Sub-MIC levels of bedaquiline and clofazimine can select Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants with increased MIC

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients not cured at the time of stopping treatment are exposed to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and sub-MIC levels for many months after discontinuing bedaquiline (BDQ) or clofazimine (CFZ) treatment. In vitro cultures treated with BDQ and CFZ sub-MIC concentrations clearly showed enrichment in the Rv0678 mutant population, demonstrating that pre-existing Rv0678 mutants can be selected by sub-MIC concentrations of BDQ and CFZ if not protected by an alternative MDR-TB treatment.

Bedquiline Resistance Mutations: Correlations with Drug Exposures and Impact on the Proteome in M. tuberculosis

Bedaquiline (BDQ) is an effective drug for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Mutations in atpE, which encodes the target of BDQ, are associated with large increases in MICs. Mutations in Rv0678 that derepress the transcription of the MmpL5-MmpS5 efflux transporter are associated with smaller increases in MICs. However, Rv0678 mutations are the most common mutations that are associated with BDQ resistance in clinical isolates, and they also confer cross-resistance to clofazimine (CFZ). To investigate the mechanism of BDQ resistance and the correlation between Rv0678 mutations and target-based atpE mutations, M. tuberculosis strains were exposed to different concentrations of BDQ or CFZ to select Rv0678 mutations and atpE mutations. Gene overexpression strains were constructed to illustrate the roles of MmpL5 and MmpS5. A quantitative proteome analysis was performed to compare the BDQ-resistant mutants to the isogenic strain H37Rv. Here, we report that the Rv0678 mutations were more readily selected than were the atpE mutations at low concentrations of BDQ or CFZ. The atpE mutations were selected by high concentrations of BDQ exposure. The overexpression of both mmpL5 and mmpS5 reduced the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to BDQ and CFZ. Secreted immunogenic proteins and proteins involved in the biosynthesis and transport of phthiocerol dimycocerosates were associated with Rv0678 mutations conferring BDQ resistance in the proteome analysis. In conclusion, exposure to different bedaquiline concentrations resulted in the selection of different mutations. The coexpression of MmpL5 and MmpS5 contributed to drug resistance and upregulated pathogenic proteins in M. tuberculosis, suggesting MmpL5-MmpS5 as a new potential target for antituberculosis drug development. These results warrant further surveillance for the evolution of BDQ resistance during clinical usage.

atpE Mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Not Always Predictive of Bedaquiline Treatment Failure

We report the emergence of an atpE mutation in a clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain. Genotypic and phenotypic bedaquiline susceptibility testing displayed variable results over time and ultimately were not predictive of treatment outcome. This observation highlights the limits of current genotypic and phenotypic methods for detection of bedaquiline resistance.

Primary Bedaquiline Resistance Among Cases of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Taiwan

Bedaquiline (BDQ), which is recommended for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), was introduced in Taiwan in 2014. Due to the alarming emergence of BDQ resistance, we conducted BDQ resistance analyses to strengthen our DR-TB management program. This retrospective population-based study included initial Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from 898 rifampicin-resistant (RR) or multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB cases never exposed to BDQ during 2008–2019. We randomly selected 65 isolates and identified 28 isolates with BDQ MIC<0.25μg/ml and MIC≥0.25μg/ml as the control and study groups, respectively. BDQ drug susceptibility testing (DST) using the MGIT960 system and Sanger sequencing of the atpE, Rv0678, and pepQ genes was conducted. Notably, 18 isolates with BDQ MIC=0.25μg/ml, 38.9% (7/18), and 61.1% (11/18) isolates were MGIT-BDQ resistant and susceptible, respectively. Consequently, we recommended redefining MIC=0.25μg/ml as an intermediate-susceptible category to resolve discordance between different DST methods. Of the 93 isolates, 22 isolates were MGIT-BDQ-resistant and 77.3% (17/22) of MGIT-BDQ-resistant isolates harbored Rv0678 mutations. After excluding 2 MGIT-BDQ-resistant isolates with borderline resistance (GU₄₀₀growth control-GU₁₀₀BDQ≤1day), 100% (15/15) harbored Rv0678 gene mutations, including seven novel mutations [g-14a, Ile80Ser (N=2), Phe100Tyr, Ala102Val, Ins g 181–182 frameshift mutation (N=2), Del 11–63 frameshift mutation, and whole gene deletion (N=2)]. Since the other 22.7% (5/22) MGIT-BDQ-resistant isolates with borderline resistance (GU₄₀₀growth control-GU₁₀₀BDQ≤1day) had no mutation in three analyzed genes. For isolates with phenotypic MGIT-BDQ borderline resistance, checking for GU differences or conducting genotypic analyses are suggested for ruling out BDQ resistance. In addition, we observed favorable outcomes among patients with BDQ-resistant isolates who received BDQ-containing regimens regardless of Rv0678 mutations. We concluded that based on MIC≥0.25μg/ml, 3.1% (28/898) of drug-resistant TB cases without BDQ exposure showed BDQ resistance, Rv0678 was not a robust marker of BDQ resistance, and its mutations were not associated with treatment outcomes.

In vitro Study of Bedaquiline Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Multi-Drug Resistant Clinical Isolates

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major causes of death related to antimicrobial resistance worldwide because of the spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis multi- and extensively drug resistant (multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR), respectively) clinical isolates. To fight MDR and XDR tuberculosis, three new antitubercular drugs, bedaquiline (BDQ), delamanid, and pretomanid were approved for use in clinical setting. Unfortunately, BDQ quickly acquired two main mechanisms of resistance, consisting in mutations in either atpE gene, encoding the target, or in Rv0678, coding for the repressor of the MmpS5-MmpL5 efflux pump. To better understand the spreading of BDQ resistance in MDR- and XDR-TB, in vitro studies could be a valuable tool. To this aim, in this work an in vitro generation of M. tuberculosis mutants resistant to BDQ was performed starting from two MDR clinical isolates as parental cultures. The two M. tuberculosis MDR clinical isolates were firstly characterized by whole genome sequencing, finding the main mutations responsible for their MDR phenotype. Furthermore, several M. tuberculosis BDQ resistant mutants were isolated by both MDR strains, harboring mutations in both atpE and Rv0678 genes. These BDQ resistant mutants were further characterized by studying their growth rate that could be related to their spreading in clinical settings. Finally, we also constructed a data sheet including the mutations associated with BDQ resistance that could be useful for the early detection of BDQ-resistance in MDR/XDR patients with the purpose of a better management of antibiotic resistance in clinical settings.

Primary Clofazimine and Bedaquiline Resistance among Isolates from Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Clofazimine has been repurposed for the treatment of tuberculosis, especially for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). To test the susceptibility to clofazimine of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates, MICs of clofazimine were determined using the microplate alamarBlue assay (MABA) method for 80 drug-resistant isolates and 10 drug-susceptible isolates for comparison. For five clofazimine-resistant strains isolated from previously treated pre-extensively drug-resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB) and XDR-TB patients without prior exposure to clofazimine or bedaquiline, clofazimine MICs were ≥1.2 μg/ml. Four isolates with cross-resistance to bedaquiline had Rv0678 mutations. The other isolate with no resistance to bedaquiline had an Rv1979c mutation. This study adds to a recent study showing that 6.3% of MDR-TB patients without prior clofazimine or bedaquiline exposure harbored isolates with Rv0678 mutations, which raises concern that preexisting resistance to these drugs may be associated with prior TB treatment. Furthermore, we propose a tentative breakpoint of 1.2 μg/ml for clofazimine resistance using the MABA method. More-widespread surveillance and individualized testing for clofazimine and bedaquiline resistance, together with assessment of their clinical usage, especially among previously treated and MDR-TB patients, are warranted.

Crystal structure of the transcriptional regulator Rv0678 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Recent work demonstrates that the MmpL (mycobacterial membrane protein large) transporters are dedicated to the export of mycobacterial lipids for cell wall biosynthesis. An MmpL transporter frequently works with an accessory protein, belonging to the MmpS (mycobacterial membrane protein small) family, to transport these key virulence factors. One such efflux system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the MmpS5-MmpL5 transporter. The expression of MmpS5-MmpL5 is controlled by the MarR-like transcriptional regulator Rv0678, whose open reading frame is located downstream of the mmpS5-mmpL5 operon. To elucidate the structural basis of Rv0678 regulation, we have determined the crystal structure of this regulator, to 1.64 Å resolution, revealing a dimeric two-domain molecule with an architecture similar to members of the MarR family of transcriptional regulators. Rv0678 is distinct from other MarR regulators in that its DNA-binding and dimerization domains are clustered together. These two domains seemingly cooperate to bind an inducing ligand that we identified as 2-stearoylglycerol, which is a fatty acid glycerol ester. The structure also suggests that the conformational change leading to substrate-mediated derepression is primarily caused by a rigid body rotational motion of the entire DNA-binding domain of the regulator toward the dimerization domain. This movement results in a conformational state that is incompatible with DNA binding. We demonstrate using electrophoretic mobility shift assays that Rv0678 binds to the mmpS5-mmpL5, mmpS4-mmpL4, and the mmpS2-mmpL2 promoters. Binding by Rv0678 was reversed upon the addition of the ligand. These findings provide new insight into the mechanisms of gene regulation in the MarR family of regulators.