Sub-MIC levels of bedaquiline and clofazimine can select Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants with increased MIC

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients not cured at the time of stopping treatment are exposed to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and sub-MIC levels for many months after discontinuing bedaquiline (BDQ) or clofazimine (CFZ) treatment. In vitro cultures treated with BDQ and CFZ sub-MIC concentrations clearly showed enrichment in the Rv0678 mutant population, demonstrating that pre-existing Rv0678 mutants can be selected by sub-MIC concentrations of BDQ and CFZ if not protected by an alternative MDR-TB treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antiviral Effects of Multiple Doses of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion Protein Inhibitor, JNJ-53718678, in Infants Hospitalized With RSV Infection: A Randomized Phase 1b Study

Background

This phase 1b study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiviral effects of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)–specific fusion inhibitor JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) in hospitalized RSV-infected patients aged > 1 to ≤24 months.

Methods

Patients categorized by age (cohort 1: ≥6 to ≤24 months; cohort 2: ≥3 to < 6 months; cohort 3: > 1 to < 3 months) were randomized to oral JNJ-8678 or placebo once daily for 7 days. Dose increases followed data review committee recommendations (cohort 1: 2/6/8/9 mg/kg; cohort 2: 1.5/4.5/6 mg/kg; cohort 3: 1/3/5 mg/kg). Cohort 1 included a 9 mg/kg dose, as target exposures were not reached at lower doses. Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were assessed using population pharmacokinetics modeling. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. To assess antiviral effects, RSV RNA viral load from nasal swabs was quantified over time using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Patients received JNJ-8678 (n = 37) or placebo (n = 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar at the highest doses for cohorts 1–3 (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time of administration up to 24 hours postdosing at day 7: 35 840, 34 980, and 39 627 ng × hour/mL, respectively). Two grade 3 AEs were reported (both bronchiolitis; 1 JNJ-8678, 1 placebo), reported as serious AEs; all other AEs were grade 1 or 2. Two additional serious AEs were reported (rhinitis [JNJ-8678]; pneumonia [placebo]). No deaths, grade 4 AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. Median RSV viral load change from baseline in JNJ-8678 vs placebo by day 3 was −1.98 vs −0.32 log₁₀ copies/mL.

Conclusions

In RSV-infected infants, JNJ-8678 was well tolerated. Target exposures were reached and antiviral activity was observed.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02593851.

Translational evaluation of novel selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist JNJ-61393215 in an experimental model for panic in rodents and humans

Orexin neurons originating in the perifornical and lateral hypothalamic area project to anxiety- and panic-associated neural circuitry, and are highly reactive to anxiogenic stimuli. Preclinical evidence suggests that the orexin system, and particularly the orexin-1 receptor (OX1R), may be involved in the pathophysiology of panic and anxiety. Selective OX1R antagonists thus may constitute a potential new treatment strategy for panic- and anxiety-related disorders. Here, we characterized a novel selective OX1R antagonist, JNJ-61393215, and determined its affinity and potency for human and rat OX1R in vitro. We also evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of JNJ-61393215 in first-in-human single- and multiple-ascending dose studies conducted. Finally, the potential anxiolytic effects of JNJ-61393215 were evaluated both in rats and in healthy men using 35% CO₂ inhalation challenge to induce panic symptoms. In the rat CO₂ model of panic anxiety, JNJ-61393215 demonstrated dose-dependent attenuation of CO₂-induced panic-like behavior without altering baseline locomotor or autonomic activity, and had minimal effect on spontaneous sleep. In phase-1 human studies, JNJ-61393215 at 90 mg demonstrated significant reduction (P < 0.02) in CO₂-induced fear and anxiety symptoms that were comparable to those obtained using alprazolam. The most frequently reported adverse events were somnolence and headache, and all events were mild in severity. These results support the safety, tolerability, and anxiolytic effects of JNJ-61393215, and validate CO₂ exposure as a translational cross-species experimental model to evaluate the therapeutic potential of novel anxiolytic drugs.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Paliperidone Palmitate (Once-Monthly Formulation) in Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Patients With Schizophrenia

The paliperidone pharmacokinetics after intramuscular administration of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate in Japanese patients were studied in 3 phase 1 studies and in 2 phase 3 studies performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. These data (Japanese, n = 509; Korean, n = 31; Taiwanese, n = 47) were used to describe the paliperidone palmitate pharmacokinetics in Japanese, to compare with non-Japanese, and to validate the historical population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) model for paliperidone palmitate, developed using data from studies in patients with schizophrenia outside Japan. The final historical Pop-PK model, including all significant patient covariates of Japanese studies, was used to simulate paliperidone plasma concentration-time data using nonlinear mixed effects, followed by comparison with actual data. Visual predictive checks displayed considerable overlap between predicted and actual plasma concentrations; the majority of observations were within the 90% prediction interval. Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese patients had comparable plasma concentrations. Covariate distributions demonstrated comparatively lower median body mass index in Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese patients versus rest-of-world population. Prediction errors for the data set used for external validation were within cutoff values, confirming accuracy/precision of the model. Paliperidone pharmacokinetics were adequately predicted for Japanese studies using the historical Pop-PK model, confirming its robustness. Pharmacokinetics in Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese patients with schizophrenia were comparable with rest-of-world population.

A Receiver Operating Characteristic Framework for Non-adherence Detection Using Drug Concentration Thresholds-Application to Simulated Risperidone Data in Schizophrenic Patients

Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication is a primary factor in disease relapse in schizophrenic patients. We sought to evaluate if plasma concentrations of the antipsychotic risperidone can be used as a predictor of treatment adherence and to identify the optimal plasma concentration threshold to reliably distinguish between adherent and non-adherent patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate plasma risperidone steady-state trough concentrations in 1000 virtual patients, where 60% of the patients were 100% adherent to their medication, while 40% of the patients were non-adherent to their medication. The probability of adherence was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on C_trough. The area under the ROC curve (AUC_ROC) was used to identify the optimal C_trough threshold. Single vs multiple C_trough at steady state was also evaluated. After a single risperidone C_trough measurement, the AUC_ROC (95% CI) was estimated to be 0.71 (0.69-0.72) and the optimal C_trough threshold accounting for the lowest number of adherent and non-adherent misclassifications was estimated to be 11.9 ng/mL. After multiple C_trough measurements, the AUC_ROC (95% CI) increased up to 0.85 (0.84-0.87) for three C_trough measurements. The optimal probability threshold to reliably discriminate between adherent and non-adherent patients was estimated to be 0.51. Using this model which is reflective of typical adherence to antipsychotic medication, we found that three consecutive steady-state C_trough measurements are needed for an accurate and precise diagnostic test to discriminate between patients who are adherent or non-adherent to treatment.

1958. Antiviral Effects, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Safety of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion Protein Inhibitor, JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678), in RSV-infected Infants With Bronchiolitis, in the Phase 1b Study 53718678RSV1005

Background

JNJ-8678 is a RSV-specific fusion inhibitor and a potential new treatment for respiratory infections caused by RSV. Data from a Phase 1b study of PK, safety and antiviral effects in hospitalized RSV-infected infants are presented.

Methods

37 and 7 patients, respectively, were randomized to JNJ-8678 (ascending doses, Table) or placebo (PBO) treatment once daily for 7 days. PK assessments were based on sparse sampling using a population PK model in adults scaled for pediatrics, accounting for allometric principles and maturation of drug clearance pathways. Safety was evaluated by AE reporting, lab and ECG assessments. Antiviral activity was assessed by measuring viral load (VL) using a quantitative RT-PCR assay for RSV RNA from nasal swabs.

Results

Sparse PK data are described by an integrated PK model (table) and indicated PK parameters for different dose levels were similar across age groups. Treatment with JNJ-8678 appeared to reduce VL more rapidly than PBO (figure). Median change in VL from baseline (BL) in JNJ-8678-treated patients (combined dose groups) vs. PBO was −1.98 vs. −0.32 log₁₀ copies/mL at Day 3. Mean differences in change from BL (90% CI) of JNJ-8678 (combined dose groups) vs. PBO on Days 2 and 3 were estimated −1.33 (−2.26; −0.39) and −1.62 (−2.55; −0.69) log₁₀ copies/mL, respectively (general linear model, adjusted for BL VL; P ≤ 0.05). There was a clear separation between JNJ-8678 and PBO, but no evident exposure–response relationship. JNJ-8678 was generally well tolerated with no new safety signals compared with adults and no dose relationship with AEs or lab abnormalities were observed.

Conclusion

This dataset in RSV-infected infants showed a clear trend for an early antiviral effect of JNJ-8678, which was similar across dose groups. JNJ-8678 treatment was generally well tolerated.

Disclosures

F. Martinon-Torres, Pfizer: Consultant, Consulting fee. SPMSD: Consultant, Consulting fee. GSK: Consultant, Consulting fee. S. Rusch, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. D. Huntjens, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. B. Remmerie, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. J. Vingerhoets, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. K. McFadyen, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Baraldi, Abbvie: Lectures, Speaker honorarium. Chiesi Farmaceutici: Consultant, Consulting fee. Novartis: Consultant, Consulting fee. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee. M. Stevens, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.

Relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and treatment failure during the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotic blood levels (ABLs) may help identify patients at risk for treatment failure. Reference ranges (RR) for plasma concentrations of ABLs that account for between-patient variability were developed for risperidone and olanzapine based on population pharmacokinetic models. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) collected clinical outcomes and ABLs, allowing testing of the relationship of ABLs with outcomes.

METHODS

ABLs from 694 patients who were randomized to olanzapine or risperidone were compared to the 80% RRs and were assessed as below or within/above the RR. Treatment failure was defined per any of these criteria: (1) emergency room visit for psychiatric reasons, (2) hospitalization for psychiatric reasons, (3) adverse event of completed suicide, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt, (4) assaultive behavior, (5) arrested or jailed, (6) 2-point increase from baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, (7) 25% increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients assessed with treatment failure within 100 days of drug concentration measurement were analyzed.

RESULTS

Treatment failure occurred in 126 of 323 patients. The proportion of patients with ABLs below RR was 18.3% (59/323) compared to 10% expected in a fully adherent population. Among the 59 with ABLs below RR, 50.8% had treatment failure (compared to 36.4% for the 264 with ABLs within/above RR). The difference between groups was significant (odds ratio = 1.810; 95% CI = 1.025, 3.197; p = 0.0408).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of CATIE data showed that ABLs within the context of RRs may identify patients with higher risk of relapse.

Determination of plasma concentration reference ranges for oral aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a common disease which is commonly managed using antipsychotic medications (APS). Inadequate response and lack of adherence often prevent optimal therapeutic effectiveness. Monitoring APS concentrations can be useful to help improve outcomes for the patient.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop "reference ranges" for oral aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine to allow clinicians to understand expected variability in patients treated with APS. The reference ranges were constructed to account for different oral doses, sampling times, and variability both between, and within, subjects.

METHODS

Population pharmacokinetic models were used to simulate plasma concentrations over time under different doses and population demographics. The references were validated against external data both numerically and graphically.

RESULTS

Reference ranges for oral aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine were derived and successfully validated against the external data. The 80% reference range for aripiprazole following a 2-mg oral dose was 14.7-41.6 ng/mL 0-4 h post dose and 10.6-37.1 ng/mL 20-24 h post dose. These ranges increased to 221-624 ng/mL 0-4 h post dose following administration of a 30-mg dose, and 159-557 ng/mL 20-24 h post dose. The 80% reference range 0-4 h post dose was 22.5-67.1 ng/mL following a 15-mg dose once daily of oral olanzapine, and 179-768 ng/mL following a 150-mg dose once daily of oral quetiapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing individual patients' APS levels with reference ranges, along with a full clinical assessment, could provide important insights to help a clinician optimize APS therapy.

Determination of Plasma Concentration Reference Ranges for Risperidone and Paliperidone

Schizophrenia is a common disease managed by a range of interventions, with the primary treatment being antipsychotic medications (APS). Inadequate response, lack of adherence, and/or adverse events often prevent optimal therapeutic effects or therapeutic efficiency. Monitoring APS plasma concentrations can be used together with a full clinical evaluation to help improve patient care or offer better treatment options for the patient. To enable interpretation of individual risperidone and paliperidone plasma concentrations, we developed "reference ranges," which consider the expected variability in plasma concentrations between subjects across the population, rather than representing a "therapeutic range" that relates to efficacy and/or safety outcomes. The reference ranges were derived from population pharmacokinetic models, which varied based upon administration route, dose, and time after dose. Good agreement between the proposed reference ranges and external data was obtained through graphical and numerical evaluations, indicating they could be reliably used in clinical practice.

Optimizing Antipsychotic Patient Management Using Population Pharmacokinetic Models and Point-of-Care Testing

Schizophrenia is a common disease, characterized by progressive functional decline exacerbated by psychotic relapses that often result from a lack of full adherence to antipsychotic (APS) medication. Although atypical APS medications do not have clear therapeutic windows, as generally required for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), measuring APS plasma levels in the context of a population expected range at the point‐of‐care (POC) may provide valuable clinical insights for differentiating lack of efficacy from a lack of adherence to medication.

Comparison of Capillary and Venous Drug Concentrations After Administration of a Single Dose of Risperidone, Paliperidone, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, or Aripiprazole

Risperidone, paliperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole are antipsychotic drugs approved for treating various psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. The objective of this randomized, parallel‐group, open‐label study was to compare finger‐stick‐based capillary with corresponding venous whole‐blood and plasma concentrations for these drugs after administration of a single dose to healthy volunteers. All whole‐blood and plasma drug concentrations were measured with validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods. Capillary and venous concentrations (both in plasma and whole blood) were in close agreement, although a time‐dependent difference was observed, most obviously for olanzapine and paliperidone, with slightly higher capillary versus venous drug concentrations during the first hours after administering a single dose. The observed difference between capillary and venous plasma drug concentrations is expected not to be relevant in clinical practice, considering the wide window of therapeutic concentrations and the wide range of drug concentrations in the patient population for a given dose. Based on these results, finger‐stick‐based capillary drug concentrations have been shown to approximate venous drug concentrations.

Comparison of Capillary and Venous Plasma Drug Concentrations After Repeated Administration of Risperidone, Paliperidone, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, or Aripiprazole

Quantification of blood levels of antipsychotic drugs may be useful for managing medication therapy. This open‐label, parallel‐group study was performed to compare finger‐stick‐based capillary with corresponding venous plasma concentrations for risperidone, paliperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole and their major metabolites after repeated dosing in patients with schizophrenia or related illnesses. Finger‐stick‐based capillary and venous blood samples were collected at various times within a dosing interval. All drug concentration measurements in the derived plasma samples were performed with validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods. Finger‐stick‐based capillary and venous plasma drug concentrations after repeated dosing were generally similar. Olanzapine capillary plasma concentrations, however, were on average approximately 20% higher than venous concentrations, with a trend for a relatively greater difference occurring shortly after dosing. In addition, smaller capillary–venous differences were observed for extended‐release and long‐acting intramuscular formulations and for aripiprazole, a drug with a long half‐life, compared with drugs administered as an immediate‐release formulation (risperidone, olanzapine). After repeated dosing, plasma derived from finger‐stick‐based blood was observed to be predictive of the venous concentrations. Capillary sampling may be an appropriate alternative to venous sampling to readily evaluate systemic drug concentrations.

Prospective dose selection and acceleration of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation development using a pharmacometric bridging strategy

AIMS

To prospectively select the dose of the paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation, using a pharmacometric bridging strategy based on the paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) formulation previously approved for schizophrenia treatment.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from a 6-month interim analysis of a single dose PP3M Phase I clinical trial was integrated with a previously developed PP1M population-PK model. The model was updated to incorporate formulation as a covariate on absorption parameters and to explore the most critical design element of the Phase III study: the PP1M-to-PP3M dose multiplier for patients switching formulations. Plasma paliperidone concentrations were measured at predetermined intervals during Phase III, enabling comparison of the multiple-dose PK between PP1M and PP3M. Exposure matching was assessed graphically to determine whether paliperidone plasma concentrations from the two formulations overlapped.

RESULTS

Prospective steady-state PK simulations revealed that a 3.5 multiple of the PP1M dose would yield a corresponding PP3M dose with comparable exposure. The prospective pharmacometric simulation and observed Phase III PK data agreed closely. Phase III results confirmed the hypothesis that efficacy of PP3M was noninferior to that of PP1M. The similarity in exposures between the two formulations was likely a key determinant of the equivalent efficacy between the two products observed in the Phase III study.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful prospective PP3M Phase III clinical trial dose selection was achieved through the use of pharmacometric bridging, without conducting a Phase II study and using only limited Phase I data for PP3M. We estimate that this strategy reduced development time by 3-5 years and may be applicable to other drug development projects.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation in patients with schizophrenia: A phase-1, single-dose, randomized, open-label study

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase-1 study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of the investigational intramuscular paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. A total of 328 patients (men or women, aged 18-65 years) were enrolled in 1 of 4 separately conducted panels (A to D). Each panel had 2 single-dose treatment periods (period 1, 1 mg intramuscular paliperidone immediate release [IR]; period 2, intramuscular PP3M 75-525 mg eq) separated by a washout of 7-21 days. Overall, 245 of 308 (79.5%) PP3M-dosed patients completed the study. Because the PK studies of panels A and C were compromised by incomplete injection in some patients, PK data from only panels B and D are presented. Safety data from all panels are presented. Peak paliperidone plasma concentration was achieved between 23 and 34 days, and apparent half-life was ∼2-4 months. Mean plasma AUC∞ and Cmax of paliperidone appeared to be dose-proportional. Relative bioavailability in comparison with paliperidone was ∼100% independent of the dose and injection site. Headache and nasopharyngitis were the most common (>7%) treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall, safety and tolerability were similar to those of the 1-month formulation. Results support a once-every-3-months dosing interval in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Efficacy and Safety of the 3-Month Formulation of Paliperidone Palmitate vs Placebo for Relapse Prevention of Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Treatment nonadherence and relapse are common problems in patients with schizophrenia. The long-acting 3-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate, owing to its extended elimination half-life, may offer a valuable therapeutic option for these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 3-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate vs placebo in delaying time to relapse of schizophrenia symptoms.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This randomized, multicenter trial conducted from April 26, 2012, through April 9, 2014, in 8 countries consisted of 4 phases: 3-week screening phase, flexible-dose 17-week open-label transition phase, 12-week open-label maintenance phase, and open-ended double-blind (DB) phase. Of the 506 patients enrolled (aged 18-70 years; DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia), 305 were randomized to 3-month paliperidone palmitate (n = 160) or placebo (n = 145) in the DB phase.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received once-monthly doses of the 1-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate (50, 75, 100, or 150 mg eq) during the transition phase, followed by a single dose of the 3-month formulation (3.5 times the stabilized dose of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate) during the maintenance phase. Stabilized patients were randomized to receive either a fixed dose of 3-month paliperidone palmitate (175, 263, 350, or 525 mg eq) or placebo once every 3 months during the DB phase.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Time from randomization to the first relapse event (time to relapse) in the DB phase.

RESULTS

In the interim analysis, time to first relapse was significantly different in favor of the paliperidone palmitate group vs the placebo group (hazard ratio = 3.45; 95% CI, 1.73-6.88; P < .001); median time to relapse was 274 days for placebo but not estimable for 3-month paliperidone palmitate. An independent data monitoring committee recommended early study termination due to efficacy. In the DB phase, 183 of 305 patients (62% with 3-month paliperidone palmitate; 58% with placebo) had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; those noted more frequently in the group receiving paliperidone palmitate than in the placebo group were headache (9% vs 4%), weight increased (9% vs 3%), nasopharyngitis (6% vs 1%), and akathisia (4% vs 1%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with placebo, the 3-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate administered 4 times yearly significantly delayed time to relapse in patients with schizophrenia. The 3-month formulation was generally tolerable and has a safety profile consistent with other marketed paliperidone formulations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01529515.

A single-dose, open-label, parallel, randomized, dose-proportionality study of paliperidone after intramuscular injections of paliperidone palmitate in the deltoid or gluteal muscle in patients with schizophrenia

Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic, developed for monthly intramuscular (i.m.) administration into deltoid/gluteal muscle, approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in many countries. To assess the options for i.m. injection sites, dose-proportionality of PP was investigated after injection of a single dose (25-150 mg eq.) of PP in either gluteal (n = 106) or deltoid (n = 95) muscle of schizophrenic patients. Overall, mean (geometric) area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞ ) of paliperidone increased proportionally with increasing PP doses, regardless of injection site. Mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) was slightly less than dose-proportional for both injection sites at PP doses >50 mg eq. Mean Cmax was higher after injection in the deltoid compared with the gluteal muscle, except for the 100 mg eq. dose, while AUC∞ for both injection sites was comparable at all doses. Median time to reach Cmax (tmax ) ranged from 13-14 days after deltoid and 13-17 days after gluteal injection across all doses. Single PP injections in deltoid and gluteal muscles in the dose range of 25-150 mg eq. were generally tolerable both locally and systemically.

Expansion of guidance for the day 8 initiation dose of paliperidone palmitate to avoid a missed dose

BACKGROUND

Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a long-acting injectable formulation of an atypical antipsychotic, paliperidone. Its dose can be expressed in milligram or milligram equivalents (mg eq) of active paliperidone (39, 78, 117, 156, and 234 mg of PP correspond to 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 mg eq of paliperidone). The recommended initiation dosing regimen for PP is 150 [day 1]/100[day 8] mg eq. Labeling guidance allowed a ± 2 day window for the day 8 injection that provides more flexibility with patient scheduling and avoids missing the day 8 initiation dose. Recently, expansion of the day 8 dosing window from ±2 to ±4 days has been approved in the United States based on results obtained from the model-based simulations and review of safety data presented here.

METHODS

The predicted exposure for the recommended initiation regimen of PP was compared with day 1/day 4, and day 1/day 12 dosing scenarios; each scenario was compared with the highest clinically evaluated initiation regimen (150[day 1]/150[day 8] mg eq) and to the recommended 6 mg/day oral dose of extended-release paliperidone.

RESULTS

Simulated exposures with PP 150 mg eq on day 1 and 100 mg eq on days 4, 8, or 12 overlap considerably, with ±3 ng/mL variation in median maximum plasma concentrations. Based upon pharmacokinetic bridging/bracketing, the peak concentration with PP 150/100 mg eq [days 1/4] was lower than that with the highest initiation regimen. Exposures for PP 150 mg eq on day 1 and 100 mg eq on days 4, 8, or 12 were maintained close to those of 6 mg of paliperidone extended-release.

CONCLUSION

These simulations indicate that using the expanded dosing window of ±4 days has little effect on paliperidone exposure. A review of the overall pattern of treatment-emergent adverse events did not identify any new safety risks associated with the expanded dosing window.

Management of antipsychotic treatment discontinuation and interruptions using model-based simulations

Background

Medication nonadherence is a well described and prevalent clinical occurrence in schizophrenia. These pharmacokinetic model-based simulations analyze predicted antipsychotic plasma concentrations in nonadherence and treatment interruption scenarios and with treatment reinitiation.

Methods

Starting from steady state, pharmacokinetic model-based simulations of active moiety plasma concentrations of oral, immediate-release risperidone 3 mg/day, risperidone long-acting injection 37.5 mg/14 days, oral paliperidone extended-release 6 mg/day, and paliperidone palmitate 117 mg (75 mg equivalents)/28 days were assessed under three treatment discontinuation/interruption scenarios, ie, complete discontinuation, one week of interruption, and four weeks of interruption. In the treatment interruption scenarios, pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using medication-specific reinitiation strategies.

Results

Following complete treatment discontinuation, plasma concentrations persisted longest with paliperidone palmitate, followed by risperidone long-acting injection, while oral formulations exhibited the most rapid decrease. One week of oral paliperidone or risperidone interruption resulted in near complete elimination from the systemic circulation within that timeframe, reflecting the rapid elimination rate of the active moiety. After 1 and 4 weeks of interruption, minimum plasma concentrations were higher with paliperidone palmitate than risperidone long-acting injection over the simulated period. Four weeks of treatment interruption followed by reinitiation resulted in plasma levels returning to predicted therapeutic levels within 1 week.

Conclusion

Due to the long half-life of paliperidone palmitate (25–49 days), putative therapeutic plasma concentrations persisted longest in simulated cases of complete discontinuation or treatment interruption. These simulations may help clinicians better conceptualize the impact of antipsychotic nonadherence on plasma concentrations, and the impact of medication-specific reinitiation strategies after intermittent nonadherence.

A one-year prospective study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the highest available dose of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

There are no previous reports of paliperidone palmitate's (PP) long term tolerability or pharmacokinetics of the highest dose in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluates safety and tolerability, as well as pharmacokinetics, of the highest marketed dose of PP (150 mg eq. [234 mg]) in stable patients with schizophrenia over a 1-year period.

METHODS

In this 1-year prospective study, eligible patients (aged 18-65 years; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale's total score ≤ 70) received an initial deltoid injection of PP 150 mg eq. The second injection one week later and subsequent once-monthly injections were deltoid or gluteal. All injections were to be PP 150 mg eq. Patients willing to participate in intensive pharmacokinetic sampling were classified as Treatment A. Patients unwilling to undergo intensive pharmacokinetic sampling or unable to tolerate the 150 mg eq. dose (consequently receiving flexible doses of 50, 100 or 150 mg eq.) were classified as Treatment B.

RESULTS

Of the 212 patients (safety analysis set), 73% were men; 45% white; 20% black; 34% Asians; mean (SD) age 41 (10.2) years, and mean (SD) baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score 54.9 (9.03). A total of 53% (n = 113) patients completed the study and 104 received PP 150 mg eq. throughout. Mean (SD) mode dose of PP was 144.8 (19.58) mg eq. The dosing initiation regimen resulted in rapidly achieved and maintained therapeutic paliperidone levels over the study (average concentrations during the dosing interval were 34.7, 40.0, and 47.8 ng/mL after the 2nd, 8th, and 14th injection respectively). Most frequent (≥ 10%) treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (n = 37), insomnia (n = 32), injection-site pain (n = 32), headache (n = 28), and tachycardia (n = 27). Akathisia (n = 19) and tremor (n = 11) were the most common extrapyramidal adverse events. 33 patients had an SAE and 27 discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events. No deaths were reported. Mean (SD) weight change from baseline was 2.5 (5.41) kg at endpoint. Patients' psychoses remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Safety results after one-year therapy with the highest available dose of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate were consistent with results from previous studies, with no new concerns noted. Plasma concentrations were within the expected range.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01150448.

A Post-hoc comparison of paliperidone palmitate to oral risperidone during initiation of long-acting risperidone injection in patients with acute schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

First-month data of a 13-week acute schizophrenia study were used to compare paliperidone palmitate to oral risperidone during initiation of long-acting injectable risperidone.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized study.

SETTING

Outpatient or inpatient.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with established (≥1 year) schizophrenia. Those assigned to risperidone long-acting injectable (n=460) received 25mg on Days 8 and 22 with oral risperidone (l-6mg) supplementation for the first 28 days. The paliperidone palmitate group (n=453) received 150mg eq. on Day 1, l00mg eq. on Day 8, and oral placebo supplementation for the first 28 days.

MEASUREMENTS

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Personal and Social Performance Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, and responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥30% reduction in PANSS total score). An analysis of covariance model estimated least-square mean differences between treatment groups. A post-hoc analysis of efficacy data for the period of interest, i.e., at the time points before and after the first 28 days, was conducted.

RESULTS

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Personal and Social Performance Scale, Clinical global Impression-Severity scores showed similar efficacy between the treatment groups during the first weeks of treatment, corresponding to the risperidone long-acting injection initiation period. Mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at baseline was 84.7 for paliperidone palmitate and 84.4 for oral risperidone, on Day 22 was 73.6 and 74.1, respectively, and on Day 36 was 71.8 and 72.8, respectively. Overall incidence of adverse events in the first 28 days was generally similar (45% for paliperidone palmitate vs. 35% for oral risperidone), except for injection site pain (4.6% vs. 0.7%). Similar active moiety plasma concentrations were obtained during this period.

CONCLUSION

During the first month, paliperidone palmitate without oral supplementation has similar efficacy and safety to oral risperidone (during initiation of risperidone long-acting injectable) in acutely exacerbated schizophrenia.

Paliperidone extended-release as adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate in the treatment of acute mania: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Combination treatment with atypical antipsychotics and a mood stabilizer is often recommended for treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.

METHODS

Eligible patients (n=300) with a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score ≥20 were randomly allocated (1:1) to continue mood stabilizer monotherapy or receive flexibly-dosed paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day) in addition (combination treatment) for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to endpoint in the YMRS total score.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) YMRS total score at baseline was 26.7 (5.26); 33% of patients presented with a mixed (as distinct from a manic) episode and 62% were on valproate and 38% on lithium. The mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint in the YMRS total score was not significantly different for combination treatment (-14.3 [10.0]) compared with mood stabilizer monotherapy (-13.2 [10.9]; p=0.16). Combination treatment also failed to separate from mood stabilizer monotherapy for the secondary efficacy measures. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was higher with combination treatment (70%) than with mood stabilizer monotherapy (54%); insomnia was the most common adverse event in both treatment groups (11%).

LIMITATIONS

The relatively low doses of paliperidone ER used in this study and the conduct across different countries may have contributed to its failure to differentiate combination treatment from mood stabilizer monotherapy for the primary and secondary efficacy measures.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, flexibly-dosed paliperidone ER used as adjunctive therapy to mood stabilizers did not demonstrate efficacy over mood stabilizer monotherapy. No new safety signals were observed with combination treatment in this population.

A double-blind study of paliperidone palmitate and risperidone long-acting injectable in adults with schizophrenia

This 13-week double-blind study was designed to assess noninferiority of the recently approved (in the U.S.) injectable atypical antipsychotic paliperidone palmitate (PP) versus risperidone long-acting injectable (RIS-LAI) in adult patients with schizophrenia. Patients (N=1220) were randomized (1:1) to either a) PP: deltoid injections on day 1 (150 mg eq.), day 8 (100 mg eq.), and once-monthly flexible dosing as deltoid or gluteal injections on day 36 (50 mg eq. or 100 mg eq.) and day 64 (50 mg eq. or 100 mg eq. or 150 mg eq.) or b) RIS-LAI: gluteal injections days 8 and 22 (25mg), days 36, 50 (25 or 37.5mg) and days 64, 78 (25, 37.5 or 50mg). RIS-LAI-treated patients received oral supplementation with RIS 1-6 mg/day (days 1 to 28), and PP-treated patients received oral placebo. The safety analysis set (n=1214) included 58% men, 78% white, with mean (SD) baseline PANSS total score: PP, 84.1 (12.09); and RIS-LAI, 83.6 (11.28). Mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint in PANSS total score decreased similarly in both groups; PP (-18.6 [15.45]) and RIS-LAI (-17.9 [14.24]). PP treatment was noninferior to RIS-LAI (point estimate [95% CI]: 0.4 [-1.62;2.38], per-protocol analysis set [primary analysis]). The tolerability and safety of PP was generally similar to RIS-LAI with no new safety or tolerability findings.

A comparison of serum prolactin concentrations after administration of paliperidone extended-release and risperidone tablets in patients with schizophrenia

Increases in serum prolactin concentrations after administration of risperidone have been attributed, by some, to the availability of paliperidone in plasma. This double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in patients with schizophrenia compared serum prolactin concentrations following the administration of paliperidone extended-release and risperidone immediate-release tablets. At steady state, the doses administered resulted in a similar exposure to paliperidone and the pharmacologically active fraction of risperidone (i.e. risperidone + paliperidone), respectively. Eligible patients were randomized to either paliperidone extended-release 12 mg on days 1-6 or risperidone immediate-release 2 mg on day 1 and 4 mg on days 2-6. Mean serum prolactin concentrations increased on day 1 (C(max): 71.8 ng/ml and 89.7 ng/ml reached at 6.5 hours and 2.6 hours for paliperidone extended-release and risperidone immediate-release, respectively). On day 6, serum prolactin concentration-time profiles were similar for both treatments, with overall higher serum prolactin concentrations than on day 1 (AUC(0-24 h): 1389 and 842 ng h/ml, and 1306 and 741 ng.h/ml on day 6 and day 1 for paliperidone extended-release and risperidone immediate-release, respectively). These results indicate that paliperidone extended-release 12 mg and risperidone immediate-release 4 mg, administered over a period of 6 days, lead to similar elevations in serum prolactin concentrations.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of paliperidone, a new monoaminergic antagonist, in humans

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of paliperidone, an atypical antipsychotic, was studied in five healthy male subjects after a single dose of 1 mg of [(14)C]paliperidone oral solution ( approximately 16 microCi/subject). One week after dosing, 88.4 to 93.8% (mean 91.1%) of the administered radioactivity was excreted: 77.1 to 87.1% (mean 79.6%) in urine and 6.8 to 14.4% (mean 11.4%) in the feces. Paliperidone was the major circulating compound (97% of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at 24 h). No metabolites could be detected in plasma. Renal excretion was the major route of elimination with 59% of the dose excreted unchanged in urine. About half of the renal excretion occurred by active secretion. Unchanged drug was not detected in feces. Four metabolic pathways were identified as being involved in the elimination of paliperidone, each of which accounted for up to a maximum of 6.5% of the biotransformation of the total dose. Biotransformation of the drug occurred through oxidative N-dealkylation (formation of the acid metabolite M1), monohydroxylation of the alicyclic ring (M9), alcohol dehydrogenation (formation of the ketone metabolite M12), and benzisoxazole scission (formation of M11), the latter in combination with glucuronidation (M16) or alicyclic hydroxylation (M10). Unchanged drug, M1, M9, M12, and M16 were detected in urine; M10 and M11 were detected in feces. The monohydroxylated metabolite M9 was solely present in urine samples of extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers, whereas M10, another metabolite monohydroxylated at the alicyclic ring system, was present in feces of poor metabolizers as well. In conclusion, paliperidone is not metabolized extensively and is primarily renally excreted.

Plasma pharmacokinetic characteristics of risperidone and their relationship to saliva concentrations in children with psychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorders

BACKGROUND

Risperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic agent widely used in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders in adults. Risperidone is probably the most frequently used atypical antipsychotic in the pediatric population.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of risperidone and its enantiomers in a pediatric population and explore relationships between saliva and plasma concentrations.

METHODS

Eligible patients, between 4 and 15 years of age, included those taking a stable dose of oral risperidone ranging from 0.01 to 0.07 mg/kg BID for > or =4 weeks to treat psychiatric or neurodevelopmental conditions. A trough blood level and predose saliva sample were collected at study initiation; the regular risperidone dose was administered; and paired samples of blood and saliva were collected at 1, 2, 4, and 7 hours postdose. Plasma/saliva concentrations of risperidone and enantiomers of its principal active metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-risperidone), were measured using a chiral liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotypes of *3,*4,*5 deletion and duplication were determined.

RESULTS

The study included 19 patients (age range, 4 years 2 months to 15 years 11 months). Mean (SD) values for C(max), t(1/2), and AUC 0 to 12 hours for risperidone in plasma were 15.9 (22.2) ng/mL, 3.0 (2.3) h, and 92.1 (200.6) ng x h/mL, respectively. Corresponding values in saliva were 12.0 (21.0) ng/mL, 3.4 (3.2) h, and 27.8 (38.7) ng x h/mL, respectively. Mean (SD) plasma enantiomer values for C(max) and AUC calculated up to the last observation were: (+)-9-OH-risperidone, 13.6 (10.0) ng/mL and 73.6 (52.3) ng x h/mL; (-)-9-OH-risperidone, 4.9 (3.1) ng/mL and 29.3 (19.1) ng x h/mL. Corresponding enantiomer values in saliva were: (+)-9-OH-risperidone, 5.2 (8.8) ng/mL and 15.6 (8.9) ng x h/mL; (-)-9-OH-risperidone, 5.0 (7.9) ng/mL and 15.6 (9.1) ng x h/mL, respectively. Large interindividual variability in risperidone and enantiomer concentrations was noted. A highly significant relationship between predose plasma and predose saliva risperidone concentrations was observed. The logarithmic regression model indicated that the log risperidone saliva concentration = -0.100 + 0.594 x log plasma concentration (R(2) = 0.93 [Spearman]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary pharmacokinetic study of parameters for risperidone and the enantiomers of 9-OH-risperidone in a pediatric population, mean C(max) and t(1/2) of risperidone were generally similar to those previously described in adults. The highly significant relationship between predose plasma and predose saliva risperidone concentrations suggests that saliva measurements may be a viable alternative to plasma sampling in children.

Pharmacokinetic profile of long-acting injectable risperidone at steady-state: comparison with oral administration

The single dose pharmacokinetic profiles of long-acting injectable (LAI) risperidone and oral risperidone were extrapolated to steady-state. Plasma concentrations of the active moiety (unchanged risperidone + 9-hydroxy-risperidone) were measured by radioimmunoassay up to 72 h after a single oral 1 mg dose of risperidone in healthy volunteers (n = 12), and up to 84 days after a single intramuscular injection of 50 mg LAI risperidone in schizophrenic patients (n = 26). These data were projected to multiple dose regimens (4 mg/day for the oral formulation and 50 mg every 2 weeks for LAI formulation) using the software package WinNonlin, and average steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles were predicted. The most interesting results, obtained at steady-state, were a lower predicted peak plasma level (46 vs. 62 ng/ml) and a lower predicted degree of fluctuation between Cssmax and Cssmin (53 vs 145%) with LAI compared to oral administration, which is in line with actual steady state data on LAI risperidone. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic profile of LAI risperidone administered every 2 weeks ensures a steady-state profile with concentrations falling in the interval observed with an equivalent oral dose but with lower and less fluctuations (i.e. 1/2 weeks vs 1/day).

Pharmacokinetics and D2 receptor occupancy of long-acting injectable risperidone (Risperdal Consta) in patients with schizophrenia

Thirteen patients with schizophrenia received injections of 25, 50, or 75 mg of long-acting risperidone every 2 wk. Brain D2 receptor occupancy was assessed with [11C]raclopride 2 wk after the last (fifth) injection (day 71) in seven subjects and 2 wk after the third injection (day 44) in one subject. Stable plasma concentrations were reached after the third injection and steady-state concentrations of the active moiety (risperidone + 9-hydroxyrisperidone) after the fourth injection. Steady-state plasma concentrations were maintained for 4-5 wk after the last injection and then declined rapidly. After injections of 25, 50 and 75 mg on day 44 or day 71, D2 receptor occupancy ranged from 25-48%, 59-83% and 62-72% respectively, while plasma active-moiety levels ranged from 4.4-8.8, 15.0-31.1 and 22.5-26.3 ng/ml respectively. The results indicate that brain D2 receptor occupancy at steady state after injections of long-acting risperidone was in the range found in patients effectively treated with 2-6 mg of oral risperidone.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of long-acting risperidone in schizophrenia

The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of long-acting risperidone (Risperdal Consta) were evaluated in a multicenter, prospective, open-label, 15-week study of 86 patients with schizophrenia. Subjects stabilized on 2, 4 or 6 mg of oral risperidone once daily for at least 4 weeks were assigned to receive i.m. injections of 25, 50 or 75 mg of risperidone, respectively, every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. The 90% confidence intervals for the i.m./oral ratios of the mean steady-state plasma-AUC, corrected for dosing interval, and of the average plasma concentration of the active moiety (risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone) were within the range of 80-125%, indicating bioequivalence of the i.m. and oral formulations. However, mean steady-state peak concentrations of the active moiety were 25-32% lower with i.m. than oral dosing (P < 0.05) and fluctuations in plasma active-moiety levels were 32-42% lower with the i.m. than oral regimen. Symptoms of schizophrenia continued to improve after switching from oral to i.m. dosing. Long-acting risperidone was well tolerated locally and systematically. Although overall bioequivalence of the two formulations was established, the differences in pharmacokinetic profiles between the two formulations indicate potential benefits for long-acting risperidone.

Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

We have studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil together with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Sixty patients (age 40-73 yr, 56 male) were assigned randomly to receive alfentanil, fentanyl or sufentanil and propofol. Plasma concentrations of these drugs and times for the plasma concentration to decrease by 50% (t50) and 80% (t80) after cessation of the infusion were determined. Times were recorded to awakening and tracheal extubation. Total dose and plasma concentrations of propofol were similar in all groups. Mean total doses of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil were 443, 45 and 4.4 micrograms kg-1, respectively. Time to awakening did not differ significantly. In patients receiving fentanyl, the trachea was extubated on average 2 h later than in those receiving sufentanil and 3 h later than in those receiving alfentanil (P < 0.05). The t80 of fentanyl was longer (P < 0.05) than that of alfentanil or sufentanil, and there was a linear correlation between the t80 of the opioid and the time to tracheal extubation (r = 0.51; P < 0.01). However, the t50 values for these opioids were similar and did not correlate with recovery time. In conclusion, patients undergoing CABG and who were anaesthetized with fentanyl and propofol needed mechanical ventilatory support for a significantly longer time than those receiving alfentanil or sufentanil and propofol. On the basis of the interindividual variation observed, the time to tracheal extubation was most predictable in patients receiving alfentanil and most variable in patients receiving fentanyl, a finding which may be important if the patients are transferred to a step-down unit on the evening of the operation.