve PDT outcomes.

Upregulation of nitric oxide in tumor cells as a negative adaptation to photodynamic therapy

One of the advantages of PDT is that it can often circumvent tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin and doxorubicin. However, pre-existing and acquired resistance to PDT has also been demonstrated. One type of resistance, which involves nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in tumor cells, was discovered in the author's laboratory. When subjected to a 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic challenge, several cancer lines, including breast, prostate, and glioma, underwent intrinsic apoptosis that could be substantially enhanced by iNOS enzymatic inhibitors or a NO scavenger, implying iNOS/NO-mediated resistance. In most cases, iNOS was significantly upregulated by the challenge and this appeared to be more important in the hyper-resistance than pre-existing enzyme. Of added importance was our observation that cells surviving ALA/light treatment typically exhibited a more aggressive phenotype, proliferating and migrating/invading more rapidly than controls in iNOS/NO-dependent fashion. Most of these in vitro PDT findings have recently been confirmed at the in vivo level, using a human breast tumor xenograft model. We have also shown that upregulated iNOS in PDT-targeted cells can elicit a pro-growth/migration response in non-targeted bystander cells, NO again playing a key role. Post-PDT resistance and potentially dangerous hyper-aggressiveness can be attenuated by inhibitors of iNOS enzymatic activity, some of which have seen pharmacologic use in non-cancer or PDT settings. These various aspects of PDT antagonism by tumor iNOS/NO and how they might be overcome will be discussed in this review. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:590-598, 2018.© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes is a free radical molecule involved in a wide variety of normophysiologic and pathophysiologic processes. Included in the latter category are cancer promotion, progression, and resistance to therapeutic intervention. Animal tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies several years ago revealed that endogenous NO can reduce PDT efficacy and that NOS inhibitors can alleviate this. Until relatively recently, little else was known about this anti-PDT effect of NO, including: (a) the underlying mechanisms; (b) type(s) of NOS involved; and (c) whether active NO was generated in vascular cells, tumor cells, or both. In addressing these questions for various cancer cell lines exposed to PDT-like conditions, the author’s group has made several novel findings, including: (i) exogenous NO can scavenge lipid-derived free radicals arising from photostress, thereby protecting cells from membrane-damaging chain peroxidation; (ii) cancer cells can upregulate inducible NOS (iNOS) after a PDT-like challenge and the resulting NO can signal for resistance to photokilling; (iii) photostress-surviving cells with elevated iNOS/NO proliferate and migrate/invade more aggressively; and (iv) NO produced by photostress-targeted cells can induce greater aggressiveness in non-targeted bystander cells. In this article, the author briefly discusses these various means by which NO can interfere with PDT and how this may be mitigated by use of NOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants.