Stillbirth diagnosis and classification: comparison of ReCoDe and ICD-PM systems

OBJECTIVES

The identification of causes of stillbirth (SB) can be a challenge due to several different classification systems of SB causes. In the scientific literature there is a continuous emergence of SB classification systems, not allowing uniform data collection and comparisons between populations from different geographical areas. For these reasons, this study compared two of the most used SB classifications, aiming to identify which of them should be preferable.

METHODS

A total of 191 SBs were retrospectively classified by a panel composed by three experienced-physicians throughout the ReCoDe and ICD-PM systems to evaluate which classification minimizes unclassified/unspecified cases. In addition, intra and inter-rater agreements were calculated.

RESULTS

ReCoDe defined: the 23.6% of cases as unexplained, placental insufficiency in the 14.1%, lethal congenital anomalies in the 12%, infection in the 9.4%, abruptio in the 7.3%, and chorioamnionitis in the 7.3%. ICD-PM defined: the 20.9% of cases as unspecified, antepartum hypoxia in the 44%, congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities in the 11.5%, and infection in the 11.5%. For ReCoDe, inter-rater was agreement of 0.58; intra-rater agreements were 0.78 and 0.79. For ICD-PM, inter-rater agreement was 0.54; intra-rater agreements were of 0.76 and 0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference between ReCoDe and ICD-PM classifications in minimizing unexplained/unspecified cases. Inter and intra-rater agreements were largely suboptimal for both ReCoDe and ICD-PM due to their lack of specific guidelines which can facilitate the interpretation. Thus, the authors suggest correctives strategies: the implementation of specific guidelines and illustrative case reports to easily solve interpretation issues.

Still Birth classification: Application of Relevant Condition at Death (ReCoDe) classification system in a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan

OBJECTIVES

To determine the cause of stillbirth after application of relevant condition at death (ReCoDe) classification system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross sectional study of 207 women diagnosed with stillbirth after 24 completed weeks of pregnancy at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2019. The primary objective was to find the cause of stillbirth according to the new classification of relevant condition at death (ReCoDe).

RESULTS

There were a total of 32413 live births and 207 stillbirths during the study period thus stillbirth rate of 6 per 1000 live births. In this study, 80% of women were in the age group of 20-35 years, 16% had advanced maternal age while 3.8% of women accounted for less than 20 years. Among the maternal factors; 54.5% cases were booked and the remaining were were un-booked cases. Pre-eclampsia was the most common associated maternal condition (14.9%).Fetal cause accounted for 34.7% of stillbirths and the fetal growth restriction (FGR) was the most common; 23.6%. After application of ReCoDe classification, in 81% of stillbirth cases associated condition were found and only 18.8% of cases were categorized unexplained.

CONCLUSION

Application of ReCoDe classification is easy to understand and applicable, especially in low resource settings with associated causes identified in vast majority of cases.

A comparison of three classification systems for stillbirth

BACKGROUND

Understanding the causes of perinatal death can provide relevant information to couples, caregivers, and society. Classification systems play a crucial role in identifying the most relevant conditions suggesting preventive measures for decreasing stillbirth (SB). In 2016 the International Classification of Disease to Deaths during the Perinatal Period (ICD-PM) was released with the aim to suggest a universally accepted classification.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study that enrolled all SBs occurred in Emilia-Romagna, from 2014 to 2017. We prospectively applied ReCoDe classification and retrospectively used Simplified CODAC classification and ICD-PM. The aim of this study is to compare different classification systems on a cohort of SBs, undergoing a comprehensive workup, to establish what classification minimizes rates of unexplained SB.

RESULTS

We registered 443 SBs. According to ReCoDe the largest category of SB was "placental insufficiency/infarction" (16.9%), followed by "abruptio placentae" (14.2%). Unexplained cases are 16.7%. Gestational age <37 weeks is less frequent in the group of women with unclassified SB (OR 0.50, OR95%CI [0.3-0.8]) against women with classified SB. Considering CODAC the two largest categories are "infarctions or thrombi" (16.3%) and "abruption or retro-placental haematoma" (15.1%), instead only 17.2% of cases remained unexplained.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing ReCoDe and CODAC we found no real difference in any category. ReCoDe and CODAC better underlines the primary cause of death. ICD-PM reveals to be easily applicable to clinical practice. ICD-PM has the lowest rate of unexplained SBs (9.3%) due to the structure itself and not to a deeper comprehension of death.

Aetiological Classification of Stillbirths: A Case Control Study

ABSTRACT

Antepartum stillbirths are a major contributor to perinatal mortality. This study was undertaken to assess the role of the ReCoDe (relevant condition at birth) classification system in evaluation of stillbirths in a tertiary teaching hospital in Central Gujarat.

AIM

To determine etiology of stillbirths using the ReCoDe classification system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective case control study over a period of 1 year from September 1st, 2012 to August 31st, 2013. Sample size was calculated as 243 cases and 486 controls. Two controls (live births) per case were matched for gestational age and birth weight. Odd's ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Maternal age and parity that appeared to be highly significant factors on univariate analysis were not found to be independent risk factors with multivariate logistic regression. Gestational age and birth weight were not statistically significant risk factors. Other risk factors like previous stillbirth (26.13; 95 % CI 3.23-211.29), antepartum hemorrhage (11.63; 95 % CI 3.83-35.30), and hypertensive disorders (2.09; 95 % CI 1.20-3.63) were found to be highly significant independent risk factors. Major congenital anomaly (P < 0.001), birth asphyxia (P = 0.0037), cord accidents (P = 0.0037), and rupture uterus (P = 0.001) were also highly significant.

CONCLUSION

The stillbirth rate was 87.83 per 1000 live births. The ReCoDe primary classification system enabled 74.1 % of the cases to be assigned a relevant condition, leaving only 25.9 % as unexplained. The single largest condition associated was fetal growth restriction (25.9 %).